The impact of age on the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

Efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with significant functional mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation has been established to be an effective therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and is recommended as the treatment of choice for many patients, including those with clinically significant functional mitral regurgitation (MR). However, there is little information available about the clinical efficacy of catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF in patients with significant functional MR.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 247 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent AF ablation. The study included 28 (11.3%) patients with significant functional MR and 219 (88.7%) without significant functional MR. AF recurrence was defined as the occurrence of confirmed atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 seconds beyond 3 months after catheter ablation.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 20.1 ± 7.4 months (range, 3-36 months), 45 (18.2%) patients developed recurrence of AF. The recurrence rate of AF was higher in patients with significant functional MR than in those without significant functional MR (42.9% vs 15.1%; P < .001). Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that significant functional MR (hazard ratio [HR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-6.72; P < .001), age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .009), the CHA2DS2-VASc score (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56; P = .017), and heart failure (HR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.85-11.96; P = .001) were associated with the risk of recurrence. Multivariable analysis showed that significant functional MR (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.21-5.05; P = .013), age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07; P = .031), and heart failure (HR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.27-9.03; P = .015) were independent predictors of AF recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Patients with significant functional MR have an increased risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial

Purpose

The prospective, multicenter SMART SF trial demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of the 56-hole porous tip irrigated contact force (CF) catheter for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation with a low primary adverse event rate (2.5%), leading to FDA approval of the catheter. Here, we are reporting the long-term effectiveness and safety results that have not yet been reported.

Methods

Ablations were performed using the 56-hole porous tip irrigated CF catheter guided by the 3D mapping system stability module. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, and/or atrial flutter), based on electrocardiographic data at 12 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurring 3 months post procedure, acute procedural failures such as lack of entrance block confirmation of all PVs, and undergoing repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation in the evaluation period (91 to 365 days post the initial ablation procedure) were considered to be effectiveness failures.

Results

Seventy-eight patients (age 64.8 ± 9.7 years; male 52.6%; Caucasian 96.2%) participated in the 12-month effectiveness evaluation. Mean follow-up time was 373.5 ± 45.4 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from 12-month atrial tachyarrhythmia was 74.9%. Two procedure-related pericardial effusion events were reported at 92 and 180 days post procedure. There were no pulmonary vein stenosis complications or deaths reported through the 12-month follow-up period.

Conclusions

The SMART SF 12-month follow-up evaluation corroborates the early safety and effectiveness success previously reported for PAF ablation with STSF.

Advanced interatrial block predicts clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

It has been demonstrated that advanced interatrial block (IAB) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the impact of advanced IAB on recurrence of paroxysmal AF after catheter ablation is not clear.

METHODS

204 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent index circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation were prospectively enrolled. In all patients, a resting electrocardiogram in sinus rhythm was evaluated for the presence of advanced IAB, defined as a P-wave duration >120ms and biphasic (±) morphology in the inferior leads. Advanced IAB was detected in 20.1% of patients. AF recurrence was defined as the occurrence of confirmed atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting more than 30s beyond 3 months after the catheter ablation in the absence of any antiarrhythmic treatment.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up period of 13.9±6.2 months (range, 3-27 months), 62 patients (30.4%) developed recurrence of AF. The recurrence rate was higher in patients with advanced IAB than those without advanced IAB (46.3% vs. 26.4%, p=0.006). Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age, P-wave duration, CHADS2 score, and PV isolation identified advanced IAB (hazard ratio, 2.111; 95% confidence interval, 1.034-4.308; p=0.040) and left atrial diameter (hazard ratio, 1.051; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-1.100; p=0.034) as two independent predictors of recurrence of AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced IAB were at an increased risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

Antiarrhythmic therapy of atrial fibrillation: are we treating too late?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk for stroke, heart failure and mortality. The causality between worse prognosis and AF is not clear at this time and AF may just be expression of underlying heart disease that by itself is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. AF is characterized by progression from rare paroxysmal episodes to permanent AF. It has been well recognized that maintenance of sinus rhythm with either antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation is easier to achieve if treatment is established early on. In addition to the established indication of symptomatic improvement, the focus of AF management is shifting to earlier intervention to prevent cardiovascular complications. This concept is currently under investigation in the ongoing EAST trial. Early treatment initiation is desirable from a pathophysiologic perspective. This includes consequent prevention and treatment of AF risk factors, efforts for early diagnosis, and stroke prevention according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. As long as no data support prognostic advantages with "aggressive" rhythm control therapy it remains reserved for symptomatic patients, since both, medication and catheter ablation, convey a significant risk for complications.

Optimal rhythm-control strategy for recurrent atrial tachycardia after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial

AIM

Although catheter ablation (CA) has replaced antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) as first-line treatment in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), optimal treatment of recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) after AF ablation remains unclear. This parallel randomized controlled study compared CA vs. AAD for recurrent AT after persistent AF ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two-hundred and one patients (aged 59.1 ± 10.9 years, 68.7% male) with recurrent AT after persistent AF ablation were enrolled and randomized to either CA (n = 101) or AAD (n = 100) treatment. Primary endpoint was freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa, including AT and AF) at 24-month follow-up. Composite secondary endpoints comprised procedural complications, long-term morbidity and improvement in quality of life (QoL). On an intention-to-treat basis, the CA group had a higher rate of freedom from recurrent ATa (56.4 vs. 34.0%; P = 0.001). Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed a significant treatment effect with a hazard ratio of 0.538 (95% CI: 0.355-0.816) in favour of CA. There was a higher proportion of periprocedural complications in the CA group (7.9 vs. 0; P = 0.012), and of long-term adverse events in the AAD group (10.9 vs. 24.0%; P = 0.014). Quality of life was significantly higher for CA.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates superiority of CA over AAD for recurrent AT after persistent AF ablation with regard to SR maintenance, long-term safety and QoL improvement. However, CA use might be limited by a higher risk for periprocedural complications.

Predictors of complete arrhythmia free survival in patients undergoing surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. PRAGUE-12 randomized study sub-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical ablation (SA) is commonly used in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, its effect has been established in few randomized studies. To assess the complete atrial fibrillation free (AF-free) survival in randomized study assessing the effects of additional concomitant SA of AF in patients primarily indicated for other cardiac surgery.

METHODS

The PRAGUE-12 study was a prospective randomized study comparing the effect of adding SA to other cardiac surgery. We examined the data from the PRAGUE-12 trial and grouped patients according to complete AF-free survival. All patients had regular check-ups at 3, 6, 9 months, some of them with Holter recordings, and a final check-up at 12 months with Holter recording.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four patients were analyzed; 104 originally randomized to surgery with adding SA (SA group) and 90 without it (non-SA group). Complete AF-free status was found in 46 patients from the SA group (44.2%) and 25 patients (27.8%) from the non-SA group (p<0.05). In a multivariate logistic regression, the SA group was associated with a greater chance for complete AF-free survival (OR 1.87, p<0.05). In the multivariate analysis of the SA group, history of myocardial infarction (OR 0.2, p<0.05) and a higher EuroSCORE (OR 0.9, p 0.05) were independently associated with a lower probability of AF-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Complete AF-free survival following SA was present in almost one half of patients. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction and higher EuroSCOREs were less likely to benefit from an add-on SA procedure.