Statin therapy reduces the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and mortality in heart failure patients: A nationwide population-based cohort study

Potential roles of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in attenuating cardiac arrhythmias in diabetes and heart failure

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are antidiabetic drugs that have been shown to exert cardiovascular benefits. Their benefits including a reduction of cardiovascular events and worsening heart failure have been extended to nondiabetic patients with high-risk. Although both heart failure and diabetes are known to increase risk of cardiac arrhythmias, the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on arrhythmia reduction and their underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. This review aims to summarize the current available evidence ranging from basic research to clinical reports regarding the potential benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors against cardiac arrhythmias. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies using various models including heart failure and diabetes are comprehensively summarized to examine the evidence of how SGLT-2 inhibitors affect cardiac action potential, cellular ion currents, calcium ion homeostasis, and cardiac mitochondrial function. Clinical reports investigating the association between SGLT-2 inhibitors and arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias are also comprehensively summarized. Valuable information obtained from this review can be used to encourage further clinical investigations to warrant the potential use of SGLT-2 inhibitors against cardiac arrhythmias in both diabetic and heart failure settings.

Mechanisms Underlying Antiarrhythmic Properties of Cardioprotective Agents Impacting Inflammation and Oxidative Stress

The prevention of cardiac life-threatening ventricular fibrillation and stroke-provoking atrial fibrillation remains a serious global clinical issue, with ongoing need for novel approaches. Numerous experimental and clinical studies suggest that oxidative stress and inflammation are deleterious to cardiovascular health, and can increase heart susceptibility to arrhythmias. It is quite interesting, however, that various cardio-protective compounds with antiarrhythmic properties are potent anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory agents. These most likely target the pro-arrhythmia primary mechanisms. This review and literature-based analysis presents a realistic view of antiarrhythmic efficacy and the molecular mechanisms of current pharmaceuticals in clinical use. These include the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors used in diabetes treatment, statins in dyslipidemia and naturally protective omega-3 fatty acids. This approach supports the hypothesis that prevention or attenuation of oxidative and inflammatory stress can abolish pro-arrhythmic factors and the development of an arrhythmia substrate. This could prove a powerful tool of reducing cardiac arrhythmia burden.

Statin therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Objectives

The study sought to assess the impact of statin therapy on survival in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Background

Data regarding the outcome of patients with statin therapy presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias is limited.

Methods

A large retrospective registry was used including all consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016. Patients with statin were compared to patients without statin therapy (non-statin). The primary prognostic endpoint was long-term all-cause death at 3 years. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied in propensity-score matched cohorts.

Results

A total of 424 matched patients was included. The rates of VT and VF were similar in both groups (VT: statin 71% vs. non-statin 68%; VF: statin 29% vs. 32%; p = 0.460). Statin therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up (mortality rates 16% versus 33%; log rank, p = 0.001; HR = 0.438; 95% CI 0.290–0.663; p = 0.001), irrespective of the underlying type of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT/VF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 35%, presence of an activated implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), cardiogenic shock or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

Conclusion

Statin therapy is independently associated with lower long-term mortality in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02982473, 11/29/2016, Retrospectively registered.

Decompensated Heart Failure With Ventricular Arrhythmia: How Useful Is VT Ablation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with heart failure. Their management especially in the context of decompensated heart failure poses a clinical challenge to modern cardiologists. In this review article, we aim to summarise the current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of ventricular tachycardia in heart failure, focusing primarily on the use of catheter ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The evolution of electro-anatomical mapping techniques and ablation catheter technology in the recent years has paved the path for the successful application of catheter ablation in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. The efficacy of catheter ablation in the management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic heart failure has recently been the epicentre of a number of randomised controlled trials, demonstrating promising results with regard to arrhythmia suppression and all-cause mortality. The usefulness of catheter ablation in decompensated heart failure has been explored to a lesser degree, primarily in the setting of an electrical storm. Implantable cardiac defibrillators play the most important role in improving prognosis and preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure. Catheter ablation for the treatment of recurrent VT in patients with chronic heart failure is an efficacious strategy that can be applied adjunctively to or in instead of antiarrhythmic therapy, and it is highly successful at preventing recurrent ventricular tachycardia, ICD shocks. Its efficacy in the context of decompensated heart failure requires further research, with current evidence rendering its use promising.

Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Early and intensive atorvastatin treatment can decrease nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The objective of this study was to compare the effects of hydrophilic rosuvastatin and lipophilic atorvastatin on nsVT in STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

The data from a cohort of patients undergoing primary PCI at Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2016 were analyzed. The patients were divided into the rosuvastatin group and the atorvastatin group based on which kind of statins that they had received. The endpoint of the study was the occurrence of nsVT on either electrocardiogram monitoring or Holter monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 301 patients were enrolled in the study (rosuvastatin group: n = 103; atorvastatin group: n = 198). The baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups, except that total ischemic time in the rosuvastatin group was markedly longer than that in the atorvastatin group (8 (5-16) h vs. 6 (4-12) h; P = 0.001). The administration of rosuvastatin was significantly associated with lower occurrence of nsVT than that of atorvastatin (9.71 vs. 19.70%; P = 0.026). Multivariable logistic regression analysis suggested that the independent predictors of nsVT included rosuvastatin (odds ratio (OR) 0.397, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.176-0.894), current smoking (OR 2.307, 95% CI 1.011-5.262), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR 1.060, 95% CI 1.023-1.098).

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of rosuvastatin on nsVT might be better than that of atorvastatin in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Lipids, statins, and clinical outcomes in heart failure: rethinking the data

Lower serum lipid levels are paradoxically predictive of poor clinical outcomes in hospitalized and ambulatory patients with heart failure (HF). In large randomized controlled trials, statins did not demonstrate an overall mortality benefit in chronic HF patients. We currently lack adequate prospective data that aggressive lipid management in HF truly alters disease course and progression. Despite their traditional use as lipid-lowering agents, hypothesis-generating works have suggested that statins may show benefit in specific enriched HF subgroups. Given that patients hospitalized for HF continue to face a high post-discharge event rate and that statins are increasingly inexpensive, widely available, and generally well tolerated, it is imperative that we identify those HF patients most likely to benefit and reconsider testing these agents in specific subpopulations.