1
|
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Murkin J, Serrick C, Gunaydin S, El-Essawi A, Bennett M, Erdoes G, Liebold A, Punjabi P, Theodoropoulos KC, Kiaii B, Wahba A, de Somer F, Bauer A, Kadner A, van Boven W, Argiriadou H, Deliopoulos A, Baker RΑ, Breitenbach I, Ince C, Starinieri P, Jenni H, Popov V, Moorjani N, Moscarelli M, Di Eusanio M, Cale A, Shapira O, Baufreton C, Condello I, Merkle F, Stehouwer M, Schmid C, Ranucci M, Angelini G, Carrel T. 2021 MiECTiS focused update on the 2016 position paper for the use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery. Perfusion 2023; 38:1360-1383. [PMID: 35961654 DOI: 10.1177/02676591221119002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The landmark 2016 Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society (MiECTiS) position paper promoted the creation of a common language between cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists and perfusionists which led to the development of a stable framework that paved the way for the advancement of minimal invasive perfusion and related technologies. The current expert consensus document offers an update in areas for which new evidence has emerged. In the light of published literature, modular minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) has been established as a safe and effective perfusion technique that increases biocompatibility and ultimately ensures perfusion safety in all adult cardiac surgical procedures, including re-operations, aortic arch and emergency surgery. Moreover, it was recognized that incorporation of MiECC strategies advances minimal invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) by combining reduced surgical trauma with minimal physiologic derangements. Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society considers MiECC as a physiologically-based multidisciplinary strategy for performing cardiac surgery that is associated with significant evidence-based clinical benefit that has accrued over the years. Widespread adoption of this technology is thus strongly advocated to obtain additional healthcare benefit while advancing patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyriakos Anastasiadis
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Polychronis Antonitsis
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - John Murkin
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Cyril Serrick
- Department of Perfusion, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Serdar Gunaydin
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aschraf El-Essawi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Mark Bennett
- Department of Anesthesia, Morriston Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Gabor Erdoes
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Liebold
- Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Prakash Punjabi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Bob Kiaii
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Alexander Wahba
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway and Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Filip de Somer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adrian Bauer
- Department of Cardiovascular Perfusion, MediClin Heart Center, Coswig, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
| | - Alexander Kadner
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | | | - Helena Argiriadou
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Apostolos Deliopoulos
- Cardiothoracic Department, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Robert Α Baker
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Quality and Outcomes, and Perfusion, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ingo Breitenbach
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Braunschweig Clinic, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Can Ince
- Department of Intensive Care, Laboratory of Translational Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hansjoerg Jenni
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Vadim Popov
- Department of Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - Narain Moorjani
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marco Moscarelli
- Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital Gvm Care & Research, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Di Eusanio
- Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alex Cale
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Oz Shapira
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Ignazio Condello
- Cardiac Surgery, Anthea Hospital Gvm Care & Research, Bari, Italy
| | - Frank Merkle
- Academy for Perfusion, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marco Stehouwer
- Department of Clinical Perfusion, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Christof Schmid
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Marco Ranucci
- Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianni Angelini
- Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Thierry Carrel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Deliopoulos A, Argiriadou H. From less invasive to minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:1909-1921. [PMID: 33841979 PMCID: PMC8024827 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-1830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Development of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) served the purpose of performing surgery while avoiding the surgical stress triggered by a full median sternotomy. Minimizing surgical trauma is associated with improved cosmesis and enhanced recovery leading to reduced morbidity. However, it has to be primarily appreciated that the extracorporeal circulation (ECC) stands for the basis of nearly all MICS procedures. With some fundamental modification and advancement in perfusion techniques, the use of ECC has become the enabling technology for the development of MICS. Less invasive cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) techniques are based on remote cannulation and optimization of perfusion techniques with assisted venous drainage and use of centrifugal pump, so as to facilitate the demanding surgical maneuvers, rather than minimizing the invasiveness of the CPB. This is reflected in the increased duration of CPB required for MICS procedures. Minimal invasive Extracorporeal Circulation (MiECC) represents a major breakthrough in perfusion. It integrates all contemporary technological advancements that facilitate best applying cardiovascular physiology to intraoperative perfusion. Consequently, MiECC use translates to improved end-organ protection and clinical outcome, as evidenced in multiple clinical trials and meta-analyses. MICS performed with MiECC provides the basis for developing a multidisciplinary intraoperative strategy towards a "more physiologic" cardiac surgery by combining small surgical trauma with minimum body's physiology derangement. Integration of MiECC can advance MICS from non-full sternotomy for selected patients to a "more physiologic" surgery, which represents the real face of modern cardiac surgery in the transcatheter era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Helena Argiriadou
- Cardiothoracic Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Schoonhoven AV, Gout-Zwart JJ, de Vries MJS, van Asselt ADI, Dvortsin E, Vemer P, van Boven JFM, Postma MJ. Costs of clinical events in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in the Netherlands: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0221856. [PMID: 31490989 PMCID: PMC6730996 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an established risk factor for cardiovascular and nephropathic events. In the Netherlands, prevalence of T2DM is expected to be as high as 8% by 2025. This will result in significant clinical and economic impact, highlighting the need for well-informed reimbursement decisions for new treatments. However, availability and consistent use of costing methodologies is limited. OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically review recent costing data for T2DM-related cardiovascular and nephropathic events in the Netherlands. METHODS A systematic literature review in PubMed and Embase was conducted to identify available Dutch cost data for T2DM-related events, published in the last decade. Information extracted included costs, source, study population, and costing perspective. Finally, papers were evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). RESULTS Out of initially 570 papers, 36 agreed with the inclusion criteria. From these studies, 150 cost estimates for T2DM-related clinical events were identified. In total, 29 cost estimates were reported for myocardial infarction (range: €196-€27,038), 61 for stroke (€495-€54,678), fifteen for heart failure (€325-€16,561), 24 for renal failure (€2,438-€91,503), and seventeen for revascularisation (€3,000-€37,071). Only four estimates for transient ischaemic attack were available, ranging from €587 to €2,470. Adherence to CHEERS was generally high. CONCLUSIONS The most expensive clinical events were related to renal failure, while TIA was the least expensive event. Generally, there was substantial variation in reported cost estimates for T2DM-related events. Costing of clinical events should be improved and preferably standardised, as accurate and consistent results in economic models are desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander V. van Schoonhoven
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics (PTE2), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Judith J. Gout-Zwart
- Asc Academics, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marijke J. S. de Vries
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics (PTE2), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Antoinette D. I. van Asselt
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pepijn Vemer
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics (PTE2), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Job F. M. van Boven
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten J. Postma
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics (PTE2), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics & Business, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pasechnik IN, Dvoryanchikova VA, Tsepenshchikov VA. [Extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: state of the problem]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2017. [PMID: 28638019 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2017672-78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- I N Pasechnik
- Central State Medical Academy of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, Moscow
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiopulmonary bypass has undoubtedly been the cornerstone in the rapid development of cardiac surgery, allowing even the performance of procedures beyond the scope of cardiothoracic surgery. Its use however, is associated with significant complications that arise from the mechanical effects of the circuit on circulating blood components as well as the contact of blood with non-endothelial surfaces. Miniature cardiopulmonary bypass systems have been developed in an attempt to minimize these complications. Areas covered: Herein clinical outcomes from the most recent studies in adult cardiac surgery are discussed. The main benefits of miniaturisation as well as potential areas of further application are described. Expert commentary: Data is critically appraised in the context of current guidelines. Finally the need for further basic science in addition to large multi-centre randomized controlled trial data is highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Dimarakis
- a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery , Wythenshawe Hospital , Manchester , UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Kostarellou G, Kleontas A, Deliopoulos A, Grosomanidis V, Argiriadou H. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation improves quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50:1196-1203. [PMID: 27307483 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2015] [Revised: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The effect on postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (cCPB) and off-pump surgery has been investigated extensively; however, there are no studies focusing on HRQoL after surgery with minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC). Therefore, we sought to prospectively investigate the effect of MiECC on postoperative HRQoL when compared with cCPB in patients undergoing CABG over a short-term (3-month) follow-up period. METHODS Sixty patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery were randomly assigned into two groups: those who had surgery on MiECC system (n = 30) and those who underwent CABG using cCPB (n = 30). Quality-of-life assessment was performed preoperatively (baseline-T0), at first postoperative month (T1) and at 3-month follow-up (T3). The RAND SF-36 scale was used for data collection, which included both sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients. The primary outcome of the study was quantitative measurement of postoperative HRQoL at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS Both groups were balanced in terms of demographic, socio-economic and operative characteristics. At 3-month follow-up, mean SF-36 component and summary scores in each group were higher in absolute values than the respective mean baseline scores, apart from role-physical score in patients operated with cCPB. Patients operated on MiECC showed uniformly significantly higher values in all individual and summary domains, whereas patients operated on cCPB showed significant improvement in 6/8 individual domains. Patients operated on MiECC showed a more pronounced increase in SF-36 individual domain scores from the first to the third postoperative month when compared with cCPB, which was statistically significant regarding physical functioning (P = 0.001), role-physical (P < 0.001), vitality (P = 0.01) and role-emotional (P = 0.004). This resulted in a significant improvement in physical (P = 0.002) and mental (P = 0.01) summary scores. CONCLUSIONS The current study proves that MiECC significantly improves HRQoL after coronary surgery compared with cCPB. This finding, combined with results from large-scale studies showing superior clinical outcomes from its use, enhances the role of MiECC as a dominant technique in coronary revascularization surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Helena Argiriadou
- Cardiothoracic Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anastasiadis K, Murkin J, Antonitsis P, Bauer A, Ranucci M, Gygax E, Schaarschmidt J, Fromes Y, Philipp A, Eberle B, Punjabi P, Argiriadou H, Kadner A, Jenni H, Albrecht G, van Boven W, Liebold A, de Somer F, Hausmann H, Deliopoulos A, El-Essawi A, Mazzei V, Biancari F, Fernandez A, Weerwind P, Puehler T, Serrick C, Waanders F, Gunaydin S, Ohri S, Gummert J, Angelini G, Falk V, Carrel T. Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22:647-62. [PMID: 26819269 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) systems have initiated important efforts within science and technology to further improve the biocompatibility of cardiopulmonary bypass components to minimize the adverse effects and improve end-organ protection. The Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society was founded to create an international forum for the exchange of ideas on clinical application and research of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation technology. The present work is a consensus document developed to standardize the terminology and the definition of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation technology as well as to provide recommendations for the clinical practice. The goal of this manuscript is to promote the use of MiECC systems into clinical practice as a multidisciplinary strategy involving cardiac surgeons, anaesthesiologists and perfusionists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Murkin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | | | - Adrian Bauer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, MediClin Heart Centre Coswig, Coswig, Germany
| | - Marco Ranucci
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico S. Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Erich Gygax
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Schaarschmidt
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, MediClin Heart Centre Coswig, Coswig, Germany
| | - Yves Fromes
- University Pierre and Marie Curie (Paris 06), Paris, France
| | | | - Balthasar Eberle
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Prakash Punjabi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Helena Argiriadou
- Cardiothoracic Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Alexander Kadner
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hansjoerg Jenni
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Guenter Albrecht
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wim van Boven
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Andreas Liebold
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Harald Hausmann
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, MediClin Heart Centre Coswig, Coswig, Germany
| | | | - Aschraf El-Essawi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Valerio Mazzei
- Department of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Fausto Biancari
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Adam Fernandez
- Department of Surgery, Sidra Medical & Research Centre, Doha, Qatar
| | - Patrick Weerwind
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Puehler
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of the Rhine University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | | | | | - Serdar Gunaydin
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medline Hospitals, Adana, Turkey
| | - Sunil Ohri
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wessex Cardiac Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Jan Gummert
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of the Rhine University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Gianni Angelini
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - Volkmar Falk
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, German Heart Centre, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thierry Carrel
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shinjo D, Fushimi K. Preoperative factors affecting cost and length of stay for isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: hierarchical linear model analysis. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008750. [PMID: 26576810 PMCID: PMC4654398 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of preoperative patient and hospital factors on resource use, cost and length of stay (LOS) among patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). DESIGN Observational retrospective study. SETTINGS Data from the Japanese Administrative Database. PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent isolated, elective OPCAB between April 2011 and March 2012. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes of this study were inpatient cost and LOS associated with OPCAB. A two-level hierarchical linear model was used to examine the effects of patient and hospital characteristics on inpatient costs and LOS. The independent variables were patient and hospital factors. RESULTS We identified 2491 patients who underwent OPCAB at 268 hospitals. The mean cost of OPCAB was $40 665 ±7774, and the mean LOS was 23.4±8.2 days. The study found that select patient factors and certain comorbidities were associated with a high cost and long LOS. A high hospital OPCAB volume was associated with a low cost (-6.6%; p=0.024) as well as a short LOS (-17.6%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The hospital OPCAB volume is associated with efficient resource use. The findings of the present study indicate the need to focus on hospital elective OPCAB volume in Japan in order to improve cost and LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Shinjo
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ganushchak YM, Körver EPJ, Yamamoto Y, Weerwind PW. Versatile minimized system--a step towards safe perfusion. Perfusion 2015; 31:295-9. [PMID: 26354746 DOI: 10.1177/0267659115604711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A growing body of evidence indicates the superiority of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) systems compared to conventional systems in terms of inflammatory reactions and transfusion requirements. Evident benefits of minimized CPB systems, however, do not come without consequences. Kinetic-assisted drainage, as used in these circuits, can result in severe fluctuations of venous line pressures and, consequently, fluctuation of the blood flow delivered to the patient. Furthermore, subatmospheric venous line pressures can cause gaseous microemboli. Another limitation is the absence of cardiotomy suction, which can lead to excessive blood loss via a cell saver. The most serious limitation of minimized circuits is that these circuits are very constrained in the case of complications or changing of the surgery plan. We developed a versatile minimized system (VMS) with a priming volume of about 600 ml. A compliance chamber in the venous line decreases peaks of pressure fluctuations. This chamber also acts as a bubble trap. Additionally, the open venous reservoir is connected parallel to the venous line and excluded from the circulation during an uncomplicated CPB. This reservoir can be included in the circulation via a roller pump and be used as a cardiotomy reservoir. The amount and rate of returned blood in the circulation is regulated by a movable level detector. Further, the circuit can easily be converted to an open system with vacuum-assisted venous drainage in the case of unexpected complications. The VMS combines the benefits of minimized circuits with the versatility and safety of a conventional CPB system. Perfusionists familiar with this system can secure an adequate and timely response at expected and unexpected intraoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y M Ganushchak
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E P J Körver
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Y Yamamoto
- Department of Clinical Engineering, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - P W Weerwind
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Anastasiadis K, Antonitsis P, Argiriadou H, Deliopoulos A, Grosomanidis V, Tossios P. Modular minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems; can they become the standard practice for performing cardiac surgery? Perfusion 2015; 30:195-200. [DOI: 10.1177/0267659114567555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) has been developed in an attempt to integrate all advances in cardiopulmonary bypass technology in one closed circuit that shows improved biocompatibility and minimizes the systemic detrimental effects of CPB. Despite well-evidenced clinical advantages, penetration of MiECC technology into clinical practice is hampered by concerns raised by perfusionists and surgeons regarding air handling together with blood and volume management during CPB. We designed a modular MiECC circuit, bearing an accessory circuit for immediate transition to an open system that can be used in every adult cardiac surgical procedure, offering enhanced safety features. We challenged this modular circuit in a series of 50 consecutive patients. Our results showed that the modular AHEPA circuit design offers 100% technical success rate in a cohort of random, high-risk patients who underwent complex procedures, including reoperation and valve and aortic surgery, together with emergency cases. This pilot study applies to the real world and prompts for further evaluation of modular MiECC systems through multicentre trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Anastasiadis
- Cardiothoracic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - P Antonitsis
- Cardiothoracic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - H Argiriadou
- Cardiothoracic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Deliopoulos
- Cardiothoracic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - V Grosomanidis
- Cardiothoracic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - P Tossios
- Cardiothoracic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|