The resting status of the coronary microcirculation is a predictor of microcirculatory function following elective PCI for stable angina

Prognostic implications of coronary physiological indices in patients with diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Has been performed of the prognostic value of coronary physiological indices in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) after coronary revascularization deferral.

METHODS

We analyzed 714 patients (235 with DM) with deferred revascularization according to fractional flow reserve (> 0.80). A comprehensive physiological evaluation including coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance, and fractional flow reserve was performed at the time of revascularization deferral. The median values of the CFR (2.88), fractional flow reserve (0.88), and index of microcirculatory resistance (17.85) were used to classify patients into high- or low-index groups. The primary outcome was the patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) at 5 years, comprising all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-DM population, the DM population showed higher risk of POCO (HR, 2.49; 95%CI, 1.64-3.78; P<.001). In the DM population, the low-CFR group had a higher risk of POCO than the high-CFR group (HR, 3.22; 95%CI, 1.74-5.97; P <.001). In contrast, CFR values could not differentiate the risk of POCO in the non-DM population. There was a significant interaction between CFR and the presence of DM regarding the risk of POCO (P for interaction=.025). Independent predictors of POCO were a low CFR and family history of coronary artery disease in the DM population and percent diameter stenosis and multivessel disease in the non-DM population.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between coronary physiological indices and clinical outcomes differs according to the presence of DM. In deferred patients, CFR is the most important prognostic factor in patients with DM, but not in those without DM.

Changes in Index of Microcirculatory Resistance during PCI in the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery in Relation to Total Length of Implanted Stents

Aim

To investigate the relationship between stent length and changes in microvascular resistance during PCI in stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods and Results

We measured fractional flow reserve (FFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) before and after stenting in 42 consecutive subjects with stable coronary artery undergoing PCI with stent in the LAD. Patients that had very long stent length (38–78 mm) had lower FFR before stenting than patients that had long (23–37 mm) and moderate (12–22 mm) stent length (0.59 (±0.16), 0.70 (±0.12), and 0.75 (±0.07); p=0.002). FFR improved after stenting and more so in subjects with very long stent length compared to long and moderate stent length (0.27 (s.d ± 16), 0.15 (s.d ± 0.12), and 0.12 (s.d ± 0.07); p for interaction = 0.013). Corrected IMR (IMR_corr) increased after stenting in subjects who had very long stent length, whereas IMR_corr was lower after stenting in subjects who had long or moderate stent length (4.6 (s.d. ± 10.7), −1.4 (s.d. ± 9,9), and −4.2 (s.d. ± 7.8); p for interaction = 0.009).

Conclusions

Changes in IMR during PCI in the LAD in stable CAD seem to be related to total length of stents implanted, possibly influencing post-PCI FFR. Larger studies are needed to confirm the relationship.

The value of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detecting coronary microcirculation function in coronary artery disease patients

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RT-MCE) for detecting coronary microcirculation (CM) function in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.

Methods:

Sixty-five consecutive patients were divided into CAD (n=52) and no-CAD (n=13) groups using coronary angiography (CAG). All patients underwent RT-MCE at rest and CAG within 1 week after RT-MCE. The ventricular segments in CAD patients were divided semi-quantitatively into ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial groups based on RT-MCE images. Myocardial blood volume (A), myocardial blood flow velocity (β), and mean myocardial blood flow (A×β) were obtained. The Gensini scores were calculated for CAD patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas of A, β, and A×β were calculated to assess CM function in CAD patients.

Results:

A total of 798 and 204 segments were investigated in the CAD and non-CAD groups, respectively. In CAD patients, 332 ischemic and 466 non-ischemic segments were identified. The values of A, β, and A×β were significantly different among non-CAD, CAD, ischemic, and non-ischemic groups. ROC curve areas of A, β, and A×β were 0.85, 0.79, and 0.83, respectively, and significant differences were observed in these values among three Gensini score groups of the CAD patients.

Conclusion:

Varying degrees of CM function deterioration was observed in CAD patients both in ischemic and non-ischemic areas, with the deterioration being more sever in the former.

Relation between fractional flow reserve value of coronary lesions with deferred revascularization and cardiovascular outcomes in non-diabetic and diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

FFR of deferred PCI lesions can predict future cardiovascular events. However, the prognostic utility of FFR remains unclear in diabetic patients in view of the potential impact of the diffuse nature of vascular disease process. We aimed to study the relation between fractional flow reserve (FFR) values and long-term outcomes of diabetic and non-diabetic patients with deferred percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Patients with FFR assessment and deferred PCI (n=630) were enrolled and stratified according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status and FFR values. Patients were followed over a median of 39months. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the association between clinical endpoints and clinical factors such as DM and FFR.

RESULTS

In non-diabetics (n=450), higher FFR values were associated with less cardiovascular events (hazard ratio (HR) for death and myocardial infarction (MI) [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.61[0.44 to 0.86] per 0.1 increase in FFR, p=0.007; HR for revascularization [95%CI], 0.66[0.49 to 0.9] per 0.1 increase in FFR, p=0.006). In diabetics (n=180), there was no difference in death and MI across the range of FFR values. Among those patients with an FFR >0.85, diabetics had a more than two-fold higher risk of death and MI than non-diabetics (HR [95% CI], 2.20 [1.19 to 4.01], p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

Among non-diabetic patients with deferred PCI, a higher FFR was associated with lower rates of death, MI and revascularization. On the contrary in diabetic patients with deferred revascularization, FFR was not able to differentiate the risk of cardiovascular events.

Epicardial Artery Stenosis with a High Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Is Frequently Functionally Insignificant as Estimated by Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

Objective Differences in microvascular integrity can diversely influence the functional assessment of epicardial coronary artery disease in each patient. We investigated the relevance of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) of intermediate coronary lesions. Methods The IMR and FFR were measured in 67 intermediate coronary lesions of the left anterior descending artery of 67 patients, by using a pressure sensor/thermistor-tipped guidewire. Results To assess the differences in FFR in relationship to the IMR value, patients were divided into tertile IMR groups as follows: Low-IMR (n=22, IMR 14±3), Mid-IMR (n=23, IMR 21±2), and High-IMR (n=22, IMR 36±10). An analysis of variance showed that the High-IMR group had significantly higher FFR values (0.87±0.07) than the Low-IMR group (0.81±0.08) (p=0.03). Functionally significant lesions with FFR ≤0.8 accounted for 9% of lesions in the High-IMR group, 36% in the Low-IMR group and 22% in the Mid-IMR group (p=0.02). In the multivariate logistic analysis, the IMR value was an independent determinant of FFR ≤0.8 (p=0.03). Conclusion In patients with a high IMR, intermediate lesions as identified with visual estimation were more frequently functionally insignificant. The IMR can provide additional information in understanding the mismatch between the anatomical and functional severity of intermediate coronary stenosis.

Prediction of Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Myocardial Ischaemia

Following revascularisation the majority of patients obtain symptom relief and improved quality of life. However, myocardial ischaemia may recur or persist in a significant patient subset. Symptom recurrence is usually attributed to inaccurate evaluation of epicardial stenosis, incomplete revascularisation or stent failure and disease progression. However, technological advances with modern imaging and/or physiological evaluation of epicardial plaques have not solved this issue. Conversely, recent clinical studies have shown that abnormal coronary vasomotion and increased myocardial resistance are frequent determinants of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) myocardial ischaemia. Strategies to enhance prediction of post-PCI angina include proper selection of patients undergoing revascularisation, construction of clinical prediction models, and further invasive evaluation at the time of coronary angiography in those with high likelihood.

Lack of correlation between the optimal glycaemic control and coronary micro vascular dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus: a cross sectional study

Background

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is associated with cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Optimal glycaemic control does not always preclude future events. We sought to assess the effect of the current target of HBA1c level on the coronary microcirculatory function and identify predictive factors for CMD in T2DM patients.

Methods

We studied 100 patients with T2DM and 214 patients without T2DM. All of them with a history of chest pain, non-obstructive angiograms and a direct assessment of coronary blood flow increase in response to adenosine and acetylcholine coronary infusion, for evaluation of endothelial independent and dependent CMD. Patients with T2DM were categorized as having optimal (HbA1c < 7 %) vs. suboptimal (HbA1c ≥ 7 %) glycaemic control at the time of catheterization.

Results

Baseline characteristics and coronary endothelial function parameters differed significantly between T2DM patients and control group. The prevalence of endothelial independent CMD (29.8 vs. 39.6 %, p = 0.40) and dependent CMD (61.7 vs. 62.2 %, p = 1.00) were similar in patients with optimal vs. suboptimal glycaemic control. Age (OR 1.10; CI 95 % 1.04–1.18; p < 0.001) and female gender (OR 3.87; CI 95 % 1.45–11.4; p < 0.01) were significantly associated with endothelial independent CMD whereas glomerular filtrate (OR 0.97; CI 95 % 0.95–0.99; p < 0.05) was significantly associated with endothelial dependent CMD. The optimal glycaemic control was not associated with endothelial independent (OR 0.60, CI 95 % 0.23–1.46; p 0.26) or dependent CMD (OR 0.99, CI 95 % 0.43–2.24; p = 0.98).

Conclusions

The current target of HBA1c level does not predict a better coronary microcirculatory function in T2DM patients. The appropriate strategy for prevention of CMD in T2DM patients remains to be addressed.