Dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance versus echocardiography for the assessment of outcome in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Are the two imaging modalities comparable?

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The clinical utility of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in stable chest pain is still debated, and the low-risk period for adverse cardiovascular (CV) events after a negative test result is unknown.

Objective

To provide contemporary quantitative data synthesis of the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of stress CMR in stable chest pain.

Data Sources

PubMed and Embase databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched for potentially relevant articles from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2021.

Study Selection

Selected studies evaluated CMR and reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy and/or raw data of adverse CV events for participants with either positive or negative stress CMR results. Prespecified combinations of keywords related to the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of stress CMR were used. A total of 3144 records were evaluated for title and abstract; of those, 235 articles were included in the full-text assessment of eligibility. After exclusions, 64 studies (74 470 total patients) published from October 29, 2002, through October 19, 2021, were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), odds ratio (OR), and annualized event rate (AER) for all-cause death, CV death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as the composite of myocardial infarction and CV death.

Results

A total of 33 diagnostic studies pooling 7814 individuals and 31 prognostic studies pooling 67 080 individuals (mean [SD] follow-up, 3.5 [2.1] years; range, 0.9-8.8 years; 381 357 person-years) were identified. Stress CMR yielded a DOR of 26.4 (95% CI, 10.6-65.9), a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI, 68%-89%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 75%-93%), and an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.89) for the detection of functionally obstructive coronary artery disease. In the subgroup analysis, stress CMR yielded higher diagnostic accuracy in the setting of suspected coronary artery disease (DOR, 53.4; 95% CI, 27.7-103.0) or when using 3-T imaging (DOR, 33.2; 95% CI, 19.9-55.4). The presence of stress-inducible ischemia was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.69-2.31), CV mortality (OR, 6.40; 95% CI, 4.48-9.14), and MACEs (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 4.04-7.04). The presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.99-2.47), CV mortality (OR, 6.03; 95% CI, 2.76-13.13), and increased risk of MACEs (OR, 5.42; 95% CI, 3.42-8.60). After a negative test result, pooled AERs for CV death were less than 1.0%.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this study, stress CMR yielded high diagnostic accuracy and delivered robust prognostication, particularly when 3-T scanners were used. While inducible myocardial ischemia and LGE were associated with higher mortality and risk of MACEs, normal stress CMR results were associated with a lower risk of MACEs for at least 3.5 years.

Dobutamine Stress Cardiac MRI in Pediatric Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Following current practice, pediatric patients with treated congenital coronary malformations or acquired coronary disease undergo Cardio-Pulmonary Exercise Test (CPET), stress Echocardiography and Electrocardiography (sEcho, sEKG), and Coronary Angiography (CA). Stress cMRI can assess cardiac function, myocardial viability, and stress/rest perfusion deficit-without radiation exposure, general anesthesia, and hospitalization-in a single non-invasive exam. The aim of our pilot study is to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of Dobutamine stress cMRI compared to the current procedures (sEcho, CPET, CA). The prospective study is focused on pediatric patients, at risk for or with previously diagnosed coronary artery disease: d-looped TGA after arterial Switch, Kawasaki disease, and anomalous origin of left coronary artery from pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) after coronary artery reimplantation. We have compared the results of MRI coronary angiography, and Dobutamine stress cMRI with traditional tests. All these diagnostic exams were acquired in a timeframe of 3 month, in a blinded fashion. All the 13 patients (age: 12 ± 2 years, median 12,7 y) recruited, completed the study without major adverse events. The mean heart rate-pressure product was 25,120 ± 5110 bpm x mm Hg. The target heart rate of 85% of the maximal theoretical was reached by 10 (77%) patients. The comparison between cardiac MRI coronarography versus the gold standard Coronary Angiography to identify the patency of the origin and the proximal pathway of the coronary arteries shows a sensitivity of 100% (confidence interval: 2,5-100%), specificity 92% (confidence interval: 64-100%). The stress test was well tolerated for the 77% of the patients and completed by the totality of patients (Table 3). Three patients (23%) had mild symptoms: nausea, vomiting, or general discomfort. In pediatric patients with a potential or definite diagnosis of coronary artery disease, stress cMRI combines an effective assessment of proximal coronary arteries anatomy with cardiac function, myocardial perfusion, and viability in a single examination. Stress cMRI can be proposed as alternative, standalone test.

Sex-Specific Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Ischemic Heart Disease: Insights From SPINS Retrospective Registry

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in women, but current noninvasive cardiac imaging techniques have sex-specific limitations.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to investigate the effect of sex on the prognostic utility and downstream invasive revascularization and costs of stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for suspected CVD.

METHODS

Sex-specific prognostic performance was evaluated in a 2,349-patient multicenter SPINS (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS] Study) registry. The primary outcome measure was a composite of cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction; secondary outcomes were hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure, and late unplanned coronary artery bypass grafting.

RESULTS

SPINS included 1,104 women (47% of cohort); women had higher prevalence of chest pain (62% vs 50%; P < 0.0001) but lower use of medical therapies. At the 5.4-year median follow-up, women with normal stress CMR had a low annualized rate of primary composite outcome similar to men (0.54%/y vs 0.75%/y, respectively; P = NS). In contrast, women with abnormal CMR were at higher risk for both primary (3.74%/y vs 0.54%/y; P < 0.0001) and secondary (9.8%/y vs 1.6%/y; P < 0.0001) outcomes compared with women with normal CMR. Abnormal stress CMR was an independent predictor for the primary (HR: 2.64 [95% CI: 1.20-5.90]; P = 0.02) and secondary (HR: 2.09 [95% CI: 1.43-3.08]; P < 0.0001) outcome measures. There was no effect modification for sex. Women had lower rates of invasive coronary angiography (ICA; 3.6% vs 7.3%; P = 0.0001) and downstream costs ($114 vs $171; P = 0.001) at 90 days following CMR. There was no effect of sex on diagnostic image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress CMR demonstrated excellent prognostic performance with lower rates of ICA referral in women. Stress CMR should be considered as a first-line noninvasive imaging tool for the evaluation of women. (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS] Study [SPINS]; NCT03192891).

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Chest Pain-High Probability of Coronary Artery Disease: 2021 Update

Management of patients with chronic chest pain in the setting of high probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) relies heavily on imaging for determining or excluding presence and severity of myocardial ischemia, hibernation, scarring, and/or the presence, site, and severity of obstructive coronary lesions, as well as course of management and long-term prognosis. In patients with no known ischemic heart disease, imaging is valuable in determining and documenting the presence, extent, and severity of obstructive coronary narrowing and presence of myocardial ischemia. In patients with known ischemic heart disease, imaging findings are important in determining the management of patients with chronic myocardial ischemia and can serve as a decision-making tool for medical therapy, angioplasty, stenting, or surgery. This document summarizes the recent growing body of evidence on various imaging tests and makes recommendations for imaging based on the available data and expert opinion. This document is focused on epicardial CAD and does not discuss the microvascular disease as the cause for CAD. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Coronary artery disease in post-menopausal women: are there appropriate means of assessment?

The recognition of sex differences in cardiovascular disease, particularly the manifestations of coronary artery disease (CAD) in post-menopausal women, has introduced new challenges in not only understanding disease mechanisms but also identifying appropriate clinical means of assessing the efficacy of management strategies. For example, the majority of treatment algorithms for CAD are derived from the study of males, focus on epicardial stenoses, and inadequately account for the small intramyocardial vessel disease in women. However, newer investigational modalities, including stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are providing enhanced diagnostic accuracy and prognostication for women with microvascular disease. Moreover, these investigations may soon be complemented by simpler screening tools such as retinal vasculature imaging, as well as novel biomarkers (e.g. heat shock protein 27). Hence, it is vital that robust, sex-specific cardiovascular imaging modalities and biomarkers continue to be developed and are incorporated into practice guidelines that are used to manage women with CAD, as well as gauge the efficacy of any new treatment modalities. This review provides an overview of some of the sex differences in CAD and highlights emerging advances in the investigation of CAD in post-menopausal women.

Analysis of spatiotemporal fidelity in quantitative 3D first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Whole-heart first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) relies on highly accelerated image acquisition. The influence of undersampling on myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification has not been systematically investigated yet. In the present work, the effect of spatiotemporal scan acceleration on image reconstruction accuracy and MBF error was studied using a numerical phantom and validated in-vivo.

METHODS

Up to 10-fold scan acceleration using k-t PCA and k-t SPARSE-SENSE was simulated using the MRXCAT CMR numerical phantom framework. Image reconstruction results were compared to ground truth data in the k-f domain by means of modulation transfer function (MTF) analysis. In the x-t domain, errors pertaining to specific features of signal intensity-time curves and MBF values derived using Fermi model deconvolution were analysed. In-vivo first-pass CMR data were acquired in ten healthy volunteers using a dual-sequence approach assessing the arterial input function (AIF) and myocardial enhancement. 10x accelerated 3D k-t PCA and k-t SPARSE-SENSE were compared and related to non-accelerated 2D reference images.

RESULTS

MTF analysis revealed good recovery of data upon k-t PCA reconstruction at 10x undersampling with some attenuation of higher temporal frequencies. For 10x k-t SPARSE-SENSE the MTF was found to decrease to zero at high spatial frequencies for all temporal frequencies indicating a loss in spatial resolution. Signal intensity-time curve errors were most prominent in AIFs from 10x k-t PCA, thereby emphasizing the need for separate AIF acquisition using a dual-sequence approach. These findings were confirmed by MBF estimation based on AIFs from fully sampled and undersampled simulations. Average in-vivo MBF estimates were in good agreement between both accelerated and the fully sampled methods. Intra-volunteer MBF variation for fully sampled 2D scans was lower compared to 10x k-t PCA and k-t SPARSE-SENSE data.

CONCLUSION

Quantification of highly undersampled 3D first-pass perfusion CMR yields accurate MBF estimates provided the AIF is obtained using fully sampled or moderately undersampled scans as part of a dual-sequence approach. However, relative to fully sampled 2D perfusion imaging, intra-volunteer variation is increased using 3D approaches prompting for further developments.

Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block

There is a high prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB); however there are many other causes for this electrocardiographic abnormality. Non-invasive assessment of these patients remains difficult, and all commonly used modalities exhibit several drawbacks. This often leads to these patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography which may not have been necessary. In this review, we examine the uses and limitations of commonly performed non-invasive tests for diagnosis of CAD in patients with LBBB.

Ischemic burden and clinical outcome: is one 'culprit' ischemic segment by dobutamine stress magnetic resonance predictive?

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the impact of ischemic burden for the prediction of hard cardiac events (cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) in patients with known or suspected CAD who undergo dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DCMR).

METHODS

We included 3166 patients (pts.), mean age 63 ± 12 years, 27% female, who underwent DCMR in 3 tertiary cardiac centres (University Hospital Heildelberg, German Heart Institute and Kings College London). Pts. were separated in groups based on the number of ischemic segments by wall motion abnormalities (WMA) as follows: 1. no ischemic segment, 2. one ischemic segment, 3. two ischemic segments and 4. ≥ three ischemic segments. Cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction were registered as hard cardiac events. Pts. with an "early" revascularization procedure (in the first three months after DCMR) were not included in the final survival analysis.

RESULTS

Pts. were followed for a median of 3.1 years (iqr 2-4.5 years). 187 (5.9%) pts. experienced hard cardiac events. 2349 (74.2%) had no inducible ischemia, 189 (6%) had ischemia in 1 segment, 292 (9.2%) in 2 segments and 336 (10.6%) ≥ 3 segments. Patients with only 1 ischemic segment showed a high rate of hard cardiac events of ∼ 6% annually, which was 10-fold higher compared to those without ischemia (0.6% annually, p < 0.001) but similar to those with 2 and ≥ 3 ischemic segments (∼ 5.5% and ∼ 7%, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of inducible ischemia even in a single 'culprit' myocardial segment during DCMR is enough to predict hard cardiac events in patients with known or suspected CAD.

Myocardial scar characteristics based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that myocardial scar characterization using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) may be associated with the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT), appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy and mortality.

BACKGROUND

Since a minority of patients with prophylactic ICD implantation receive appropriate ICD therapy, there is a need for more effective risk stratification for primary prevention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 99 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, CMR was performed prior to ICD implantation. We assessed if CMR indices (cardiac mass, LVEF) and CMR scar characteristics (infarct core mass, peri-infarction mass and the ratio's between left ventricular mass, infarct core mass and peri-infarction mass) were associated with outcome. The primary endpoint was sustained VT and/or appropriate ICD therapy. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up of 5.4 years (IQR 4.5-6.6 years), 34 patients reached the primary end-point (17 appropriate ICD shocks) and 26 patients died. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, peri-infarction to core-infarction ratio (HR 2.01, 95%CI: 1.17-3.44, p=0.01) was independently and significantly associated with the primary endpoint, whereas NYHA-class and lower LVEF were not. Conversely, age (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p=0.02) and lower LVEF (HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-1.00, p=0.04) were independently associated with all-cause mortality, mainly due to heart failure.

CONCLUSION

A relatively large peri-infarction mass is associated with sustained VT and/or appropriate ICD therapy, whereas age and lower LVEF are associated with mortality. CMR based tissue characterization could aid in the prediction of specific outcome measures and in clinical decision making.