A two center 320 slice CT study for evaluating coronary arteries in subjects with chronic atrial fibrillation: A comparison of prospective and retrospective ECG-gating acquisition

Influence of irregular heart rhythm on radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic impact of cardiac computed tomography angiography in 4,339 patients. Data from the German Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) provides non-invasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with high precision for the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD).

AIM

To investigate whether irregular heart rhythm including atrial fibrillation and premature beats during data acquisition influences (i) radiation and contrast media exposure, (ii) number of non-evaluable coronary segments and (iii) diagnostic impact of coronary CTA.

METHODS

Twelve tertiary care centers with ≥64 slice CT scanners and ≥5 years of experience with cardiovascular imaging participated in this registry. Between 2009 and 2014, 4339 examinations were analysed in patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary CTA for suspected CAD. Clinical and epidemiologic data were gathered from all patients. In addition, clinical presentation, heart rate and rhythm during the scan, Agatston score, radiation and contrast media exposure and the diagnostic impact of coronary CTA were systematically analysed.

RESULTS

Of 4339 patients in total, 260 (6.0%) had irregular heart rhythm, whereas the remaining 4079 (94.0%) had stable sinus rhythm. Patients with irregular heart rhythm were older (63.2 ± 12.5yrs versus 58.6 ± 11.4yrs. p < 0.001), exhibited a higher rate of pathologic stress tests before CTA (37.1% versus 26.1%, p < 0.01) and higher heart rates during CTA compared to those with sinus rhythm (62.5 ± 11.6bpm versus 58.9 ± 8.5bpm, p < 0.001). Both contrast media exposure and radiation exposure were significantly higher in patients with irregular heart rhythm (90 mL (95%CI = 80-110 mL) versus 80 mL (95%CI = 70-90 mL) and 6.2 mSv (95%CI = 2.5-11.7) versus 3.3 mSv (95%CI = 1.7-6.9), p < 0.001 for both). Coronary CTA excluded significant CAD less frequently in patients with irregular heart rhythm (32.9% versus 44.8%, p < 0.001). This was attributed to the higher rate of examinations with at least one non-diagnostic coronary segment in patients with irregular heart rhythm (10.8% versus 4.6%, p < 0.001). Subsequent invasive angiography could be avoided in 47.2% of patients with irregular heart rhythm compared to 52.9% of patients with sinus rhythm (p = NS), whereas downstream stress testing was recommended in 3.2% of patients with irregular heart rhythm versus 4.0% of patients with sinus rhythm (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

A significant number of patients scheduled for coronary CTA have irregular heart rhythm in a real-world clinical setting. In such patients, heart rate during coronary CTA is higher, possibly resulting in (i) higher radiation and contrast agent exposure and (ii) more frequent coronary CTA examinations with at least one non-diagnostic coronary artery segment. However, this does not seem to lead to increased downstream stress testing or subsequent invasive procedures.

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Patient-related factors determining image quality using a second-generation 320-slice CT scanner

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic confidence of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and the effect of patient-related factors on CCTA image quality using a second-generation 320-slice scanner.

METHODS AND RESULTS

200 consecutive patients (mean age 60±12years; 109 men) prospectively underwent CCTA. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.1±4.9kg/m(2); the median heart rate (HR) was 60.0 (interquartile range (IQR), 53.9-66.1) beats per minute (bpm). The median segment's diameter was 2.8 (IQR, 2.2-3.4) mm. For each coronary segment ≥1.5mm in diameter, two readers scored: diameter narrowing as < or ≥50%, overall diagnostic confidence and motion-related image quality, with interobserver agreement kappa-values of 0.89, 0.91 and 0.61 respectively. Seventy-nine of the 2505 evaluated segments (3.2%) had non-diagnostic image quality because of coronary calcifications (66/79; 83.5%), stent- (6/79; 7.5%), pacemaker- (2/79; 2.5%) or motion-related artifacts (5/79; 6.5%). The effect of patient-related factors on motion-related image quality was investigated by multinomial logistic regression in 181 patients with calcium score (IQR, 0-446.5). Increasing coronary diameter was the most improving image quality factor (odds ratio (OR), 1.8637; p<0.001), marginally followed by lower HR (OR, 0.9547; p<0.001) and calcium score (OR, 0.9997; p=0.04). Gender (p=0.70), age (p=0.24) and BMI (p=0.45) did not affect image quality.

CONCLUSION

Using a second-generation 320-slice scanner, CCTA diagnostic confidence is predominantly affected by coronary calcifications, whereas motion-related image quality is non-diagnostic only in exceptional cases and mainly influenced by the coronary diameter. For future developments, our study findings therefore suggest greater requirements concerning spatial resolution and calcium-related artifact removal than concerning temporal resolution, especially to improve diagnostic confidence in patient groups with smaller coronary diameters.

Coronary CT angiography in calcified coronary plaques: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between bifurcation angle measurement and coronary lumen assessment for diagnosing significant coronary stenosis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) by bifurcation angle measurement in the assessment of calcified plaques compared to conventional coronary lumen analysis.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with calcified plaques identified on CCTA in the left coronary artery were included in the study. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and bifurcation angle between the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCx) arteries were measured and compared between CCTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA), while the areas under the curves (AUCs) by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC) were compared between CCTA and ICA with regard to the diagnostic value of using bifurcation angle as a criterion.

RESULTS

On a per-vessel assessment, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and 95% confidence interval (CI) with the use of bifurcation angle for determining coronary stenosis were 100% (86%, 100%), 79% (59%, 92%), 81% (62%, 92%), and 100% (85%, 100%) for CCTA, and 100% (86%, 100%), 82% (63%, 94%), 83% (65%, 94%), and 100% (85%, 100%) for ICA, respectively. While the sensitivity and NPV remained unchanged, the specificity and PPV of CCTA by MLD were 33% (21%, 47%) and 43% (31%, 56%). The AUCs by ROC curve analysis for CCTA and ICA bifurcation angle measurements demonstrated no significant difference (p>0.05, 0.79 vs 0.86, and 0.70 vs 0.68 at the LAD and LCx assessment, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Coronary CT angiography by bifurcation angle measurement shows significant improvement in the diagnosis of calcified plaques with diagnostic value comparable to invasive coronary angiography.

Noninvasive and Invasive Assessments of the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis: Is This a Matter of Right or Wrong?

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (cCTA) has emerged in recent years as a noninvasive modality to evaluate coronary artery disease. Many studies have revealed the excellent diagnostic accuracy of cCTA when compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). It is generally accepted that the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis is important to make treatment decisions; however, cCTA, ICA, and IVUS are limited in the ability to determine the physiologic significance of coronary stenosis. The FIGURE-OUT study compared the noninvasive and invasive assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis.