Cardiac rehabilitation in pacing patient complications: an increasing scenario requiring a collaborative vision of a multi-disciplinary treatment team

How Do Patients Understand Safety for Cardiac Implantable Devices? Importance of Postintervention Education

Aim

This study was designed to assess the effect of patient education on the knowledge of safety and awareness about living with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) within the context of phase I cardiac rehabilitation.

Methods

The study was conducted with 28 newly implanted CIED patients who were included in “education group (EG)”. Patients were questioned with a survey about living with CIEDs and electromagnetic interference (EMI) before and 1 month after an extensive constructed interview. Ninety-three patients who had been living with CIEDs were included in the “without education group (woEG)”.

Results

Patients in EG had improved awareness on topics related to physical and daily life activities including work, driving, sports and sexual activities, EMI of household items, harmful equipment, and some of the medical devices in the hospital setting (p<0.05). Patients in EG gave significantly different percent of correct answers for doing exercise or sports, using the arm on the side of CIEDs, EMI of some of the household appliances, medical devices, and all of the harmful equipment compared to woEG (p<0.05).

Conclusion

It was demonstrated that a constructed education interview on safety of CIEDs and living with these devices within the context of phase I cardiac rehabilitation is important for improving the awareness of patients significantly. Thus, patients might achieve a faster adaptation to daily life and decrease disinformation and misperceptions and thus promote the quality of life after the device implantation.

The Influence of Cardiac Pacemaker Programming Modes on Exercise Capacity

BACKGROUND/AIM

The cardiac pacing mode influences the atrioventricular synchronicity and the response of the heart rate to physical exercise. The aim of this study was to compare the influence of the most common pacemaker programming modes on exercise capacity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two pacemaker-wearing patients were clinically evaluated and submitted to an exercise stress test.

RESULTS

Symptoms of heart failure were more frequently met in the single-chamber pacemaker group compared to the dual-chamber group. The parameters recorded during the exercise stress test were significantly better with the rate responsive function (RRF) activated. The effort time was higher by an average of 2.1 minutes and the exercise capacity was higher by 0.92 metabolic equivalents.

CONCLUSION

Dual-chamber pacing is superior to single-chamber (ventricular) pacing and the activation of the RRF in single-chamber pacemakers has similar impact on exercise capacity as the preservation of atrioventricular synchronicity by dual-chamber pacemakers.