Individual-patient visit-by-visit office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements over 24months in patients undergoing renal denervation for hypertension

Hypertension management in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities

Arterial hypertension is a leading cause of death globally. Due to ageing, the rising incidence of obesity, and socioeconomic and environmental changes, its incidence increases worldwide. Hypertension commonly coexists with Type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemia, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking leading to risk amplification. Blood pressure lowering by lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive drugs reduce cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend dual- and triple-combination therapies using renin–angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or a diuretic. Comorbidities often complicate management. New drugs such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve CV and renal outcomes. Catheter-based renal denervation could offer an alternative treatment option in comorbid hypertension associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity. This review summarises the latest clinical evidence for managing hypertension with CV comorbidities.

Predictors for success in renal denervation-a single centre retrospective analysis

Renal denervation (RDN) is one of the most frequently used invasive methods for the treatment of arterial hypertension. However, recent randomized sham-controlled studies raised concern about the efficacy and predictability of response. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of patients, who underwent RDN in our hypertension center between November 2010 and April 2014 and report here outcomes twelve months after procedure based on 24-hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. We defined ten-mm Hg decrease in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) as a cut-off for response and looked for possible predictors of this response using binary multiple regression analysis. 42 patients were included. Their mean age was 59.6 ± 9.2 years and 24% were female. Baseline office SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 164.1 ± 20.3 and 91.8 ± 12.4 mm Hg respectively. Mean 24 h-SBP significantly decreased from 149.8 ± 13.3 mm Hg to 141.2 ± 14.6 mm Hg. Mean 24 h-DBP significantly decreased from 83.3 ± 11.7 mm Hg to 78.8 ± 11.2 mm Hg. A higher level of mean 24 h-DBP and office DBP was shown to be predictive for response in office BP and a higher level of mean 24 h-DBP for response in 24 h-SBP and 24 h-DBP. Further properly designed randomized trials are warranted to confirm this finding as well as further investigate the role of diabetes mellitus and arterial stiffness in RDN.

Endpoint design for future renal denervation trials - Novel implications for a new definition of treatment response to renal denervation

BACKGROUND

Defining an adequate endpoint for renal denervation trials represents a major challenge. A high inter-individual and intra-individual variability of blood pressure levels as well as a partial or total non-adherence on antihypertensive drugs hamper treatment evaluations after renal denervation. Blood pressure measurements at a single point in time as used as primary endpoint in most clinical trials on renal denervation, might not be sufficient to discriminate between patients who do or do not respond to renal denervation.

METHODS

We compared the traditional responder classification (defined as systolic 24-hour blood pressure reduction of -5mmHg six months after renal denervation) with a novel definition of an ideal respondership (based on a 24h blood pressure reduction at no point in time, one, or all follow-up timepoints).

RESULTS

We were able to re-classify almost a quarter of patients. Blood pressure variability was substantial in patients traditionally defined as responders. On the other hand, our novel classification of an ideal respondership seems to be clinically superior in discriminating sustained from pseudo-response to renal denervation.

CONCLUSION

Based on our observations, we recommend that the traditional response classification should be reconsidered and possibly strengthened by using a composite endpoint of 24h-BP reductions at different follow-up-visits.

Frequency of renal artery stenosis after renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension

Catheter-based ablation of nerves in the adventitia of renal arteries (renal artery denervation [RAD]) using radiofrequency energy can reduce blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (RAH). Occurrence of renal artery stenosis after RAD is still an important concern. We systematically investigated the renal artery anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) angiography in a consecutive series of patients 6 months after RAD. Patients with RAH were treated by RAD after exclusion of secondary causes of hypertension. RAH was defined by a mean systolic office BP >160 mm Hg. Renal artery imaging was performed 6 months after RAD by MRI angiography. In case of any contraindication for MRI, a CT angiography was performed. The primary end point was the incidence of significant renal artery stenosis (≥70% lumen diameter reduction). RAD was performed in 76 patients, and evaluation of renal artery anatomy by MRI (n = 66; 87%) or CT angiography (n = 10; 13%) was performed in all patients 6 months after RAD. We found no renal artery stenosis but 2 cases of new nonsignificant stenosis (50% TO 69% lumen diameter reduction). In responders, mean systolic office BP reduction was -30 mm Hg (p <0.001) and mean systolic 24-hour BP reduction was -18 mm Hg (p <0.001). In conclusion, the incidence of significant renal artery stenosis 6 months after RAD seems to be very low. However, late-onset development of nonsignificant renal artery narrowing cannot be excluded in some patients and should be anticipated in the case of RAH relapse or worsening of renal function after successful RAD.