The use of adenosine and adenosine triphosphate testing in the diagnosis, risk stratification and management of patients with syncope: current evidence and future perspectives

Adenosinergic System and Neuroendocrine Syncope: What Is the Link?

Although very common, the precise mechanisms that explain the symptomatology of neuroendocrine syncope (NES) remain poorly understood. This disease, which can be very incapacitating, manifests itself as a drop in blood pressure secondary to vasodilation and/or extreme slowing of heart rate. As studies continue, the involvement of the adenosinergic system is becoming increasingly evident. Adenosine, which is an ATP derivative, may be involved in a large number of cases. Adenosine acts on G protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane domains. A1 and A2A adenosine receptor dysfunction seem to be particularly implicated since the activation leads to severe bradycardia or vasodilation, respectively, two cardinal symptoms of NES. This mini-review aims to shed light on the links between dysfunction of the adenosinergic system and NHS. In particular, signal transduction pathways through the modulation of cAMP production and ion channels in relation to effects on the cardiovascular system are addressed. A better understanding of these mechanisms could guide the pharmacological development of new therapeutic approaches.

Syncope without prodromes is associated with excessive plasma release of adenosine at the time of syncope during head-up tilt table test

BACKGROUND

In syncopal patients without underlying structural disease, we sought to investigate the association of Adenosine Plasma Levels (ADP) with the clinical presentation of neurally mediated syncope (NMS) and the outcomes of Head-Up Tilt Table Test (HUTT) and Adenosine test (ADT).

METHODS

We studied 124 patients with different clinical types of NMS, i.e., Vasovagal (VVS, n=58), non-prodromes (NPS, n=18), or situational syncope (SS, n=48), using a standard protocol including HUTT and ADT. During HUTT, ADP was measured in the supine position, at table tilting and in syncope.

RESULTS

Baseline ADP did not differ among groups. ADP at syncope were higher in NPS (n=5) compared to VVS (n=20): 0.23 vs. 0.12 μΜ, p=0.03, and SS (n=22): 0.04 μΜ, p=0.02. In NPS, ADP increased from supine to syncope (n=5): 0.15 vs. 0.23 μΜ, p=0.04. In VVS, ADP increased only from supine to tilt position: 0.11 vs. 0.14 μΜ, p=0.02. In SS, ADP did not change during HUTT. In positive vasodepressor HUTT, ADP increased from supine to tilt position (p=0.002) and at syncope (p=0.01). In SS, 20.0% exhibited cardioinhibitory HUTT vs. 6.8% in other forms of syncope (p=0.04). In SS, 22.9% manifested positive ADT vs 6.6% in other types of syncope (p=0.012).

CONCLUSION

The subset of NPS patients with positive HUTT, show excessive ADP release at the time of syncope. This may explain the lack of prodromes in this form of syncope. Such observations contribute to the understanding of distinct profiles of clinical forms of syncope and may differentiate the management approach accordingly.

Is the Adenosine Test Obsolete in the Clinical Assessment of Syncope of Unknown Origin?

Syncope is a common clinical condition affecting 50% of the general population; however, its exact pathophysiology and underlying mechanisms remain elusive. The adenosine test (ADT) has been proposed as a complementary diagnostic test in the work-up of syncope of unknown origin aiming to further elucidate the underlying pathogenetic mechanism of spontaneous syncope. Although ADT has not been endorsed by the recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on syncope management, the use of a quick, safe and non-invasive test which can contribute to an accurate diagnosis and rationalised therapy, may deserve further consideration. This review summarises the evidence on the role of ADT in the investigation and management of syncope of unknown origin and highlights future perspectives in this area. The authors also analyse the current challenges and research targets on adenosine plasma levels and its receptors due to the involvement of the adenosine pathway in the ADT response.

Comparison of trinitroglycerin and adenosine as provocative agents for head-up tilt test in patients with unexplained syncope: a semi-crossover randomized clinical trial with prospective follow-up

PURPOSE

Head-up tilt test (HUTT) is a reasonable diagnostic evaluation for patients with suspected vasovagal syncope; however, its lengthy duration is a remarkable limitation. Although adenosine (AD), as an alternative provocative agent, is a promising option for tackling this shortcoming, it received little appreciation in the literature. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the time to elicit a positive response to HUTT for sublingual trinitroglycerin (TNG) and intravenous AD. Furthermore, we evaluated patients' outcomes in the follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with a chief complaint of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) were evaluated. We randomized patients with the diagnosis of unexplained syncope after diagnostic evaluations, to undergo TNG-augmented HUTT or AD-augmented HUTT. They were crossed over to receive the other medication in case of negative response to the test. In the follow-up, we evaluated traumatic and non-traumatic TLOCs, hospitalization due to syncope, and death in patients.

RESULTS

We randomized 132 patients (41.70 ± 19.37 years, 52.3% female) to receive TNG (n = 66) or AD (n = 66). Respectively, the positivity rate of TNG and AD for the first and the crossover-HUTT was 31.1% and 26.7%, and 20.5% and 26.2% with no statistically significant differences in both tests (P ˃ 0.50). The time to positive response was significantly shorter for AD than TNG (P < 0.001). In the follow-up, re-admission was significantly more prevalent in HUTT-negative patients compared to HUTT-positive patients (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that diagnostic yield of TNG and AD in HUTT is comparable, while AD acts 4 times faster than TNG in evoking a vasovagal response.

Adenosine as a Marker and Mediator of Cardiovascular Homeostasis: A Translational Perspective

Adenosine, a purine nucleoside, is produced broadly and implicated in the homeostasis of many cells and tissues. It signals predominantly via 4 purinergic adenosine receptors (ADORs) - ADORA1, ADORA2A, ADORA2B and ADOosine signaling, both through design as specific ADOR agonists and antagonists and as offtarget effects of existing anti-platelet medications. Despite this, adenosine has yet to be firmly established as either a therapeutic or a prognostic tool in clinical medicine to date. Herein, we provide a bench-to-bedside review of adenosine biology, highlighting the key considerations for further translational development of this proRA3 in addition to non-ADOR mediated effects. Through these signaling mechanisms, adenosine exerts effects on numerous cell types crucial to maintaining vascular homeostasis, especially following vascular injury. Both in vitro and in vivo models have provided considerable insights into adenosine signaling and identified targets for therapeutic intervention. Numerous pharmacologic agents have been developed that modulate adenmising molecule.

Purinergic Signalling: Therapeutic Developments

Purinergic signalling, i.e., the role of nucleotides as extracellular signalling molecules, was proposed in 1972. However, this concept was not well accepted until the early 1990's when receptor subtypes for purines and pyrimidines were cloned and characterised, which includes four subtypes of the P1 (adenosine) receptor, seven subtypes of P2X ion channel receptors and 8 subtypes of the P2Y G protein-coupled receptor. Early studies were largely concerned with the physiology, pharmacology and biochemistry of purinergic signalling. More recently, the focus has been on the pathophysiology and therapeutic potential. There was early recognition of the use of P1 receptor agonists for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia and A2A receptor antagonists are promising for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Clopidogrel, a P2Y12 antagonist, is widely used for the treatment of thrombosis and stroke, blocking P2Y12 receptor-mediated platelet aggregation. Diquafosol, a long acting P2Y2 receptor agonist, is being used for the treatment of dry eye. P2X3 receptor antagonists have been developed that are orally bioavailable and stable in vivo and are currently in clinical trials for the treatment of chronic cough, bladder incontinence, visceral pain and hypertension. Antagonists to P2X7 receptors are being investigated for the treatment of inflammatory disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases. Other investigations are in progress for the use of purinergic agents for the treatment of osteoporosis, myocardial infarction, irritable bowel syndrome, epilepsy, atherosclerosis, depression, autism, diabetes, and cancer.

A target triggered proximity combination-based fluorescence sensing strategy for adenosine detection

Adenosine is a potent physiological and pharmacological regulator, and its abnormal level is closely related to disease development. The sensitive and specific detection of adenosine is crucial for health evaluation and disease diagnosis. In this work, a target triggered proximity combination-based fluorescence sensing strategy is developed for the sensitive and specific detection of adenosine. A difunctional probe showing target recognition and signal amplification is designed, by integration of DNA linker-connected split aptamer fragments with a fragment-elongated polymerase/nicking template. The presence of adenosine would glue the split aptamers, which triggers the two distal aptamer fragments to combine with each other into proximity. The approaching aptamer fragment ends then initiate the strand displacement amplification (SDA) reaction, generating numerous DNA primers. The DNA primers further hybridize with a padlock probe and initiate the rolling circle amplification (RCA) reaction, producing numerous G-quadruplex sequences. The G-quadruplex sequences finally bind with Thioflavin T to obtain enhanced fluorescence signals. The method exhibits a linear correlation within the adenosine concentration range from 5.0 × 10^-7 M to 2.0 × 10^-5 M (R = 0.999) with a detection limit of 8.4 × 10^-8 M, and a good selectivity to distinguish adenosine from its analogues. The recoveries of adenosine in human serum are from 91% to 94%, demonstrating that the system works well in biological fluids. The proposed sensing strategy is anticipated to hold promise in biochemical research, clinical diagnosis and disease treatment.

Purinergic Signaling in the Cardiovascular System

There is nervous control of the heart by ATP as a cotransmitter in sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory-motor nerves, as well as in intracardiac neurons. Centers in the brain control heart activities and vagal cardiovascular reflexes involve purines. Adenine nucleotides and nucleosides act on purinoceptors on cardiomyocytes, AV and SA nodes, cardiac fibroblasts, and coronary blood vessels. Vascular tone is controlled by a dual mechanism. ATP, released from perivascular sympathetic nerves, causes vasoconstriction largely via P2X1 receptors. Endothelial cells release ATP in response to changes in blood flow (via shear stress) or hypoxia, to act on P2 receptors on endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide, endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, or prostaglandins to cause vasodilation. ATP is also released from sensory-motor nerves during antidromic reflex activity, to produce relaxation of some blood vessels. Purinergic signaling is involved in the physiology of erythrocytes, platelets, and leukocytes. ATP is released from erythrocytes and platelets, and purinoceptors and ectonucleotidases are expressed by these cells. P1, P2Y₁, P2Y₁₂, and P2X1 receptors are expressed on platelets, which mediate platelet aggregation and shape change. Long-term (trophic) actions of purine and pyrimidine nucleosides and nucleotides promote migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells via P1 and P2Y receptors during angiogenesis, vessel remodeling during restenosis after angioplasty and atherosclerosis. The involvement of purinergic signaling in cardiovascular pathophysiology and its therapeutic potential are discussed, including heart failure, infarction, arrhythmias, syncope, cardiomyopathy, angina, heart transplantation and coronary bypass grafts, coronary artery disease, diabetic cardiomyopathy, hypertension, ischemia, thrombosis, diabetes mellitus, and migraine.

Assessment of increasing intravenous adenosine dose in fractional flow reserve

Background

Effects of increased adenosine dose in the assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR) were studied in relation to FFR results, hemodynamic effects and patient discomfort. FFR require maximal hyperemia mediated by adenosine. Standard dose is 140 μg/kg/min administrated intravenously. Higher doses are commonly used in clinical practice, but an extensive comparison between standard intravenous dose and a high dose (220 μg/kg/min) has previously not been performed.

Methods

Seventy-five patients undergoing FFR received standard dose adenosine, followed by high dose adenosine. FFR, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were analyzed. Patient discomfort measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was assessed.

Results

No significant difference was found between the doses in FFR value (0.85 [0.79–0.90] vs 0.85 [0.79–0.89], p = 0.24). The two doses correlated well irrespective of lesion severity (r = 0.86, slope = 0.89, p = <0.001). There were no differences in MAP or HR. Patient discomfort was more pronounced using high dose adenosine (8.0 [5.0–9.0]) versus standard dose (5.0 [2.0–7.0]), p = <0.001.

Conclusions

Increased dose adenosine does not improve hyperemia and is associated with increased patient discomfort. Our findings do not support the use of high dose adenosine.

Trial registration

Retrospective Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14618196. Registered 15 December 2016.

Electrophysiological Testing for the Investigation of Bradycardias

In this article we review the role of electrophysiological testing in patients presenting with bradycardia due to sinus node or atrioventricular node disease. In sinus bradycardia the role of electrophysiology studies is not established. In AV conduction disturbances, an electrophysiology study may be necessary both for the establishment of atrioventricular block as the main cause of symptoms, and for identification of the anatomic site of block that may dictate the potential need of permanent pacing.