Diastolic bicycle stress echocardiography: Normal reference values in a middle age population

Novel Strategies in Diagnosing Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent global condition affecting approximately 50% of the HF population. With the aging of the worldwide population, its incidence and prevalence are expected to rise even further. Unfortunately, until recently, no effective medications were available to reduce the high mortality and hospitalization rates associated with HFpEF, making it a significant unmet need in cardiovascular medicine. Although HFpEF is commonly defined as HF with normal ejection fraction and elevated left ventricular filling pressure, performing invasive hemodynamic assessments on every individual suspected of having HFpEF is neither feasible nor practical. Consequently, several clinical criteria and diagnostic tools have been proposed to aid in diagnosing HFpEF. Overall, these criteria and tools are designed to assist healthcare professionals in identifying and evaluating patients who may have HFpEF based on a combination of signs, symptoms, biomarkers, and non-invasive imaging findings. By employing these non-invasive diagnostic approaches, clinicians can make informed decisions regarding the best pharmacological and rehabilitation strategies for individuals with suspected HFpEF. This literature review aims to provide an overview of all currently available methods for diagnosing and monitoring this disabling condition.

[The role of diastolic transthoracic stress echocardiography with incremental workload in the evaluation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: indications, methodology, interpretation. Expert consensus developed under the auspices of the National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Society of Experts in Heart Failure (SEHF), and Russian Association of Experts in Ultrasound Diagnosis in Medicine (REUDM)]

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with certain difficulties since many patients with HFpEF have a slight left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and normal filling pressure at rest. Diagnosis of HFpEF is improved by using diastolic transthoracic stress-echocardiography with dosed exercise (or diastolic stress test), which allows detection of increased filling pressure during the exercise. The present expert consensus explains the requirement for using the diastolic stress test in diagnosing HFpEF from clinical and pathophysiological standpoints; defines indications for the test with a description of its methodological aspects; and addresses issues of using the test in special patient groups.

The prognostic value of estimating stroke volume before and after exercise during treadmill stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Stress echocardiography (SE) is an established technique for assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) which is difficult to perform and interpret. Left ventricular stroke volume (SV) is readily estimated with Doppler echocardiography. It can be affected by myocardial ischemia, with possible adjunctive value during SE.

METHODS

Patients underwent Bruce protocol SE with SV estimated before and after maximal treadmill exertion post routine regional wall analysis. Incremental change in SV (ΔSV) with exercise was measured.

RESULTS

A derivation cohort (n = 273) was established to test the hypothesis. An optimal cutoff for detection on inducible ischemia was ΔSV ≤ +10 mL. The validation cohort of consecutive patients (n = 1093, 376 [34%] female; age 59 ± 12 years) were followed clinically after SE for 20 460 patient-months. There were 1000 patients with nonischemic SE, and 93 patients with studies suggestive of myocardial ischemia. Secondary analysis yielded 831 patients with a normal exercise response (ΔSV > +10 mL) and 192 with an abnormal ΔSV ≤ +10 mL. Time to first combined adverse cardiac event (composite of angina, acute coronary syndrome, cardiac revascularization, worsening New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, a reduction in EF, and cardiovascular death) was analyzed and adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression. The hazard ratio for an adverse event with an abnormal ΔSV response (≤10 mL) was 10.3 (95% confidence intervals 5.6-19.1, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke volume assessment during SE is feasible and readily performed. It is simple, practical, and has incremental diagnostic and prognostic value when added to exercise regional wall-motion analysis.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and echocardiographic exam: an useful interaction

Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is a functional assessment that helps to detect disorders affecting the system involved in oxygen transport and utilization through the analysis of the gas exchange during exercise. The clinical application of CPET is various, it including training prescription, evaluation of treatment efficacy and outcome prediction in a broad spectrum of conditions. Furthermore, in patients with shortness of breath it provides pivotal information to bring out an accurate differential diagnosis between physical deconditioning, cardiopulmonary disease and muscular diseases. Modern software allows the breath-by-breath analysis of the volume of oxygen intake (VO₂), volume of carbon dioxide output (VCO₂) and expired air (VE). Through this analysis, CPET provides a series of additional parameters (peak VO₂, ventilatory threshold, VE/VCO₂ slope, end-tidal carbon dioxide exhaled) that characterize different patterns, helping in diagnosis process. Limitations to the routine use of CPET are mainly represented from the lack of measurement standardization and limited data from randomized multicentric studies. The integration of CPET with exercise stress echocardiography has been recently introduced in the clinical practice by integrating the diagnostic power offered by both the tools. This combined approach has been demonstrated to be valuable for diagnosing several cardiac diseases, including heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction, cardiomyopathies, pulmonary arterial hypertension, valvular heart disease and coronary artery disease. Future investigations are needed to further promote this intriguing combination in the clinical and research setting.

The Prognostic Value of the Diastolic Stress Test in Patients Undergoing Treadmill Stress Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Exercise stress echocardiography (SE) is well validated for the evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Diastolic stress testing (DST) is recommended in the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for unexplained dyspnea. This study's aim was to prognostically evaluate the DST prospectively in a large stress testing population.

METHODS

Patients underwent SE with mitral E/e' measured before and after maximal treadmill exertion to estimate diastolic function. Patients were divided into four groups: group 1 (n = 201)-ischemic; group 2 (n = 1,563)-negative DST (E/e'_pre < 12, E/e'_post < 12); group 3 (n = 68)-positive DST (E/e'_pre < 12, E/e'_post ≥ 12); group 4 (n = 314)-high baseline E/e' (E/e'_pre ≥ 12).

RESULTS

Consecutive patients (n = 2,201, 770 [35%] female; 58 ± 12 years) were followed after SE for 27,964 patient-months. Time to first heart failure event (composite of heart failure admission, worsening New York Heart Association class, worsening ejection fraction, or cardiovascular death) was analyzed and adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression. Ischemic patients hazard ratio (HR) was 28, 95% CI, 17-44, P < .0005, for subsequent heart failure compared with negative DST patients. Nonischemic, positive DSTs were highly predictive (HR = 4.2; 95% CI, 1.6-11.0; P = .001); while high E/e'_pre was not predictive (HR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.4; P = .49) of future heart failure events.

CONCLUSIONS

DST differentiates heart failure prognosis in patients with induced diastolic dysfunction. Ischemia predictably portends the worst heart failure outcomes, and nonischemic, positive diastolic stress tests predicted more events compared with negative tests. These prognostic data support and add to the recommendations of the 2016 guidelines.

Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction: Predicting Progression to Symptomatic Heart Failure

Asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (ALVDD) (diastolic abnormalities and normal ejection fraction in the absence of symptoms) is associated with incident heart failure (HF) and decreased survival. Abnormalities of diastolic function might therefore be included in the definition of stage B HF, which denotes individuals at risk for the development of HF. Imaging techniques, especially echocardiography, are necessary for the recognition of preclinical left ventricular (LV) diastolic disturbances, as well as further tracking of pathological changes and responses to treatment. The transition of ALVDD to symptomatic HF is underlain by multiple factors, including both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular determinants. The initiation of management strategies targeting cardiovascular and systemic comorbidities in patients identified as having ALVDD may delay symptomatic progression and improve prognosis.