Non-obstructive prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (NOPVT): Really a benign entity?

Management of prosthetic valve thrombosis with unfractionated heparin

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a severe and life-threatening complication. Surgery and thrombolytic therapy (TT) carry a high risk, and in several circumstances, optimal anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion may be an alternative treatment. This study aimed to assess the results of UFH in patients diagnosed with both obstructive and non-obstructive PVT.

METHODS

This observational retrospective study enrolled patients who had contraindications for TT and surgery underwent UFH therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were enrolled [male: 55 (40.4%), mean age: 50.3 ± 14.6 years] in the study. In the successful group, 66 patients (48,5%) showed >75% regression in the thrombus burden without facing death or major non-fatal complications.In the unsuccessful group, 56 had less than a 50% reduction in thrombus load and 14 (10.3%) suffered major complications. The presence of obstruction (27.1% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.028), thrombus area 1.1 cm2 vs. 0.8 cm2; p = 0.005] and the duration of UFH treatment (15.1 vs. 11.8 (days); p = 0.005) were significantly higher in the unsuccessful UFH group.In multivariate regression analyses the presence of obstruction (RR: 3.088, p = 0.020), increased thrombus area (RR: 2.400; p = 0.015), and increased duration of UFH therapy (RR: 1.073 95%, p = 0.012) were identified as independent predictive parameters for a failed UFH therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that UFH therapy may be considered a relatively beneficial treatment strategy for some patients with PVT. The most significant factors affecting success are the obstructive nature and area of the thrombus.

Mechanical Aortic Valve Thrombosis with Heart Failure Successfully Treated with Oral Anticoagulation: A Case Report

Background

The use of anticoagulation is mandatory for prevention of prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) worldwide, regardless of the valve type or position in the heart. In case a thrombosis causes symptomatic dysfunction, treatment usually includes the use of thrombolytic therapy or surgery. We report a case of PVT involving a patient with a mechanical aortic valve which was treated entirely with the use of anticoagulation therapy (warfarin).

Case Presentation

A 58-year-old man had an aortic valve replacement using a Carbomedics® mechanical valve due to severe aortic stenosis as a result of a calcific bicuspid native aortic valve. He was commenced on warfarin after surgery which was continued thereafter. He presented to our hospital after three years with shortness of breath at rest. On clinical examination, his condition was poor with a New York Heart Association functional classification of IV. He was in sinus rhythm and had an enlarged heart shadow on chest X-ray. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed aortic valve regurgitation with vegetations on the anterior valve leaflet causing reduced hemi leaflet motility and a mean pressure gradient of 50 mmHg. Cinefluoroscopy revealed a dysfunctional mechanical valve leaflet. Surgery was at high risk of mortality due to the patient's clinical status and he was continued on warfarin therapy with close monitoring. Cinefluoroscopy and echocardiography done six months later revealed complete dissolution of thrombus and a normally functioning mechanical aortic valve.

Conclusion

Only a few cases of symptomatic, thrombotic mechanical aortic valve were entirely treated with anticoagulation only. Our patient is one such case who had resolution of symptoms and improvement on NYHA functional classification (IV to I).

Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario

PURPOSE

Valvular heart disease (VHD) patients after prosthetic valve implantation are at risk of thromboembolic events. Follow-up care of patients with prosthetic valve has a paramount role in reducing the morbidity and mortality. Currently, in India, there is quintessential need to stream line the follow-up care of prosthetic valve patients. This mandates the development of a consensus guideline for the antithrombotic therapy in VHD patients post prosthetic valve implantation.

METHODS

A national level panel was constituted comprising 13 leading cardio care experts in India who thoroughly reviewed the up to date literature, formulated the recommendations, and developed the consensus document. Later on, extensive discussions were held on this draft and the recommendations in 8 regional meetings involving 79 additional experts from the cardio care in India, to arrive at a consensus. The final consensus document is developed relying on the available evidence and/or majority consensus from all the meetings.

RESULTS

The panel recommended vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy with individualized target international normalized ratio (INR) in VHD patients after prosthetic valve implantation. The panel opined that management of prosthetic valve complications should be personalized on the basis of type of complications. In addition, the panel recommends to distinguish individuals with various co-morbidities and attend them appropriately.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulant therapy with VKA seems to be an effective option post prosthetic valve implantation in VHD patients. However, the role for non-VKA oral therapy in prosthetic valve patients and the safety and efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic valve need to be studied extensively.

Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis in the Acute Phase of the Stroke: Relevance of Detection and Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Stroke may be the first symptom of prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT); therefore, rapid diagnosis and therapy are crucial. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, main predictors, and long-term clinical evolution of patients with PVT in the acute phase of stroke.

METHODS

We studied consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with prosthetic heart valves who underwent emergent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during a 5-year period. Two groups were defined depending on the presence of PVT (PVT or non-PVT groups). Baseline characteristics, TEE findings, and international normalized ratios (INRs) at the stroke event were registered. Follow-up visits and TEE control examinations were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were registered. TEE was performed within the first week in 85% of patients (n = 57). PVT was diagnosed in 41.8% of cases (n = 28). Clinical severity and baseline INR level showed no differences when the PVT and non-PVT groups were compared. The presence of PVT was associated with the mitral valve location as compared with the aortic valve location (75% versus 25%, P = .003), the presence of spontaneous echocontrast (64.3% versus 35.9%, P = .022), and low ejection fraction (66.7% versus 32.7%, P = .019). The PVT group showed a trend toward higher percentage of recurrence (10.7% versus 2.5%, P = .102) in the follow up period (mean follow-up 25 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of PVT in the acute stroke phase was relevant, as the stroke recurrence rate was considerable. Therefore, all patients with prosthetic heart valve should undergo emergent TEE.