Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new second-generation TAVI system - J-Valve™ for high-risk patients with aortic valve diseases: Initial results with 90-day follow-up

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic regurgitation using the J-Valve system: A midterm follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established intervention for severe aortic valve stenosis. However, its application for severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is still under evaluation. This study aims to present the 3-year follow-up outcomes of the J-Valve system in managing severe AR.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term efficacy and durability of the J-Valve system in the treatment of severe AR and to provide new information on this intervention.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, we evaluated the prognostic outcomes of patients with AR, who underwent treatment with the J-Valve system at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Consecutive patients who were treated with the J-Valve were included in the analysis. The study focused on the echocardiographic follow-up to assess the effectiveness and durability of the J-Valve system in managing AR.

RESULTS

From January 2018 to December 2022, 36 high-risk AR patients treated with the J-Valve system had a procedural success rate of 97.2%, with one case requiring open-heart surgery due to valve displacement. Significant improvements were observed in left ventricular diameter (from 63.50 [58.75-69.50] mm to 56.50 [53.00-60.50] mm, p < 0.001) and left atrial diameter (from 44.00 [40.00-45.25] mm to 39.00 [36.75-41.00] mm, p = 0.003) postsurgery. All patients completed the 1-year follow-up, with an overall mortality rate of 2 out of 36 (5.6%). Among the surviving patients, there was one case of III° atrioventricular block and one case of stroke, both occurring within 90 days postsurgery. After a 3-year follow-up, 15.0% of patients had mild or moderate valvular regurgitation, with no cases of moderate or severe paravalvular leak. Additionally, 89.5% of patients were classified as New York Heart Association class I or II, showing significantly enhanced cardiac function.

CONCLUSION

The J-Valve system has shown positive therapeutic outcomes in treating AR, with notable effectiveness in managing the condition and significant improvements in heart failure symptoms and cardiac remodeling. However, due to the limited sample size and partial follow-up data, it is important to emphasize the need for further research with comprehensive long-term follow-up, to fully validate these results.

A Novel System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: First-in-Man Study

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a therapeutic treatment for severe symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. This study aimed to test a novel transcatheter aortic self-expandable bioprosthesis-the ScienCrown system (Lepu Medtech Inc., Beijing, China)-and evaluate the safety of the new device during TAVI. ScienCrown aortic valve implantation was performed on 10 patients. Clinical assessment was performed at baseline, post procedure, and after 1 year. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were assessed according to Valvular Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. The mean age was 75.30 ± 4.78 years with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 4.64 ± 3.23%. Device success was achieved in all patients (80% transfemoral, 20% transapical). After 1 year, there were no deaths, disabling strokes, myocardial infarctions, conversions to surgery, or major procedure-related complications. New pacemaker implantation was required in one patient (10%). ScienCrown implantation resulted in a reduction in mean valve gradient (63.00 ± 18.84 to 9.67 ± 4.97 mm Hg, p <0.001) and an increase in effective orifice area (0.57 ± 0.20 to 2.57 ± 0.59 cm2, p <0.001) at 1 year. Paravalvular leak was absent in 9 patients (90%), and there was a trace in one patient (10%). All patients were in New York Heart Association class I to II at a mean follow-up of 1 year. The experience showed that ScienCrown transcatheter aortic valve system was safely and successfully implanted for treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The newer-generation device affords a stable implantation while providing optimal hemodynamic performance.

Innovative use of a self-expanding valve for valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement: experience from a four-year single-center study

Background

Valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (ViV-TMVR) is a minimally invasive option for patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve failure. Since January 2019, our center has been using a new innovative option, J-Valve, to treat patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve failure who were at high risk for open heart surgery. The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness and safety of J-Valve and report the results from the four-year follow-up period of the innovative application of the transcatheter valve.

Methods

Patients who underwent the ViV-TMVR procedure between January 2019 and September 2022 in our center were included in the study. J-Valve™ system (JC Medical Inc., Suzhou, China) with three U-shape grippers was used for ViV-TMVR via transapical approach. Data on survival, complications, transthoracic echocardiographic results, New York Heart Association functional class in heart failure, and patient-reported health-related quality of life according to the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) were collected during the four-year follow up.

Results

Thirty-three patients (mean age 70.1 ± 1.1 years, 13 men) were included and received ViV-TMVR. The surgery success rate was 97%: only one patient was converted to open-heart surgery due to intraoperative valve embolization to the left ventricle. During the first 30 days all-cause mortality was 0%, risk of stroke 2.5% and risk of mild paravalvular leak 15.2%; mitral valve hemodynamics improved (179.7 ± 8.9 at 30 days vs. 269 ± 49 cm/s at baseline, p < 0.0001). Median time from operation to discharge was six days, and there were no readmissions within 30 days from operation. The median and maximum follow-up durations were 28 and 47 months, respectively; during the entire follow-up, all-cause mortality was 6.1%, and the risk of cerebral infarction 6.1%. Cox regression analysis did not identify any variables significantly associated with survival. The New York Heart Association functional class and the KCCQ-12 score improved significantly compared with their preoperative values.

Conclusion

The use of J-Valve for ViV-TMVR is safe and effective with a high success rate, low mortality and very few associated complications, representing an alternative surgical strategy for the elderly, high-risk patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve failure.

Emergently Alteration of Procedural Strategy During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to Prevent Coronary Occlusion: A Case Report

Background

Coronary occlusion is an uncommon but fatal complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a poor prognosis.

Case Presentation

A patient with symptomatic severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis was admitted to a high-volume center specializing in transfemoral TAVR with self-expanding valves. No anatomical risk factors of coronary occlusion were identified on pre-procedural computed tomography analysis. The patient was scheduled for a transfemoral TAVR with a self-expanding valve. Balloon pre-dilatation prior to prosthesis implantation was routinely used for assessing the supra-annular structure and assessing the risk of coronary occlusion. Immediately after the tubular balloon inflation, fluoroscopy revealed that the right coronary artery was not visible, and the flow in the left coronary artery was reduced. The patient would be at high-risk of coronary occlusion if a long stent self-expanding valve was implanted. Therefore, our heart team decided to suspend the ongoing procedure. A transapical TAVR with a 23 mm J-valve was performed 3 days later. The prosthesis was deployed at a proper position without blocking the coronary ostia and the final fluoroscopy showed normal flow in bilateral coronary arteries with the same filling as preoperatively.

Discussion

Our successful case highlights the importance of a comprehensive assessment of coronary risk and a thorough understanding of the TAVR procedure for the heart team. A short-stent prosthesis is feasible for patients at high risk of coronary occlusion. Most importantly TAVR should be called off even if the catheter has been introduced when an extremely high risk of coronary obstruction is identified during the procedure and no solution can be found.

30-Day Outcomes after Surgical or Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement in Symptomatic Aortic Regurgitation

Background: We aimed to analyze the short-term clinical outcomes of transapical aortic valve replacement (TA-TAVR) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in symptomatic aortic regurgitation (AR) patients to draw preliminary conclusions about the advantages and disadvantages of TA-TAVR compared with SAVR and to provide evidence for future use of TA-TAVR in AR patients. Method: From September 2016 to September 2021, 69 patients undergoing TA-TAVR with J-valve implantation and 42 patients undergoing SAVR at the Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were analyzed for clinical data and 30-day follow-up outcomes to analyze and compare the differences in clinical endpoints between the two procedures. Results: At 30-day follow-up, there were no significant differences in mortality or neurological events between the two groups before and after the PSM. In secondary endpoints there were significant differences between the pre-match TAVR and SAVR groups, such as the incidence of paravalvular leaks (33.8% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.05), which also remained after the PSM (37.5% vs. 0, p < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of major bleeding was 7.4% in the TAVR group and 26.2% in the SAVR group before matching (p < 0.05). After matching, the statistical difference still remained. In longitudinal comparison, significant improvements in postoperative cardiac ultrasound indices and NYHA classification occurred in both groups. Conclusion: The TA-TAVR approach is safe and reliable, with similar clinical efficacy to SAVR, and has advantages in bleeding rate and speed of recovery.

An Update on New Generation Transcatheter Aortic Valves and Delivery Systems

Over the last 15 years, the management of aortic valve disease has been changed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement, which has become the standard of care across the entire spectrum of surgical risk. As a result of continuous evolution of this technique, several next-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) have been developed to minimize procedural complications and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to provide an update on the new generation THVs and delivery systems.

Transcatheter Heart Valves: A Biomaterials Perspective

Heart valve disease is prevalent throughout the world, and the number of heart valve replacements is expected to increase rapidly in the coming years. Transcatheter heart valve replacement (THVR) provides a safe and minimally invasive means for heart valve replacement in high-risk patients. The latest clinical data demonstrates that THVR is a practical solution for low-risk patients. Despite these promising results, there is no long-term (>20 years) durability data on transcatheter heart valves (THVs), raising concerns about material degeneration and long-term performance. This review presents a detailed account of the materials development for THVRs. It provides a brief overview of THVR, the native valve properties, the criteria for an ideal THV, and how these devices are tested. A comprehensive review of materials and their applications in THVR, including how these materials are fabricated, prepared, and assembled into THVs is presented, followed by a discussion of current and future THVR biomaterial trends. The field of THVR is proliferating, and this review serves as a guide for understanding the development of THVs from a materials science and engineering perspective.

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation for predominant aortic regurgitation with a self-expandable valve

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the gold standard for high-risk severe aortic stenosis. However, the experience of treating aortic regurgitation (AR) with this technology is still limited. Previously, we have demonstrated excellent 1-year outcomes of transapical TAVI with J-Valve^TM (JieCheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) in treating predominant AR, while the mid-term outcomes up to 4 years have never been reported.

Methods

Transapical TAVI with J-Valve^TM to treat predominant AR was performed in 47 patients in Zhongshan Hospital from May 2014 through October 2018. Procedural and clinical outcomes with follow-up up to 4 years were analyzed using Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria (VARC-2).

Results

All patients (age 73.7±7.9 years) were considered to be prohibitive or high-risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, 21.1% to 44.4%; mean, 24.3%±5.1%) after evaluated by a multidisciplinary heart team. Transapical implantations were successful in all patients. The clinical outcomes of the entire cohort in the latest follow-up (371 to 1,968 days, median 574 days) included all-cause mortality (6.4%), disabling stroke (2.3%), new permanent pacemaker (6.8%) and valve-related re-intervention (0). Paravalvular leak (PVL) was rate as none or trace in 37 of 44 and mild in 7 of 44 patients at the latest follow-up. Mean transvalvular gradient was favorable after valve implantation during follow-up at 9.3±2.5 mmHg.

Conclusions

This study revealed that, transapical TAVI with J-Valve^TM for treating AR has encouraging mid-term outcomes, and the advantages at one year demonstrated in previous study can be maintained through 4 years.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for pure aortic valve regurgitation: "on-label" versus "off-label" use of TAVR devices

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the mainstay of treatment for aortic stenosis in patients with high surgical risk. Pure aortic regurgitation (PAR) is considered a relative contraindication for TAVR; however, TAVR is increasingly performed in PAR patients with unfavorable risk profile. Herein, we aim to summarize available data on TAVR for PAR with special emphasis on "on-label" versus "off-label" TAVR devices.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pubmed was searched for studies of patients undergoing TAVR for PAR. Primary outcome was 30 day-mortality. Pooled estimated event rates were calculated. Twelve studies including a total of 640 patients were identified until December 2017. Among these, 208 (33%) patients were treated with devices with CE-mark approval for PAR ("on-label"; JenaValve and J valve). Overall, the procedural success rate was 89.9% (95% CI 81.1-96.1%; I² 80%). Major bleeding was reported in 6.4% (95% CI 2.9-10.8%; I² 48%). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 10.4% (95% CI 7.1-14.2%; I² 20%). Stroke occurred in 2.2% (95% CI 0.9-3.9%; I² 0%). A permanent pacemaker was required in 10.7% (95% CI 7.3-14.6%; I² 23%). At 30 days after TAVR, ≥ moderate AR post-interventional was observed in 11.5% (95% CI 2.9-23.6%; I² 90%). In the "on-label"-group, success rate was 93.0% (95% CI 85.9-98.1%; I² 52%). 30-day-mortality was 9.1% (95% CI 3.7-16.0%; I² 36%). More than trace AR was present in 2.8% (95% CI 0.1-7.6%; I² 0%). Compared to first-generation devices, second-generation devices were associated with significantly lower 30-day-mortality (r = - 0.10; p = 0.02), and significantly higher procedural success rates (r = 0.28; p < 0.001). Compared to other second-generation devices, the use of J valve or JenaValve was not associated with altered mortality (r = 0.04; p = 0.50), rates of > trace residual AR (r = - 0.05; p = 0.65) but with a significantly higher procedural success (r = 0.15; p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Based on this summary of available observational data TAVR for PAR is feasible and safe in patients deemed inoperable. First-generation TAVR devices are associated with inferior outcome and should be avoided. The "on-label" use of PAR-certified TAVR devices is associated with a significantly higher procedural success rate and might be favorable compared to other second-generation devices.

Changes in left ventricular function in patients with aortic regurgitation 12 months after transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for high surgical risk aortic stenosis patients; in recent years, it has also been used in patients with pure/dominant aortic regurgitation (AR). This study aimed to determine the impact of transapical TAVI on left ventricle myocardial mechanics in AR patients. Thirty AR patients (70% men; mean age, 72.8 ± 4.3 years) were enrolled. Conventional echocardiography was performed on all patients before and 12 months after TAVI. Three-dimensional speckle tracking was accomplished in 20 AR patients for the evaluation of global longitudinal strain, global circumferential strain, twist, torsion, apical rotation and basal rotation. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), twist, torsion and apical rotation were impaired in AR patients compared with controls. Mean left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter (from 62.9 ± 7.3 to 52.0 ± 6.8 mm, p < 0.001), LV end-diastolic volume (from 199.4 ± 55.0 to 130.1 ± 48.9 mL, p < 0.001), and LV mass index (179.8 ± 52.2-134.4 ± 42.5 g/m², p = 0.001) decreased 12 months after TAVI. Interestingly, GLS (from - 17.2 ± 3.2 to - 18.9 ± 3.7, p = 0.007) and GCS (from - 23.9 ± 4.9 to - 25.7 ± 5.0, p = 0.008) improved significantly, but LVEF did not significantly improve. In terms of the rotational mechanics, twist, rotation and basal rotation remained almost unchanged, whereas apical rotation (from 7.4 ± 4.0 to 5.5 ± 3.9, p = 0.009) was significantly impaired after transapical TAVI. Our results indicate that LV function was improved in terms of myocardial deformation but worsened in terms of apical rotation 12 months after TAVI in AR patients. Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography appears to be a sensitive method for detecting subtle cardiac remodeling after TAVI.

A versatile transapical device for aortic valvular disease: One-year outcomes of a multicenter study on the J-Valve system

BACKGROUND

The novel J-Valve (JC Medical Inc, Burlingame, CA, USA) was developed to cope with aortic valvular disease by facilitating accurate positioning. We present the first one-year results regarding the safety and efficacy of the J-Valve system implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic regurgitation (AR) undergoing transapical-transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study enrolled 107 high-risk patients (mean age 74.4 ± 5.2 years; mean EuroSCORE-I 11.2 ± 1.2%) with severe AS (n = 64) or AR (n = 43), at the three largest cardiac centers in China. The study was fully monitored, and adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee using Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria.

RESULTS

The success rate of the procedure was 91.6% (98/107). At 1 year, the all-cause mortality was 5.0%, stroke 2%, and rate of new pacemakers 5.0%. Only mild paravalvular leak was reported. Among the patients with AS, the 1-year follow-up demonstrated a sustainable reduction of mean transaortic gradient from 57.7 ± 15.4 mmHg to 15.5 ± 8.3 mmHg. All patients who completed the follow-up reported improvements in New York Heart Association functional class (n = 93) and health-related quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire index (n = 94). In intergroup comparisons, the 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events-free survival was similar between the groups based on valve disease (AS vs. AR, log-rank p = 0.17) or morphology (tricuspid vs. bicuspid aortic valve, log-rank p = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides further evidence on the safety and efficacy of the J-Valve in high-risk patients with AS or AR for surgery.

The first transapical transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation using the J-valve system into a failed biophysio aortic prosthesis in a patient with high risk of coronary obstruction

We report the first successful valve-in-valve (ViV) implantation into a failed Edwards Biophysio surgical prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) and also the first use of the J-Valve system (Jie Cheng Medical Technologies, Suzhou, China) in a ViV configuration. A 77-year old male had symptomatic severe aortic stenosis secondary to failure of a 25 mm Biophysio bioprosthetic valve implanted 11 years previously, along with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed calcified leaflets, a mean aortic gradient of 50 mm Hg, and an estimated valve area of 0.9 cm² with no aortic insufficiency. The patient had low coronary ostial height with the right coronary artery arising only 8.5 mm from the valve annulus and the left main coronary artery arising only 9.4 mm from the valve annulus. Risk of coronary ostial obstruction was especially concerning in context of both the patient's extremely low coronary ostial height and the unique structure of the Biophysio valve. Under general anesthesia, transapical transcatheter aortic ViV implantation with a 25 mm J-Valve was performed in a hybrid operating room. The J-Valve prosthesis was deployed in the 25 mm Biophysio surgical valve without difficulty or complications. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient was discharged home after 3 days. TTE at 1 year showed a mean aortic valve gradient of 14 mm Hg, and no aortic insufficiency. This case demonstrated that J-Valve implantation may be a new option for patients at high risk for coronary obstruction.

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation with a second-generation heart valve

OBJECTIVE

To report on the Chinese multicenter study of the J-Valve transcatheter heart valve for treatment of predominant aortic regurgitation.

METHODS

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the J-Valve for treating high-risk severe aortic regurgitation was performed in 43 patients in 3 Chinese centers. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-OPC-15006354). Procedural results and clinical outcomes up to 1-year were analyzed using Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria.

RESULTS

All patients (mean age, 73.9 ± 5.7 years) were considered at prohibitive or high risk for surgical valve replacement (logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, 20.0% to 44.4%; mean, 25.5% ± 5.3%) after evaluation by an interdisciplinary heart team. Transapical implantation was successful in 42 patients (97.7%). The 1-year outcomes included all-cause mortality (4.7%), disabling stroke (2.3%), new permanent pacemaker (4.7%), and valve-related reintervention (7.0%). At the 1-year follow-up, postprocedural paravalvular regurgitation was none/trace in 30 of 39 patients and mild in 8 of 39 patients, and the mean transvalvular gradient after valve implantation was favorable at 10.4 ± 4.5 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

After an initial demonstration of feasibility, this multicenter study shows that the J-Valve transcatheter heart valve system is a reasonable option for patients with predominant aortic regurgitation.