Cardiac MRI-based multi-modality imaging in clinical decision-making: Preliminary assessment of a management algorithm for patients with suspected cardiac mass

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Predict Cardiac Mass Malignancy: The CMR Mass Score

BACKGROUND

Multimodality imaging is currently suggested for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac masses. The identification of cardiac masses' malignant nature is essential to guide proper treatment. We aimed to develop a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived model including mass localization, morphology, and tissue characterization to predict malignancy (with histology as gold standard), to compare its accuracy versus the diagnostic echocardiographic mass score, and to evaluate its prognostic ability.

METHODS

Observational cohort study of 167 consecutive patients undergoing comprehensive echocardiogram and CMR within 1-month time interval for suspected cardiac mass. A definitive diagnosis was achieved by histological examination or, in the case of cardiac thrombi, by histology or radiological resolution after adequate anticoagulation treatment. Logistic regression was performed to assess CMR-derived independent predictors of malignancy, which were included in a predictive model to derive the CMR mass score. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to investigate the prognostic ability of predictors.

RESULTS

In CMR, mass morphological features (non-left localization, sessile, polylobate, inhomogeneity, infiltration, and pericardial effusion) and mass tissue characterization features (first-pass perfusion and heterogeneity enhancement) were independent predictors of malignancy. The CMR mass score (range, 0-8 and cutoff, ≥5), including sessile appearance, polylobate shape, infiltration, pericardial effusion, first-pass contrast perfusion, and heterogeneity enhancement, showed excellent accuracy in predicting malignancy (areas under the curve, 0.976 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]), significantly higher than diagnostic echocardiographic mass score (areas under the curve, 0.932; P=0.040). The agreement between the diagnostic echocardiographic mass and CMR mass scores was good (κ=0.66). A CMR mass score of ≥5 predicted a higher risk of all-cause death (P<0.001; hazard ratio, 5.70) at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A CMR-derived model, including mass morphology and tissue characterization, showed excellent accuracy, superior to echocardiography, in predicting cardiac masses malignancy, with prognostic implications.

MRI and CT Appearances in Various Cardiac Tumours

While primary cardiac malignancies are infrequent, the heart often serves as a site for metastases. Myxomas are recognized as among the most prevalent primary benign tumours globally, while sarcomas represent the most common malignant primary tumours. The diverse range of potential clinical presentations depends on factors such as location, size, and the aggressiveness of the disease. The majority of diagnoses rely on medical imaging, making it crucial to familiarize oneself with their distinctive characteristics. When a cardiac mass is suspected, MRI of the heart has emerged as the preferred diagnostic method, surpassing previous techniques. CT is a valuable tool for assessing cardiac morphology and improving electrocardiography gating by providing enhanced details. This article conducts a comprehensive review of the MRI and CT characteristics of both primary and secondary cardiac malignancies, emphasizing crucial distinctions and common diagnostic pitfalls. Despite their rarity, cardiac masses continue to hold significance in the realm of cardio-oncology. Furthermore, this article explores conditions such as thrombus, Lambl's excrescences, and pericardial cysts, which can mimic tumours. Multimodal imaging has played a pivotal role in identifying the origin of cardiac masses in numerous cases, particularly when combined with the clinical context. This article offers an in-depth examination of the frequency, clinical indicators, imaging, diagnostic procedures, available treatments, and prognoses related to cardiac masses.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Versus Histopathologic Study for Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Cardiac Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The gold standard for diagnosis of cardiac tumours is histopathological examination. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a valuable non-invasive, radiation-free tool for identifying and characterizing cardiac tumours. Our aim is to understand CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours by distinguishing benign vs. malignant tumours compared to the gold standard.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to December 2022, and the results were reviewed by 2 independent investigators. Studies reporting CMR diagnosis were included in a meta-analysis, and pooled measures were obtained. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tools from the National Institutes of Health.

RESULTS

A total of 2,321 results was obtained; 10 studies were eligible, including one identified by citation search. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis, which presented a pooled sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 94%, a diagnostic odds ratio of 185, and an area under the curve of 0.98 for CMR diagnosis of benign vs. malignant tumours. Additionally, 4 studies evaluated whether CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours matched specific histopathological subtypes, with 73.6% achieving the correct diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published systematic review on CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours. Compared to histopathological results, the ability to discriminate benign from malignant tumours was good but not outstanding. However, significant heterogeneity may have had an impact on our findings.

Multimodality imaging to distinguish between benign and malignant cardiac masses

BACKGROUND

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of CMR and FDG-PET/CT and their complementary role to distinguish benign vs malignant cardiac masses.

METHODS

Retrospectively assessed patients with cardiac mass who underwent CMR and FDG-PET/CT within a month between 2003 and 2018.

RESULTS

72 patients who had CMR and FDG-PET/CT were included. 25 patients (35%) were diagnosed with benign and 47 (65%) were diagnosed with malignant masses. 56 patients had histological correlation: 9 benign and 47 malignant masses. CMR and FDG-PET/CT had a high accuracy in differentiating benign vs malignant masses, with the presence of CMR features demonstrating a higher sensitivity (98%), while FDG uptake with SUVmax/blood pool ≥ 3.0 demonstrating a high specificity (88%). Combining multiple (> 4) CMR features and FDG uptake (SUVmax/blood pool ratio ≥ 3.0) yielded a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 88% to diagnose malignant masses. Over a mean follow-up of 2.6 years (IQR 0.3-3.8 years), risk-adjusted mortality were highest among patients with an infiltrative border on CMR (adjusted HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5-6.5; P = .002) or focal extracardiac FDG uptake (adjusted HR 3.8; 95% CI 1.9-7.7; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although CMR and FDG-PET/CT can independently diagnose benign and malignant masses, the combination of these modalities provides complementary value in select cases.

Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET for characterisation of cardiac masses compared to conventional imaging techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The present systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic performance of F-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and conventional imaging, including MRI, echocardiography, and CT, in characterising cardiac masses.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for studies comparing the diagnostic accuracies of 18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging in characterising cardiac masses, from inception of indexing to 31 July 2020, was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess study quality. Sensitivity and specificity across the studies were determined, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-, respectively) were calculated, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed.

RESULTS

Of six included studies (n = 212 patients), 18F-FDG PET demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80-0.94). LR syntheses yielded an overall LR+ of 7.9 (95% CI 4.3-14.6) and LR- of 0.12 (95% CI 0.07-0.22). The calculated pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 64 (95% CI 23-181). For conventional imaging, the pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.81) and the pooled specificity was 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.98). LR syntheses yielded an overall LR+ of 16.1 (95% CI 5.8-44.5) and LR- of 0.31 (95% CI 0.21-0.46). The evaluated pooled DOR was 52 (95% CI 17-155).

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracies for the characterisation of cardiac masses. Further large multicentre studies are, however, required to corroborate the diagnostic performances of 18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for the characterisation of cardiac masses.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

No previous studies have comprehensively analysed the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional imaging techniques including echocardiography, CT, and MRI. According to the current study, 18F-FDG PET/CT yielded a pooled DOR of 64, whereas other conventional imaging techniques demonstrated a DOR of 52. As such, 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated sensitivity and specificity, with a high pooled DOR comparable with other conventional imaging modalities.

Cutting-Edge Imaging of Cardiac Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors: Lesson from a Case Series

With the increasing availability of high-performance medical imaging for the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), a progressive growth of asymptomatic and incidentally detected cardiac metastases (CMs) has been observed in the recent years. In clinical practice, CMs of NENs are often incidentally detected by whole-body 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs or 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and afterwards accurately characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and/or gated cardiac computed tomography when CMR is contraindicated or not available. The interpreting physician should familiarize with the main imaging features of CM, a finding that may be encountered in NETs patients more than previously thought. Herein, we present a case series of four patients with CMs from small-intestine NETs highlighting strengths and weaknesses of a multimodality imaging approach in clinical practice.

[Cardiac MRI today]

Since its beginning, 30 years ago, magnetic resonance imaging of the heart made tremendous progress. Starting from an almost experimental level in the 90 s it has now become a routine tool within cardiac diagnostics. This article presents a selection of present applications of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Besides it superiority in determining mass and volumes of the heart, structural imaging of myocardial tissue has become the domain of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. This implies detection and quantification of scars and fibrosis, inflammatory and infiltrative processes in myocarditis and amyloidosis, and characterization of cardiac tumors. Perfusion imaging allows detection of ischemia, and measurement of blood flow quantifies cardiac shunts and valve disorders. In combination with Positron Emission Tomography, the relationship of molecular/cellular processes and functional, microstructural alterations become visible in myocarditis and amyloidosis. Recent contraindications of cMRI/MRI as cardiac devices MRI have been resolved; however, image quality of the heart is still a challenge.

Differential and prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived scoring algorithm in cardiac tumors

OBJECTIVES

To establish a scoring algorithm based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters for differentiating between benign and malignant cardiac tumors and for predicting outcome.

METHODS

Patients referred for CMR for suspected cardiac tumors were prospectively enrolled. Tumors were categorized as benign or malignant based on pathology, imaging, and clinical information. The CMR protocol included cine, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, first-pass perfusion, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Variables independently associated with malignancy in the multivariable logistic analysis were used to construct the scoring algorithm, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to assess the ability to discriminate malignant from benign tumors. The ability of the score to predict outcome (all-cause mortality) was also assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 105 enrolled patients, 74 had benign and 31 had malignant tumors. In multivariable analysis, the independent predictors of malignant tumors were invasiveness (odds ratio, OR = 11.4, 2 points), irregular border (OR = 5.8, 1 point), and heterogenous LGE (OR 10.6, 2 points). The area under curves (AUC) of the scoring algorithm was 0.912 (cut-off score of 5) and showed significantly higher AUCs than individual variables (all P < 0.05) in differentiating benign and malignant tumors. After median follow-up of 18.2 months, mortality was significantly higher in patients with a score of 5 than in patients with score ≤ 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring algorithm based on CMR-detected invasiveness, irregularity of border, and heterogenous LGE is an effective method for differentiating malignant from benign cardiac tumors and for predicting outcome.

Masses in right side of the heart: spectrum of imaging findings

Primary heart tumors are rare, benign tumors represent the majority of these. If a cardiac mass is found, the probability that it is a metastasis or a so-called “pseudo-mass” is extremely higher than a primary tumor. The detection of a heart mass during a transthoracic echocardiography (TE) is often unexpected. The TE assessment can be difficult, particularly if the mass is located at the level of the right chambers. Cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT) can be useful in anatomical evaluation and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) for masses characterization as well. We provide an overview of right cardiac masses and their imaging futures. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Combined PET/CT with thoracic contrast-enhanced CT in assessment of primary cardiac tumors in adult patients

Background

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a key molecular imaging modality to noninvasively assess and differentiate benign and malignant cardiac tumors. However, few benign cardiac tumors can be characterized by increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, which makes differential diagnosis difficult. This study sought to retrospectively evaluate whether combined ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT with thoracic contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) helps in assessing primary cardiac tumors in adult patients, compared with CECT or PET/CT alone.

Methods

Forty-six consecutive patients who were diagnosed as primary cardiac tumors were enrolled. All patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT followed by thoracic CECT before biopsy or surgery. Visual qualitative interpretation and quantitative analysis were performed, and diagnostic performance was evaluated.

Results

More than half (16/29) of benign tumors exhibited with mild ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. There were significant differences in ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and the degree of absolute enhancement between benign and malignant tumors (P < 0.001). The combination of two modalities improved the specificity from 79 to 93%, the positive predictive value from 73 to 89%, and the accuracy of diagnosis from 85 to 93%. There were significant differences between PET/CT alone or thoracic CECT alone and combined modalities (P = 0.034 and P = 0.026, respectively). The combination with the optimal SUVmax cutoff value generated 94% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 97% negative predictive values, 100% positive predictive values, and 98% accuracy rates.

Conclusions

Combining ¹⁸F-FDG PET/C with thoracic CECT significantly improved specificity and accuracy compared to CECT or PET/CT alone in detecting tumors. This combination of diagnostic imaging is effective in differentiating malignant from benign masses.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Computed Tomography and 18-F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cardiac Masses

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography (CT) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in defining the nature of cardiac masses.

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in identifying the nature of cardiac masses has been analyzed to date only in small samples.

METHODS

Of 223 patients with echocardiographically diagnosed cardiac masses, a cohort of 60 cases who underwent cardiac CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was selected. All masses had histological confirmation, except for a minority of thrombotic formations. For each mass, 8 morphological CT signs, standardized uptake value (SUV_max, SUV_mean), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis in ¹⁸F-FDG PET were used as diagnostic markers.

RESULTS

Irregular tumor margins, pericardial effusion, invasion, solid nature, mass diameter, CT contrast uptake, and pre-contrast characteristics were strongly associated with the malignant nature of masses. The coexistence of at least 5 CT signs perfectly identified malignant masses, whereas the detection of 3 or 4 CT signs did not accurately discriminate the masses' nature. The mean SUV_max, SUV_mean, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis values were significantly higher in malignant than in benign masses. The diagnostic accuracy of SUV, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters was excellent in detecting malignant masses. Among patients with 3 or 4 pathological CT signs, the presence of at least 1 abnormal ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameter significantly increased the identification of malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac CT is a powerful tool to diagnose cardiac masses as the number of abnormal signs was found to correlate with the lesions' nature. Similarly, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT accurately identified malignant masses and contributed with additional valuable information in diagnostic uncertainties after cardiac CT. These imaging tools should be performed in specific clinical settings such as involvement of great vessels or for disease-staging purposes.

A Multimodal Approach to Evaluate for Cardiac Metastasis in a Case of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Malignancies have demonstrated the ability to metastasize to cardiac tissue. However, an optimal diagnostic algorithm for cardiac tumors has not yet been established, due at least in part to the scarcity of symptomatic cases. Several case reports describe how the usage of ¹⁸F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) incidentally revealed cardiac neoplasia. This modality, which indicates uptake sites of the radioisotope ¹⁸F-FDG, allows for whole-body imaging and is often used for preoperative determination of malignant metastasis or for assessing response to therapy over time. However, findings of false positivity are often reported due to increased FDG avidity caused by a range of other, nonmetastatic processes, most notably inflammation and infection. In this case report, an 84-year-old male with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer presented a clinical course, echocardiogram, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT findings that were suggestive of endocardial metastasis. Nine months into therapy, after extensive consultation, the patient finally consented to a more complete workup using cardiac MRI (CMRI), which showed no evidence of cardiac metastasis. This case report supports the utility of CMRI as a means of further interpreting intracardiac, localized FDG uptake foci in PET-CT findings, in order to avoid false positivity and further refine proposed cardiac differential diagnoses in cancer patients.

Maneuvering the Management of a Rare Case of Primary Undifferentiated Cardiac Sarcoma

BACKGROUND Primary cardiac tumors are rare and mostly benign. Cardiac sarcomas are the most common malignant neoplasms of the heart and harbor a dismal prognosis of 6 to 12 months. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcomas may be challenging. Treatment entails surgical resection despite the high rate of recurrence, as well as adjuvant chemotherapy. CASE REPORT In this report, we discuss a case of a 58-year-old male with undifferentiated pleomorphic primary cardiac sarcomas who received multiple lines of treatment that included surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy and was alive more than 4 years after his diagnosis. Herein, we discuss the different treatment regimens utilized and we present detailed imaging of his case findings at different treatment stages. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic cardiac sarcoma requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgery and adjuvant treatment are commonly utilized, while neoadjuvant treatment is under investigation.

Cardiac tumors prevalence and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac tumors and their associated outcomes are poorly characterized. This study sought to comprehensively assess the epidemiology and natural history of primary and secondary malignant cardiac tumors (PMCT and SMCT), a well as establish predictors of mortality.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify articles reporting on PMCTs and SMCTs. The prevalence of important cardiac tumor (CT) subtypes was evaluated and further stratified based on the continental region. Outcomes of interest included short- and long-term mortality and utilization of heart transplantation (HTX). A random effect model was adopted, and a meta-regression was performed to determine predictors of the prevalence of CTs as well as predictors of operative mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 1,226 retrieved articles, 74 were included in our study (n = 8,849 patients). The mean follow-up was 2.27 years, mean age was 42.9 years, and 55% of the patients were females. There was a total number of 7,484 benign primary cardiac tumors (PCTs) (5,140 were myxoma), 862 (9.7%) malignant PCTs, and 355 secondary cardiac tumors. The prevalence of PMCTs among PCTs was 10.83% [95%CI = 09.11; 12.83%] with a trend towards being lower in South America compared to other continents (Prevalence = 5.80%). The prevalence of HTX among all patients was 2.45% [1.36; 4.38%]. The pooled short-term mortality was 5.90% [4.70; 7.39%] and the incidence of late mortality in all CTs, benign CT and PMCTs was 2.55% [1.76; 3.72%], 0.79% [0.46; 1.37%] and 14.77% [9.32; 23.40%], respectively. On meta-regression, the annual volume of cardiac tumor cases per center was the only predictor of lower early mortality (Beta = -0.14 ± 0.03, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PMCTs represent the minority of PCT (~10%) and have a higher prevalence in Europe and North America. Survival is higher in benign pathology and is significantly improved by treatment in specialized high-volume centers. Approximately 2% of patients with CTs undergo heart transplantation.

The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating the nature of cardiac masses: A systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Cardiac masses are rare, but lead to high risk of stroke and death. Because of the different treatment methods, it is significant for clinicians to differentiate the nature of masses. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has high intrinsic soft-tissue contrast and high spatial and temporal resolution and can provide evidence for differential diagnosis of cardiac masses. However, there is no evidence-based conclusion as to its accuracy. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to perform a systematic review on this issue and provide useful information for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

We will perform a systematic search in EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science for diagnostic studies using CMR to detect cardiac masses from inception to October, 2019. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts for relevance, review full texts for inclusion and conduct detail data extraction. The methodological quality will be assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. If pooling is possible, we will use bivariate model for diagnostic meta-analysis to estimate summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of CMR, as well as different sequences of CMR. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity from each study will be plotted in summary receive operating curve space and forest plots will be constructed for visual examination of variation in test accuracy. If enough studies are available, we will conduct sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review on the accuracy of CMR in the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses. This study will provide evidence and data to form a comprehensive understanding of the clinical value of CMR for cardiac masses patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval and patient consent are not required, as this study is a systematic review.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019137800.

Right Cardiac Chambers' Involvement as the First Manifestation of Recurrent Complex Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia

We describe a case of a 21-year-old male, with a history of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, referred to our department for atypical chest pain and dyspnea. Echocardiography revealed an extensive mass involving right cardiac chambers and tricuspid valve annulus, with increased thickness and impairment of right ventricle. Cardiac magnetic resonance confirmed the presence of cardiac mass involving pulmonary artery trunk, pericardial sleeves, and lung parenchyma. These findings were attributed to a manifestation of recurrent AML involving the right heart.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology

BACKGROUND

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is emerging as an important diagnostic modality in the management of cardiovascular-related dysfunction in oncological diseases. Advances in imaging techniques have enhanced the detection and evaluation of cardiac masses; meanwhile, innovative applications have created a growing role for cardiac MRI for the management of cardiotoxicity caused by cancer therapies.

METHODS

An overview is provided of the clinical indications and technical considerations of cardiac MRI. Its role in the evaluation of cardiac masses and cardiac function is reviewed, and novel sequences are discussed that are giving rise to future directions in cardio-oncology research. A review of the literature was also performed, focusing on cardiac MRI findings associated with cardiac dysfunction related to cancer treatment.

RESULTS

Cardiac MRI can be used to differentiate benign and malignant primary cardiac tumors, metastatic disease, and pseudotumors with high spatial and temporal resolution. Cardiac MRI can also be used to detect the early and long-term effects of cardiotoxicity related to cancer therapy. This is accomplished through a multiparametric approach that uses conventional bright blood, dark blood, and postcontrast sequences while also considering the applicability of newer T1 and T2 mapping sequences and other emerging techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardio-oncology programs have an expanding presence in the multidisciplinary approach of cancer care. Consequently, knowledge of cardiac MRI and its potential applications is critical to the success of contemporary cancer diagnostics and cancer management.

Cardiac and pericardial tumors: A potential application of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiac and pericardial masses may be neoplastic, benign and malignant, non-neoplastic such as thrombus or simple pericardial cysts, or normal variants cardiac structure can also be a diagnostic challenge. Currently, there are several imaging modalities for diagnosis of cardiac masses; each technique has its inherent advantages and disadvantages. Echocardiography, is typically the initial test utilizes in such cases, Echocardiography is considered the test of choice for evaluation and detection of cardiac mass, it is widely available, portable, with no ionizing radiation and provides comprehensive evaluation of cardiac function and valves, however, echocardiography is not very helpful in many cases such as evaluation of extracardiac extension of mass, poor tissue characterization, and it is non diagnostic in some cases. Cross sectional imaging with cardiac computed tomography provides a three dimensional data set with excellent spatial resolution but utilizes ionizing radiation, intravenous iodinated contrast and relatively limited functional evaluation of the heart. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has excellent contrast resolution that allows superior soft tissue characterization. CMR offers comprehensive evaluation of morphology, function, tissue characterization. The great benefits of CMR make CMR a highly useful tool in the assessment of cardiac masses. (Fluorine 18) fluorodeoxygluocse (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has become a corner stone in several oncological application such as tumor staging, restaging, treatment efficiency, FDG is a very useful imaging modality in evaluation of cardiac masses. A recent advance in the imaging technology has been the development of integrated PET-MRI system that utilizes the advantages of PET and MRI in a single examination. FDG PET-MRI provides complementary information on evaluation of cardiac masses. The purpose of this review is to provide several clinical scenarios on the incremental value of PET and MRI in the evaluation of cardiac masses.