Prognostic significance of exercise capacity and resting heart rate: Comparison between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm

Impacts of sinus rhythm maintenance with catheter ablation on exercise tolerance in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

It has been recently reported that sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance with catheter ablation therapy improves exercise tolerance (ET) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains to be elucidated whether this is also the case for patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF).

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive 54 patients with PAF (age; 63 ± 10 [SD] years old, male/female 46/8) and 26 patients with persistent AF (non-PAF) (age; 57 ± 12 [SD] years old, male/female 23/3) who underwent AF ablation without recurrence. ET and cardiac function were evaluated by cardio-pulmonary exercise test and ultrasound echocardiography before and 6 months after ablation.

RESULTS

The parameters of cardiopulmonary exercise test were comparable between the 2 groups. When PAF group was divided into 2 groups according to the time since diagnosis, peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂) before ablation was significantly lower in patients with PAF duration of more than 1 year (n = 26), compared with those with less than 1 year (n = 28) (18.1 ± 3.7 vs 21.3 ± 5.8 ml/kg/min, P = 0.022). At 6 months after SR maintenance without AF burden, peak VO₂ significantly improved in both PAF (19.8 ± 5.1 to 22.0 ± 4.8 ml/kg/min, P = 0.0001) and non-PAF (20.6 ± 3.9 to 23.4 ± 5.0 ml/kg/min, P < 0.01). Furthermore, the improvement rate of peak VO₂ after successful ablation had a highly significant inverse relationship with peak VO₂ at baseline in patients with PAF (r = - 0.48, P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that SR maintenance with ablation improves ET in patients with PAF, especially in those with reduced ET.

Prognostic value of the heart rate profile during exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the correlation of heart rate profile during exercise with exercise capacity and heart failure occurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation compared with patients with sinus rhythm.

Methods

We analyzed 2231 patients (atrial fibrillation: n = 321, sinus rhythm: n = 1910) who underwent a symptom-limited maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test at our institute. Their heart rate profile during exercise was assessed using peak heart rate and chronotropic response; (peak heart rate−resting heart rate)/(220−age−resting heart rate). The endpoint was the occurrence of heart failure events, defined as hospitalization for heart failure or heart failure-related death.

Results

There were significant positive correlations of peak heart rate and chronotropic response to peak oxygen consumption, both in atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. During a median follow-up period of 1262 (interquartile range 974–2921) days, 117 (5.2%) heart failure events were observed. Multivariate analyses showed that peak heart rate and chronotropic response were statistically significant predictors of heart failure events both in atrial fibrillation (peak heart rate: heart rate 0.975, p = 0.002, chronotropic response: heart rate 0.196, p = 0.003) and in sinus rhythm (peak heart rate: heart rate 0.988, p = 0.036, chronotropic response: heart rate 0.347, p = 0.020). Bivariate models showed that compared with chronotropic response, peak heart rate was a stronger predictor of heart failure in atrial fibrillation, whereas the finding was reversed in sinus rhythm.

Conclusion

The exercise- heart rate profile was significantly related to exercise capacity and future heart failure events, regardless of rhythm. However, the impacts of peak heart rate and chronotropic response on the endpoint varied according to the cardiac rhythm.