CSA Is Not Beneficial Long Term in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Central sleep apnea: emphasizing recognition and differentiation

INTRODUCTION

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder in which the effort to breathe is intermittently diminished or absent. CSA is a common disorder among patients with different cardiovascular disorders, including heart failure. In addition, a growing number of medications have been shown to induce CSA and CSA can emerge after initiation of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Accumulating evidence shows that CSA is a heterogeneous disorder with individual differences in clinical and biological characteristics and/or underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review offers an overview of the diagnostic aspects and classification of CSA, with an emphasis on heart failure patients, patients with CSA due to a medication and treatment-emergent CSA. The importance of evaluation of prognostic biomarkers in patients with different types of CSA is discussed. This narrative review synthesizes literature on CSA sourced from the PubMed database up to February 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

CSA presents a remarkably diverse disorder, with treatment modalities exhibiting potentially varied efficacy across its various phenotypes. This highlights the imperative for tailored management strategies that are rooted in phenotype classification.

Central sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation: A review on pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic implications

Precipitating factors and chronic diseases associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) are detailed in the literature. Emerging evidence over the last several decades suggests a potential causal relationship between central sleep apnea (CSA) and AF. Mechanisms including apnea-induced hypoxia with intermittent arousal, fluctuating levels of carbon dioxide, enhanced sympathetic/neurohormonal activation and oxidative stress causing inflammation have been implicated as etiologic causes of AF within this subpopulation. CSA affects the efficacy of pharmacologic and catheter-based antiarrhythmic treatments, which is why treating CSA prior to these interventions may lead to lower rates of AF. Subsequently, a reduction in the AF burden with transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) has become a topic of interest. The present review describes the relationship between these conditions, pathophysiologic mechanisms implicating the role of CSA in development of AF, and emerging therapeutic interventions.

Identification and Treatment of Central Sleep Apnoea: Beyond SERVE-HF

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) occurs in a large proportion of HF patients. CSA has clear detrimental effects, resulting in intermittent hypoxia and sympathetic activation, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment options are limited following the results of a recent trial in which adaptive servo-ventilation resulted in an increase in cardiovascular mortality. Ongoing studies utilising other forms of positive airway pressure may provide additional insight into the results of this trial. A new neurostimulation therapy, phrenic nerve stimulation, has offered a new physiological approach to the treatment of CSA. This therapy has resulted in improvements in the severity of disease and quality of life.

Characteristics and circadian distribution of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with heart failure and sleep-disordered breathing

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrhythmias and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are common comorbidities in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, understanding of the association between arrhythmias and SDB is poor. This study assessed the occurrence and circadian distribution of ventricular arrhythmias in HFrEF patients with and without SDB.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included HFrEF patients admitted for unattended overnight cardiorespiratory polygraphy and 24-h Holter-ECG recording. Holter-ECG data (events/h) were categorized by time of day: morning, 06:00-13:59; afternoon, 14:00-21:59; nighttime, 22:00-05:59. Respiratory events were expressed using the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and an AHI ≥ 15/h was categorized as moderate to severe SDB.

RESULTS

167 patients were included (82% male, age 65 ± 10.4 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 30.9 ± 7.9%); SDB was predominantly central sleep apnea (CSA) in 45.5%, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in 23.9% or none/mild (nmSDB) in 17.4%. Morning premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were detected significantly more frequently in CSA versus nmSDB patients (44.4/h versus 1.8/h; p = 0.02). Non-sustained VT was more frequent in patients with CSA versus versus OSA or nmSDB (17.9 versus 3.2 or 3.2%/h; p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). There was no significant variation in VT occurrence by time of day in HFrEF patients with CSA (p = 0.3). CSA was an independent predictor of VT occurrence in HFrEF in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.5-11.4, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

CSA was associated with VT occurrence irrespective of sleep/wake status in HFrEF patients, and independently predicted the occurrence of VT. This association may contribute to chances by which CSA increases sudden death risk in HFrEF patients.

Adaptive servo-ventilation to treat central sleep apnea in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the Bad Oeynhausen prospective ASV registry

BACKGROUND

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is highly prevalent in heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-REF). The Bad Oeynhausen Adaptive Servo-ventilation (ASV) registry (NCT01657188) was designed to investigate whether treatment of CSA with ASV improved survival in HF-REF patients; the effects of ASV on symptoms and cardiopulmonary performance were also investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 2004 to October 2013, the registry prospectively enrolled HF-REF patients [NYHA class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45%] with moderate to severe predominant CSA [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h]. ASV-treated patients were followed up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, including natriuretic peptide concentrations, blood gas analyses, echocardiography, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) testing. 550 patients were included [age 67.7 ± 10 years, 90% male, 52% in NYHA class ≥ III, LVEF 29.9 ± 8%, AHI 35.4 ± 13.6/h, and time with nocturnal oxygen saturation < 90% (T < 90%) 58 ± 73 min]; ASV was prescribed to 224 patients. Over a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 109 (48.7%) ASV-treated patients and 191 (58.6%) controls died (adjusted Cox modelling hazard ratio of 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.24; p = 0.740); older age, lower LVEF, impaired renal function, low sodium concentration, and nocturnal hypoxemia were significant predictors of mortality. Patient reported NYHA functional class improved in the ASV group, but LVEF, CPX, 6MWD, natriuretic peptides and blood gases remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term ASV treatment of predominant CSA in HF-REF patients included in our registry had no statistically significant effect on survival. ASV improved HF symptoms, but had no significant effects on exercise capacity, LVEF, natriuretic peptide concentrations or blood gases during follow-up as compared to control patients.

Predominant obstructive or central sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation: influence of characterizing apneas versus apneas and hypopneas

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib). Although a high proportion of respiratory events are hypopneas, previous studies have only used apneas to differentiate obstructive (OSA) from central (CSA) sleep apnea. This study investigated the impact of using apneas and hypopneas versus apneas only to define the predominant type of SDB in Afib patients with preserved ejection fraction.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This retrospective analysis was based on high-quality cardiorespiratory polygraphy (PG) recordings (07/2007-03/2016) that were re-analyzed using 2012 American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria, with differentiation of apneas and hypopneas as obstructive or central. Classification of predominant (>50% of events) OSA and CSA was defined based on apneas only (OSA_AI and CSA_AI) or apneas and hypopneas (OSA_AHI and CSA_AHI). SDB was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index ≥5/h.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients were included (146 male, age 68.7 ± 8.5 y). Hypopneas accounted for >50% of all respiratory events. Based on apneas only, 46% of patients had predominant OSA and 44% had predominant CSA. Based on apneas and hypopneas, the proportion of patients with OSA was higher (56%) and that with CSA was lower (36%). In the subgroup of patients with moderate to severe SDB (AHI ≥ 15/h), the proportion with predominant CSA was 55.2% based on apneas only versus 42.1% with apneas and hypopneas.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized patients with Afib and SDB, use of apneas and hypopneas versus apneas alone had an important influence on the proportion of patients classified as having predominant OSA or CSA.