Invasive assessment of coronary flow reserve impairment in severe aortic stenosis and ecochadiographic correlations

Coronary Flow Reserve and Myocardial Resistance Reserve Changes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Aortic Stenosis

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) induces an alteration in hemodynamic conditions that are responsible for coronary microvasculature impairment. Relief of AS by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is expected to improve the coronary artery hemodynamic. We aimed to assess the midterm effects of TAVI in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and myocardial resistance reserve (MRR) by a continuous intracoronary thermodilution technique. At-rest and hyperemic coronary flow was measured by a continuous thermodilution technique in 23 patients with AS and compared with that in 17 matched controls, and repeated 6 ± 3 months after TAVI in 11 of the patients with AS. In patients with AS, absolute coronary flow at rest was significantly greater, and absolute resistance at rest was significantly less, than in controls (p <0.01 for both), causing less CFR and MRR (1.73 ± 0.4 vs 2.85 ± 1.1, p <0.01 and 1.95 ± 0.4 vs 3.22 ± 1.4, p <0.01, respectively). TAVI implantation yielded a significant 35% increase in CFR (p >0.01) and a 39% increase in MRR (p <0.01) driven by absolute coronary flow at rest reduction (p = 0.03). In patients with AS, CFR and MRR determined by continuous thermodilution are significantly impaired. At 6-month follow-up, TAVI improves these indexes and partially relieves the pathophysiologic alterations, leading to a partial restoration of CFR and MRR.

Prognostic value of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and nonobstructed coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Patients with aortic valve stenosis have been postulated to have coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) contributing to the clinical symptoms and adverse outcomes. The coronary angiography (CAG)-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) is proposed as a novel, less invasive and pressure-wire-free index to assess CMD. This study aimed to quantify CMD assessed by caIMR and investigate its prognostic impact in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

METHODS

This study included 77 moderate or severe aortic valve stenosis patients with no obstructive coronary disease (defined as having no stenosis more than 50% in diameter) who underwent caIMR measurement. CMD was defined by caIMR at least 25. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were the clinical outcomes during the median 40 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The incidence of CMD was 47.7%. Seventeen MACE occurred during the follow-up duration. CMD was associated with an increased risk of MACE (log-rank P < 0.001) and an independent predictor of clinical outcomes [hazard ratio 5.467, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.393-21.458; P = 0.015]. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that caIMR could provide a significant predictive value for MACE in aortic valve stenosis patients (AUC 0.785, 95% CI 0.609-0.961, P < 0.001). In addition, the risk of MACE was higher in CMD patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (log-rank P < 0.001) and no aortic valve replacement (log-rank P = 0.003) than in other groups.

CONCLUSION

Aortic valve stenosis patients demonstrated markedly impaired caIMR. CMD assessed by caIMR increases the risk of MACE and is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in aortic valve stenosis patients. This finding suggests that using caIMR in the clinical assessment may help identify high-risk groups and stimulate earlier intervention.

Management of coronary artery disease in patients with aortic stenosis in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valve disorder among the elderly, and these patients frequently have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). Risk factors for calcific AS are similar to those for CAD. Historically, the treatment of these conditions involved simultaneous surgical replacement of the aortic valve (AV) with coronary artery bypass grafting. Since the advancement of transcatheter AV therapies, there have been tremendous advancements in the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of this procedure with expanding indications. This has led to a paradigm shift in our approach to the patient with AS and concomitant CAD. Data regarding the management of CAD in patients with AS are largely limited to single-center studies or retrospective analyses. This article aims to review available literature around the management of CAD in patients with AS and assist in the current understanding in approaches toward management.

Absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance reserve in patients with severe aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Development of left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy in aortic stenosis (AS) is accompanied by adaptive coronary flow regulation. We aimed to assess absolute coronary flow, microvascular resistance, coronary flow reverse (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) in patients with and without AS.

METHODS

Absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance were measured by continuous thermodilution in 29 patients with AS and 29 controls, without AS, matched for age, gender, diabetes and functional severity of epicardial coronary lesions. Myocardial work, total myocardial mass and left anterior descending artery (LAD)-specific mass were quantified by echocardiography and cardiac-CT.

RESULTS

Patients with AS presented a significantly positive LV remodelling with lower global longitudinal strain and global work efficacy compared with controls. Total LV myocardial mass and LAD-specific myocardial mass were significantly higher in patients with AS (p=0.001). Compared with matched controls, absolute resting flow in the LAD was significantly higher in the AS cohort (p=0.009), resulting into lower CFR and MRR in the AS cohort compared with controls (p<0.005 for both). No differences were found in hyperaemic flow and resting and hyperaemic resistances. Hyperaemic myocardial perfusion (calculated as the ratio between the absolute coronary flow subtended to the LAD, expressed in mL/min/g), but not resting, was significantly lower in the AS group (p=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe AS and non-obstructive coronary artery disease, with the progression of LV hypertrophy, the compensatory mechanism of increased resting flow maintains adequate perfusion at rest, but not during hyperaemia. As a consequence, both CFR and MRR are significantly impaired.

Microcirculatory Function in Nonhypertrophic and Hypertrophic Myocardium in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis

Background Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has often been supposed to be associated with abnormal myocardial blood flow and resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify the physiological and pathological changes in myocardial blood flow and microcirculatory resistance in patients with and without LVH attributable to severe aortic stenosis. Methods and Results Absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance were measured using a novel technique with continuous thermodilution and infusion of saline. In addition, myocardial mass was assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Fifty-three patients with aortic valve stenosis were enrolled in the study. In 32 patients with LVH, hyperemic blood flow per gram of tissue was significantly decreased compared with 21 patients without LVH (1.26±0.48 versus 1.66±0.65 mL·min^-1·g^-1; P=0.018), whereas minimal resistance indexed for left ventricular mass was significantly increased in patients with LVH (63 [47-82] versus 43 [35-63] Wood Units·kg; P=0.014). Conclusions Patients with LVH attributable to severe aortic stenosis had lower hyperemic blood flow per gram of myocardium and higher minimal myocardial resistance compared with patients without LVH.

Challenges in Diagnosis and Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

More than half of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) over 70 years old have coronary artery disease (CAD). Exertional angina is often present in AS-patients, even in the absence of significant CAD, as a result of oxygen supply/demand mismatch and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Moreover, persistent myocardial ischemia leads to extensive myocardial fibrosis and subsequent coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) which is defined as reduced coronary vasodilatory capacity below ischemic threshold. Therefore, angina, as well as noninvasive stress tests, have a low specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for the assessment of epicardial coronary stenosis severity in AS-patients. Moreover, in symptomatic patients with severe AS exercise testing is even contraindicated. Given the limitations of noninvasive stress tests, coronary angiography remains the standard examination for determining the presence and severity of CAD in AS-patients, although angiography alone has poor accuracy in the evaluation of its functional severity. To overcome this limitation, the well-established invasive indices for the assessment of coronary stenosis severity, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), are now in focus, especially in the contemporary era with the rapid increment of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the treatment of AS-patients. TAVR induces an immediate decrease in hyperemic microcirculatory resistance and a concomitant increase in hyperemic flow velocity, whereas resting coronary hemodynamics remain unaltered. These findings suggest that FFR may underestimate coronary stenosis severity in AS-patients, whereas iFR as the non-hyperemic index is independent of the AS severity. However, because resting coronary hemodynamics do not improve immediately after TAVR, the coronary vasodilatory capacity in AS-patients treated by TAVR remain impaired, and thus the iFR may overestimate coronary stenosis severity in these patients. The optimal method for evaluating myocardial ischemia in patients with AS and co-existing CAD has not yet been fully established, and this important issue is under further investigation. This review is focused on challenges, limitations, and future perspectives in the functional assessment of coronary stenosis severity in these patients, bearing in mind the complexity of coronary physiology in the presence of this valvular heart disease.

Invasive Assessment of Microvascular Resistance in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Echocardiographic Correlates

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often associated with ischaemia despite lack of focal epicardial coronary stenosis. Our aim was to assess invasive coronary microvascular circulation and correlate findings with echocardiography.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with HCM and controls who were referred for diagnostic coronary angiography. A pressure-temperature sensor coronary guidewire was used with intracoronary injections of room-temperature saline to measure mean coronary transit time during rest and hyperaemia induced with intravenous adenosine. The index of microvascular resistance (IMR) was calculated. Left ventricular mass was calculated during echocardiographic studies.

RESULTS

Patients with HCM (n=12) and controls (n=7), had similar demographics. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in HCM (76.7%±11.0% vs 55.0%±15.9%, p=0.003). IMR was non-significantly higher in HCM (21.7±10.2 vs 15.3±4.8, p=0.16). Only patients with HCM had abnormal IMR (>25). Coronary flow reserve was non-significantly higher in HCM (2.7±1.6 vs 2.1±1.2, p=0.34). IMR correlated with left ventricular mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy subjects (Pearson r=0.68, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Microvascular dysfunction as assessed by IMR may be abnormal in HCM and is correlated with left ventricular mass.

Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions

With the increasing prevalence of aortic stenosis (AS) due to a growing elderly population, a proper understanding of its physiology is paramount to guide therapy and define severity. A better understanding of the microvasculature in AS could improve clinical care by predicting left ventricular remodeling or anticipate the interplay between epicardial stenosis and myocardial dysfunction. In this review, we combine five decades of literature regarding microvascular, coronary, and aortic valve physiology with emerging insights from newly developed invasive tools for quantifying microcirculatory function. Furthermore, we describe the coupling between microcirculation and epicardial stenosis, which is currently under investigation in several randomized trials enrolling subjects with concomitant AS and coronary disease. To clarify the physiology explained previously, we present two instructive cases with invasive pressure measurements quantifying coexisting valve and coronary stenoses. Finally, we pose open clinical and research questions whose answers would further expand our knowledge of microvascular dysfunction in AS. These trials were registered with NCT03042104, NCT03094143, and NCT02436655.

Pathophysiological and clinical implications of high intramural coronary blood flow velocity in aortic stenosis

We sought to recognize the blood flow velocity (BFV) through the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and its small intramyocardial (IM) branches by transthoracic Doppler-echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Sixty-two patients, aged 74.0 ± 9.6 years, 37 women, with preserved left ventricular (LV) function, apparently free of active ischemic disease, were enrolled and classified into 3 groups according to the mean gradient (MG) across the aortic valve: 13 patients (21%) entered the group A (MG ≤ 20 mmHg), 29 (48%) group B (MG 21-40 mmHg) and 20 (31%) group C (MG > 40 mmHg). Peak and mean coronary BFVs were demonstrated to gradually increase according to AV gradient, especially through the IM arteries. Peak IM-BFV was 58.9 cm/s (95% CI 46.4-71.4) in group A, 73.2 cm/s (95% CI 64.8-81.6) in group B, and 96.4 cm/s (95% CI 86.3-106.5) in group C (p < 0.001), whereas peak LAD-BFV was 38.1 cm/s (95% CI 32.8-43.3), 44.4 cm/s (95% CI 40.9-47.9) and 47.3 cm/s (95% CI 43.1-52.5), respectively (p = 0.03). Also, 34 patients complaining with unspecific symptoms showed much higher IM-BFV than those who were not. High values were also recognized in patients with LV ejection fraction/velocity ratio (EFVR) ≤ 0.90 (IM-BFV 91 ± 26 cm/s vs. 72 ± 24 cm/s in those with EFVR > 0.90, p = 0.001). In conclusion, AS patients in the present study showed gradually higher coronary BFVs according to AS gradient, especially through the IM vessels, and both peak and mean velocities were discriminating specific patient subsets. Pathophysiological mechanisms and potential clinical implications are discussed.

Pathophysiological coronary and microcirculatory flow alterations in aortic stenosis

Regulation of coronary blood flow is maintained through a delicate balance of ventriculoarterial and neurohumoral mechanisms. The aortic valve is integral to the functions of these systems, and disease states that compromise aortic valve integrity have the potential to seriously disrupt coronary blood flow. Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common cause of valvular heart disease requiring medical intervention, and the prevalence and associated socio-economic burden of AS are set to increase with population ageing. Valvular stenosis precipitates a cascade of structural, microcirculatory, and neurohumoral changes, which all lead to impairment of coronary flow reserve and myocardial ischaemia even in the absence of notable coronary stenosis. Coronary physiology can potentially be normalized through interventions that relieve severe AS, but normality is often not immediately achievable and probably requires continued adaptation. Finally, the physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with AS represents an ongoing challenge, as the invasive physiological measures used in current cardiology practice are yet to be validated in this population. This Review discusses the key concepts of coronary pathophysiology in patients with AS through presentation of contemporary basic science and data from animal and human studies.