Anti-inflammatory treatment and risk of depression in 91,842 patients with acute coronary syndrome and 91,860 individuals without acute coronary syndrome in Denmark

Aspirin may be more suitable for patients with major depression: Evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

OBJECTIVE

Utilizing two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) analysis, this study aims to explore the potential bidirectional causal relationship between common nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (paracetamol, ibuprofen, aspirin) and major depression (MD) from a genetic standpoint.

METHODS

We employed summarized data from a Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) of European populations. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used for TSMR analysis; outcomes were evaluated based on p-value, OR (Odds Ratio), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

From a genetic perspective, the study found that the use of paracetamol and ibuprofen increased the risk of MD (IVW (MRE): OR = 2.314, 95% CI: 1.609-3.327; p = 6.07E-06) and (IVW (MRE): OR = 2.308, 95% CI: 1.780-3.653; p = 0.002), respectively. No significant causal relationship was found between aspirin and MD (p > 0.05). Reverse TSMR analysis found that MD increased the genetic predisposition to use paracetamol, ibuprofen, and aspirin (IVW (MRE): OR = 1.042, 95% CI: 1.030-1.054, p = 3.07E-12), (IVW (FE): OR = 1.015, 95% CI: 1.007-1.023, p = 1.13E-04), (IVW (MRE): OR = 1.019, 95% CI: 1.009-1.030, p = 4.22E-04), respectively. Other analytical methods and sensitivity analyses further supported the robustness and reliability of these findings.

CONCLUSION

This study provides preliminary genetic evidence through bidirectional TSMR analysis that MD increases the genetic predisposition to use paracetamol, ibuprofen, and aspirin, aiding clinicians in devising preventive strategies against the misuse of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Moreover, we found that the use of paracetamol and ibuprofen increases the risk of MD, whereas aspirin did not. This suggests a crucial clinical implication: clinicians treating MD patients could opt for the relatively safer aspirin over paracetamol and ibuprofen.

Association between Regular Use of Analgesics before Cancer Diagnosis and Occurrence of Mood Disorders

We aimed to determine the relationship between the use of analgesics prescribed for pain management and the onset and progression of mood disorders using a large-scale cohort database. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for patient risk of developing mood disorders based on age, income, health-related variables, disease history, Charlson comorbidity index, and analgesics prescription behavior (Models 1-3). Additionally, we determined the risk of mood disorder occurrence by age group (Model 4) using a proportional hazards regression model. The age- and income-adjusted HR (Model 1) was 1.8275. The age-, income-, BMI-, and physical-activity-adjusted HR (Model 2) was 1.882. The fully adjusted HR (Model 3) was 1.698. Compared with no analgesic use, nonregular use (HR = 1.386) and regular use (HR = 1.698) was associated with a higher risk of mood disorders. Among patients older than 50 years, those who participated in physical activity (less than five days) had a lower risk of mood disorders than those who did not. This suggests that it may be useful for preventing mood disorders in older cancer survivors. A high risk of comorbidities and regular use of analgesics are risk factors for developing mood disorders. Therefore, our results suggest that cancer survivors with a high risk of comorbidities and a history of regular analgesic use should undergo careful psychiatric consultation.

Statins in depression: a repurposed medical treatment can provide novel insights in mental health

Depression has a large burden, but the development of new drugs for its treatment has proved difficult. Progresses in neuroscience have highlighted several physiopathological pathways, notably inflammatory and metabolic ones, likely involved in the genesis of depressive symptoms. A novel strategy proposes to repurpose established medical treatments of known safety and to investigate their potential antidepressant activity. Among numerous candidates, growing evidence suggests that statins may have a positive role in the treatment of depressive disorders, although some have raised concerns about possible depressogenic effects of these widely prescribed medications. This narrative review summarises relevant findings from translational studies implicating many interconnected neurobiological and neuropsychological, cardiovascular, endocrine-metabolic, and immunological mechanisms by which statins could influence mood. Also, the most recent clinical investigations on the effects of statins in depression are presented. Overall, the use of statins for the treatment of depressive symptoms cannot be recommended based on the available literature, though this might change as several larger, methodologically robust studies are being conducted. Nevertheless, statins can already be acknowledged as a driver of innovation in mental health, as they provide a novel perspective to the physical health of people with depression and for the development of more precise antidepressant treatments.

Associations of Cardiovascular Agents and Metformin with Depression Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the HUNT Study, Norway

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular agents, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor inhibitors, acetylsalicylic acid, statins, and metformin, have demonstrated benefits for depression. However, there is scant evaluation of these drugs' antidepressant properties in large population settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine cross-sectional associations between depression symptoms and the use of cardiovascular agents and metformin in populations with cardiovascular diseases or diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Participants in the Trøndelag Health Study 2006-08 (HUNT3, n = 40,516) and 2017-19 (HUNT4, n = 42,103) were included and data on their drug use from 2006 to 2019 was retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database. The outcome was self-reported depression symptoms defined by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Associations between cardiovascular agents or metformin use and self-reported depression were analyzed by multi-level logistic regression in sex-stratified samples.

RESULTS

Among men with cardiovascular diseases, use of acetylsalicylic acid was associated with reduced depression symptoms compared with acetylsalicylic acid non-users (reference) in HUNT3 and HUNT4 [risk ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.94, risk ratio = 0.67; 95% CI 0.52-0.82, respectively]. Similarly, male statin users had a lower likelihood of reporting depression than statin non-users in HUNT3 (risk ratio = 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.86) and HUNT4 (risk ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.84). Associations between statins or acetylsalicylic acid use and reduced depression symptoms were detected in women with cardiovascular diseases in HUNT4. We found no statistical support for associations between other cardiovascular agents or metformin use and a reduced or increased depression symptom risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest negative associations between acetylsalicylic acid or statin use and depression symptoms. However, longitudinal cohort studies and randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the antidepressant effects of these drugs.

Statins in Depression: An Evidence-Based Overview of Mechanisms and Clinical Studies

Background: Depression is a leading cause of disability, burdened by high levels of non-response to conventional antidepressants. Novel therapeutic strategies targeting non-monoaminergic pathways are sorely needed. The widely available and safe statins have several putative mechanisms of action, especially anti-inflammatory, which make them ideal candidates for repurposing in the treatment of depression. A large number of articles has been published on this topic. The aim of this study is to assess this literature according to evidence-based medicine principles to inform clinical practise and research. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the electronic databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and an unstructured Google Scholar and manual search, until the 9th of April 2021, for all types of clinical studies assessing the effects of statins in depression. Results: Seventy-two studies were retrieved that investigated the effects of statins on the risk of developing depression or on depressive symptoms in both depressed and non-depressed populations. Fifteen studies specifically addressed the effects of statins on inflammatory-related symptoms of anhedonia, psychomotor retardation, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in depression. Most studies suggested a positive effect of statins on the occurrence and severity of depression, with fewer studies showing no effect, while a minority indicated some negative effects. Limitations: We provide a narrative report on all the included studies but did not perform any quantitative analysis, which limits the strength of our conclusions. Conclusions: Robust evidence indicates that statins are unlikely to lead to depressive symptoms in the general population. Promising data suggest a potential role for statins in the treatment of depression. Further clinical studies are needed, especially in specific subgroups of patients identified by pre-treatment assessments of inflammatory and lipid profiles.

The Effects of Ibuprofen Consumption on the Incidence of Postpartum Depression

OBJECTIVES

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a common and debilitating psychiatric condition whose etiology is yet to be fully elucidated. Anti-inflammatory medications have been shown to be effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder but there have only been a few trials examining whether anti-inflammatory medications can serve as effective prophylactic agents against the development of major depressive disorder. Prophylaxis against PPD with anti-inflammatory agents has never been studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective observational trial examining whether consumption of higher doses of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen is associated with a lower incidence of PPD. We recruited high-risk women and collected data on Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System pain scale and clinical assessment of PPD at postpartum weeks 0, 3, and 6. Subjects were instructed to keep a log of medication consumed.

RESULTS

When looking at the total sample, we found that higher consumption of ibuprofen was associated with lower incidence of PPD, although this result was nonsignificant (P = 0.26). When we stratified by concurrent psychotropic medication, we found that among women not taking psychotropic medications, higher consumption of ibuprofen at week 3 was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of having PPD at week 3 (P = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

We found that ibuprofen consumption was significantly associated with a reduced risk of development of PPD at week 3 among high-risk women not taking psychotropic medications.

The association between aspirin use and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

PURPOSE

Many clinical trials and observational studies have been conducted under the premise that the anti-inflammatory effect of aspirin may prevent depression. These studies, however, showed inconsistent results. To inspect the association between aspirin use and depression, we conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

In August 2019, two authors independently searched PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO to retrieve observational epidemiological studies presenting an association between aspirin use and depression. Case-control and cohort studies were included, and odds ratios (ORs) or relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of depression were estimated using a random-effects model. In addition, number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated to measure the rates of depression.

RESULTS

In total, 12 observational studies-five case-control studies and seven prospective cohort studies-were included in this meta-analysis. The random-effects model demonstrated a significant association between aspirin use and depression (OR/RR 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.16) with insignificant heterogeneity (I² = 23.3%). The risk estimates of depression from prospective cohort studies were similar (RR 1.11; 95% CI: 1.08-1.14), and heterogeneity was not observed (I² = 0.0%). In the subgroup meta-analysis, a duration of aspirin use ≥5 years and a dosage ≥500 mg daily were also associated with depression. The NNH for depression with aspirin use >5 years was 103 (95% CI 91-111) indicating that observed event is rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin use was associated with depression in the present meta-analysis. One of the major limitations is the lack of detail and consistency with respect to exposure verification in the included papers. Another limitation is the lack of randomized controlled studies and prospective cohort studies.

Youth Depression Alleviation with Anti-inflammatory Agents (YoDA-A): a randomised clinical trial of rosuvastatin and aspirin

BACKGROUND

Inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), and anti-inflammatory strategies might therefore have therapeutic potential. This trial aimed to determine whether adjunctive aspirin or rosuvastatin, compared with placebo, reduced depressive symptoms in young people (15-25 years).

METHODS

YoDA-A, Youth Depression Alleviation with Anti-inflammatory Agents, was a 12-week triple-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Participants were young people (aged 15-25 years) with moderate to severe MDD (MADRS mean at baseline 32.5 ± 6.0; N = 130; age 20.2 ± 2.6; 60% female), recruited between June 2013 and June 2017 across six sites in Victoria, Australia. In addition to treatment as usual, participants were randomised to receive aspirin (n = 40), rosuvastatin (n = 48), or placebo (n = 42), with assessments at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 26. The primary outcome was change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from baseline to week 12.

RESULTS

At the a priori primary endpoint of MADRS differential change from baseline at week 12, there was no significant difference between aspirin and placebo (1.9, 95% CI (- 2.8, 6.6), p = 0.433), or rosuvastatin and placebo (- 4.2, 95% CI (- 9.1, 0.6), p = 0.089). For rosuvastatin, secondary outcomes on self-rated depression and global impression, quality of life, functioning, and mania were not significantly different from placebo. Aspirin was inferior to placebo on the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF) at week 12. Statins were superior to aspirin on the MADRS, the Clinical Global Impressions Severity Scale (CGI-S), and the Negative Problem Orientation Questionnaire scale (NPOQ) at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of either aspirin or rosuvastatin did not to confer any beneficial effect over and above routine treatment for depression in young people. Exploratory comparisons of secondary outcomes provide limited support for a potential therapeutic role for adjunctive rosuvastatin, but not for aspirin, in youth depression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12613000112763. Registered on 30/01/2013.

Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and the risk of depression: The "Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN)" cohort

BACKGROUND

The potential effect of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) to prevent depression remains largely unknown, in spite of the implication of inflammation in depression. This study aimed to investigate whether the habitual intake of aspirin and other NSAIDs was prospectively associated with a reduction in the observed incidence of depression.

METHODS

A dynamic cohort including 22,564 Spanish university graduates (mean age: 37 years) initially free of depression was followed during an average of 8.7 years. Exposure to NSAIDs was assessed with specific repeated questionnaires throughout follow-up, starting in the 2-year follow-up questionnaire. Incident cases of depression were defined as either a new validated medical diagnosis of depression or reporting the initiation of habitual use of antidepressants.

RESULTS

We identified 772 incident cases of depression. Regular intake of aspirin and other NSAIDs was not associated with depression risk. Only in secondary sensitivity analyses using a definition of the outcome with higher specificity (a validated medical diagnosis of depression), an inverse association of aspirin with depression was found [HR (95%CI): 0.20 (0.04-0.87)]. However, these results were non-significant after adjustment for multiple testing.

LIMITATIONS

A possible underestimation of incident depression and a limited ability to detect all possible residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of NSAIDs was not associated with the incidence of depression. Further longitudinal controlled studies are necessary to clarify a potential role of aspirin use in depression risk.

Migraine and risk of stroke and acute coronary syndrome in two case-control studies in the Danish population

INTRODUCTION

Migraine has consistently been associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke, while the evidence for a relation with other types of stroke or coronary outcomes is limited. We examined the association between migraine and stroke and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes and the influence of potential confounding factors.

METHODS

All first-time hospital contacts for stroke (n=155,216) or ACS (n=97,799) were identified in Danish National Patient Registers and matched with 2 control groups of the background population. A hospital diagnosis of migraine and use of migraine medication were the main exposures and associations (odds ratios [OR]) were estimated using multiple logistic regression. Confounding was also addressed by including use of general headache medication as a negative control exposure.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of migraine was associated with increased odds of both stroke (ORcrude, age <50 years: 4.80 [95% CI: 3.75-6.21]; ORcrude, age ≥50 years:1.91 [95% CI: 1.67-2.19]) and ACS (ORcrude:1.88 [95% CI: 1.53-2.32]), while the ORs for the associations between migraine medication and stroke and ACS were lower. Patients with a diagnosis of migraine or redeemed migraine medication had increased ORs of all stroke subtypes (ischemic, hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attacks). The diagnosis of migraine was also associated with both angina and myocardial infarction (ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction [STEMI], non-STEMI and unspecified) with the highest OR for angina. These associations were not fully explained by adjustment for confounding co-variables or when compared with the negative control exposure that were assumed to be influenced by similar confounding factors, but no shared pathogenesis.

CONCLUSION

Hospital-diagnosed migraine was associated with all stroke and ACS subtypes, with ischemic stroke and angina having the highest odds. Confounding did not explain the associations.