Evolution and prognosis of intramural aortic hematoma. Insights from a midterm cohort study

Acute Aortic Syndromes from Diagnosis to Treatment-A Comprehensive Review

This work aims to provide a comprehensive description of the characteristics of a group of acute aortic diseases that are all potentially life-threatening and are collectively referred to as acute aortic syndromes (AASs). There have been recent developments in the care and diagnostic plan for AAS. A substantial clinical index of suspicion is required to identify AASs before irreversible fatal consequences arise because of their indefinite symptoms and physical indicators. A methodical approach to the diagnosis of AAS is addressed. Timely and suitable therapy should be started immediately after diagnosis. Improving clinical outcomes requires centralising patients with AAS in high-volume centres with high-volume surgeons. Consequently, the management of these patients benefits from the increased use of aortic centres, multidisciplinary teams and an "aorta code". Each acute aortic entity requires a different patient treatment strategy; these are outlined below. Finally, numerous preventive strategies for AAS are discussed. The keys to good results are early diagnosis, understanding the natural history of these disorders and, where necessary, prompt surgical intervention. It is important to keep in mind that chest pain does not necessarily correspond with coronary heart disease and to be alert to the possible existence of aortic diseases because once antiplatelet drugs are administered, a blocked coagulation system can complicate aortic surgery and affect prognosis. The management of AAS in "aortic centres" improves long-term outcomes and decreases mortality rates.

[Acute aortic syndrome]

Acute aortic syndrome embraces a group of heterogenous pathological entities involving the aortic wall with a common clinical profile. The current epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment strategy are discussed in this review. Besides, the importance of multidisciplinary aortic teams, aortic centers and the implementation of an aortic code are emphasized.

Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Intramural hematoma (IMH) and Aortic dissection (AD) have overlapping features. The aim of this study was to explore the differences between them by comparing the clinical manifestations and imaging features of patients with acute Stanford type B IMH-like lesions and acute Stanford type B AD (ATBAD).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analysed the clinical and computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging data of 42 IMH-like lesions patients with ulcer-like projection (ULP) and 38 ATBAD patients, and compared their clinical and imaging features.

RESULTS

(1) The IMH-like lesions patients were older than the ATBAD patients (64.2 ± 11.5 vs. 50.9 ± 12.2 years, P < 0.001). The D-dimer level in the IMH-like lesions group was significantly higher than that in the ATBAD group (11.2 ± 3.6 vs. 9.2 ± 4.5 mg/L, P < 0.05). The incidence rate of back pain was significantly higher in the ATBAD group than in the IMH-like lesions group (71.1% vs. 26.2%, P < 0.05). (2) The ULPs of IMH-like lesions and the intimal tears of ATBAD were concentrated in zone 4 of the descending thoracic aorta. The ULPs of IMH-like lesions and the intimal tears of ATBAD were mainly in the upper quadrant outside the lumen (64.3% vs. 65.8%, P > 0.05). (3) The maximum diameter of the ULPs in IMH-like lesions was smaller than that of the intimal tears in ATBAD (7.4 ± 3.4 vs. 10.8 ± 6.8 mm, P = 0.005). The lumen compression ratio in the ULPs plane and the maximum compression ratio of the aortic lumen in the IMH-like lesions group were smaller than that in the ADBAD group (P < 0.05). Fewer aortic segments were involved in IMH-like lesions patients than in ATBAD patients (5.6 ± 2.2 vs. 7.1 ± 1.9 segments, P < 0.005). The IMH-like lesions group had less branch involvement than that of the ATBAD group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The degree of intimal tears, lumen compression ratio, extent of lesion involvement, and impact on branch arteries in ATBAD are more severe than that of IMH-like lesions. But for the ULPs of IMH-like lesions and intimal tears of ATBAD, they have astonishing similarities in the location of the partition and the lumen quadrant, we have reason to believe that intimal tear is the initial factor in the pathogenesis of this kind of disease, and their clinical and imaging manifestations overlap, but the severity is different. Concerning similarities between these two conditions, these two may be a spectrum of one disease.

Comparison of population characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with type B aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Survival and aortic-related adverse events after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) and aortic dissection (AD) are controversial. We aimed to assess the preoperative characteristics and to evaluate TEVAR outcomes of acute type B IMH and AD.

METHODS

Between June 2002 and May 2021, 83 patients with acute type B IMH and 755 patients with acute type B AD underwent TEVAR at the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command. We retrospectively analyzed data from these patients, including clinical characteristics and follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

The patients with IMH were significantly older than the ones with AD (P < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus (P = 0.035) and ischemic cerebrovascular disease (P = 0.017) were more common in the IMH group than in the AD group. The results demonstrated a less long-term aortic-related death-free survival rate in the IMH group than the AD group for all the patients (P = 0.014) and the matched patients (P = 0.027). It also presents a lower long-term overall survival rate (P = 0.047) and aortic-related event-free rate (P = 0.048) in the IMH group than in the matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with AD patients, patients with IMH who underwent TEVAR had a worse long-term outcome of aortic-related survival in all and matched patients.

Acute Aortic Syndrome Revisited: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

The purpose of this paper is to describe all available evidence on the distinctive features of a group of 4 life-threatening acute aortic pathologies gathered under the name of acute aortic syndrome (AAS). The epidemiology, diagnostic strategy, and management of these patients has been updated. The authors propose a new and simple diagnostic algorithm to support clinical decision making in cases of suspected AAS, thereby minimizing diagnostic delays, misdiagnoses, and unnecessary advanced imaging. AAS-related entities are reviewed, and a guideline to avoid imaging misinterpretation is provided. Centralization of patients with AAS in high-volume centers with high-volume surgeons is key to improving clinical outcomes. Thus, the role of multidisciplinary teams, an "aorta code" (streamlined emergent care pathway), and aortic centers in the management of these patients is boosted. A tailored patient treatment approach for each of these acute aortic entities is needed, and as such has been summarized. Finally, a set of prevention measures against AAS is discussed.

Therapeutic management of acute type A aortic intramural hematoma

OBJECTIVES

The proper therapeutic management for acute type A aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes following emergency surgery or conservative treatment for patients with this disease.

METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2018, 124 consecutive patients were diagnosed with an acute type A aortic IMH and were included in this study. According to our surgical indications, they were divided into two groups: an operation group (OG) and a conservative treatment group (CG).

RESULTS

Of 124 patients, 83 (66.9%) patients accepted emergency surgery and 41 (33.1%) patients accepted strict conservative treatment. There were no differences between these two groups in early mortality and complications. However, the late mortality of patients in the CG was significantly higher than for patients in the OG. A maximum aortic diameter in the ascending aorta and aortic arch ≥ 45 mm and maximum thickness of IMH in the same section ≥ 8 mm were risk factors for IMH related death in patients undergoing conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality associated with emergency surgery for patients with acute type A aortic IMH was satisfactory. In clinical centers with well-established surgical techniques and postoperative management, emergency surgical treatment may provide a better outcome than medical treatment for patients with acute type A aortic IMH.

Prognostic value of estimated glomerular filtration rate and presence of proteinuria in type B aortic intramural hematoma

Background

Although aggressive medical treatment is recommended in patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma (IMH), a variety of aortic events can occur during the later period. For early identification of these patients, the present study was aimed at evaluating the prognostic validity of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the presence of proteinuria in type B aortic IMH.

Methods

Data of 61 patients with type B IMH in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2008 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected. The serum creatinine level and urine protein levels were measured at admission. And eGFR were calculated by the CKD-EPI equation. Adverse aortic-related events were defined as a composite of satisfaction of criteria for surgical conversion (with or without actual surgical intervention) and death from aortic rupture.

Results

Initial eGFR was significantly different between patients with adverse aortic-related events and those without (P=0.003). On multivariate analysis, eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m² (OR, 8.726; 95% CI: 1.711-46.144; P=0.009) and ULP (OR, 17.516; 95% CI: 3.322-92.258; P=0.001) were independent predictors of adverse aorta-related events. Furthermore, eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m² and proteinuria (+) (OR, 8.344; P=0.030) had significantly greater rates of aortic-related events. In addition, eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m² and proteinuria (+) had incremental prognostic value (C-statistic, 0.860, P=0.039) compared with ulcer-like projection (C-statistic, 0.815) alone.

Conclusions

Initial eGFR and presence of proteinuria were able to provide incremental prognostic information in addition to ulcer-like projection in patients with type B aortic IMH.

Clinical medical decision-making of acute aortic intramural hematoma: A non-randomized retrospective case study

Objective

This study explored the timing of interventional treatment for acute intramural aortic hematoma (IMH) and the corresponding high-risk factors for its development into local aortic dissection (AD).

Method

This retrospective case study method examined clinical follow-up data of 42 patients with acute IMH between April 2013 and October 2016 from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiʹan Jiaotong University. SPSS 17.0 and PPMS1.5 were used to analyze follow-up data spanning 3–12 months (mean, 7.5 ​± ​3.7 months).

Results

Patients were divided into the conversion group and the hematoma group according to whether they developed AD. Among them, 16 patients (38.1%) developed AD and were treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The remaining patients (61.89%) were treated conservatively. After 1 week, the mean aortic diameter of the conversion versus hematoma group was significantly widened. Hemodynamically unstable patients and those with hematoma to the abdominal aorta extension were more likely to develop AD. Patient outcomes after TEVAR were similar between groups.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that aortic isthmus diameter ≥3.0 ​cm, hematoma extending to the abdominal aorta, and hemodynamic instability are associated with AD development in acute IMH patents. TEVAR should be considered if hematoma thickening, calcification ingression, ulcer progression, or contrast enhancement within the intramural hematoma is noted beyond 2 weeks after IMH onset.

A Review on the Surgical Management of Intramural Haematoma of the Aorta

Intramural haematoma (IMH) of the aorta is one of the causes of acute aortic syndrome which often requires emergency or urgent life-saving surgery. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, surgery and clinical outcomes associated with IMH.

Diagnosing Aortic Intramural Hematoma: Current Perspectives

Aortic intramural hematoma (AIH) is an entity within the acute aortic syndrome. Combination of a priori probability, clinical history, laboratory blood test and imaging techniques are the basis for diagnosis of AIH. This review is focused on all aspects related to diagnosis of patients with AIH, from clinical to imaging and analytical.

The onset of acute type A aortic dissection following recovery of type B intramural haematoma: a case report

Background

Aortic intramural hematoma is a life-threatening condition reported with increasing frequency. It can be classified into Stanford type A or B depending on whether the ascending or descending aorta are involved, respectively. However, the onset of acute type A aortic dissection following recovery of type B intramural haematoma is rarely reported.

Case presentation

We present an uncommon case of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection developing 3 months after recovery of type B IMH in a 47-year-old female.

She complained acute chest pain. The operation was successfully done. She was in good condition and asymptomatic at a 3-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Type B intramural haematoma can lead to type A aortic dissection even after totally absorbed and the primary entry has the potential to be located in the ascending aorta. Unsatisfied blood pressure control may be the underlying cause.

Surgery for type A intramural hematoma: a systematic review of clinical outcomes

Background

Management of type A intramural hematoma (IMH) remains controversial, with opinions divided as to whether patients should be treated with early aggressive surgery or a more conservative approach. The present systematic review aims to evaluate the mortality and morbidities following surgery for type A IMH.

Methods

Electronic searches were performed on five databases from dates of inception to December 2018. All studies with surgical outcomes for type A intramural hematoma were identified by two independent researchers and relevant data extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions or meta-analysis of means were performed to aggregate the data. Survival data were pooled using reconstructed individual patient data derived from Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

Fifteen studies with 744 patients were identified. Ten studies were from Asian countries (73% of patients). Overall mortality was 8.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.6-13.9%]. Mortality from Asian centers was 5.3% (95% CI: 3.6-7.7%) and 18.9% (95% CI: 7.0-40.4%) in Western centers. Postoperative complications were poorly reported and hence not analyzable. Overall pooled survival of 343 patients from four studies at 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year was 91.8%, 90.2%, 89.2%, 87.7%, and 71.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

There is an acceptable level of risk of death after surgery for type A IMH, though significant variations exist between results from Asian and Western centers. More detailed studies are required to clarify the controversies surrounding management of type A IMH.

Endovascular versus medical management of type B intramural hematoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Aortic intramural hematoma constitutes one of the three classifications of acute aortic syndrome (AAS). Type B intramural hematoma (IMH-B) is localized to the descending thoracic aorta and can be managed through medical, endovascular or surgical means. Data comparing contemporary management with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) versus traditional medical management (MM) is sparse and only moderate strength recommendations for TEVAR are provided in guidelines. This meta-analysis aimed to pool available data from comparative studies between TEVAR and MM and examine differences in outcomes.

Methods

Literature search of electronic medical databases was conducted to identify studies comparing TEVAR and MM for management of IMH-B. Data extraction from studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria was performed by two authors and meta-analysis using a random-effects model applied to pool baseline data and examine risk ratios (RR) for management outcomes.

Results

Of the initial 2,349 studies, nine studies were identified for analysis. There were 161 TEVAR patients and 166 who were medically managed. The mean age of the cohort was 62.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 55.8-68.7 years]. Patients with complicating features of IMH-B at presentation were more likely to appear in the TEVAR group, with more penetrating atheromatous ulcer (PAU) [risk difference (RD), 0.565, 95% CI: 0.240-0.889, P=0.001], ulcer-like projection (ULP) (RD 0.240, 95% CI: 0.965-0.384, P=0.001), and greater IMH size (mean difference, MD 5.47 mm, 95% CI: 0.320-10.6, P=0.037). There was no statistical difference between TEVAR and MM for the primary endpoints of aortic-related death (RR 0.535, 95% CI: 0.191-1.5, P=0.234) or IMH-B regression (RR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.859-1.81, P=0.246). Of the secondary endpoints, TEVAR had both significantly less dissection during follow-up (RR 0.295, 95% CI: 0.0881-0.989, P=0.048) and less rupture during follow-up (RR 0.206, 95% CI: 0.0462-0.921, P=0.039).

Conclusions

A small number of series comparing TEVAR and MM for management of IMH-B are available and random-effects meta-analysis did not reveal any statistically significant difference between treatments for aortic related death or IMH-B regression at a mean follow-up of 37 months. TEVAR was found to be associated with lower risk of dissection and lower risk of rupture during follow-up. Baseline data meta-analysis showed patients with complicating features of PAU, ULP, and larger IMH size were more likely to be managed with TEVAR.