Cardiac arrest and Brugada syndrome: Is drug-induced type 1 ECG pattern always a marker of low risk?

NaV1.5 autoantibodies in Brugada syndrome: pathogenetic implications

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients suffering from Brugada syndrome (BrS) are predisposed to life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Diagnosis is challenging due to the elusive electrocardiographic (ECG) signature that often requires unconventional ECG lead placement and drug challenges to be detected. Although NaV1.5 sodium channel dysfunction is a recognized pathophysiological mechanism in BrS, only 25% of patients have detectable SCN5A variants. Given the emerging role of autoimmunity in cardiac ion channel function, this study explores the presence and potential impact of anti-NaV1.5 autoantibodies in BrS patients.

METHODS

Using engineered HEK293A cells expressing recombinant NaV1.5 protein, plasma from 50 BrS patients and 50 controls was screened for anti-NaV1.5 autoantibodies via western blot, with specificity confirmed by immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence. The impact of these autoantibodies on sodium current density and their pathophysiological effects were assessed in cellular models and through plasma injection in wild-type mice.

RESULTS

Anti-NaV1.5 autoantibodies were detected in 90% of BrS patients vs. 6% of controls, yielding a diagnostic area under the curve of .92, with 94% specificity and 90% sensitivity. These findings were consistent across varying patient demographics and independent of SCN5A mutation status. Electrophysiological studies demonstrated a significant reduction specifically in sodium current density. Notably, mice injected with BrS plasma showed Brugada-like ECG abnormalities, supporting the pathogenic role of these autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates the presence of anti-NaV1.5 autoantibodies in the majority of BrS patients, suggesting an immunopathogenic component of the syndrome beyond genetic predispositions. These autoantibodies, which could serve as additional diagnostic markers, also prompt reconsideration of the underlying mechanisms of BrS, as evidenced by their role in inducing the ECG signature of the syndrome in wild-type mice. These findings encourage a more comprehensive diagnostic approach and point to new avenues for therapeutic research.

Deep learning unmasks the ECG signature of Brugada syndrome

One in 10 cases of sudden cardiac death strikes without warning as the result of an inherited arrhythmic cardiomyopathy, such as Brugada Syndrome (BrS). Normal physiological variations often obscure visible signs of this and related life-threatening channelopathies in conventional electrocardiograms (ECGs). Sodium channel blockers can reveal previously hidden diagnostic ECG features, however, their use carries the risk of life-threatening proarrhythmic side effects. The absence of a nonintrusive test places a grossly underestimated fraction of the population at risk of SCD. Here, we present a machine-learning algorithm that extracts, aligns, and classifies ECG waveforms for the presence of BrS. This protocol, which succeeds without the use of a sodium channel blocker (88.4% accuracy, 0.934 AUC in validation), can aid clinicians in identifying the presence of this potentially life-threatening heart disease.

Electrophysiological Study Prognostic Value and Long-Term Outcome in Drug-Induced Type 1 Brugada Syndrome: The IBRYD Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to retrospectively assess long-term outcome and the prognostic role of electrophysiological study (EPS) for risk stratification of drug-induced type 1 Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients.

BACKGROUND

BrS is a hereditary cardiac disease, predisposing to sudden cardiac death. Few real-world data are available on long-term outcomes of drug-induced type 1 BrS patients, and questions about risk stratification still remain unanswered.

METHODS

The IBRYD (Italian Brugada Syndrome) study is a multicenter observational retrospective study. A total of 226 drug-induced type 1 BrS patients were enrolled from 9 Italian tertiary referral institutions. Primary endpoint was a composite of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy and sudden cardiac death. The authors further assessed clinical predictors to ICD implantation, as well as for arrhythmia induction at EPS, along with EPS as potential risk factor for the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

142 patients (62.8%) received an ICD due to syncope and/or inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias at EPS. During a median follow-up of 106 months, 11 patients (4.9%) experienced primary outcome events. The ICD therapy median annual incidence over 8 years was 0.38% (interquartile range: 0% to 1.47%). Ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducibility during EPS was not predictive of arrhythmic events in ICD recipients versus non-ICD patients and in symptomatic versus asymptomatic subgroups, showing a low positive predictive value (9.6% and 8.9%, respectively) versus a high negative predictive value (96.6% and 95%, respectively). The authors reported 29 ICD-related complications and 4.9% inappropriate shocks.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-induced type 1 BrS patients have a very low arrhythmic risk. Clinical decision for implantation is supported by syncope and/or EPS positivity, though they fail to stratify high-risk patients. A better risk-to-benefit ratio should be pursued, considering both arrhythmic risk and ICD-related complications.

Non-invasive assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate in Brugada syndrome using signal-averaged electrocardiogram: clinical implications from a prospective clinical trial

AIMS

Brugada syndrome (BrS) represents a major cause of sudden cardiac death in young individuals. The risk stratification to forecast future life-threatening events is still controversial. Non-invasive assessment of late potentials (LPs) has been proposed as a risk stratification tool. However, their nature in BrS is still undetermined. The purpose of this study is to assess the electrophysiological determinants of non-invasive LPs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients with (Group 1, n = 96) and without (Group 2, n = 154) BrS-related symptoms were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) was performed in all subjects before undergoing epicardial mapping. Group 1 patients exhibited larger arrhythmogenic substrates (AS; 5.8 ± 2.8 vs. 2.6 ± 2.1 cm2, P < 0.001) with more delayed potentials (220.4 ± 46.0 vs. 186.7 ± 42.3 ms, P < 0.001). Late potentials were present in 82/96 (85.4%) Group 1 and in 31/154 (20.1%) Group 2 individuals (P < 0.001). Patients exhibiting LPs had more frequently a spontaneous Type 1 pattern (30.1% vs. 10.9%, P < 0.001), SCN5A mutation (34.5% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.02), and exhibited a larger AS with longer potentials (5.8 ± 2.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.7 cm2; 231.2 ± 37.3 vs. 213.8 ± 39.0 ms; P < 0.001, respectively). Arrhythmogenic substrate dimension was the strongest predictor of the presence of LPs (odds ratio 1.9; P < 0.001). An AS area of at least 3.5 cm2 identified patients with LPs (area under the curve 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.843-0.931; P < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 89%.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study support the role of the epicardial AS as an electrophysiological determinant of non-invasive LPs, which may serve as a tool in the non-invasive assessment of the BrS substrate, as SAECG-LPs could be considered an expression of the abnormal epicardial electrical activity.

ClinicalTrials.gov number (NCT02641431; NCT03106701).

ArrhythmoGenoPharmacoTherapy

This review is focusing on the understanding of various factors and components governing and controlling the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias including (i) the role of various ion channel-related changes in the action potential (AP), (ii) electrocardiograms (ECGs), (iii) some important arrhythmogenic mediators of reperfusion, and pharmacological approaches to their attenuation. The transmembrane potential in myocardial cells is depending on the cellular concentrations of several ions including sodium, calcium, and potassium on both sides of the cell membrane and active or inactive stages of ion channels. The movements of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ via cell membranes produce various currents that provoke AP, determining the cardiac cycle and heart function. A specific channel has its own type of gate, and it is opening and closing under specific transmembrane voltage, ionic, or metabolic conditions. APs of sinoatrial (SA) node, atrioventricular (AV) node, and Purkinje cells determine the pacemaker activity (depolarization phase 4) of the heart, leading to the surface manifestation, registration, and evaluation of ECG waves in both animal models and humans. AP and ECG changes are key factors in arrhythmogenesis, and the analysis of these changes serve for the clarification of the mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drugs. The classification of antiarrhythmic drugs may be based on their electrophysiological properties emphasizing the connection between basic electrophysiological activities and antiarrhythmic properties. The review also summarizes some important mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias in the ischemic/reperfused myocardium and permits an assessment of antiarrhythmic potential of drugs used for pharmacotherapy under experimental and clinical conditions.

Qual o Diagnóstico?

Paciente do sexo feminino, 82 anos, branca, com história de fibrilação atrial paroxística (FA) há vários anos, com crises de palpitação com duração variável entre poucos minutos e várias horas, sem controle clínico, com uso de betabloqueadores e diltiazem. Apresentava queixas de cansaço aos esforços moderados, sem dor precordial ou síncope, com progressiva astenia e indisposição. Informou três internações prévias para cardioversão química de FA. Apresentava antecedente de hipertensão arterial sistêmica, hipotireoidismo e doença aterosclerótica do coração, tendo sido submetida a angioplastia coronariana em 2014 com colocação de stent não farmacológico, sem infarto prévio. Vinha em uso regular de irbesartana 300 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg e levotiroxina 75 mcg. Ao longo dos últimos oito meses, houve piora das crises de FA, passando a fazer uso de propafenona em doses crescentes, inicialmente 150 mg BID, sem melhora dos sintomas, passando para 300 mg BID e atualmente 750 mg/dia (300 – 150 – 300 mg, distribuídos de 8/8 horas), sem controle das palpitações e com sensação de mal-estar e fraqueza.

What is the Diagnosis?

A female 82-year-old Caucasian patient with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) for several years, with palpitation crises of varying duration between a few minutes and several hours, without clinical control, using beta-blockers and diltiazem. The patient presented complaints of fatigue on moderate efforts, without precordial pain or syncope, with progressive asthenia and indisposition. She informed three previous hospitalizations for chemical cardioversion of AF.

Electrocardiographic evidence of abnormal atrial phenotype in Brugada syndrome

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited ion channelopathy that may predispose affected individuals to atrial cardiomyopathy. We tested the hypothesis that BrS patients have higher degrees of atrial electrophysiological abnormalities compared to controls, and these can be reflected by changes in P-wave parameters determined on the electrocardiogram (ECG).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study comparing BrS patients to age- and gender-matched control subjects. Mean P-wave duration (PWD_mean), maximum PWD (PWD_max) and minimum PWD (PWD_min), P-wave dispersion (PWD_max - PWD_min), and P-wave terminal force in V1 (PTFV1) were measured. PWD_max ≥ 120 ms, in the presence and absence of biphasic P-waves in the inferior leads, were termed advanced and partial inter-atrial block (IAB), respectively.

RESULTS

The proportion of IAB was significantly higher in BrS patients (28/51; 55%) than in control subjects (14/51; 27%; Fisher's Exact test; P < 0.01). Advanced IAB was observed in two BrS patients but none of the control subjects (P = 0.50). Compared to controls, BrS patients showed higher PWD_mean (107 [98-113] vs. 97 [90-108] ms; KWANOVA, P < 0.01), PWD_max (123 [110-132] vs. 113 [107-121] ms; P < 0.001) but statistically indistinguishable PWD_min (82 [72-92] vs. 77 [69-85]; P = 0.09), and P-wave dispersion (38 [26-52] vs. 37 [23-45] ms; P = 0.14). PTFV1 was significantly higher in BrS patients than in control subjects (24 [0-40] vs. 0 [0-27] mm.ms; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Atrial conduction abnormalities are frequently observed in BrS. These patients may require monitoring for future development of atrial fibrillation and stroke.

Higher Dispersion Measures of Conduction and Repolarization in Type 1 Compared to Non-type 1 Brugada Syndrome Patients: An Electrocardiographic Study From a Single Center

Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a cardiac ion channelopathy that predisposes affected individuals to sudden cardiac death (SCD). Type 1 BrS is thought to take a more malignant clinical course than non-type 1 BrS. We hypothesized that the degrees of abnormal repolarization and conduction are greater in type 1 subjects and these differences can be detected by electrocardiography (ECG). Methods: Electrocardiographic data from spontaneous type 1 and non-type 1 BrS patients were analyzed. ECG parameters were measured from leads V1 to V3. Values were expressed as median [lower quartile-upper quartile] and compared using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. Results: Compared to non-type 1 BrS patients (n = 29), patients with spontaneous type 1 patterns (n = 22) showed similar (P > 0.05) heart rate (73 [64-77] vs. 68 [62-80] bpm), QRS duration (136 [124-161] vs. 127 [117-144] ms), uncorrected QT (418 [393-443] vs. 402 [386-424] ms) and corrected QT intervals (457 [414-474] vs. 430 [417-457] ms), JTpeak intervals (174 [144-183] vs. 174 [150-188] ms), Tpeak- Tend intervals (101 [93-120] vs. 99 [90-105] ms), Tpeak- Tend/QT ratios (0.25 [0.23-0.27] vs. 0.24 [0.22-0.27]), Tpeak- Tend/QRS (0.77 [0.62-0.87] vs. 0.77 [0.69-0.86]), Tpeak- Tend/(QRS × QT) (0.00074 [0.00034-0.00096] vs. 0.00073 [0.00048-0.00012] ms-1), index of Cardiac Electrophysiological Balance (iCEB, QT/QRS, marker of wavelength: 3.14 [2.56-3.35] vs. 3.21 [2.85-3.46]) and corrected iCEB (QTc/QRS: 3.25 [2.91-3.73] vs. 3.49 [2.99-3.78]). Higher QRS dispersion was seen in type 1 subjects (QRSd: 34 [24-66] vs. 24 [12-34] ms) but QT dispersion (QTd: 48 [39-71] vs. 43 [22-94] ms), QTc dispersion (QTcd: 52 [41-79] vs. 46 [23-104] ms), JTpeak dispersion (44 [23-62] vs. 45 [30-62] ms), Tpeak- Tend dispersion (28 [15-34] vs. 29 [22-53] ms) or Tpeak- Tend/QT dispersion (0.06 [0.03-0.08] vs. 0.08 [0.04-0.12]) did not differ between the two groups. Type 1 subjects showed higher (QRSd × Tpeak- Tend)/QRS (25 [19-44] vs. 19 [9-30] ms) but similar iCEB dispersion (0.83 [0.49-1.14] vs. 0.61 [0.34-0.92]) and iCEBc dispersion (0.93 [0.51-1.15] vs. 0.65 [0.39-0.96]). Conclusion: Higher levels of dispersion in conduction and repolarization are found in type 1 than non-type 1 BrS patients, potentially explaining the higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in the former group.