Impact of saline loading at cardiac catheterization on the classification and management of patients evaluated for pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease

Left heart disease (LHD) is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH), which may be classified further as isolated post-capillary (ipcPH) or combined post- and pre-capillary PH (cpcPH). The 7th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension PH-LHD task force reviewed newly reported randomised clinical trials and contemplated novel opportunities for improving outcome. Results from major randomised clinical trials reinforced prior recommendations against the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy in PH-LHD outside of clinical trials, and suggested possible harm. Greater focus on phenotyping was viewed as one general strategy by which to ultimately improve clinical outcomes. This is potentially achievable by individualising ipcPH versus cpcPH diagnosis for patients with pulmonary arterial wedge pressure within a diagnostic grey zone (12-18 mmHg), and through a newly developed PH-LHD staging system. In this model, PH accompanies LHD across four stages (A=at risk, B=structural heart disease, C=symptomatic heart disease, D=advanced), with each stage characterised by progression in clinical characteristics, haemodynamics and potential therapeutic strategies. Along these lines, the task force proposed disaggregating PH-LHD to emphasise specific subtypes for which PH prevalence, pathophysiology and treatment are unique. This includes re-interpreting mitral and aortic valve stenosis through a contemporary lens, and focusing on PH within the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and amyloid cardiomyopathy clinical spectra. Furthermore, appreciating LHD in the profile of PH patients with chronic lung disease and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease is essential. However, engaging LHD patients in clinical research more broadly is likely to require novel methodologies such as pragmatic trials and may benefit from next-generation analytics to interpret results.

Impact of targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy in patients with combined post- and precapillary pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Combined post- and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH) portends poor outcomes in pulmonary hypertension related to left heart disease (PH-LHD). While recent evidence does not support the use of targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy in PH-LHD, there is a lack of clinical data on their use in CpcPH. We evaluated the outcomes in patients with CpcPH treated with PAH therapies.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 50 patients meeting hemodynamic criteria of CpcPH and started on PAH-targeted drugs were identified. Fifty age- and gender-matched PAH patients were chosen as controls. We evaluated the change in 6-minute walk distance, World Health Organization functional class (FC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, BNP or NT-proBNP, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

After adjusting for age and gender, there was no improvement in World Health Organization FC in CpcPH over 2 years (odds ratio of change to FC I/II 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98-1.04). There was no significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance (β coefficient 0.21, 95% CI: -0.98 to 1.4), reduction in BNP/NT-proBNP (β coefficient -12.16, 95% CI: -30.68 to 6.37), increase in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (β coefficient 0.074, 95% CI: 0.010-0.139), or decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (0.996, 95% CI: 0.991-1.011) in CpcPH with therapy. There was higher mortality in CpcPH compared to PAH on treatment (24% vs 4%, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no improvements in symptoms, exercise capacity, or echocardiographic parameters with PAH-targeted therapy in CpcPH. Further studies into potential treatments benefiting this population are needed.

A Fluid Challenge Test for the Diagnosis of Occult Heart Failure

A right heart catheterization with measurements of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) may be necessary for the diagnosis of left heart failure as a cause of pulmonary hypertension or unexplained dyspnea. Diagnostic cutoff values are a PAWP of ≥ 15 mm Hg at rest or a PAWP of ≥ 25 mm Hg during exercise. However, accurate measurement of PAWP can be challenging and heart failure may be occult. Left heart catheterization, with measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, may also be indecisive. Measurements are then best repeated in stress conditions. Exercise is an option, but the equipment is not universally available, and interpretation can be difficult in patients with wide respiratory pressure swings. An alternative is offered by a fluid challenge. Studies have gathered data supporting infusion of 500 mL or 7 mL/kg saline and a PAWP of 18 mm Hg as a diagnostic cutoff. The procedure is simple and does not take much catheterization laboratory time. Combining echocardiography with invasive measurements may increase the diagnostic accuracy of diastolic dysfunction. Cardiac output after a fluid challenge may be of prognostic relevance.