Elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure is associated with increased risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure for the Prediction of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Primary Percutaneous Intervention (the ELEVATE Study)

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We investigated whether left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in patients who underwent PCI might be additive to current risk stratification of CIN. Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction between 2013 and 2018 at Western Health in Victoria, Australia were analyzed. CIN was defined as a 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline or 44 µmol/L increase in absolute value within 48 hours of contrast administration. Compared with patients without CIN (n = 455, 93%), those who developed CIN (n = 35, 7%) were older (64 vs 58 years, p = 0.006), and had higher peak creatine kinase (2,862 [1,258 to 3,952] vs 1,341 U/L [641 to 2,613], p = 0.02). The CIN group had higher median LVEDP (30 [21-33] vs 25 mm Hg [20-30], p = 0.013) and higher median Mehran risk score (MRS) (5 [2-8] vs 2 [1-5], p <0.001). Patients with CIN had more in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (composite end point of death, new or recurrent myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization or stroke) (23% vs 8.6%, p = 0.01), but similar 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (20% vs 15%, p = 0.46). An LVEDP >30 mm Hg independently predicted CIN (odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.46 to 8.03, p = 0.005). The addition of LVEDP ≥30 mm Hg to MRS marginally improved risk prediction for CIN compared with MRS alone (area-under-curve, c-statistic = 0.71 vs c-statistic = 0.63, p = 0.08). In conclusion, elevated LVEDP ≥30 mm Hg during primary PCI was an independent predictor of CIN in patients treated for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The addition of LVEDP to the MRS may improve risk prediction for CIN.

Dilated Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter Is a New Risk Factor of Acute Kidney Injury Following Coronary Angiography

Purpose

Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) is a common indicator in echocardiogram, and dilated LVEDD was correlated with left ventricular insufficiency. However, it is uncertain whether dilated LVEDD is associated with increasing the risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Patients and Methods

We enrolled 8,189 patients with CAD undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) between January 2007 and December 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to the LVEDD length (normal LVEDD: men: LVEDD ≤56 mm, women: LVEDD ≤51 mm; dilated LVEDD: men: LVEDD >56 mm, women: LVEDD >51 mm). The endpoints were CA-AKI⁰³⁵⁰ and CA-AKI⁰⁵²⁵ (CA-AKI⁰³⁵⁰: an increase in the serum creatinine (Scr) level by >0.3 mg/dl or >50% within the first 48 h after CAG; CA-AKI⁰⁵²⁵: an absolute Scr increase ≥ 0.5 mg/dl or a relative increase ≥ 25% within 72 h after contrast medium exposure). In-hospital dialysis, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality were contained as well. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the association between LVEDD and CA-AKI.

Results

Among 8,189 participants (men: 76.6%, mean age: 64.4 ± 10.7 years), 1,603 (19.6%) presented with dilated LVEDD. In addition, the dilated LVEDD group indicated an elevation of CA-AKI⁰³⁵⁰ (12.4 vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001) and CA-AKI⁰⁵²⁵ (15.0 vs. 8.8%; p < 0.001) when compared with the normal group. According to multivariable logistic analysis, dilated LVEDD was an independent predictor of CA-AKI⁰³⁵⁰ [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–1.61, p = 0.010) and CA-AKI⁰⁵²⁵ (aOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.04–1.67; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

In conclusion, these results demonstrated that the dilated LVEDD was a significant and independent predictor of CA-AKI following CAG in patients with CAD. Further verifications are needed to verify the association between LVEDD and CA-AKI.

Low Ejection Fraction Predisposes to Contrast-Induced Nephropathy after the Second Step of Staged Coronary Revascularization for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Observational Study

Patients who develop contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) are at an increased short-term and long-term risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. Our aim was to search for patient characteristics associated with changes in serum creatinine and CIN incidence after each step of two-stage coronary revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing staged coronary angioplasty during hospitalization for AMI. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 138 patients with acute myocardial infarction without hemodynamic instability, in whom two-stage coronary angioplasty was performed during the initial hospital stay. In-hospital serum creatinine levels were recorded before the 1st intervention (at admission), within 72 h after the 1st intervention (before the 2nd intervention), and within 72 h after the 2nd intervention. The incidence of CIN was 2% after the 1st intervention (i.e., primary angioplasty) and 8% after the 2nd intervention. Patients with significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction after the 1st intervention (ejection fraction (EF) ≤35%) exhibited higher relative rises in creatinine levels after the 2nd intervention (18 ± 29% vs. 2 ± 16% for EF ≤35% and >35%, respectively, p = 0.03), while respective creatinine changes after the 1st revascularization procedure were comparable (−1 ± 14% vs. 2 ± 13%, p = 0.4). CIN after the 2nd intervention was over five-fold more frequent in subjects with low EF (28% vs. 5%, p = 0.007). The association between low EF and CIN incidence or relative creatinine changes after the 2nd intervention was maintained upon adjustment for baseline renal function, major CV risk factors, and the use of renin-angiotensin axis antagonists prior to admission. In conclusion, low EF predisposes to CIN after second contrast exposure in patients undergoing two-stage coronary angioplasty during the initial hospitalization for AMI. Our findings suggest a need of extended preventive measures against CIN or even postponement of second coronary intervention in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction scheduled for the second step of staged angioplasty.