A pairwise meta-analytic comparison of aortic valve area determined by planimetric versus hemodynamic methods in aortic stenosis

Validation of fluid-structure interaction simulations of the opening phase of phantom mitral heart valves under physiologically inspired conditions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Atrioventricular valve disease is a common cause of heart failure, and successful surgical or interventional outcomes are crucial. Patient-specific fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling may provide valuable insights into valve dynamics and guidance of valve repair strategies. However, lack of validation has kept FSI modeling from clinical implementation. Therefore, this study aims to validate FSI simulations against in vitro benchmarking data, based on clinically relevant parameters for evaluating heart valve disease.

METHODS

An FSI model that mimics the left heart was developed. The domain included a deformable mitral valve of different stiffnesses run with different inlet velocities. Five different cases were simulated and compared to in vitro data based on the pressure difference across the valve, the valve opening, and the velocity in the flow domain.

RESULTS

The simulations underestimate the pressure difference across the valve by 6.8-14 % compared to catheter measurements. Evaluation of the valve opening showed an underprediction of 5.4-7.3 % when compared to cine MRI, 2D Echo, and 3D Echo data. Additionally, the simulated velocity through the valve showed a 7.9-8.4 % underprediction in relation to Doppler Echo measurements. Qualitative assessment of the velocity profile in the ventricle and the streamlines of the flow in the domain showed good agreement of the flow behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Parameters relevant to the diagnosis of heart valve disease estimated by FSI simulations showed good agreement when compared to in vitro benchmarking data, with differences small enough not to affect the grading of heart valve disease. The FSI model is thus deemed good enough for further development toward patient-specific cases.

Implementation of a CT-derived correction factor to refine the measurement of aortic valve area and stroke volume using Doppler echocardiography improves grading of severity and prediction of prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis

AIMS

To assess rates of reclassification of severity and associated 5-year survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after application of a CT-derived correction factor (CF) to refine the measurement of aortic valve area (AVA) and stroke volume index (SVi) using Doppler echocardiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 1450 patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF from a French registry. Multiplication of echocardiographic LV outflow tract diameter by a CT-derived CF of 1.13 to calculate the AVA and SVi using the continuity equation resulted in reclassification of 39% of patients from severe to moderate AS (AVA > 1 cm²) and 77% from low flow (LF, SVi < 35 ml/m²) to normal flow (NF, SVi ≥ 35 ml/m²). After application of the CF, 5-year survival with conservative management was 50 ± 4% for severe AS compared to 62 ± 4% for moderate AS (p < 0.001). A strategy of medical management followed by intervention for severe AS was associated with higher risk of mortality over 5-year follow-up after adjustment for covariates and application of the CF (HR 1.35 [1.10-1.55], p = 0.015). Five-year survival was also poorer in patients remaining in the LF group after application of the CF, even after valve intervention (72%, 66% and 47% for NF to NF, LF to NF and LF to LF, respectively). After adjustment for covariates (including intervention), risk of mortality was higher in LF to LF patients compared to NF to NF (HR 1.78 [1.25-2.56]), but similar for NF to NF and LF to NF (HR 1.20 [0.90-1.60]).

CONCLUSION

Refined accuracy of echocardiographic LV outflow tract diameter measurement using a CF of 1.13 before derivation of AVA and SVi in patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF allows improved grading of severity, and prediction of prognosis. We recommend implementation of the CF during routine echocardiography when using the continuity equation for Doppler haemodynamic measurements.