Late lumen enlargement after treatment of de-novo lesions with drug coated balloon catheters - Glagov effect or plaque regression?

Serial angiography and angioscopy of late lumen enlargement after drug-coated balloon for dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula

The use of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) to treat dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula (AVF) has shown promising results. After percutaneous coronary intervention with DCB, late lumen enlargement (LLE) often develops in the early follow-up phase, but questions regarding the natural history of changes in lesions after DCB angioplasty have not been clearly elucidated. Here, we reported on a patient in whom angiography and angioscopy were performed immediately and 4 months after DCB angioplasty to treat cephalic vein stenosis of the dysfunctional AVF. Immediately after DCB application, angiography showed good dilatation and blood flow and mild vascular dissection that did not affect blood flow. Angioscopy showed that although the balloon had damaged the intima and the paclitaxel particles had adhered to the vessel wall. Four months after DCB treatment, follow-up angiography and angioscopy were performed. Angiography showed LLE in the cephalic vein of the AVF that had been treated by DCB angioplasty. Angioscopy showed that the intima of the vessel had almost completely healed, and the paclitaxel particles had disappeared. LLE might occur when DCB is used for AVF.

Serial quantitative angiographic study of target lumen enlargement after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for native coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Target lumen enlargement (TLE) or "late lumen enlargement" is often encountered after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-coated balloons (DCB). To date, the prognosis of coronary arterial lesions with or without TLE has not been clearly elucidated.

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the long-term prognosis of coronary arterial lesions with or without TLE observed within 1 year (early TLE) after DCB angioplasty using serial quantitative angiographic follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-three consecutive patients (de novo coronary arterial lesions, 251) who underwent follow-up angiography within 1 year after DCB angioplasty (early follow-up, median: 6 months) were retrospectively evaluated. Of these, 97 patients (125 lesions) also underwent angiography more than 1 year after DCB angioplasty (late follow-up, median: 37 months). TLE was defined as an increase in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) after PCI at each follow-up.

RESULTS

Early TLE was detected in 142 lesions (56.6%). Of these, 76 lesions were also evaluated at late follow-up. TLE persisted even at late follow-up in 67 of the 76 lesions (88.2%). An increase in MLD in early TLE (+) lesions was observed in the period between post-PCI and early follow-up (1.84 ± 0.06 vs. 2.12 ± 0.07 mm, p < 0.001) but not between early and late follow-up (2.12 ± 0.07 vs. 2.16 ± 0.07 mm, p = 0.74). In contrast, 49 of 109 lesions without early TLE were evaluated at late follow-up, of which 28 lesions (57.1%) showed TLE at late follow-up. The MLD of early TLE (-) lesions (n = 49) significantly increased from early (1.63 ± 0.061 mm) to late follow-up (1.84 ± 0.06 mm) (p < 0.001). No aneurysms were found in any of these cases.

CONCLUSION

Early TLE was observed in more than half of the lesions, with the majority remaining at late follow-up. Alternatively, half of the lesions without early TLE showed late TLE, occurring biphasically after DCB angioplasty.

Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions by a Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with the best investigated paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB).

BACKGROUND

There is increasing clinical evidence for the treatment of coronary de novo disease using drug-coated balloons. However, it is unclear whether paclitaxel remains the drug of choice or if sirolimus is an alternative, in analogy to drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

Seventy patients with coronary de novo lesions were enrolled in a randomized, multicenter trial to compare a novel SCB (SeQuent SCB, B. Braun Melsungen; 4 μg/mm²) with a PCB (SeQuent Please, B. Braun Melsungen; 3 μg/mm²). The primary endpoint was angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events and individual clinical endpoints such as cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and binary restenosis.

RESULTS

Quantitative coronary angiography revealed no differences in baseline parameters. After 6 months, in-segment LLL was 0.01 ± 0.33 mm in the PCB group versus 0.10 ± 0.32 mm in the SCB group. The mean difference between SCB and PCB was 0.08 (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.24). Noninferiority at a predefined margin of 0.35 was shown. However, negative LLL was more frequent in the PCB group (60% of lesions vs 32% in the SCB group; P = 0.019). Major adverse cardiovascular events up to 12 months also did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This first-in-human comparison of a novel SCB with a crystalline coating showed similar angiographic outcomes in the treatment of coronary de novo disease compared with a clinically proven PCB. However, late luminal enlargement was more frequently observed after PCB treatment. (Treatment of Coronary De-Novo Stenosis by a Sirolimus Coated Balloon or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter Malaysia [SCBDNMAL]; NCT04017364).