Clinical utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to assess the left atrium before catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Factors predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: A review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common and clinically significant type of cardiac arrhythmia. Although catheter ablation (CA) can restore sinus rhythm in patients with AF, some patients experience recurrence after the procedure. This requires us to find a simple and effective way to identify patients at a high risk of recurrence and to intervene early in the high-risk population to improve patient prognosis. The mechanism of AF recurrence is unclear, but it involves several aspects including patient history, inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, and genes. This article summarizes the current predictors of AF recurrence after CA, including myocardial fibrosis markers, inflammatory markers, MicroRNAs, Circular RNAs, AF recurrence scores, and imaging indicators. Each predictor has its own scope of application, and the predictive capacity and joint application of multiple predictors may improve the predictive power. In addition, we summarize the mechanisms involved in AF recurrence. We hope that this review will assist researchers understand the current predictors of AF recurrence and help them conduct further related studies.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Preprocedural Planning for Left Atrial Procedures in Atrial Fibrillation

This document summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of preprocedural imaging in three clinical scenarios in patients needing endovascular treatment or cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. These clinical scenarios include preprocedural imaging prior to radiofrequency ablation; prior to left atrial appendage occlusion; and prior to cardioversion. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

From Atrial Fibrillation Management to Atrial Myopathy Assessment: The Evolving Concept of Left Atrium Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent genetically inherited cardiovascular disorder in adults and a significant cause of heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Historically, atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considered as a critical aspect in HCM patients as it is considered to be a marker of disease progression, escalates the frequency of heart failure hospitalisations, increases the risk of thromboembolic events, and worsens quality of life and outcome. Increasing evidence suggests that AF is the result of a subtle long-standing process that starts early in the history of HCM. The process of left atrial dilation accompanied by morphologic and functional remodelling is the quintessential prerequisite for the onset of AF. This review aims to describe the current understanding of AF pathophysiology in HCM, emphasising the role of left atrial myopathy in its development. In addition, we discuss risk factors and management strategies specific to AF in the context of HCM, providing insights into the complexities and challenges of treating this specific patient population.

Association of the interatrial block and left atrial fibrosis in the patients without history of atrial fibrillation

Presence of left atrial (LA) fibrosis reflects underlying atrial cardiomyopathy. Interatrial block (IAB) is associated with LA fibrosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The association of IAB and LA fibrosis in the patients without history of AF is unknown. We examined association of IAB and LA fibrosis in the patients without AF history. This is a retrospective analysis of 229 patients undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). LA fibrosis was reported from spatial extent of late gadolinium enhancement of CMR. IAB was measured from 12-lead electrocardiography using digital caliper. Of 229 patients undergoing CMR, prevalence of IAB was 50.2%. Patients with IAB were older (56.9±13.9 years vs. 45.9±19.2 years, p<0.001) and had higher prevalence of co-morbidities. Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in IAB group. LA volume index (LAVI) was greater in IAB group (54.6±24.9 ml/m2 vs. 43.0±21.1 ml/m2, p<0.001). Patients with IAB had higher prevalence of LA fibrosis than those without IAB (70.4% vs. 21.2%; p<0.001). After multivariable analysis, only IAB and LAVI were independent factors that predict LA fibrosis. Prevalence of IAB in patients undergoing CMR was high. IAB was highly associated with LA fibrosis and larger LA size in patients without AF history.

Multimodality Imaging in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation

Ventricular hypertrophy is associated with diastolic dysfunction, resulting in increased left atrial (LA) pressure, enlargement, fibrosis, and decreased LA function. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by myocyte disarray, myocardial fibrosis, and hypertrophy. Notably, a thickened and noncompliant LV results in the impairment of diastolic function. These conditions promote LA remodeling and enlargement, which contribute to developing and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is an atrial arrhythmia that occurs frequently in HCM, and evaluating the morphology and physiology of the atrium and ventricle is important for treatment and prognosis determination in HCM patients with AF. In addition, it provides a clue that can predict the possibility of new AF, even in patients not previously diagnosed with AF. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), which can overcome the limitations of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), has been widely used traditionally and even enables tissue characterization; moreover, it has emerged as an essential imaging modality for patients with HCM. Here, we review the role of multimodal imaging in patients with HCM and AF.

Atrial cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis, clinical implications and unresolved issues in anticoagulation therapy

Atrial cardiomyopathy (AC) is an evolving pathophysiological entity that has expanded our understanding regarding the atrium and its role in arrhythmogenesis and cardiac thromboembolism. The pathological myocardium in AC promotes arrhythmogenesis through mechanical dysfunction (hypocontractility, fibrosis), adverse alterations of the endothelium and secretion of prothrombotic factors (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-a). 'Red flags', indicative of AC, can be recognized either non-invasively by electrocardiography, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or invasively by high-density electroanatomical mapping as low bipolar voltage areas of the affected myocardium. Signs of AC have been strongly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke, even embolic strokes of undetermined source, regardless of the coexistence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The underlying existence of AC has been negatively correlated with the success rate of catheter ablation of AF. The clinical value of AC is the provision of a novel pathway regarding the potential mechanisms of cerebrovascular events of cardiac thromboembolic origin. In addition, AC may serve as a risk stratification tool to predict the long-term responders of AF catheter ablation.

Left atrial strain for predicting recurrence in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a single-center two-dimensional speckle tracking retrospective study

Background

Although catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), a good many of patients still have a recurrence following post-operation. Prediction of AF recurrence by evaluating left atrial (LA) phase function with speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) may be helpful for risk stratification and clinical management for AF patients. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the prognostic value of LA strains in non-valvular AF patients after CA.

Methods

A total of 95 non-valvular AF patients (70.5% paroxysmal AF, 56.8% males, mean age 63.2 ± 9.7 years) were included in this retrospective study between October 2019 and August 2020. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all the subjects and STE was used to analyze the LA reservoir strain (LASr), LA conduit strain (LAScd) and LA contractile strain (LASct) during different phases before CA. Patients were followed up with until January 2022. The endpoint was AF recurrence.

Results

Over a median follow-up period of 26.0 months (interquartile range, 24.7–26.7 months), 26 patients experienced recurrence and 69 stayed in sinus rhythm. Compared with no-recurrence group, maximum volume of LA (LAVmax), minimum volume of LA (LAVmin) and LA volume index (LAVI) were increased in the recurrence group, while LAEF, LASr and LASct were worsened (P < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that LASct was an independent predictor of AF recurrence (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–0.97; P = 0.007) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an area under the curve of LASct<8% was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59–0.79; P = 0.0008).

Conclusions

LASct was of independent predictive value of AF recurrence. LA function assessed by STE may contribute to the risk stratification for AF patients and selection of suitable patients for CA.

Left atrial evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: sensitive and unique biomarkers

Left atrial (LA) imaging is still not routinely used for diagnosis and risk stratification, although recent studies have emphasized its importance as an imaging biomarker. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance is able to evaluate LA structure and function, metrics that serve as early indicators of disease, and provide prognostic information, e.g. regarding diastolic dysfunction, and atrial fibrillation (AF). MR angiography defines atrial anatomy, useful for planning ablation procedures, and also for characterizing atrial shapes and sizes that might predict cardiovascular events, e.g. stroke. Long-axis cine images can be evaluated to define minimum, maximum, and pre-atrial contraction LA volumes, and ejection fractions (EFs). More modern feature tracking of these cine images provides longitudinal LA strain through the cardiac cycle, and strain rates. Strain may be a more sensitive marker than EF and can predict post-operative AF, AF recurrence after ablation, outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stratification of diastolic dysfunction, and strain correlates with atrial fibrosis. Using high-resolution late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), the extent of fibrosis in the LA can be estimated and post-ablation scar can be evaluated. The LA LGE method is widely available, its reproducibility is good, and validations with voltage-mapping exist, although further scan-rescan studies are needed, and consensus regarding atrial segmentation is lacking. Using LGE, scar patterns after ablation in AF subjects can be reproducibly defined. Evaluation of 'pre-existent' atrial fibrosis may have roles in predicting AF recurrence after ablation, predicting new-onset AF and diastolic dysfunction in patients without AF. LA imaging biomarkers are ready to enter into diagnostic clinical practice.