Gender differences in factors associated with vasospastic angina

Effects of Smoking on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Spasm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Smoking is an established independent risk factor for coronary artery spasm (CAS), but its effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with CAS have not been systematically assessed.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from January 2000 to July 2023 was conducted to examine the relationship between smoking and MACE in patients with CAS. Data on MACE were obtained from both smoking and non-smoking CAS patient groups. The effects of smoking on MACE in patients with CAS were assessed through meta-analysis, utilising Stata 17.0 software for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Nine studies, encompassing 9,376 patients, from Japan (5 studies), Korea (4 studies) and Spain (1 study) were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that smoking significantly impacted MACE in patients with CAS (RR 1.965; 95% CI 1.348-2.865), a finding further validated by sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses identified a stronger correlation between smoking and increased MACE endpoints in Japanese patients and in those with >3 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis strongly indicates that smoking escalates the risk of MACE in patients with CAS, with a more pronounced association observed in Japanese patients and those with extended follow-up periods.

Relation of Vasoreactivity in the Left and Right Coronary Arteries During Acetylcholine Spasm Provocation Testing

The diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VSA) according to Japanese guidelines involves an initial intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test in the left coronary artery (LCA) followed by testing in the right coronary artery (RCA). However, global variations in test protocols often lead to the omission of ACh provocation in the RCA, potentially resulting in the underdiagnosis of VSA. This study assessed the validity of the LCA-only ACh provocation approach for the VSA diagnosis and whether vasoreactivity in the LCA aids in determining further provocation in the RCA. A total of 273 patients who underwent sequential intracoronary ACh provocation testing in the LCA and RCA were included. Patients with a positive ACh provocation test in the LCA were excluded. Relations between vasoreactivity in the LCA and ACh test outcomes (positivity and adverse events) in the RCA were evaluated. In patients with negative ACh test results in the LCA, subsequent ACh testing was positive in the RCA in 23 of 273 (8.4%) patients. In patients with minimal LCA vasoconstriction (<25%), only 3.0% had a positive ACh test in the RCA, whereas the ACh test in the RCA was positive in 13.5% of those with LCA constriction of 25% to 90% (p = 0.002). No major adverse events occurred during ACh testing in the RCA. In conclusion, for the VSA diagnosis, the omission of ACh provocation in the RCA may be clinically acceptable, particularly when vasoconstriction induced by ACh injection was minimal in the LCA. Further studies are needed to define ACh provocation protocols worldwide.

Omitting 50 μg of intracoronary acetylcholine injection in the left coronary artery during spasm provocation test

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines recommend intracoronary administration of acetylcholine (ACh) with incremental doses of 20, 50, and 100 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA) during spasm provocation test for diagnosing vasospastic angina, 50 μg of ACh rarely induced significant coronary vasospasm when no vasoconstriction was observed with 20 μg of ACh in a previous report. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of omitting 50 μg according to the vasoreactivity by 20 μg of ACh in the LCA.

METHODS

A total of 556 patients undergoing ACh provocation test with 20 μg followed by 50 and/or 100 μg were retrospectively included. Injection of 50 μg of ACh was primarily omitted when vasoconstriction <25 % was observed with 20 μg, which was left to operator's discretion. Adverse events were defined as a composite of ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and cardiogenic shock during ACh test in the LCA.

RESULTS

Positive ACh test in the LCA was observed in 245 (44.1 %) patients. Overall, patients with LCA constriction <25 % by 20 μg of ACh had a lower rate of positive ACh test than their counterpart (24.0 % vs. 88.4 %, p < 0.001). In patients with LCA constriction ≥25 % by 20 μg, the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher than in those with LCA constriction <25 % during the provocation test at doses of 50 and 100 μg (2.3 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Omitting 50 μg of ACh in the LCA may be safe and feasible when little vasoconstriction was observed with preceding injection of 20 μg of ACh during spasm provocation test for diagnosing vasospastic angina. However, we believe that 50 μg of ACh should not be omitted when 20 μg of ACh induced LCA constriction ≥25 %.

Safety and potential usefulness of sequential intracoronary acetylcholine and ergonovine administration for spasm provocation testing

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines recommend intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER) provocation testing for diagnosis of vasospastic angina, the feasibility and safety of sequential (combined) use of both pharmacological agents during the same catheterization session remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we investigated the feasibility and safety of sequential intracoronary ACh and ER administration for coronary spasm provocation testing.

METHODS

The study included 235 patients who showed positive results on ACh and ER provocation testing. Initial intracoronary ACh administration was followed by ER administration for left coronary artery (LCA) spasm provocation testing. Subsequently, the right coronary artery (RCA) was subjected to sequential ACh and ER administration for provocation testing. The primary outcome of the study was the safety of sequential intracoronary ACh and ER provocation testing, which was assessed based on a composite of all-cause death, sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, and cardiogenic shock.

RESULTS

Even in patients with negative results on sequential intracoronary ACh and ER provocation testing in the LCA and only ACh administration into the RCA, additional administration of ER into the RCA showed a positive provocation test result in 33 of 235 (14.0%) patients; three (1.3%) patients developed adverse effects (cardiogenic shock occurred in all cases) during LCA provocation testing. We observed no deaths attributable to spasm provocation testing.

CONCLUSION

Sequential administration of intracoronary ACh and ER was associated with a relatively low major complication rate and may be safe and potentially useful for diagnosis of vasospastic angina.

Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count for Coronary Blood Flow Evaluation during Interventional Diagnostic Procedures

Background and Objectives: An interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP), including intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation and coronary physiological testing, is recommended as an invasive diagnostic standard for patients suspected of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Recent guidelines suggest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count (TFC) as an alternative to wire-based coronary physiological indices for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction. We evaluated trajectories of TFC during IDP and the impact of ACh provocation on TFC. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Patients who underwent IDP to diagnose INOCA were included and divided into two groups according to the positive or negative ACh provocation test. Wire-based invasive physiological assessment was preceded by ACh provocation tests and intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). We evaluated TFC at three different time points during IDP; pre-ACh, post-ISDN, and post-hyperemia. Results: Of 104 patients, 58 (55.8%) had positive ACh provocation test. In the positive ACh group, resting mean transit time (Tmn) and baseline resistance index were significantly higher than in the negative ACh group. Post-ISDN TFC was significantly correlated with resting Tmn (r = 0.31, p = 0.002). Absolute TFC values were highest at pre-ACh, followed by post-ISDN and post-hyperemia in both groups. All between-time point differences in TFC were statistically significant in both groups, except for the change from pre-ACh to post-ISDN in the positive ACh group. Conclusions: In patients suspected of INOCA, TFC was modestly correlated with Tmn, a surrogate of coronary blood flow. The positive ACh provocation test influenced coronary blood flow assessment during IDP.

Vasospastic angina: Past, present, and future

Vasospastic angina (VSA) is characterized by episodes of rest angina that are responsive to short-acting nitrates and are attributable to coronary artery vasospasm. The condition is underdiagnosed as the provocation test is rarely performed. VSA, the most important component of non-obstructive coronary artery disease, can present with angina, be asymptomatic, or can even present with fatal arrhythmias and cardiac arrest. Although most patients with VSA respond well to vasodilating medications, prognosis does not improve as expected in most patients, suggesting the existence elusive prognostic factors and pathogenesis that warrant further exploration. Moreover, patients with either severe or refractory VSA barely respond to conventional treatment and may develop life-threatening arrhythmias or suffer sudden cardiac death during ischemic attacks, which are associated with immune-inflammatory responses and have been shown to achieve remission following glucocorticoid and immunoglobulin treatments. Our recent work revealed that inflammation plays a key role in the initiation and development of coronary spasms, and that inflammatory cytokines have predictive value for diagnosis. In contrast to the existing literature, this review both summarizes the theoretical and clinical aspects of VSA, and also discusses the relationship between inflammation, especially myocarditis and VSA, in order to provide novel insights into the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of VSA.

Impact of preceding acetylcholine provocation testing on following coronary physiological assessment during an interventional diagnostic procedure

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test and coronary physiological assessment are useful interventional diagnostic procedures for evaluating ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). However, the appropriate sequential order of the diagnostic procedures has been a matter of debate. We investigated the impact of preceding ACh provocation on following coronary physiological assessment.

METHODS

Patients suspected of INOCA underwent invasive coronary physiological assessment using thermodilution method and were divided into two groups according to the implementation of ACh provocation test. The ACh group was further divided into the positive and negative ACh groups. In the ACh group, intracoronary ACh provocation was performed before the invasive coronary physiological assessment. The main interest of this study was to compare coronary physiological indices among the no ACh, negative ACh, and positive ACh groups.

RESULTS

Of 120 patients, the no ACh, and negative and positive ACh groups included 46 (38.3 %), 36 (30.0 %), and 38 (31.7 %), respectively. Fractional flow reserve was lower in the no ACh group than in the ACh group. Resting mean transit time was significantly longer in the positive ACh group, followed by the no ACh and negative ACh groups (1.22 ± 0.55 vs. 1.00 ± 0.46 vs. 0.74 ± 0.36 s, p < 0.001). Index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve did not differ significantly among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preceding ACh provocation influenced following physiological assessment, particularly when ACh test was positive. Further studies are warranted to determine which interventional diagnostic procedure, ACh provocation or physiological assessment, should be preceded in the invasive evaluation of INOCA.

Vasospastic angina in women: Clinical backgrounds and prognoses of patients younger than and older than 60 years

BACKGROUND

We frequently encounter cases of women with vasospastic angina (VSA). Additionally, some women with VSA are younger than 60 years old. However, it is unknown whether the characteristics of VSA in women aged < 60 years are different from those in women aged ≥ 60 years.

AIM

To investigate and compare the clinical characteristics and prognosis of VSA in women aged < 60 years from those in women aged ≥ 60 years.

METHODS

We enrolled 94 women with VSA who were diagnosed using the spasm provocation test. According to the age at diagnosis, the patients were divided into two groups: Group Y (age < 60 years, n = 17) and Group O (age ≥ 60 years, n = 77). Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced dilation (NID) of the brachial artery were performed and assessed using brachial ultrasonography. Moreover, conventional coronary risk factors, such as atherosclerotic lesions (stenosis > 20%) detected using coronary angiography and focal spasms (coronary spasm within one segment of one coronary artery), and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) were assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

Smoking was more prevalent in Group Y than in Group O (P = 0.04). FMD was similar in both groups (Group O: 4.3% ± 3.2%, Group Y: 4.5% ± 3.3%; P = 0.75), whereas NID was higher in Group Y (20.5% ± 8.6%) than in Group O (13.6% ± 5.3%, P < 0.01). Atherosclerosis was not detected in Group Y but was detected in Group O (61%, P < 0.01). Focal spasms were less frequent in Group Y (12%) than in Group O (38%, P = 0.04). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.40).

CONCLUSION

Women aged < 60 years with VSA have less atherosclerotic lesions and focal spasms. These characteristics may be affected by smoking habits and vascular smooth muscle dysfunction.