1
|
Yamazaki T, Saito Y, Nakamura S, Tanabe Y, Kitahara H, Kobayashi Y. Combined assessment of fractional flow reserve, resting full-cycle ratio, and resting ratio of distal coronary to aortic pressure for clinical outcomes. J Cardiol 2024:S0914-5087(24)00169-2. [PMID: 39214509 DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 08/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and non-hyperemic indices are invasive standards for evaluating functional significance of coronary stenosis. However, data are limited about outcomes in vessels with concordant and discordant physiological results, particularly with a ratio of distal coronary to aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) at rest. METHODS This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Coronary physiological indices including FFR, resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), and resting Pd/Pa were invasively evaluated in vessels with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. FFR ≤0.80, RFR ≤0.89, and resting Pd/Pa ≤0.92 were considered physiologically positive. Vessels were divided into three groups according to the results of FFR, RFR, and resting Pd/Pa: concordant positive (all positive for FFR, RFR, and resting Pd/Pa), concordant negative (all negative for FFR, RFR, and resting Pd/Pa), and discordant groups. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) defined as a composite of cardiac death and target vessel myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization. RESULTS Of 987 vessels included, 311 (31.5 %), 263 (26.6 %), and 413 (41.9 %) were in the concordant positive, discordant, and concordant negative groups. During a median follow-up period of 417 (208-756) days, TVF occurred more frequently in the concordant positive group, followed by the discordant and concordant negative groups (7.7 % vs. 4.6 % vs. 2.4 %, p = 0.004). TVF increasingly accrued during long-term follow-up, while discordant results of RFR and resting Pd/Pa did not result in worse outcomes compared with negative RFR and resting Pd/Pa. CONCLUSION The combined assessment of FFR with RFR and resting Pd/Pa stratified TVF risks in vessels with intermediate coronary stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuro Yamazaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuichi Saito
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
| | - Shunsuke Nakamura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuya Tanabe
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideki Kitahara
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshio Kobayashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dahdal J, Bakker F, Svanerud J, Danad I, Driessen RS, Raijmakers PG, Harms HJ, Lammertsma AA, van de Hoef TP, Appelman Y, van Royen N, Knaapen P, de Waard GA. Validation of resting full-cycle ratio and diastolic pressure ratio with [ 15O]H 2O positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion. Heart Vessels 2024; 39:299-309. [PMID: 38367040 PMCID: PMC10920410 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-023-02356-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are invasive techniques used to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. These methods have been validated through perfusion imaging and clinical trials. New invasive pressure ratios that do not require hyperemia have recently emerged, and it is essential to confirm their diagnostic efficacy. The aim of this study was to validate the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) and the diastolic pressure ratio (dPR), against [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. A total of 129 symptomatic patients with an intermediate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. All patients underwent cardiac [15O]H2O PET with quantitative assessment of resting and hyperemic myocardial perfusion. Within a 2 week period, coronary angiography was performed. Intracoronary pressure measurements were obtained in 320 vessels and RFR, dPR, and FFR were computed. PET derived regional hyperemic myocardial blood flow (hMBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) served as reference standards. In coronary arteries with stenoses (43%, 136 of 320), the overall diagnostic accuracies of RFR, dPR, and FFR did not differ when PET hyperemic MBF < 2.3 ml min-1 (69.9%, 70.6%, and 77.1%, respectively) and PET MPR < 2.5 (70.6%, 71.3%, and 66.9%, respectively) were considered as the reference for myocardial ischemia. Non-significant differences between the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were found between the different indices. Furthermore, the integration of FFR with RFR (or dPR) does not enhance the diagnostic information already achieved by FFR in the characterization of ischemia via PET perfusion. In conclusion, the novel non-hyperemic pressure ratios, RFR and dPR, have a diagnostic performance comparable to FFR in assessing regional myocardial ischemia. These findings suggest that RFR and dPR may be considered as an FFR alternative for invasively guiding revascularization treatment in symptomatic patients with CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Dahdal
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Del Salvador, Salvador 364, 7500922, Santiago, Chile
| | - Frank Bakker
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Svanerud
- Coroventis Research AB, Ulls Väg 29A, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ibrahim Danad
- Utrecht University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel S Driessen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter G Raijmakers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J Harms
- Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim P van de Hoef
- Utrecht University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande Appelman
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels van Royen
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Knaapen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guus A de Waard
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Islam U, Sabbah M, Özbek BT, Madsen JM, Lønborg JT, Engstrøm T. Prognostic differences between physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and optimal medical therapy in coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL PLUS : CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2024; 38:100362. [PMID: 38510744 PMCID: PMC10945893 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Background Intracoronary physiology, particularly fractional flow reserve (FFR), has been used as a guide for revascularization for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The optimal treatment in the physiological grey-zone area has been unclear and remains subject to ongoing debate. Methods We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the prognostic effect of percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI) and optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with CAD. Studies were identified by medical literature databases. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and its components, death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization. Results A total of 16 studies with 27,451 patients were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that PCI was associated with a prognostic advantage over OMT in patients with FFR value ≤0.80 (RR: 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.45-0.90, p < 0.01). Patients with an FFR value >0.80 were shown to benefit more from OMT (RR 1.38, 95 % CI 1.24-1.53, p < 0.01). The analysis also showed that there was no significant difference in MACE in the grey-zone area (FFR 0.75-0.80) (RR 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.35-1.16, p = 0.14), but a significant reduction in repeat revascularization (RR 0.54, 95 % CI, 0.31-0.91, p < 0.01) when patients were treated with PCI. Conclusions Among patients with CAD and FFR values >0.80, OMT was associated with favorable outcomes over PCI in reducing the risk of MACE. However, among patients with FFR values ≤0.80, revascularization was superior in terms of reducing MACE. The available evidence supports the guideline-recommended use of an FFR cut-off of ≤0.80.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utsho Islam
- The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Muhammad Sabbah
- The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Burcu T. Özbek
- The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jasmine M. Madsen
- The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob T. Lønborg
- The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Engstrøm
- The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Winter RW, van Diemen PA, Schumacher SP, Jukema RA, Somsen YBO, Hoek R, van Rossum AC, Twisk JWR, de Waard GA, Nap A, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, Knaapen P, Danad I. Hemodynamic Insights into Combined Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Assessment Through Quantitative [ 15O]H 2O PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:279-286. [PMID: 38176722 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
In patients evaluated for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), guidelines recommend using either fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) to guide coronary revascularization decision-making. The hemodynamic significance of lesions with discordant FFR and iFR measurements is debated. This study compared [15O]H2O PET-derived absolute myocardial perfusion between vessels with concordant and discordant FFR and iFR measurements. Methods: We included 197 patients suspected of obstructive CAD who had undergone [15O]H2O PET perfusion imaging and combined FFR/iFR interrogation in 468 vessels. Resting myocardial blood flow (MBF), hyperemic MBF, and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were compared among 4 groups: FFR low/iFR low (n = 79), FFR high/iFR low (n = 22), FFR low/iFR high (n = 22), and FFR high/iFR high (n = 345). Predefined [15O]H2O PET thresholds for ischemia were 2.3 mL·min-1·g-1 or less for hyperemic MBF and 2.5 or less for CFR. Results: Hyperemic MBF was lower in the concordant low (2.09 ± 0.67 mL·min-1·g-1), FFR high/iFR low (2.41 ± 0.80 mL·min-1·g-1), and FFR low/iFR high (2.40 ± 0.69 mL·min-1·g-1) groups compared with the concordant high group (2.91 ± 0.84 mL·min-1·g-1) (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, and P < 0.001, respectively). A lower CFR was observed in the concordant low (2.37 ± 0.76) and FFR high/iFR low (2.64 ± 0.84) groups compared with the concordant high group (3.35 ± 1.07, P < 0.01 for both). However, for vessels with either low FFR or low iFR, quantitative hyperemic MBF and CFR values exceeded the ischemic threshold in 38% and 49%, respectively. In addition, resting MBF exhibited a negative correlation with iFR (P < 0.001) and was associated with FFR low/iFR high discordance compared with concordant low FFR/low iFR measurements, independent of clinical and angiographic characteristics, as well as hyperemic MBF (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.65; P < 0.001). Conclusion: We found reduced myocardial perfusion in vessels with concordant low and discordant FFR/iFR measurements. However, FFR/iFR combinations often inaccurately classified vessels as either ischemic or nonischemic when compared with hyperemic MBF and CFR. Furthermore, a lower resting MBF was associated with a higher iFR and the occurrence of FFR low/iFR high discordance. Our study showed that although combined FFR/iFR assessment can be useful to estimate the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions, these pressure-derived indices provide a limited approximation of [15O]H2O PET-derived quantitative myocardial perfusion as the physiologic standard of CAD severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben W de Winter
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pepijn A van Diemen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan P Schumacher
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruurt A Jukema
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvemarie B O Somsen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hoek
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert C van Rossum
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Guus A de Waard
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Nap
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter G Raijmakers
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET Research, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roel S Driessen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Knaapen
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Ibrahim Danad
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|