The comparison of early healing 1-month after PCI among CoCr-everolimus-eluting stent (EES), biodegradable polymer (BP)-EES and BP-sirolimus-eluting stent: Insights from OFDI and coronary angioscopy

Impact of Neointimal Condition and Platelet Reactivity on Intrastent Thrombus at Long-Term Follow-up After 2nd- and 3rd-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation - Insights From a Coronary Angioscopy and Pharmacodynamic Study

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of very late stent failure (VLSF) is reduced with newer generation drug-eluting stent (DES), the mechanism of VLSF has not been fully explored.Methods and Results:This study evaluated both local vascular healing using coronary angioscopy and systemic factors determined by platelet reactivity at long-term follow-up after 2nd- and 3rd-generation DES implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Coronary angioscopy was performed to assess neointimal coverage (NIC), yellow color (YC) grade and presence of thrombus. The obtained findings were compared with 2nd- and 3rd-DES. Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry. 100 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled: 2nd- (n=50) and 3rd-DES (n=50). 3rd-DES patients had significantly higher NIC grade and lower YC grade compared with 2nd-DES. The presence of thrombus was tended to be lower with 3rd-DES than with 2nd-DES (8% vs. 18%, P=0.11). Patients with thrombus had significantly higher maximum platelet aggregation and higher prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) than those without thrombus. Multivariable analysis showed stent strut exposure and HPR as independent predictors of thrombus.

CONCLUSIONS

Newer generation DES contribute to better vascular healing depending on the degree of neointimal coverage. In addition to local factors at the stented lesion, systemic factors such as degree of platelet reactivity might also contribute to VLSF.

Clinical outcome of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a risk for increased incidence of adverse clinical events after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the difference in the incidence of adverse clinical events according to stent type in patients with diabetes remains to be elucidated. In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients treated with the biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) and the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) among patients with diabetes.

Methods

Among 631 lesions in 510 consecutive patients treated with either BP-SES or DP-EES, 165 lesions in 141 patients with diabetes mellitus and stable angina pectoris were identified and classified into the BP-SES group (48 lesions in 44 patients) and the DP-EES group (117 lesions in 100 patients). The incidence of adverse clinical events after stent implantation was compared between the 2 groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in the prevalence of conventional risk factors, lesion characteristics, and procedural characteristics between the 2 groups. During median 386 [334–472] days follow-up, the incidence of target lesion revascularization (11.4 vs. 2.0%, p = 0.003) and device-oriented clinical endpoint (13.6 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.035) in the BP-SES group was significantly greater than that in the DP-EES group. A univariate model demonstrated that the BP-SES usage was significantly associated with the higher incidence of target lesion revascularization (odds ratio, 6.686; 95% confidence interval, 1.234–36.217; p = 0.028).

Conclusion

BP-SES was associated with the greater incidence of TLR than the DP-EES in patients with diabetes mellitus. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are required to confirm the present results.

Early vascular response of ultra-thin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical frequency domain imaging: the EVALUATION study

This study aimed to evaluate the early vascular response of ultra-thin strut bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP SES) using optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI). Ultra-thin strut BP SES have superior outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety endpoints when compared to other thin strut new-generation stents. However, the factors contributing to the superiority of BP SES over other thin strut new-generation stents are unclear. A total of 32 patients with multivessel disease requiring staged procedures at 1 month were enrolled from 3 cardiovascular institutions; of these, 31 were immediately assessed by OFDI (n = 31). All patients were assessed at 1 month after ultra-thin strut BP SES implantation. The primary endpoint was % of uncovered struts. A total of 1723 cross sections (17,014 struts) were analyzed at baseline and 1 month after percutaneous coronary intervention. The % uncovered struts at 1-month follow-up was 7.7% (4.0, 13.8). Furthermore, the covered strut % (88.4% and 80.4%, P = 0.013) and malapposition rate (2.7% and 4.3%, P = 0.012) were significantly different between the 60-μm and 80-μm stents. Ultra-thin strut BP SES implantation may feasibly achieve early vascular responses due to the ultra-thin struts. This may ultimately lead to lower stent thrombosis and target lesion failure rates.Clinical trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (No. UMIN000033406).