The clinical value of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

The predictive value of PRECISE-DAPT score for long-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Besides its primary clinical utility in predicting bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the PRECISE-DAPT (Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy) score may also be useful for predicting long-term mortality in ACS patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) since several studies have reported an association between the score and certain cardiovascular conditions or events. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of the PRECISE-DAPT score for predicting the long-term all-cause mortality in patients (n = 293) with ACS presenting with CS.

METHODS

The PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated for each patient who survived in hospital, and the association with long-term mortality was studied. Median follow-up time was 2.7 years. The performance of the final model was determined with measurements of its discriminative power (Harrell's and Uno's C indices and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) and predictive accuracy (coefficient of determination [R2] and likelihood ratio χ2). Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess the relationship between the variables of the model and long-term all-cause death.

RESULTS

All-cause death occurred in 197 patients (67%). There was a positive association between the PRECISE-DAPT score (change from 17 to 38 was associated with an HR of 2.42 [95% CI: 1.59-3.68], R2 = 0.209, time-dependent AUC = 0.69) and the risk of death such that in the adjusted survival curve, the risk of mortality increased as the PRECISE-DAPT score increased.

CONCLUSION

The PRECISE-DAPT score may be a useful easy-to-use tool for predicting long-term mortality in patients with ACS complicated by CS.

Predictive value of PRECISE-DAPT score for long-term all-cause mortality in atrial fibrillation patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) may co-exist in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). In patients with NSTEMI, AF should therefore be regarded as an important risk factor irrespective of its presentation. To predict outcomes in AF patients presenting with NSTEMI, early risk stratification can help to identify the patients with a possible poor long-term prognosis. The development of the PRECISE-DAPT score aimed to predict the risk of bleeding in patients who underwent stent implantation and received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), providing a valuable tool for assessing bleeding risk in this specific patient population.

Aim

To assess the performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting long-term prognosis in AF patients with NSTEMI.

Material and methods

Five hundred and twenty-six consecutive AF patients presenting with NSTEMI were included in the present study. The PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated in each case and evaluated for the association of increased mortality in the study population, who survived in-hospital but died in the long term.

Results

All-cause mortality deaths occurred in 278 (52.6%) patients. Higher PRECISE-DAPT score, shorter duration of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and a history of diabetes mellitus (DM) were all associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the multivariable logistic regression model.

Conclusions

High PRECISE-DAPT score was associated with higher long-term all-cause mortality in AF patients presenting with NSTEMI.

Prediction of Bleeding by the PRECISE-DAPT Score in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenting

PURPOSE

The predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and the subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score predicts the risk of bleeding in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Patients with carotid artery stenting (CAS) are also treated with DAPT. In this study, we aimed to investigate the performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting bleeding in patients with CAS.

METHODS

Patients who had CAS between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated for each patient. The patients were divided into two groups based on their PRECISE-DAPT score: low < 25 and high ≥ 25. Bleeding and ischemia complications and laboratory data among the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients with a mean age of 67.3 ± 9.7 years were included. Forty-three patients had high PRECISE-DAPT scores, and 77 patients had low PRECISE-DAPT scores. Six patients developed bleeding events during the six-month follow-up, and five of them were in the PRECISE DAPT score ≥ 25 group. The difference between the two groups regarding bleeding events at six months was significant (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The PRECISE-DAPT score might be used for predicting the bleeding risk in patients with CAS, and the bleeding rate was significantly higher in patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 25.

The value of PRECISE-DAPT score and lesion complexity for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with NSTEMI

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic effects of stroke risk scores (SRS), SYNTAX score (SX score), and PRECISE-DAPT score on mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Three hundred forty-three patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of NSTEMI and underwent coronary angiography (CAG) between January 1, 2022, and June 1, 2022, were included retrospectively in this single-center study. Patients' demographic, clinical and routine biochemical parameters were recorded. The scores (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, R2CHA2DS2-VASc, ATRIA, SX score, PRECISE-DAPT) of each patient were calculated. Participants were then divided into two groups by in-hospital status; all-cause mortality (+) and all-cause mortality (-).

RESULTS

Overall, the mean age was 63.5 ± 11.8 years, of whom 63.3% (n = 217) were male. In-hospital mortality occurred in 31 (9.3%) patients. In the study population, those who died had significantly higher SX (p < 0.001), PRECISE-DAPT (p < 0.001), and ATRIA (p = 0.002) scores than those who survived. In logistic regression analysis, PRECISE-DAPT score [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.063, 95% CI 1.014-1.115; p = 0.012] and SX score [OR: 1.061, 95% CI 1.015-1.109, p = 0.009] were found to be independent predictors of in-hospital all-cause mortality among NSTEMI patients. In ROC analysis, the PRECISE-DAPT score performed better discriminative ability than the SX score in determining in-hospital mortality [Area under the curve = 0.706, 95% CI 0.597-0.814; p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

During the hospital stay, both PRECISE-DAPT and SX scores showed better performance than SRS in predicting all-cause mortality among NSTEMI patients undergoing CAG. Aside from their primary purpose, both scores might be useful in determining risk stratification for such patient populations.

Correlation Between the Japanese Version of the High Bleeding Risk (J-HBR) Criteria and the PRECISE-DAPT Score, and Optimal J-HBR Cut-Off Score to Predict Major Bleeding

Background: The correlation between the Japanese version of high bleeding risk (J-HBR) criteria and the Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score is unknown, as is the relationship of both risk scores with ischemic events.

Methods and Results: This study enrolled 842 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2016 and December 2020. The 2 bleeding risk scores at the time of PCI and the subsequent risk of bleeding and ischemic events over a 1-year follow-up were examined. The J-HBR score was significantly correlated with the PRECISE-DAPT score (r=0.731, P<0.001). However, 1 year after PCI, the J-HBR was not significantly associated with the incidence of major bleeding and ischemic events (log-rank, P=0.058 and P=0.351, respectively), whereas the PRECISE-DAPT score predicted both the incidence of major bleeding and ischemic events (log-rank, P=0.006 and P=0.019, respectively). According to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a J-HBR score ≥1.5 was significantly associated with a higher cumulative incidence of major bleeding, but not ischemic events (log-rank, P=0.004 and P=0.513, respectively).

Conclusions: The J-HBR score is highly correlated with the PRECISE-DAPT score. A J-HBR score ≥1.5 can identify high bleeding risk patients without an increased risk of ischemic events.

Should PRECISE-DAPT be included for long-term prognostic stratification of diabetic patients with NSTEACS?

AIMS

There are insufficient data regarding risk scores validation in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). We performed a diabetes mellitus-specific analysis of cardiovascular outcomes after NSTEACS. We tested the predictive power of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and PREdicting bleeding Complications In patients undergoing Stent implantation and subsEquent Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) scores.

METHODS

This work is a retrospective analysis that included 7,415 consecutive NSTEACS patients from two Spanish Universitarian hospitals between the years 2003 and 2017. The area under the ROC curve among with and without diabetes mellitus patients was calculated, to evaluate the predictive power of both scores.  RESULTS: Among the study participants, 2124 patients (28.0%) were diabetic. The median follow-up was 54,3 months (IQR 24,7-80,0 months). Diabetic patients were more women (30.5% vs. 25.7%) and older (70.0 ± 10.8 vs. 65.3 ± 13.2 years old); they had higher GRACE (146 ± 36 vs. 137 ± 36), PRECISE-DAPT (15 ± 7 vs. 18 ± 9) at admission. Early invasive coronary angiography (≤ 24 h after admission) was performed more frequently in non-diabetic. We tested the predictive power of the GRACE and PRECISE-DAPT risk scores among diabetic and non-diabetic. PRECISE-DAPT risk score showed a good predictive power for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE in diabetic admitted with NSTEACS, without differences compared to non-diabetic.

CONCLUSIONS

PRECISE-DAPT risk score has an appropriate predictive power in diabetic patients admitted with NSTEACS compared to non-diabetic NSTEACS. However, GRACE would be predictive worse in diabetic during long-term follow-up in a large contemporary registry.

Predictors of renal infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with flank pain: A retrospective observational study

Objectives

Flank pain is a common symptom in the emergency department and can be caused by a variety of diseases. Renal infarction (RI) is a very rare disease, and many RI patients complain of flank pain. However, there is no definitive predictor of RI when patients complain of flank pain. This study aimed to identify the clinical factors for predicting RI in patients with flank pain.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study was conducted on patients complaining of flank pain from January 2016 to March 2020 at a South Korean tertiary care hospital. Exclusion criteria included patients who did not undergo contrast-enhanced computed tomography, age < 18 years, and trauma. Demographic and laboratory data were obtained from medical records. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of RI occurrence.

Results

In all, 2,131 patients were enrolled, and 39 (1.8%) had RI. From a multivariable logistic regression analysis, an age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 3.249; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.366–7.725; p = 0.008), male sex (OR, 2.846; 95% CI, 1.190–6.808; p = 0.019), atrial fibrillation (OR, 10.386; 95% CI, 3.724–28.961; p < 0.001), current smoker (OR, 10.022; 95% CI, 4.565–22.001; p < 0.001), and no hematuria (OR, 0.267; 95% CI, 0.114–0.628; p = 0.002) were significantly associated with the occurrence of RI.

Conclusions

Five clinical factors, i.e., age ≥ 65 years, male sex, atrial fibrillation, current smoker, and no hematuria, were significantly associated with the occurrence of RI in patients with flank pain.

Simplified Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) Definition Predicts Bleeding Events in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

It has recently been reported that the simplified Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) definition, which excludes 6 rare criteria, is comparable to the original ARC-HBR definition in predicting major bleeding in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. In this study, we investigated whether the simplified ARC-HBR definition could be applied to patients with heart failure (HF) to identify those at high bleeding risk (HBR).Methods and Results:In all, 2,437 patients hospitalized for HF were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the simplified ARC-HBR definition: those at HBR (n=2,026; 83.1%) and those not (non-HBR group; n=411; 16.9%). The HBR group was older (72.0 vs. 61.0 years; P<0.001) and had a lower prevalence of CAD (31.1% vs. 36.5%; P=0.034) than the non-HBR group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that post-discharge bleeding events defined as hemorrhagic stroke or gastrointestinal bleeding were more frequent in the HBR than non-HBR group (log-rank P<0.001). The simplified ARC-HBR definition accurately predicted bleeding events (Fine-Gray model; hazard ratio 2.777, 95% confidence interval 1.464-5.270, P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified ARC-HBR definition predicts a high risk of bleeding events in patients with HF.

The association of PRECISE-DAPT score with thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

The presence of intracoronary thrombus is associated with adverse events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). PRECISE-DAPT score is used to detect the bleeding risk in STEMI patients who are on dual antiplatelet therapy. Recently, the PRECISE-DAPT score was shown to be related to cardiovascular events. We aimed to investigate the association of PRECISE-DAPT score with thrombus burden in patients with STEMI.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis with 204 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention was conducted in this study. Thrombus burden grade and PRECISE-DAPT score were calculated for each subject. Patients were divided into two groups as high thrombus burden (HTB) (grade 4, 5) and low thrombus burden (LTB) (grade 1, 2 and 3) based on thrombus burden grade. The PRECISE-DAPT scores were compared between thrombus burden groups.

RESULTS

The mean age in HTB (N = 136) was 63.7 (11.3), and 64.7% were male. HTB had a higher PRECISE-DAPT score than LTB (p < .0001). PRECISE-DAPT score, baseline troponin I levels, ejection fraction, and pain to balloon time were independent predictors of HTB.

CONCLUSIONS

PRECISE-DAPT score was an independent predictor of HTB in patients with STEMI.

The Association of a PRECISE-DAPT Score With No-Reflow in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

This study aimed to evaluate the association of admission PREdicting bleeding Complications In patients undergoing Stent implantation and subsEquent Dual Anti Platelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score with the development of no-reflow (NR) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational, retrospective study, 335 consecutive STEMI patients who were treated with primary PCI were included. We classified the study population into 2 groups: patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score <25 and those with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25. Overall, 30 (8.9%) patients developed NR. The mean PRECISE-DAPT score (20.03 ± 15.32 vs 11.33 ± 12.18; P = .005) was significantly higher in cases who developed NR. Moreover, arrhythmic complications, in-hospital shock, and in-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 compared to those with a PRECISE-DAPT score <25. According to a multivariable analysis, the PRECISE-DAPT score was found to be independently linked with NR (odds ratio: 2.87, with P = .015). To our knowledge, these data are the first in major medical science databases to determine the relationship between the PRECISE-DAPT score and the NR phenomenon in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Risk prediction of bleeding and MACCE by PRECISE-DAPT score post-PCI

Background

Guidelines recommend the PRECISE-DAPT (PD) score to adapt duration of dual antiplatelet therapy due to bleeding risk. However, there is first evidence that PD predicts mortality and ischemic events as well.

Methods

We investigated PD Score in 994 patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PD was correlated with clinically frequently used scores. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) bleeding were assessed during one-year follow-up.

Results

524 patients had PD < 25 and 470 patients PD ≥ 25 (47%). Rate of major and minor bleeding was higher in the PD ≥ 25 group (major bleeding: Hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.01–8.16, p = 0.049; minor bleeding: HR 3.94, 95% Cl 1.36–9.19, p = 0.0096). Rate of MACCE, death and myocardial infarction were higher as well (MACCE: HR 2.0, 95% Cl 1.52–2.71, p < 0.0001; death: HR 3.9, 95% Cl 2.12–5.68, p < 0.0001; MI: HR 2.1, 95% Cl 1.26–3.43, p = 0.0041). Rate of stroke/transient ischemic attack did not differ between groups. Discriminative potency to predict major and minor bleeding, MACCE, death and MI were high with nearly equal cut-off values calculated by Youden’s index (YI) (major bleeding: Area under the curve [AUC] 0.66; p = 0.026; YI 32; minor bleeding: AUC 0.72; p = 0.001; YI 28; MACCE: AUC 0.62; p < 0.0001; YI 24).

Conclusion

In our cohort, PD score predicted bleeding moderately in post-PCI patients. In this study, ischemic events were predicted as well. Adaption of antiplatelet therapy duration by PD score is accurate. Nevertheless, it should be well-balanced with patient-related risk for ischemic events.

Differential prognostic accuracy of right ventricular dysfunction, the Seattle heart failure model and the MAGGIC score in patients with severe mitral regurgitation undergoing the MitraClip® procedure

Background

MitraClip ® (MC) is an established procedure for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients deemed unsuitable for surgery.

Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is associated with a higher mortality risk. The prognostic accuracy of heart failure risk scores like the Seattle heart failure model (SHFM) and Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score in pts undergoing MC with or without RVD has not been investigated so far.

Methods

SHFM and MAGGIC score were calculated retrospectively. RVD was determined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) ≤15 mm. Area under receiver operating curves (AUROC) of SHFM and MAGGIC were performed for one-year all-cause mortality after MC.

Results

N = 103 pts with MR III° (73 ± 11 years, LVEF 37 ± 17%) underwent MC with a reduction of at least I° MR. One-year mortality was 28.2%.

In Kaplan-Meier analysis, one- year mortality was significantly higher in RVD-pts (34.8% vs 2.8%, p = 0.009).

Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) for SHFM and MAGGIC were comparable for both scores (SHFM: 0.704, MAGGIC: 0.692). In pts without RVD, SHFM displayed a higher AUROC and therefore better diagnostic accuracy (SHFM: 0.776; MAGGIC: 0.551, p < 0.05). In pts with RVD, MAGGIC and SHFM displayed comparable AUROCs.

Conclusion

RVD is an important prognostic marker in pts undergoing MC. SHFM and MAGGIC displayed adequate over-all prognostic power in these pts. Accuracy differed in pts with and without RVD, indicating higher predictive power of the SHFM score in pts without RVD.