Atrial fibrillation screening on systematic ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: A prospective study

Flecainide to Prevent Atrial Arrhythmia After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: AFLOAT Study, A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The real incidence of atrial arrhythmia (AA) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and whether this complication can be prevented remain unknown. We assessed whether flecainide is effective to prevent AA during the first 3 months after PFO closure, and whether 6 months of treatment with flecainide is more effective than 3 months to prevent AA after PFO closure.

METHODS

AFLOAT (Assessment of Flecainide to Lower the Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Risk of Atrial Fibrillation or Tachycardia Trial) is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, superiority trial with a blind evaluation of all the end points (PROBE [Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded End Point] design). Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio after PFO closure to receive flecainide (150 mg once daily in a sustained-release dose) for 3 months, flecainide (150 mg once daily in a sustained-release dose) for 6 months, or no additional treatment (standard of care) for 6 months. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with at least 1 episode of AA (≥30 seconds) recorded within 3 months after PFO closure on long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor. The secondary end point was the percentage of patients with at least 1 episode of AA (≥30 seconds) recorded with insertable cardiac monitor during the 3- to 6-month period after PFO closure.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients were included (mean age, 54 years; 68.8% men) and AA (≥30 seconds) occurred in 53 patients (28.5%) during the 6-month follow-up; 86.8% of these AA events occurred in the first month after PFO closure. The primary outcome occurred in 33 of 123 (26.8%) and 16 of 63 (25.4%) patients receiving flecainide for at least 3 months or standard of care, respectively (risk difference, 1.4% [95% CI, -12.9% to 13.8%]; NS). The secondary end point occurred in 3 of 60 (5.0%), 4 of 63 (6.3%), and 5 of 63 (7.9%) patients receiving flecainide for 6 months, for 3 months, or standard of care, respectively (risk difference, -2.9% [95% CI, -12.7% to 6.9%], and risk difference, -1.6% [95% CI, -11.8% to 8.6%], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first 6 months after successful PFO closure, AA (≥30 seconds) occurred in 28.5% of cases, mostly in the first month after the procedure. Flecainide did not prevent AA after PFO closure.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05213104.

New-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The exact incidence and predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to find post-procedural AF incidence rates and differences due to different screening strategies and devices.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Controlled trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included into this meta-analysis. The incidence of new-onset AF was the primary outcome. Further parameters were surveillance strategy, device type, AF treatment and neurological events. New AF was determined as early onset within one month after implantation and late thereafter.

RESULTS

8 controlled trials and 16 cohort studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. 7643 patients received percutaneous PFO closure after cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 117 with other indications, whereas 1792 patients formed the control group. Meta-analysis of controlled trials showed an AF incidence of 5.1% in the interventional and 1.6% in the conservative arm, respectively (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.46-6.86, P = 0.03, I2 = 55%). 4.7% received high-quality surveillance strategy with Holter-ECG or Loop recorder whereby AF incidence was overall higher compared to the low-quality group with 12-lead ECG only (3.3-15% vs. 0.2-4.3%). Heterogeneous results on time of AF onset were found, limited by different follow-up strategies. CardioSEAL and Starflex seemed to have higher AF incidences in early and late onset with 4.5% and 4.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous PFO closure led to higher AF post-procedural incidence compared to the conservative strategy. Heterogeneity in surveillance and follow-up strategy limited the generalizability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022359945).

Incidence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale closure: protocol for the prospective, observational PFO-AF study

INTRODUCTION

After closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) due to stroke, atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in up to one in five patients. However, data are sparse regarding the possible pre-existence of AF in these patients prior to PFO closure, and about recurrence of AF in the long term after the procedure. No prospective study to date has investigated these topics in patients with implanted cardiac monitor (ICM). The PFO-AF study (registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT04926142) will investigate the incidence of AF occurring within 2 months after percutaneous closure of PFO in patients with prior stroke. AF will be identified using systematic ICM. Secondary objectives are to assess incidence and burden of AF in the 2 months prior to, and up to 2 years after PFO closure.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Prospective, multicentre, observational study including 250 patients with an indication for PFO closure after stroke, as decided by interdisciplinary meetings with cardiologists and neurologists. Patients will undergo implantation of a Reveal Linq device (Medtronic). Percutaneous PFO closure will be performed 2 months after device implantation. Follow-up will include consultation, ECG and reading of ICM data at 2, 12 and 24 months after PFO closure. The primary endpoint is occurrence of AF at 2 months, defined as an episode of AF or atrial tachycardia/flutter lasting at least 30 s, and recorded by the ICM and/or any AF or atrial tachycardia/flutter documented on ECG during the first 2 months of follow-up.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee 'Comité de Protection des Personnes (CPP) Sud-Méditerranéen III' on 2 June 2021 and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04926142). Findings will be presented in national and international congresses and peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04926142.

Characteristics of Patent Foramen Ovale: Analysis from a Single Center

Objective

To collect and analyze data of patent foramen ovale (PFO).

Methods

This study included a total of 260 patients diagnosed with PFO. We analyzed basic clinical data such as sex, age, transesophageal echocardiography as well as other symptoms.

Results

Our data showed that females accounted for the highest proportion of PFO (166 females, 64%), with the highest number of patients (65 patients) having between 45 and 55 years. Transesophageal echocardiography examination demonstrated frequent occurrence of tunnel-like anatomical structures. In addition, PFO was associated with symptoms such as migraine, stroke or TIA, syncope, chest tightness, and palpitations, with dizziness being the most common symptom in the patients with PFO.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrated that females accounted for the highest proportion of PFO patients, with those aged between 45 and 55 years being most affected. The most frequently encountered clinical symptom was dizziness. Taken together, these findings may help doctors to better understand and screen for PFO patients.