Comparison of selective and nonselective primary enrichments for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in cheese

Targeting Novel LPXTG Surface Proteins with Monoclonal Antibodies for Immunomagnetic Separation of Listeria monocytogenes

The Gram-positive bacterium Listeria monocytogenes causes a significantly high percentage of fatalities among human foodborne illnesses. Surface proteins, specifically expressed from a wide range of L. monocytogenes serotypes under selective enrichment culture conditions, can serve as targets for the isolation of this pathogen using antibody-based methods to facilitate molecular detection. In this study, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), previously raised against the L. monocytogenes LPXTG surface proteins LMOf2365_0639 and LMOf2365_0148, were investigated for their ability to isolate L. monocytogenes from bacterial samples with immunomagnetic separation (IMS). Only 1 out of 35 MAbs against LMOf2365_0639, M3644, was capable of capturing L. monocytogenes. Among all the 24 MAbs examined against LMOf2365_0148, 4 MAbs, M3686, M3697, M3699, and M3700, were capable of capturing L. monocytogenes cells specifically from abbreviated primary selective enrichment cultures in either Palcam or LEB/UVM1 media or from mixed samples containing target and nontarget bacteria. MAb M3686 showed a unique specificity with the capability to capture strains of seven L. monocytogenes serotypes (1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c, 3a, 4a, 4b, and 4d). These promising MAbs were subsequently characterized by quantitative measurements of antigen-binding affinity using surface plasmon resonance analysis and epitope mapping using overlapping recombinant polypeptides. The usefulness of these MAbs to LMOf2365_0148 in bacterial capture was consistent with their high affinities with K_D constants in the nanomolar range and can be explored further for the development of an automated IMS method suitable for routine isolation of L. monocytogenes from food and environmental samples.

The challenge of enumerating Listeria monocytogenes in food

Listeria monocytogenes is recognised as a serious foodborne pathogen in humans. However, food products are usually contaminated at low levels (i.e. <100 CFU/g) and there is still no adequate enumeration method for testing food. Much research has been carried out to improve Listeria enumeration methods, leading to several proposed alternative methods such as the most probable number technique, molecular-based methods and bacterial cell concentration techniques. Here, we catalogue the current knowledge concerning L. monocytogenes enumeration, with a particular focus on the problem of enumerating low level contamination.

Using nested PCR to detect the hlyA gene of Listeria monocytogenes in Minas Frescal cow's milk cheese

To evaluate a nested PCR protocol for Listeria monocytogenes detection, Minas Frescal cow's milk cheeses were produced, artificially inoculated with this pathogen at concentrations ranging from 1 to 1,000 CFU/g, and stored at 4°C for 10 days. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standardized method 11290-1/A1 was used to detect L. monocytogenes in the inoculated samples, and DNA was extracted from aliquots (1, 5, and 10 ml) of 1:10 dilution, followed by a nested PCR protocol for the hlyA gene. The ISO standardized reference method and nested PCR both detected L. monocytogenes at all concentrations and during all storage periods; McNemar's test showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). The results indicated that the nested PCR protocol can be used as a screening test to detect L. monocytogenes in Minas Frescal cheese, allowing earlier detection of the pathogen that can later be confirmed by the ISO standardized reference method.

Reduced detectability of Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of Listeria innocua

Recent foodborne crises have demonstrated the importance of monitoring food safety. In terms of microbiological criteria, food safety requires the reliable detection of pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes along the food chain by appropriate analytical methods. However, indications exist that accompanying Listeria innocua strains suppress the growth of L. monocytogenes during selective enrichment, which may cause reduced or even inhibited detection. To study these effects, the limit of detection of L. monocytogenes was investigated in the presence of L. innocua using the International Organization for Standardization standard method ISO 11290-1 and the VIDAS LDUO system, an automated method based on enzyme-linked fluorescence technology. The challenge was to provide low initial Listeria concentrations at sufficient precision to quantify the influence on the probability of detection of L. monocytogenes. The application of reference materials appropriate for quantitative test methods and a standardized dilution procedure were necessary to ensure accurate CFU levels of defined proportions of mixtures of both Listeria species. During selective enrichment, overgrowth of L. monocytogenes by L. innocua could be confirmed, leading to high rates of false-negative results. Moreover, with both methods, a significant decrease in the detectability of L. monocytogenes could be quantified at ratios of 2:1 at very low concentrations representative of natural contamination levels often found in foods and environments. It is concluded that there is a need to improve existing procedures with respect to selective enrichment, as well as the detection techniques.

Detecção de Listeria monocytogenes pela técnica de PCR em leite contaminado artificialmente

Avaliou-se a técnica de PCR como opção para reduzir o tempo de detecção de Listeria monocytogenes no leite. Para tanto, amostras de leite desnatado esterilizado e de leite cru integral - com baixa, média e alta contagem de microrganismos aeróbios mesófilos - foram inoculadas experimentalmente com diversas concentrações de L. monocytogenes. Os resultados da reação de PCR foram comparados com os da cultura da amostra empregando-se metodologia padronizada tradicional. Não se detectou L. monocytogenes pela reação de PCR quando esta foi realizada a partir do caldo de enriquecimento de Listeria (LEB) após 24 horas de incubação, nem no leite desnatado esterilizado, nem no leite cru integral. Após 48 horas de enriquecimento em LEB, a bactéria foi detectada por PCR nas amostras de leite desnatado esterilizado, com a sensibilidade de 1UFC/mL, mas não nas amostras de leite cru integral. Pela metodologia tradicional, a bactéria foi recuperada de todos os ensaios. Entretanto, nas amostras de leite cru com altas contagens de aeróbios mesófilos, a sensibilidade da metodologia tradicional foi reduzida (a partir de 7UFC/mL). Melhores resultados foram obtidos quando a reação de PCR foi feita utilizando-se DNA obtido diretamente da colônia suspeita em meio sólido (Oxford e Palcam). Foi possível substituir os testes fenotípicos de identificação de L. monocytogenes pela técnica de PCR reduzindo-se o tempo de identificação da bactéria de vários dias para algumas horas.

Comparison of recovery methods for the enumeration of injured Listeria innocua cells under isothermal and non-isothermal treatments

This study compares the feature of different media with the combination of selective with non-selective media in a TAL method for recovery of Listeria innocua cells exposed to thermal treatments. Experiments were conducted in broth at constant temperature (52.5 and 65.0 °C) and pH (4.5 and 7.5) conditions, using NaCl or glycerol to adjust water activity to 0.95. Four different media were used in bacterial cell enumeration: (i) a non-selective medium - TSAYE, (ii) two selective media - TSAYE + 5%NaCl and Palcam Agar and (iii) TAL medium (consisting of a layer of Palcam Agar overlaid with one of TSAYE). Two food products were used as case studies aiming at comparison of results obtained on selective and TAL media enumeration. Parsley samples were inoculated with L. innocua and subjected to posterior thermal treatments both under isothermal (52.5, 60.0 and 65.0 °C) and non-isothermal (heating rate of 1.8 °C/min from 20.0 to 65.0 °C) conditions. The recovery capability of TAL method was also studied when a pre-cooked frozen food (i.e. meat pockets) was fried (oil temperature of ∼180 °C). TAL method proved to be better than Palcam Agar in terms of capability to recover injured cells and was effective in L. innocua enumeration when non-sterile samples were analysed.

60-day aging requirement does not ensure safety of surface-mold-ripened soft cheeses manufactured from raw or pasteurized milk when Listeria monocytogenes is introduced as a postprocessing contaminant

Because of renewed interest in specialty cheeses, artisan and farmstead producers are manufacturing surface-mold-ripened soft cheeses from raw milk, using the 60-day holding standard (21 CFR 133.182) to achieve safety. This study compared the growth potential of Listeria monocytogenes on cheeses manufactured from raw or pasteurized milk and held for > 60 days at 4 degrees C. Final cheeses were within federal standards of identity for soft ripened cheese, with low moisture targets to facilitate the holding period. Wheels were surface inoculated with a five-strain cocktail of L. monocytogenes at approximately 0.2 CFU/ cm2 (low level) or 2 CFU/cm2 (high level), ripened, wrapped, and held at 4 degrees C. Listeria populations began to increase by day 28 for all treatments after initial population declines. From the low initial inoculation level, populations in raw and pasteurized milk cheese reached maximums of 2.96 +/- 2.79 and 2.33 +/- 2.10 log CFU/g, respectively, after 60 days of holding. Similar growth was observed in cheese inoculated at high levels, where populations reached 4.55 +/- 4.33 and 5.29 +/- 5.11 log CFU/g for raw and pasteurized milk cheeses, respectively. No significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed in pH development, growth rate, or population levels between cheeses made from the different milk types. Independent of the milk type, cheeses held for 60 days supported growth from very low initial levels of L. monocytogenes introduced as a postprocess contaminant. The safety of cheeses of this type must be achieved through control strategies other than aging, and thus revision of current federal regulations is warranted.

Development of Listeria monocytogenes-specific immunomagnetic beads using a single-chain antibody fragment

A method for coupling single-chain antibody fragments (scFvs) to immunomagnetic beads (IMBs) was developed and evaluated using scFvs specific for Listeria monocytogenes. A plasmid vector, pBAD380, was constructed that allowed the expression of histidine-tagged biotinylated scFvs in Escherichia coli. The gene encoding a scFv specific for L. monocytogenes was cloned into pBAD380 and the 6-histidine-tagged biotinylated anti-L. monocytogenes scFvs were coupled to streptavidin-coated IMBs. The ability of the anti-L. monocytogenes scFv-IMBs to capture L. monocytogenes and other Listeria species was evaluated in comparison to commercially available anti-Listeria IMBs. The anti-L. monocytogenes scFv-IMBs displayed higher efficiencies of capture (1.38-19.04%) for most strains of L. monocytogenes than were observed for the anti-Listeria IMBs (0.05-3.35%); also, the anti-L. monocytogenes scFv-IMBs exhibited improved specificity for L. monocytogenes as determined by cell capture efficiency in pure and mixed cultures.

Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: Analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts

The proficiency testing program in food microbiology RAEMA (Réseau d'Analyses et d'Echanges en Microbiologie des Aliments), created in 1988, currently includes 450 participating laboratories. This interlaboratory comparison establishes proficiency in detection of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes, as well as enumeration of aerobic micro-organisms, Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, beta-glucuronidase-positive Escherichia coli, anaerobic sulfito-reducing bacteria, Clostridium perfringens, coagulase-positive staphylococci, and L. monocytogenes. Twice a year, five units samples are sent to participants to assess their precision and trueness for enumeration and detection of micro-organisms. Most of participating laboratories use standard or validated alternative methods, they were 50-70% in 1994 and, for 5 years, they are 95%. An increasing use of alternative methods was also observed. This phenomenon is all the more significant as standard methods are laborious and time consuming; thus, 50% of the laboratories use alternative methods for the detection of Salmonella and L. monocytogenes. More and more laboratories use ready-to-use media and although the percentage is variable according to the microflora, we can consider that, today, 50-60% of the laboratories participating to the proficiency program only use ready-to-use media. The internal quality assurance programs lead also to an increasing use of media quality controls. The impact of analytical methods on bacterial counts was assessed by grouping together the results obtained by participating laboratories during the 10 last testing schemes from 1999 to 2003. The identified significant factors influencing enumeration results are variable from one microflora to another. Some of them significantly influence many microflora: the plating method (spiral plating or not) is influential for aerobic micro-organisms, Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, and staphylococci, the type of culture medium and the medium manufacturer is influential for aerobic micro-organisms, Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, E. coli, anaerobic sulfito-reducing bacteria, staphylococci, and L. monocytogenes. Others are specific of some micro-organisms: the resuscitation broth for L. monocytogenes, the mode of medium preparation for staphylococci and the incubation temperature for C. perfringens. These effects lead generally to small differences of about 0.1 log10 cfu g(-1), except for the enumeration of anaerobic sulfito-reducing bacteria, where the difference reaches 0.7 log10 cfu g(-1). These results, although difficult to extrapolate to all actual situations, which associate numerous food constituents and physiological states of bacteria to detect or numerate, allow nevertheless the quantification of interlaboratory variations linked to the methods in use. The analysis of bacterial counts obtained by the laboratories participating to the RAEMA proficiency testing program allowed also to validate a formula to calculate the repeatability of bacterial counts and to estimate the between-laboratory uncertainties for the majority of micro-organisms enumerated in food microbiology. The repeatability uncertainty is only indirectly affected by the method in use but depends essentially on the number of counted colonies. On the other hand, the between-laboratory uncertainty varies with the enumeration method in use, this variability is relatively small for the enumerations calling for methods without colony confirmation, i.e. for the enumeration of aerobic micro-organisms, Enterobacteriaceae, 'total' and thermotolerant coliforms, beta-glucuronidase-positive E. coli and coagulase-positive staphylococci with the technique using the rabbit-plasma fibrinogen agar. For these methods, the average between-laboratory standard deviation is 0.17 log10 cfu g(-1). The between-laboratory uncertainty is, on the contrary, larger for more complex techniques. For the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci with the Baird-Parker agar, the between-laboratory standard deviation is equal to 0.23 log10 cfu g(-1), it is equal to 0.28 log10 cfu g(-1) for the enumeration of L. monocytogenes, to 0.34 log10 cfu g(-1) for the enumeration of C. perfringens, and to 0.47 log10 cfu g(-1) for the enumeration of anaerobic sulfito-reducing bacteria.

Detection of Listeria monocytogenes and the toxin listeriolysin O in food

Listeria monocytogenes is an emerging bacterial foodborne pathogen responsible for listeriosis, an illness characterized by meningitis, encephalitis, and septicaemia. Less commonly, infection can result in cutaneous lesions and flu-like symptoms. In pregnant women, the pathogen can cause bacteraemia, and stillbirth or premature birth of the fetus. The mortality rate for those contracting listeriosis is approximately 20%. Currently, the United States has a zero tolerance policy regarding the presence of L. monocytogenes in food, while Canada allows only 100 cfu/g of food. As such, it is essential to be able to detect the pathogen in low numbers in food samples. One of the best ways to detect and confirm the pathogen is through the detection of one of the virulence factors, listeriolysin O (LLO) produced by the microorganism. The LLO-encoding gene (hlyA) is present only in virulent strains of the species and is required for virulence. LLO is a secreted protein toxin that can be detected easily with the use of blood agar or haemolysis assays and it is well characterized and understood. This paper focuses on some of the common methods used to detect the pathogen and the LLO toxin in food products and comments on some of the potential uses and drawbacks for the food industry.