Galactomyces candidus diversity in the complex mycobiota of cow-milk bryndza cheese comprising antagonistic and sensitive strains

High intragenomic, intergenomic, and phenotypic diversity in pulcherrimin-producing Metschnikowia yeasts indicates a special mode of genome evolution

In molecular systematics, the delimitation of yeast species is based on the notion that the barcode differences are smaller within species than between them. The most widely used barcodes are segments of the chromosomal repeats coding for ribosomal RNAs that are homogenised in yeasts. The analysis of these segments of the type strains of ten species recently merged in Metschnikowia pulcherrima and 37 new isolates demonstrated that this is not the case in this species. The intragenomic diversity significantly exceeded the threshold gaps used to differentiate related yeast species. Large segments of the D1/D2 domains were not diverse within the genomes and could therefore be used to determine the taxonomic affiliation of the isolates. The genome structures of the isolates were compared by RAPD and the RFLP of the mitochondrial DNA. Both patterns were highly heterogeneous. The sequence analysis of the PUL4 gene (a member of the PUL gene cluster involved in pulcherrimin production) revealed very high intragenomic differences, suggesting that the genomes may be chimerised. Three phenotypic traits related to the antimicrobial antagonism characteristic of the species were also highly diverse and prone to reversible segregation resembling epigenetic processes (silencing and reactivation of regulators) rather than mutations and back-mutations. These features make M. pulcherrima unique among yeasts and indicate that it evolves in a non-standard way.

Natural trait variation across Saccharomycotina species

Among molecular biologists, the group of fungi called Saccharomycotina is famous for its yeasts. These yeasts in turn are famous for what they have in common-genetic, biochemical, and cell-biological characteristics that serve as models for plants and animals. But behind the apparent homogeneity of Saccharomycotina species lie a wealth of differences. In this review, we discuss traits that vary across the Saccharomycotina subphylum. We describe cases of bright pigmentation; a zoo of cell shapes; metabolic specialties; and species with unique rules of gene regulation. We discuss the genetics of this diversity and why it matters, including insights into basic evolutionary principles with relevance across Eukarya.

Identification of antagonistic yeasts as potential biocontrol agents: Diverse criteria and strategies

Plant pathogenic and food spoilage microorganisms cause serious losses in crop production and severe damage during food manufacturing, transportation and storage. Synthetic antimicrobial agents are commonly used to control their propagation and harmful activities. However, the recent trend is shifting from chemicals towards safer and more eco-friendly alternatives. The use of antagonistic microorganisms as biological antimicrobial agents is becoming popular throughout the world to replace chemical agents. High numbers of microorganisms have turned out to exert adverse/inhibitory effects on other microorganisms including pathogens and spoiling strains. However, most of them are only active under laboratory conditions and their activity is sensitive to environmental changes. Only a small number of them can be used to manufacture biological protective products on an industrial scale. Therefore, there is a great need to identify additional antagonists. Yeasts have come to the forefront of attention because antimicrobial antagonism is fairly widespread among them. In the recent years, numerous excellent review articles covered various aspects of the phenomenon of antimicrobial antagonism of yeasts. However, none of them dealt with how antagonistic yeasts can be sought and identified, despite the high number and diverse efficiency of screening and identification procedures. As researchers working in different laboratories use different criteria and different experimental set-ups, a yeast strain found antagonistic in one laboratory may prove to be non-antagonistic in another laboratory. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and partially critical overview of the wide diversity of identification criteria and procedures to help researchers choose appropriate screening and identification strategies.