A prospective multicenter audit of labor-room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the Netherlands

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury After Episiometer-Guided Versus Conventional Episiotomy in Instrumental Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Guidelines recommend episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery with an optimal incision angle of 60° to protect the anal sphincter. The "Episiometer" is a new device promising a 60° incision angle. We compared the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and post-repair suture angle of episiotomies made with conventional "eyeballing" versus Episiometer guided during instrumental delivery.

METHODS

We conducted this randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care teaching institute in southern India after ethical committee approval, trial registration, and informed consent. We randomized (block) 328 pregnant women aged 18 years and above with term, singleton fetuses delivered by instruments into Episiometer-guided (164) or conventional episiotomy (164) groups (allocation concealed). We compared the OASI (identified clinically) and the suture angle measured from the midline (assessor blinded) in the two groups. We followed up on the subjects at 6 and 12 weeks to assess perineal pain and fecal/flatus incontinence.

RESULTS

The incidence of OASI of 0.61% in the Episiometer group was significantly lower compared with 4.88% in the eyeballing group (Chi-squared = 5.6; p = 0.02; adjusted risk ratio = 5.9; CI 0.7-46.1; p = 0.09). A significantly higher proportion of subjects (59.1%) in the Episometer group had a post-suture angle between 36 and 40° compared with 36.6% in the eyeballing group (Chi-squared = 21.8, p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the perineal pain or Wexner score during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The Episiometer-guided episiotomy during instrumental delivery resulted in a significantly higher suture angle and lower obstetric anal sphincter injuries than with conventional eyeballing.

Episiotomy practice in France and prevention of high-grade perineal tears at the time of operative vaginal delivery: a prospective multicentre ancillary cohort study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Evidence suggests that episiotomies reduce the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) in operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs). However, there is limited evidence on the importance of episiotomy technique in this context. The primary objective of this study was to assess if an episiotomy suture angle >45° from the median line would be associated with a lower risk for OASIs at the time of OVD.

METHODS

This was an ancillary study from the multicentre prospective cohort INSTRUMODA study. Of the 2,620 patients who had an OVD with a concomitant episiotomy between April 2021 and March 2022, a total of 219 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Post-suturing photographs were used to assess episiotomy characteristics.

RESULTS

Based on suture angles of ≤45° and >45° the study cohort was categorized into groups A (n = 155) and B (n = 64) respectively. The groups had comparable demographic and birth-related characteristics. The mean episiotomy length was significantly longer in group A than in group B (3.21 cm vs 2.84 cm; p = 0.009). Senior obstetricians performed more acute angled episiotomies than junior residents (p = 0.016). The total prevalence of OASIS was 2.3%, with no significant difference in rate of OASI between the two study groups. Birthweight was significantly higher in OASI births (p = 0.018) and spatula-assisted births were associated with higher risk for OASIs than ventouse or forceps (p = 0.0039).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in risk for OASI at the time of OVD when the episiotomy suture angle was >45° from the median line. However, these results should be interpreted with caution owing to the low prevalence of OASIs in our cohort.

Imaging Characteristics of Episiotomy Scars on Translabial Ultrasound: An Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Episiotomy has been purported to protect the anal sphincter from injury; efficacy is, however, disputed. Correct execution of episiotomy may have substantial implications. We aimed to describe the characteristics of episiotomy scars on translabial ultrasound (TLUS).

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study involving women after repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries, 76 women with a history of episiotomy were analyzed. Episiotomy scars were assessed on tomographic ultrasound in the transverse plane using volumes acquired on pelvic floor muscle contraction. We measured scar length, depth, and angle relative to a vertical reference line. Episiotomy scars were described as 1) ipsilateral if they started on the same side as the direction of the episiotomy, 2) contralateral if on the opposite side, and 3) mediolateral if the scar began in the midline.

RESULTS

The mean scar angle was 50.5° (SD 14°; range 14.4°-79.3°) while mean scar length was 14.2 mm (SD 4.5; range 5.7-27.5 mm) and depth was 8.4 mm (SD 2.8, range 3.1-18.2 mm). Sixteen (21%) scars were located mediolateral while 32 (42%) were ipsilateral. In 28 (37%) women, the starting point of the episiotomy was located contralateral to the direction of the episiotomy.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot series, the mean angle of episiotomy scars was within the safe zone of 40° to 60°, however, in one-third of cases the cut may have been initially directed toward the sphincter, not away from it. This observation suggests that not all episiotomies are performed optimally.

Is mediolateral episiotomy angle associated with postpartum perineal pain in primiparous women?

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim is to elucidate the relationship between mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) angle and postpartum perineal pain.

METHODS:

This study was designed prospectively. Primiparous women with MLE in the postpartum period were included in the study and divided into three groups according to episiotomy angle ranges (Group 1: <40°, Group 2: 40°–60°, and Group 3: >60°). Postpartum perineal pain was quantified with the short-form McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) consisting of the following three parts: Sensory-affective-verbal descriptions, visual pain scale (VPS), and present pain intensity scale (PPI). Postpartum perineal pain scores on days 1 and 7 were compared among the angle group.

RESULTS:

Overall, 86 eligible women were enrolled in this study. Seventy-three women (85%) scored the perineal pain between 0 and 3 on the VPS and 13 women (15%) rated the pain from 4 to 6 on the 1^st postpartum day. No significant differences were noted among the three groups regarding the total pain scores on SF-MPQ and on the each part of form at the 1^st postpartum day. At 7 days postpartum, total pain score was found significantly high in Group 1 [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 4 (0–5)] compared with Group 2 [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0–5)]. The pain scores obtained from the sensory, affective, VPS, and PPI parts of the questionnaire were [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 1 (0–2)], [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 1 (0–1)], [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 2 (0–2)], and [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0.25 (0–1)], respectively, in Group 1. For Group 2, pain scores obtained from the sensory, affective, and PPI were [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0-1)]; and VPS was [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0-2)]. No significant differences were observed between Groups 1 and 2 for each part of the questionnaire on day 7. Percentage of need for analgesics on day 7 was found significantly higher in Group 1 (42.9%) than Group 2 (31.2%)

CONCLUSION:

MLE at an angle <40° to the midline is associated with a higher score of perineal pain and an increase need for analgesics during the early postpartum days.

Which characteristics of the episiotomy and perineum are associated with a lower risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in instrumental deliveries

OBJETIVE

Operative vaginal delivery (OVD) is the most important risk fact for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Knowledge of possible risk factors for their occurrence may therefore reduce the likelihood of faecal incontinence. The aim is to analyse the effect of mediolateral episitomy and perineum characteristics on the occurrence of OASI in OVD.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study, which included 958 OVD that were reviewed in Pelvic Floor and Puerperium Clinic. The episiotomy and perineum characteristics of those women who experienced OASIs (n = 150) were compared with those who had no evidence of anal sphincter injury (n = 788).

RESULTS

In multivariate logistic regression analysis the factors which were independently associated were nulliparity, persistent occipitoposterior position, birthweight >3500 g, an angle of episiotomy <30°, a distance episiotomy-fourchette <5 mm and a distance of perineal body <30 mm. The analysis of subgroups show that only the multiparous women does not benefit from any feature of the episiotomy, and an angle greater than 30° and a distance episiotomy-fourchette >5 mm are associated with a risk reduction of OASI in nulliparous, perineal bodies ≤30 mm and occipitoanterior position.

CONCLUSIONS

Two modifiable risk factors at the time of performing the episiotomy, the angle and distance episiotomy-fourchette, have been identified as the risk modification of OASI. It is necessary to achieve an adequate angle to reduce the probability of OASIs in OVD, and in nulliparous women with an anterior position and a distance of perineal body ≤30 mm could benefit from increasing the episiotomy-fourchette distance.

Differences in characteristics of mediolateral episiotomy in proffesionals at the same hospital

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our study was to compare the theoretical concept of the accoucheur in our institution with regard to the characteristics of the mediolateral episiotomy (MLE), with a crowning head and after a delivery.

METHODS

We devised two simple pictorial questionnaires (one with a crowning head and the other in rest after a delivery) in order to explore possible differences in clinical practice between the accoucheurs of our institution with respect to the MLE characteristics.

RESULTS

With a crowning head, we found more acute angles when the age of accoucheurs was greater than 35 years old and more than 15 years of experience, but no with the perineum at rest. No difference was found between doctors and midwives, nor between males and females. 28.1% of accoucheurs indicated an acuter episiotomy angle with a crowning head.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that the individual interpretation of MLE differed widely among professionals at the same hospital. These differences which have been shown could predispose women to a greater risk of anal sphincter injuries. For this reason, there is a need to standardize this practice, to make the technique more homogeneous, particularly in the context of future research into the risks and benefits of episiotomy with respect to major perineal trauma.

Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)

Introduction

Episiotomy angle is a crucial factor in causation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), which are the major cause of female bowel incontinence. Sutured episiotomies angled too close to the midline (<30 degree) or too far away from the midline (>60 degree) fail to unload the perineum sufficiently and predispose to OASIS. A 25-degree post-delivery episiotomy suture angle has a 10% risk of OASIS while 45-degree episiotomy is associated with 0.5% risk. To account for perineal distension at crowning, a 60-degree episiotomy incision is required to achieve 43–50 degree suture angles. We compared episiotomy suture angles with commonly used Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors with the new fixed angle EPISCISSORS-60^®.

Methods

Ethical approval was obtained. A prospective cluster randomization design was chosen. Thirty-one patients were required in each group for a 12-degree difference with power at 90% and 5% significance. Sutured episiotomy angles and post-delivery linear distance from caudal end of the sutured episiotomy to the anus were measured with protractors and rulers. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare the two groups.

Results

Thirty-one nulliparae had episiotomies with EPISCISSORS-60^®, 32 with Braun-Stadler. Mean age (25 versus 24.8 years) was similar. EPISCISSORS-60^® episiotomies were angled 12 degrees more laterally away from the anus compared to Braun-Stadler (40.6 degrees, 95% confidence interval [CI] ±2, interquartile range [IQR] 35–45 versus 28.3 degrees, 95% CI ±2, IQR 25–30, P<0.0001). The post-delivery linear distance from caudal end of the sutured episiotomy to the anus was 15 mm more with the EPISCISSORS-60^® compared to Braun-Stadler (35 mm, 95% CI ±2.2, IQR =30–39 versus 19.5; 95% CI ±1.3, IQR =14.75–22.25 P<0.0001). EPISCISSORS-60^® episiotomies measured longer (47 mm versus 40 mm, P<0.0001). There were no OASIS cases in the EPISCISSORS-60^® group versus one in the Braun-Stadler group.

Conclusion

The EPISCISSORS-60^® sutured episiotomies are much further away from the midline in angular and distance measures, hence at lower OASIS risk.

The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Our objective was to assess episiotomy technique used in Israeli hospitals, to determine factors influencing incision parameters, and to review relevant up-to-date professional literature.

METHODS

Using anonymous questionnaires, a survey was conducted among obstetricians and midwives in the four public hospitals in northern Israel over a 1-year period commencing in October 2013. In addition to demographic and professional data, the accoucheurs were asked to describe the technique they usually use to perform an episiotomy (length, angle, and distance of initiation point from midperineum).

RESULTS

Overall, 84 obstetricians and 32 midwives participated in the survey. Only 37.6% reported performing a mediolateral episiotomy, while the rest described the lateral type, placing the initiation point at an average distance of 2.45 ± 0.88 cm from the fourchette. Compared with midwives, obstetricians reported performing a significantly longer episiotomy (3.53 ± 1.01 vs. 2.73 ± 0.81 cm, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our study and relevant literature review, the technique of episiotomy varies significantly between health professionals and is not uniformly congruent with international practice guidelines. In part, this is derived from unclear literature evidence and lack of consensus definition for proper technique of this procedure by the national guidelines. Thus, further higher-quality research, uniform protocols, and educational programs are needed to guide episiotomy practice.

Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the trigonometric properties of episiotomy in operative vaginal delivery (OVD) and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

METHODS

The study included 72 primiparous women who had an OVD and episiotomy. Cases (n = 36) had sustained OASIS at birth, while controls (n = 36) had not. The groups were matched for instrumental delivery. The episiotomy scar was identified and its trigonometric characteristics were measured at 8-12 weeks postpartum. Data were analysed using conditional logistic analysis.

RESULTS

The angle of episiotomy behaves as a factor associated with anal sphincter injury, so women with a mediolateral episiotomy and an angle greater than 20° have an 87% less risk of having an OASIS (odds ratio 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.58). The study showed that scarred episiotomies at 8-12 weeks after OVD with an angle ≤ 20°, depth and distance between the episiotomy and anus ≤ 15 mm, total upper triangle perimeter ≤ 75 mm, para-anal triangle perimeter ≤ 15 mm and areas between scar and midline ≤ 250 mm(2) were significantly associated with higher risk of OASIS.

CONCLUSIONS

When a mediolateral episiotomy is performed in OVD the technique has a strong effect on the occurrence of OASIS. Additional research is needed to determine if the optimal technique for mediolateral episiotomies produces less OASIS than deferring the performance of episiotomy.

Risk factors for birth-related perineal trauma: a cross-sectional study in a birth centre

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

To identify maternal, newborn and obstetric factors associated with birth-related perineal trauma in one independent birth centre.

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for birth-related perineal trauma include episiotomy, maternal age, ethnicity, parity and interventions during labour including use of oxytocin, maternal position at time of birth and infant birth weight. Understanding more about these factors could support the management of vaginal birth to prevent spontaneous perineal trauma, in line with initiatives to reduce routine use of episiotomy.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from one independent birth centre in Brazil, during 2006-2009. The dependent variable (perineal trauma) was classified as: (1) intact perineum or first-degree laceration, (2) second-degree laceration and (3) episiotomy (right mediolateral or median).

RESULTS

There were 1079 births during the study period. Parity, use of oxytocin during labour, position at time of giving birth and infant birth weight were associated with second-degree lacerations and episiotomies. After adjusting for parity, oxytocin, maternal position at the expulsive stage of labour and infant birth weight influenced perineal outcomes among primiparae only.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall rate of episiotomies in this study was low compared with national data, it was observed that younger women were most vulnerable to this intervention. In this age group in particular, the use of oxytocin as well as semi-upright positions at the time of birth was associated with second-degree lacerations and episiotomies.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The use of upright alternative positions for birth and avoidance of use of oxytocin could reduce the risk of perineal trauma from lacerations and need to perform episiotomy.

Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study

Objectives

To investigate the association between the geometrical properties of episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) because episiotomies angled at 40–60° are associated with fewer OASIS than episiotomies with more acute angles.

Design

Case–control study.

Setting

University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø and Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway.

Sample

Seventy-four women who had one vaginal birth and episiotomy. Cases (n = 37) have sustained OASIS at birth, while controls (n = 37) had not. The groups were matched for instrumental delivery.

Methods

Two groups of women with history of only one vaginal birth were compared. Episiotomy scar was identified and photographed and relevant measures were taken. Data were analysed using conditional logistic analysis.

Main outcome measures

Mean episiotomy angle, length, depth, incision point.

Results

The risk of sustaining OASIS decreased by 70% (odds ratio [OR] 0.30; 95% CI 0.14–0.66) for each 5.5-mm increase in episiotomy depth, decreased by 56% (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23–0.86) for each 4.5-mm increase in the distance from the midline to the incision point of the episiotomy, and decreased by 75% (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.10–0.61) for each 5.5-mm increase in episiotomy length. Lastly, there was no difference in mean angle between groups but there was a “U-shaped” association between angle and OASIS (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.02–4.28) with an increased risk (OR 9.00; 95% CI 1.1–71.0) of OASIS when the angle was either smaller than 15°or >60°.

Conclusion

The present study showed that scarred episiotomies with depth > 16 mm, length > 17 mm, incision point > 9 mm lateral of midpoint and angle range 30–60° are significantly associated with less risk of OASIS. Shrinkage of tissue must be considered.

Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees

OBJECTIVE

To study the angle of mediolateral episiotomy at the time of cut, after primary repair, and 6 months postpartum; and the incidence and severity of perineal pain and anal incontinence 6 months after delivery.

METHODS

The study group comprised 60 consecutively recruited primiparous women who required episiotomy during delivery assisted by 2 obstetricians. The incision angle of episiotomy (defined as 60°) was measured before cutting, after primary repair, and after 6 months. At follow-up, perineal pain was evaluated by a verbal rating score; anal incontinence was assessed by St Mark's score.

RESULTS

The angles differed significantly among the incision (60°), repair (45°), and 6-month (48°) measurements (P < 0.001). There was a poor correlation between the suture angle and the angle measured at 6 months postpartum. No severe perineal tear was diagnosed in the cohort. At 6 months postpartum, only 1 woman reported mild symptoms of de novo anal incontinence, whereas 7 women reported perineal pain related to episiotomy.

CONCLUSION

An incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy of 60° resulted in a low incidence of anal sphincter tearing, anal incontinence and perineal pain. A randomized controlled trial is needed to assess the outcome when different angles of episiotomy are used.