Cervical priming with misoprostol before manual vacuum aspiration versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester surgical abortion

No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews evidence relating to the provision of surgical induced abortion (IA) and second trimester medical abortion, including pre- and post-procedural care.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who currently or intend to provide and/or teach IAs.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with an unintended or abnormal first or second trimester pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Database were searched using the key words: first-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester medical abortion, dilation and evacuation, induction abortion, feticide, cervical preparation, cervical dilation, abortion complications. Results were restricted to English or French systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1979 to July 2017. National and international clinical practice guidelines were consulted for review. Grey literature was not searched.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. The summary of findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

IA is safe and effective. The benefits of IA outweigh the potential harms or costs. No new direct harms or costs identified with these guidelines.

Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation)

First-trimester surgical abortion is a common, safe procedure with a major complication rate of less than 1%. Cervical dilation before suction abortion is usually accomplished using tapered mechanical dilators. Risk factors for major complications in the first trimester include increasing gestational age and provider inexperience. Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion has been studied using osmotic dilators and pharmacologic agents, most commonly misoprostol. Extensive data demonstrate that a variety of agents are safe and effective at causing preoperative cervical softening and dilation; however, given the small absolute risk of complications, the benefit of routine use of misoprostol or osmotic dilators in first-trimester surgical abortion is unclear. Although cervical priming results in reduced abortion time and improved provider ease, it requires a delay of at least 1 to 3 h and may confer side effects. The Society of Family Planning does not recommend routine cervical priming for first-trimester suction abortion but recommends limiting consideration of cervical priming for women at increased risk of complications from cervical dilation, including those late in the first trimester, adolescents and women in whom cervical dilation is expected to be challenging.

Complications of first-trimester abortion by vacuum aspiration after cervical preparation with and without misoprostol: a multicentre randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Little information is available about the incidence of complications from vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion after cervical preparation with prostaglandin analogues. We compared incidence of complications from vacuum aspiration in women who had had cervical preparation with misoprostol and those who had not.

METHODS

We did a randomised parallel-group trial at 14 centres in nine countries between Oct 22, 2002, and Sept 24, 2005. Healthy women seeking first-trimester abortion were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation sequence stratified by centre, to receive vaginal administration of either two 200 μg tablets of misoprostol or two placebo tablets 3 h before abortion by vacuum aspiration. Participants and health-care personnel other than staff administering the treatment were masked to group assignment. Follow-up was up to 2 weeks. The primary outcome was one or more complications of vacuum aspiration (cervical tear, uterine perforation, incomplete abortion, uterine re-evacuation, pelvic inflammatory disease, or any other serious adverse event). We included women undergoing treatment and vacuum aspiration in the analysis of immediate complications; whereas, in the analysis of delayed complications, we included only those followed-up. In the analysis of any immediate or delayed complication, we excluded women lost to follow-up. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN85366519.

FINDINGS

We randomly assigned 2485 women to the misoprostol group and 2487 to the placebo group. Two women in the misoprostol group did not have vacuum aspiration. 56 women in each group were lost to follow-up. 50 (2%) of 2427 women in the misoprostol group and 74 (3%) of 2431 in the placebo group had one or more complication of vacuum aspiration (relative risk [RR] 0·68, 95% CI 0·47-0·96). No women in the misoprostol group had cervical tears and three had uterine perforations compared with two women in the placebo group who had cervical tears and one who had perforation. 19 (<1%) women given misoprostol and 55 (2%) on placebo had incomplete abortions (0·35, 0·21-0·58), of whom 14 (<1%) versus 48 (2%) needed uterine re-evacuation (0·29, 0·16-0·53). We noted no difference between groups in incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (30 [1%] vs 25 [1%]; RR 1·20, 0·71-2·04) or other serious adverse events. The main side-effects of misoprostol during the 3 h treatment were abdominal pain (1355 [55%] of 2484 women vs 545 [22%] of 2487 women in the placebo group) and vaginal bleeding (909 [37%] vs 167 [7%]).

INTERPRETATION

Cervical preparation with 400 μg of vaginal misoprostol can reduce incidence of complications from vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortion.

FUNDING

UN Development Programme/UN Population Fund/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, and the Packard Foundation.