Predictive value of negative cone margin status for risk of residual disease among women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ

Nationwide cohort study on the risk of high-grade cervical dysplasia and carcinoma after conservative treatment or hysterectomy for adenocarcinoma in situ

Internationally, little consensus exists about the best treatment for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). This study aimed to determine the incidence of recurrent high-grade cervical dysplasia and development of local cervical cancer after treatment for AIS. This nationwide, retrospective cohort study included patients with AIS, who were treated by a large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), cold-knife conization (CKC), or hysterectomy between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2021 in the Netherlands. Pathology reports were retrieved from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga). Primary outcomes were the cumulative incidences of high-grade cervical dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3, and AIS) and local cervical cancer up to 20 years after primary treatment. In total, 4243 patients with AIS were included. The primary treatment was a LLETZ, CKC, or hysterectomy in 1593, 2118, and 532 patients, respectively. The incidence of recurrent high-grade cervical dysplasia after LLETZ (10.5%; 95%CI: 8.6-12.3) was higher than after CKC (5.5%; 95%CI: 4.4-6.6, p <.0001). When a radical excision, that is, surgical margins free of dysplasia at end of treatment, was achieved, the incidence of recurrent high-grade dysplasia and local cervical cancer did not differ between LLETZ (5.6% [95%CI: 3.3-7.9] and 1.9% [95%CI: 0-4.4]) and CKC (4.7% [95%CI: 3.5-5.8], p = .631 and 1.5% [95%CI: 0.7-2.3], p = .918). After hysterectomy, none of the patients developed cervical dysplasia or local cervical cancer. Conservative treatment for AIS can be considered a safe and final treatment modality when a radical excision is achieved.

Margin Status Post Cervical Conization Predicts Residual Adenocarcinoma In Situ (AIS) and Occult Adenocarcinoma in a Predominantly Hispanic Population

Background: Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the cervix, is increasing in incidence, particularly in women of reproductive age. Fertility preservation is often desired. In a predominantly Hispanic population, we sought to determine the incidence of occult cervical cancer co-existing with AIS, and evaluate how conization margin status correlates with residual disease upon hysterectomy. Methods: A retrospective study utilizing a comprehensive cancer center database was conducted. Data from patients with histologically proven AIS of the cervix were abstracted. Results: Of 47 patients that met the criteria, 23 (49%) were Hispanic, 21 (45%) were White, two (4%) were Asian, and one (2%) was Black. The median age was 37. Forty-two patients underwent cervical conizations; 13/42 (48%) had positive margins upon conization; 28/42 (67%) underwent hysterectomies. Furthermore, 6/13 (46%) patients with positive conization margins had residual disease in hysterectomy specimens, with 2/13 (15%) found to have invasive cancer. In contrast, 0/14 (0%) of patients with negative margins had residual disease (p = 0.036, Chi-squared 4.41, df = 1). In total, 2/27 (7%) patients who underwent hysterectomies had invasive cancer (7%). Conclusions: Positive margins upon cervical conization for AIS of the cervix were correlated with a relatively high rate of residual AIS and occult invasive cancer. Negative conization margins were correlated with no residual disease. Those patients may be candidates for fertility-sparing treatment.

Cervical Screening Results Leading to Detection of Adenocarcinoma in Situ of the Uterine Cervix

Background: Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix is a preinvasive lesion of the invasive adenocarcinoma. We analyzed the cervical screening results leading to detecting the AIS lesions including the coexistence of AIS lesions with high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (HSIL) and invasive carcinoma. Methods: Women who were diagnosed and received treatment for AIS at Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 1, 2007 and August 31, 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were the women who had pathological diagnosis of AIS obtained from cervical punch biopsy or excisional cone biopsy with either loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold-knife conization (CKC). The patient characteristics, diagnostic work-up and treatment details were reviewed, including the cervical screening results prior to the diagnosis of cervical AIS, pathologic results of excisional cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens. Results: During the study period, 75 women with AIS pathology undergoing excisional cone biopsy with either LEEP (n=62) or CKC (n=13) were identified. The abnormal cytologic screening leading to detection of AIS was the squamous cell abnormality accounting for 57.3%. Abnormal glandular cytology accounted for 37.3%. The most common abnormal cervical screening results was HSIL cytology (n = 25) followed by AIS cytology (n = 13). Normal cytology was noted in 4 women in whom 3 were positive for HPV 18 and 1 had AIS on the endocervical polyp. AIS coexisted with HSIL and invasive carcinoma were detected in cone biopsy specimens in 21 (28%) and 29 (38.7%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: The majority of cervical screening results leading to detection of cervical AIS was the squamous cell abnormality accounting for 57.3% in which, HSIL cytology was the most common. Abnormal glandular cytology accounted for only 37.3%. Diagnostic cone excision is recommended if AIS lesion is noted in cervical biopsy specimen since nearly 40% have coexisting invasive lesions.

Oncological and reproductive outcomes of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix managed with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure

Background

The standard treatment for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is hysterectomy, which is a more aggressive treatment than that used for squamous intraepithelial lesions. Several previous studies have primarily demonstrated that the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is as safe and effective as cold knife cone (CKC) biopsy when AIS is unexpectedly found in a loop excision. This study evaluated the safety of LEEP as the initial treatment for patients with AIS who were strictly selected and evaluated before and after loop resection.

Methods

The oncological and reproductive outcomes of a series of AIS patients who underwent LEEP as the initial treatment between February 2006 and December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

A total of 44 women were eligible for analysis. The mean age at diagnosis was 36.1 years, and 14 patients were nulliparous. Multiple lesions were identified in 4 (9.1%) patients. Either hysterectomy (6 patients) or repeat cone biopsies (3 patients) were performed in 8 of the 10 patients who presented positive or not evaluable surgical resection margins (SMs) on the initial LEEP specimens. Residual disease was detected in two patients. All patients were closely followed for a mean of 36.9 months via human papillomavirus testing, PAP smears, colposcopy, and endocervical curettage when necessary. No recurrences were detected. Of the 16 patients who desired to become pregnant, 8 (50%) successfully conceived, and the full-term live birth rate was 83.3% among this subgroup.

Conclusions

LEEP with negative SMs was a safe and feasible fertility-sparing surgical procedure for patients with AIS, and the obstetric outcome was satisfactory. However, long-term follow-up is mandatory.

Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix is the precursor to invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma. An excisional biopsy such as a cold knife cone biopsy (CKC) should be performed to exclude invasive adenocarcinoma. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is an alternative modality to CKC but is controversial in AIS. There is a perception that there is a greater likelihood of incomplete excision of AIS with LEEP because the depth of excised tissue tends to be smaller and the tissue margins may show thermal artefact which can interfere with pathology assessment. In the USA, guidelines recommend that any treatment modality can be used to excise AIS, provided that the specimen remains intact with interpretable margins. However, there are no high-quality studies comparing LEEP with CKC and well-designed prospective studies are needed. If such a study were to show that LEEP was non-inferior to CKC for the outcomes of post-treatment persistence, recurrence and adenocarcinoma, LEEP could be recommended as an appropriate treatment option for AIS in selected patients. This would benefit women because, unlike CKC, LEEP does not require general anaesthesia and may be associated with reduced morbidity.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The proposed exploratory study is a parallel group trial with an allocation ratio of 2:1 in favour of the intervention (LEEP: CKC). Participants are women aged ≥18 to ≤45 years diagnosed with AIS on cervical screening and/or colposcopically directed biopsy in Australia and New Zealand, who are to receive excisional treatment in a tertiary level centre.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for the study has been granted by the St John of God Healthcare Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number #1137). Results from the study will be presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

REGISTRATION

ANZCTR registration number ACTRN12617000132347 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372173&isReview=true.

Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to conduct a more comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis of original studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) versus cold-knife conization (CKC) in conservative surgical treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) for women who have not completed childbearing.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted in the PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to identify all potential studies involving patients with ACIS treated with LEEP versus CKC published until December 2015.

RESULTS

Eighteen retrospective studies were included in this systematic review. All the 18 included studies reported the rate of positive margins, and the results of the individual studies varied. The positive margins were 44% (267/607) after LEEP and 29% (274/952) after CKC. The pooled meta-analysis exhibited significantly different outcome (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.34-1.80, P<0.00001) without significant heterogeneity (P = 0.34). The residual rate following LEEP was 9.1% (17/186) and 11% (39/350) after CKC in re-cone or hysterectomy cases. Recurrent ACIS following LEEP was reported in 10 of 142 (7.0%) cases compared to 10 of 177 (5.6%) cases following CKC. There were no significant differences in the residual rate (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.60-1.72, P = 0.95) or recurrence rate (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.46-2.79; P = 0.79) between the two procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review demonstrates that both LEEP and CKC are safe and effective for the conservative treatment of ACIS. LEEP appears to be as equally effective as CKC regarding the residual and recurrence rates. Due to the findings showing that LEEP achieves comparable oncologic outcomes with fewer obstetric complications to that of CKC, LEEP may be the preferred option in patients whose fertility preservation is important. However, further prospective studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up periods are needed to establish the superiority of either procedure.

Risk of residual disease and invasive carcinoma in women treated for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix

OBJECTIVE

Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is increasing in incidence among reproductive-age women. Cervical conization is an alternative to hysterectomy that allows future fertility, however reports regarding the risk of residual AIS and underlying adenocarcinoma are conflicting. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of a large cohort of women treated for AIS.

METHODS

The medical records of 180 women with cervical AIS evaluated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and its outlying clinics between 1983 and 2011 were reviewed for demographic information, treatment history, pathologic findings and outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnosis was 33.8years (range 17.6-76.1years). 172 of the 180 women had at least one cone biopsy performed, with 110 (64.0%) undergoing a cold knife cone (CKC), and 62 (36.0%) undergoing a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) as their initial method of treatment. Positive margins were noted in 35.0% of patients undergoing CKC compared with 55.6% undergoing LEEP (p=0.017). 71 patients ultimately underwent hysterectomy with residual disease noted in 10 patients (14.1%), 8 patients (11.3%) with residual AIS and 2 patients (2.8%) with invasive carcinoma. Of the 101 patients who did not undergo hysterectomy, 2 patients (2.0%) developed recurrent AIS at a median of 27.5months (range 18-37months) from the last cone, and none developed invasive carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing conservative management for AIS with cervical conization alone should be monitored closely and counseled regarding the potential risks of residual and recurrent disease, even when negative cone margins are obtained.