1
|
Meyer R, Toussia-Cohen S, Shats M, Segal O, Mohr-Sasson A, Peretz-Bookstein S, Amitai-Komem D, Sindel O, Levin G, Mashiach R, Blumenthal PD. 24-Hour Compared With 12-Hour Mifepristone-Misoprostol Interval for Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 144:60-67. [PMID: 38781593 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare 24-hour and 12-hour mifepristone-to-misoprostol intervals for second-trimester medication abortion. METHODS We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated to receive mifepristone either 24 hours or 12 hours before misoprostol administration. The primary outcome was the time from the first misoprostol administration to abortion (induction time). Secondary outcomes included the time from mifepristone to abortion (total abortion time); fetal expulsion percentages at 12, 24, and 48 hours after the first misoprostol dose; side effects proportion; and pain and satisfaction scores. A sample size of 40 per group (N=80) was planned to compare the 24- and 12-hour regimens. RESULTS Eighty patients were enrolled between July 2020 and June 2023, with 40 patients per group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Median induction time was 9.5 hours (95% CI, 10.3-17.8 hours) and 12.5 hours (95% CI, 13.5-20.2 hours) in the 24- and 12-hour interval arms, respectively ( P =.028). Median total abortion time was 33.0 hours (95% CI, 34.2-41.9 hours) and 24.5 hours (95% CI, 25.7-32.4 hours) in the 24- and 12-hour interval groups, respectively ( P <.001). At 12 hours from misoprostol administration, 25 patients (62.5%) in the 24-hour arm and 18 patients (45.0%) in the 12-hour arm completed abortion ( P =.178). At 24 hours from misoprostol administration, 36 patients (90.0%) in the 24-hour arm and 30 patients (75.0%) in the 12-hour arm had complete abortion ( P =.139). The need for additional medication or surgical treatment for uterine evacuation, pain scores, side effects, and satisfaction levels were not different between groups. CONCLUSION A 24-hour mifepristone-to-misoprostol regimen for medication abortion in the second trimester provides a median 3-hour shorter induction time compared with the 12-hour interval. However, the median total abortion time was 8.5-hours longer in the 24-hour interval regimen. These findings can aid in shared decision making before medication abortion in the second trimester. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04160221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raanan Meyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, and the Dr. Pinchas Bornstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, the School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, and the School of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sium AF, Teklu H, Reeves M, Tolu LB, Prager S. One-day versus two-day mifepristone-misoprostol interval prior to initiation of misoprostol during late second trimester medication abortion: A cohort study. Contraception 2024; 132:110356. [PMID: 38151223 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare one-day versus two-day mifepristone-misoprostol interval in late second trimester medication abortion. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study was conducted at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, in Ethiopia. Data were collected retrospectively and analysed with SPSS 23 using simple descriptive analysis, t-test, Chi-squared test, and regression analysis, as appropriate. P-value < 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% CI were used to present results significance. RESULTS A total of 282 women who had medication abortion in the late second trimester (167 with one-day and 115 with two-day mifepristone-misoprostol intervals) at 20-28 weeks of gestation were analysed. Both median and mean induction to expulsion interval (I-E) were much higher in the one-day mifepristone-misoprostol (mife-miso) interval than in the two-day mife-miso interval group. The median (and mean) I-E in the one-day interval group was 24 hours (21.9+/-6.6 hours) compared to 12 hours (14.6+/-8.8 hours) in the two-day mife-miso interval group (p-value < 0.001). Expulsion rate within 12 hours of starting misoprostol was significantly higher in the two-day cohort than in the one-day cohort (73% vs 25.6%, p-value < 0.001, aOR = 19.08 95%, CI = 5.1-70.7). CONCLUSIONS For second trimester medication abortion at later gestation, a two-day mifepristone-to-misoprostol interval significantly reduces induction to expulsion time compared to a one-day interval. IMPLICATIONS Compared to one-day interval, administration of mifepristone two days prior to misoprostol initiation has a shorter interval of induction to expulsion and a higher rate of abortion completion within 12 hours of initiation of misoprostol during late second trimester medication abortion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Fessehaye Sium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Hana Teklu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Lemi Belay Tolu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Sarah Prager
- Complex Family Planning Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UW Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zwerling B, Edelman A, Jackson A, Burke A, Prabhu M. Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation: Jointly developed with the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023:S0002-9378(23)00726-3. [PMID: 37821258 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this Clinical Recommendation is to review relevant literature and provide evidence-based recommendations for medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation, with a focus on mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol-only regimens. We systematically reviewed PubMed articles published between 2008 and 2022 and reviewed reference lists of included articles to identify additional publications. See Search Strategy for more details. Several randomized trials of medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation demonstrate that mifepristone 200 mg orally before misoprostol increases effectiveness (complete abortion at 24 or 48 hours) compared to misoprostol only. Studies continue to evaluate different doses, routes, and dosing intervals for misoprostol. If mifepristone is unavailable, several misoprostol regimens with individual doses of at least 200 mcg or more are effective. Adjunctive osmotic dilators are of limited benefit. It is important to individualize care, with consideration to reducing misoprostol dose in low-resource settings or at 24 0/7 weeks of gestation or later (or equivalent uterine size). Misoprostol in the setting of two or more previous cesarean sections is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture compared to one or none, but risk remains low. Most contraceptives can be started during or immediately following abortion. Appropriately trained and credentialed advanced practice clinicians can provide medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation with appropriate backup within the confines of local regulations and licensure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake Zwerling
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Division of Family Planning, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Alison Edelman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Complex Family Planning, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Anwar Jackson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Anne Burke
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Division of Family Planning, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Malavika Prabhu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yawkey Center for Outpatient Care, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zwerling B, Edelman A, Jackson A, Burke A, Prabhu WTAOM. Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation: Jointly developed with the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Contraception 2023:110143. [PMID: 37821241 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this Clinical Recommendation is to review relevant literature and provide evidence-based recommendations for medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation, with a focus on mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol-only regimens. We systematically reviewed PubMed articles published between 2008 and 2022 and reviewed reference lists of included articles to identify additional publications. See Search Strategy for more details. Several randomized trials of medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation demonstrate that mifepristone 200 mg orally before misoprostol increases effectiveness (complete abortion at 24 or 48 hours) compared to misoprostol only. Studies continue to evaluate different doses, routes, and dosing intervals for misoprostol. If mifepristone is unavailable, several misoprostol regimens with individual doses of at least 200 mcg or more are effective. Adjunctive osmotic dilators are of limited benefit. It is important to individualize care, with consideration to reducing misoprostol dose in low-resource settings or at 24 0/7 weeks of gestation or later (or equivalent uterine size). Misoprostol in the setting of two or more previous cesarean sections is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture compared to one or none, but risk remains low. Most contraceptives can be started during or immediately following abortion. Appropriately trained and credentialed advanced practice clinicians can provide medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation with appropriate backup within the confines of local regulations and licensure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake Zwerling
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Division of Family Planning, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Alison Edelman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Complex Family Planning, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Anwar Jackson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Anne Burke
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Division of Family Planning, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - With The Assistance Of Malavika Prabhu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yawkey Center for Outpatient Care, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dickinson JE, Doherty DA. Maternal complications associated with second trimester medical abortion using mifepristone priming and subsequent misoprostol. Contraception 2023; 125:110080. [PMID: 37245784 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the frequency of maternal adverse events associated with second trimester medical abortion using sequential mifepristone and misoprostol. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of medical abortions 13 to 28 weeks gestation using sequential mifepristone and misoprostol in a single center from January 2008 to December 2018. The main outcomes evaluated were the nature and incidence of adverse procedural events and the impact of gestation upon these outcomes. RESULTS During the study period, 1393 people underwent a medical abortion with sequential mifepristone and misoprostol. The median maternal age was 31 years (IQR 27-36 years) and 21.8% had at least one prior cesarean delivery. The median gestational age at abortion commencement was 19 weeks (IQR 17-21). The main adverse maternal events were complete or partial placental retention greater than 60 minutes triggering removal in the operating room (19%), maternal hemorrhage>1000 cc (4.3%), blood transfusion (1.7%), hospital readmission (1.4%), uterine rupture (0.29%) and hysterectomy (0.07%). There were significant reductions in placental retention rates with increasing gestational age (23.3% at 13-16 weeks gestation declining to 10.1% at>23 weeks gestation, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Serious adverse maternal events associated with second trimester medical abortion with sequential mifepristone-misoprostol are uncommon. IMPLICATIONS Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol is generally safe, however, on occasions serious complications may occur. All health care units providing a medical abortion service require the facilities and expertise to deal with these adverse events in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan E Dickinson
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Dorota A Doherty
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Biostatistics and Study Design, Women and Infants Research Foundation, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shay RL, Benson LS, Lokken EM, Micks EA. Same-day mifepristone prior to second-trimester induction termination with misoprostol: A retrospective cohort study. Contraception 2021; 107:29-35. [PMID: 34529952 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether same-day administration of mifepristone and misoprostol, compared with misoprostol alone, reduces the duration of second-trimester induction of labor for termination of pregnancy or increases the rate of fetal expulsion within 24 hours. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing induction of labor for pregnancy termination in the second trimester between 2009 and 2018. We compared patients who received mifepristone on the same day as the first dose of misoprostol to those who received misoprostol alone. The primary outcome was expulsion within 24 hours after the first dose of misoprostol. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-eight patients met criteria for inclusion, of whom 94 (31.5%) received same-day mifepristone. Expulsion within 24 hours occurred in 93.6% of the mifepristone-plus-misoprostol group and 79.9% of the misoprostol-only group (RR 1.17, 95%CI 1.07-1.28). Expulsion within 12 hours occurred in 56.4% of the mifepristone-plus-misoprostol group and 34.0% of the misoprostol-only group (RR 1.66, 95%CI 1.28-2.16). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, the rate of expulsion within 24 hours was similar between groups (RR 1.07, 95%CI 0.92-1.26), while the rate of expulsion within 12 hours remained different (RR 1.69, 95%CI 1.01-2.83). Median time to expulsion was shorter in the mifepristone-plus-misoprostol group than the misoprostol-only group (689 minutes vs 901 minutes, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION(S) Patients who received mifepristone on the same day as misoprostol had a shorter duration of induction termination and higher rate of success within 12 hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemary L Shay
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
| | - Lyndsey S Benson
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| | - Erica M Lokken
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| | - Elizabeth A Micks
- University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu L, Xiong W, Zeng M, Yan A, Song L, Chen M, Wei T, Zu Q, Zhang J. Different dosing intervals of mifepristone-misoprostol for second-trimester termination of pregnancy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 154:195-203. [PMID: 33332580 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare 1- and 2-day drug administration interval between mifepristone and misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination and provide evidence-based recommendations. METHODS Search strategy: the search was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for the relevant published studies from their establishment to March 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 1- and 2-day time interval of mifepristone-misoprostol for termination of pregnancy during second-trimester pregnancy were considered. Data were processed using Revman 5.3 software. RESULTS Meta-analyses of three RCTs showed no significant difference was reported in the induction-to-abortion time and successful abortion rate between 1- and 2-day mifepristone and misoprostol intervals. Statistical difference was not identified in the induction-to-abortion time between the two drug administration intervals in nulliparous or parous women. CONCLUSIONS Both 1- and 2-day dosing intervals between mifepristone and misoprostol are suitable for clinical use for second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Limei Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Wanchun Xiong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Manman Zeng
- Department of Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Guangdong, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Aihua Yan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ling Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Meng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Tianqin Wei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qian Zu
- Department of Neurology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiayin Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Whitehouse K, Brant A, Fonhus MS, Lavelanet A, Ganatra B. Medical regimens for abortion at 12 weeks and above: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contracept X 2020; 2:100037. [PMID: 32954250 PMCID: PMC7484538 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mifepristone and misoprostol are recommended for second-trimester medical abortion, but consensus is unclear on the ideal regimen. Objectives The objectives were to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating efficacy, safety and satisfaction of medical abortion at ≥ 12 weeks' gestation. Data sources We searched PubMed, Popline, Embase, Global Index Medicus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from January 2008 to May 2017. Study eligibility participants and interventions We included RCTs on medical abortion at ≥ 12 weeks' gestation using mifepristone and/or misoprostol. We excluded studies with spontaneous abortion, fetal demise and mechanical cervical ripening and those not reporting ongoing pregnancy (OP). Study appraisal and synthesis methods After extracting prespecified data and assessing risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane handbook, we used Revman5 software to combine data and GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. Results We included 43 of the 1894 references identified. Combination mifepristone-misoprostol had lower rates of OP [risk ratio (RR) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.35] vs. misoprostol only. A 24-h interval between mifepristone and misoprostol had lower OP rate at 24 h than simultaneous dosing (RR 3.13, 95% CI 1.23-7.94). Every 3-h dosing had lower OP rate at 48 h (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.88). Limitations Direct comparisons of buccal misoprostol to sublingual or vaginal routes after mifepristone were limited. Evidence from clinical trials on how to best manage women with prior uterine incisions was lacking. Conclusion Our analysis supports the use of mifepristone 200 mg 1 to 2 days before misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally every 3 h at ≥ 12 weeks' gestation. Implications Where available, providers should use mifepristone plus misoprostol for second-trimester medical abortion. Vaginal misoprostol appears to be most efficacious with fewest side effects, but sublingual and buccal routes are also acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Whitehouse
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ashley Brant
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St., Washington, DC, 20010, USA
| | | | - Antonella Lavelanet
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bela Ganatra
- The UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Costescu D, Guilbert É. No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 40:750-783. [PMID: 29861084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This guideline reviews evidence relating to the provision of surgical induced abortion (IA) and second trimester medical abortion, including pre- and post-procedural care. INTENDED USERS Gynaecologists, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who currently or intend to provide and/or teach IAs. TARGET POPULATION Women with an unintended or abnormal first or second trimester pregnancy. EVIDENCE PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Database were searched using the key words: first-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester medical abortion, dilation and evacuation, induction abortion, feticide, cervical preparation, cervical dilation, abortion complications. Results were restricted to English or French systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1979 to July 2017. National and international clinical practice guidelines were consulted for review. Grey literature was not searched. VALUES The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. The summary of findings is available upon request. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS IA is safe and effective. The benefits of IA outweigh the potential harms or costs. No new direct harms or costs identified with these guidelines.
Collapse
|
10
|
No 360 - Avortement provoqué : avortement chirurgical et méthodes médicales au deuxième trimestre. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018; 40:784-821. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
11
|
Bettahar K, Pinton A, Boisramé T, Cavillon V, Wylomanski S, Nisand I, Hassoun D. Interruption volontaire de grossesse par voie médicamenteuse. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 45:1490-1514. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Revised: 09/26/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
12
|
Verma ML, Singh U, Singh N, Sankhwar PL, Qureshi S. Efficacy of concurrent administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for termination of pregnancy. HUM FERTIL 2016; 20:43-47. [PMID: 27804310 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2016.1243817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In this prospective randomized parallel group study, subjects with a pregnancy of less than 63 d were randomized to receive either (i) 200 mg oral mifepristone plus 400 μg misoprostol per vaginally concurrently (group A); (ii) or the administration of misoprostol after 48 h (group B). Transvaginal sonography was performed on the 14th day of misoprostol administration to confirm complete abortion. The primary outcome was to compare the rates of complete abortion in two groups. Secondary outcomes were to compare induction abortion interval, side effects and compliance. A total of 200 subjects included in the study were randomized into groups A and B (100 each). Both the groups were comparable for age, parity, gestational age and history of previous abortion. The complete expulsion rate in group A was 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 95.1-98.2%) and group B was 95% (95% CI 93.0-96.8%) (p > 0.100). A gestational age of more than 56 d was found to predict failure of treatment in both groups. The adverse effect profile in the two groups was the same. Efficacy of concurrent mifepristone and misoprostol in combination is similar to that when misoprostol is given 48 h later (ctri.nic.in CTRI/2010/091/001422).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manju Lata Verma
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Hind Institute of Medical Sciences , Lucknow , Uttar Pradesh , India
| | - Uma Singh
- b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , King George's Medical University , Lucknow , Uttar Pradesh , India
| | - Nisha Singh
- b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , King George's Medical University , Lucknow , Uttar Pradesh , India
| | - Pushpa Lata Sankhwar
- b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , King George's Medical University , Lucknow , Uttar Pradesh , India
| | - Sabuhi Qureshi
- b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , King George's Medical University , Lucknow , Uttar Pradesh , India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chaudhuri P, Datta S. Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for induction of labor in intrauterine fetal death: A randomized trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41:1884-90. [PMID: 26419824 DOI: 10.1111/jog.12815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Accepted: 06/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Picklu Chaudhuri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Nilratan Sircar Medical College, West Bengal University of Health Sciences; Kolkata India
| | - Sutapa Datta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Nilratan Sircar Medical College, West Bengal University of Health Sciences; Kolkata India
| |
Collapse
|