Prospective evaluation of five methods used to treat cesarean scar defects

Factors Associated to the Presence of Isthmocele Diagnosed by Pelvic Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study

We aimed to analyze the prevalence of isthmocele and factors associated with its onset within a cohort of women with previous history of cesarean section. A cross-sectional study with 90 women assessed from 2020 to 2022. Isthmocele was a composite variable diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or diagnostic hysteroscopy (DxHys) and were asked about clinical symptoms, sociodemographic and obstetrical history and quality of life by the WHO-QOL questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analysis (odds ratio (OR) plus 95% confidence intervals-CI) were performed to seek factors associated with the presence of isthmocele (5% significance level).The prevalence of isthmocele after combining MRI, TVUS and DxHys was 63.3% (n = 57). Women with isthmocele presented a higher body mass index (BMI) measured during delivery (32.70 ± 6.07 vs. 28.28 ± 9.86 kg/m2;p < 0.05) than women without isthmocele. Other sociodemographic variables, obstetrical history and WHO-QOL subdomains did not differ between groups. Within women with isthmocele, the residual myometrial mantle had an average of 4.97 ± 1.57 cm. Uterine volume was higher in the isthmocele group (103.95 vs. 81.34 cm3; p = 0.08), but with no statistical difference. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) has reported that the factors associated with isthmocele were: higher BMI during delivery (aOR = 1.26[1.07-1.49];p < 0.05); longer interpartum interval (aOR = 1.22[1.03-1.46];p = 0.02) and presence of more than two cesarean sections (aOR = 2.16[1.16-4.01];p = 0.02). We concluded that a high prevalence of isthmocele was found. Women with previous cesarean section, with higher BMI during delivery and longer interdelivery interval were risk factors for the presence of isthmocele.

Reproductive outcomes after vaginal repair of isthmocele: A preliminary study and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Although vaginal repair of isthmocele is an effective and safe surgical option, data on reproductive and obstetrical outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate reproductive outcomes of women undergone vaginal repair of isthmocele. We also systematically reviewed the existent literature to offer a general view of available data.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a database prospectively collected between January 2018 and January 2022 at San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. We included secondary infertile women with ultrasound documented isthmocele who undergone vaginal repair. Post-surgical clinical, reproductive and obstetric outcomes were recorded. An advanced systematic search of the literature up to January 2023 was conducted.

RESULTS

17 women were included. The mean age of the included patients was 37.2 ± 2.7 years. The median of previous caesarian sections was 1 (1-2). One intra-operative complication (5.9 %) was reported (bladder injury, repaired at the time of surgery). At follow up, bleeding was successfully treated in 8 women (8/10; 80 %). Pregnancy was obtained in 7 women (7/17; 41.2 %): the conception was spontaneous in 4 women (4/7; 57.1 %) and trough assisted reproductive technology in 3 patients (3/7; 42.9 %). The mean time from surgery to pregnancy was 10.8 (±6.7) months. One spontaneous abortion was reported (1/7; 14.3 %), while live birth was achieved in 6 pregnancies (6/7; 85.7 %). All deliveries were by caesarian section at a median gestational age of 37.5 (36-38.25) weeks. No obstetrical complications were reported. At the time of caesarean section, no defects on the lower segment were retrieved. Regarding the systematic research, among the 21 studies screened, only 4 articles were included in the review. Pregnancy rate was around 60-70 % with very few obstetrical complications (0.01 %) such as abnormal placentation or preterm birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal repair of isthmocele is a minimally invasive, safe and effective surgical approach in terms of postsurgical residual myometrium tichness. Systematic review to date has found low-quality evidences on the impact of vaginal surgery in the management of secondary infertility and obstetrics outcomes in women with isthmocele.

Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: an expert review

The decision to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean delivery is complex and depends on patient preference, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, assessment of the risks vs benefits of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and available resources to support safe trial of labor after cesarean delivery at the planned birthing center. The most feared complication of trial of labor after cesarean delivery is uterine rupture, which can have catastrophic consequences, including substantial maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although the absolute risk of uterine rupture is low, several clinical, historical, obstetrical, and intrapartum factors have been associated with increased risk. It is therefore critical for clinicians managing patients during trial of labor after cesarean delivery to be aware of these risk factors to appropriately select candidates for trial of labor after cesarean delivery and maximize the safety and benefits while minimizing the risks. Caution is advised when considering labor augmentation and induction in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. With established hospital safety protocols that dictate close maternal and fetal monitoring, avoidance of prostaglandins, and careful titration of oxytocin infusion when induction agents are needed, spontaneous and induced trial of labor after cesarean delivery are safe and should be offered to most patients with 1 previous low transverse, low vertical, or unknown uterine incision after appropriate evaluation, counseling, planning, and shared decision-making. Future research should focus on clarifying true risk factors and identifying the optimal approach to intrapartum and induction management, tools for antenatal prediction, and strategies for prevention of uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery. A better understanding will facilitate patient counseling, support efforts to improve trial of labor after cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates, and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Comparison of clinical effectiveness and subsequent fertility between hysteroscopic resection and vaginal repair in patients with cesarean scar defect: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and pregnancy rate after hysteroscopic resection (HR) and/or vaginal repair (VR) in patients with cesarean scar defect (CSD).

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled 191 patients who received CSD surgery in the First affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between September 2019 to February 2022 (96 in HR and 95 in VR, respectively). Patient follow-up were performed three months after surgery in both groups by transvaginal ultrasound to confirm the presence of fluid in the niche, along with the resolution of prolonged menses at the same time. The primary outcome was the clinical effectiveness between HR and VR, identified by the resolution of prolonged menses.

RESULTS

The rates of niche-fluid disappearance (70.1% vs 60.2%, P = 0.176) and prolonged menses resolution (74.8% vs 80.0%, P = 0.341) were comparable for HR and VR. A subgroup analysis for niche size revealed that HR provides patients with small niche a more favorable rate of menstrual resolution compared to VR (size of niche ≤ 15 mm2, aOR = 3.423, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.073-10.918), but patients with large niche experience a lower rate of resolution compared to VR (size of niche > 25 mm2, aOR = 0.286, 95% CI 0.087- 0.938). During follow-up, 41 patients who wanted to conceive became pregnant. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of pregnancy at 12 months and 24 months were 47.1% (95% CI: 34.5%, 58.8%) and 63.8% (95% CI: 52.5%, 72.9%), respectively. The median pregnancy time was 22 months (95% CI: 14.2, 29.8) after VR and 12 months (95% CI: 8.3, 15.7, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon P = 0.021) after HR. Among patients with subsequent infertility, 31.6% achieved pregnancy by unassisted mode and 29.8% by IVF/ICSI. Moreover, among patients with previously failed IVF/ICSI treatment, 60% (12/20) obtained pregnancy, including 71.4% (10/14) after HR and 33.3% (2/6) after VR.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopic resection is as effective as vaginal repair at relieving symptoms of CSD-associated prolonged menses. Hysteroscopic resection is the modality of choice with an improvement in prolonged menses for small niche, while vaginal might be considered for a large niche. Furthermore, surgical intervention could improve the clinical pregnancy rate of CSD patients. All of these provide evidence for the individualized management of CSD.

Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long-term follow-up on the prospective LAPNICHE study

INTRODUCTION

After incomplete healing of the uterine cesarean section scar, a niche can be observed; 24% of the women develop large niches with a residual myometrial thickness <3 mm. In these cases a laparoscopic resection is possible. The effect of this new treatment on fertility outcome is not known yet. This paper describes reproductive outcomes 2 years after a laparoscopic niche resection and compares women with or without secondary infertility at baseline.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed, with consecutive inclusion of women between 2011 and 2019. Women with a niche in the uterine cesarean scar, with a residual myometrial thickness of <3 mm and with a desire to become pregnant, were scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic niche resection because of one or more of the following problems (1) postmenstrual spotting; (2) midcycle intrauterine fluid accumulation diagnosed during the fertility workup or (3) difficulties with a previous embryo transfer and preferring a surgical therapy. The study is registered in the ISRCTN register (ref. no. ISRCTN02271575) on April 23, 2013.

RESULTS

There were 133 (62%) women included with a desire to become pregnant, 88 with secondary infertility. In all, 83 had an ongoing pregnancy at the 2-year follow-up. The ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with previous fertility problems was 60.2% compared with 66.7% in patients without infertility (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-1.7). The OR for live births was 0.57 (95% CI 0.02-1.2). Overall, 8.3% of the pregnancies resulted in miscarriages by the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The reproductive outcomes in women with and without previous fertility problems undergoing resection of a large niche are very promising and quite comparable in both groups. These results suggest, but do not prove, a beneficial effect of this therapy for these indications. The results support the design of future randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of niche resection vs expectant management to assess its additional value in women with or without fertility problems who desire pregnancy.

Assessment of the clinical outcomes and complications of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of symptomatic isthmocele: An observational study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic or hysteroscopic approaches for isthmoplasty.

METHODS

A total of 99 isthmocele patients with an average age of 38.45 ± 4.72 years were included in the 2 years of this retrospective cohort study. Forty-five underwent laparoscopic and 54 underwent hysteroscopic isthmocele excision and myometrial repair.

RESULTS

Pain scores were significantly higher in the hysteroscopy group before the procedure, but there were no significant pain score differences after the surgery. In 1 year of follow up, dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia were higher among hysteroscopy patients. Furthermore, hysteroscopy significantly improved postmenstrual spotting after surgery better than laparoscopy, but in the follow up, there was no significant difference between the two groups in this regard (mean rank for hysteroscopy vs. laparoscopy: 32.30 vs. 37.48, U = 418, P = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

In patients with a history of infertility, ectopic pregnancy, lower gravidity, lower parity, and a lower number of cesarean sections, laparoscopic isthmoplasty is preferred over the hysteroscopic approach. Both methods have similar effects on midcycle vaginal bleeding, duration of postmenstrual spotting, and pain. However, a higher rate of dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea could be associated with hysteroscopy.

Isthmocele correction: resectoscopic, laparoscopic or both?

Background

An isthmocele is a myometrial defect in the site of the caesarean scar. In symptomatic women with abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility, surgical correction can be considered. Most authors advocate that when there's a residual myometrium ≥ 3mm it can be corrected through resectoscopic approach and when < 3mm the treatment should be laparoscopic, eventually guided by diagnostic hysteroscopy. Both these techniques have important limitations; therefore, the authors propose combining both techniques, in the same procedure, in order to overcome them.

Objectives

To demonstrate the advantages of a surgical technique for correction of an isthmocele using both resectoscopic and laparoscopic resection.

Material and Methods

A stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage.

Main outcome measures

Intraoperative data and outcomes in the patient's follow-up.

Results

One month after the surgery the patient was asymptomatic, reporting a resolution of the uterine abnormal bleeding, and the ultrasound showed a full correction of the isthmocele.

Conclusion

A combination of resectoscopic and laparoscopic resection, in correcting bigger isthmoceles, is a good option to fully excise all the fibrotic tissue.

Learning objective

This video aims to demonstrate the benefits of using a technique combining resectoscopic and laparoscopic resection for correcting larger isthmoceles.

Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis

The purpose of this State-of-the-Art Review was to provide a strategic analysis, in terms of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis), of the current evidence regarding the management of uterine isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect). Strengths include the fact that isthmocele can be diagnosed on two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, and that surgical repair may restore natural fertility potential and prevent secondary infertility, as well as reduce the risk of miscarriage and other obstetric complications. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the best diagnostic method and criteria, as well as the potential benefits of surgical repair with respect to fertility. There is a need for experienced surgeons skilled in the various isthmocele repair techniques. Isthmocele repair does not prevent the need for Cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancies. There is increasing awareness regarding the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosing isthmocele. This may lead to surgical correction and prevention of obstetric and perinatal complications in subsequent pregnancies, including Cesarean scar pregnancy. Regarding threats, the existence of different surgical techniques means that there is a risk of selecting an inadequate approach if the type of isthmocele and the patient's characteristics are not considered. There is a risk of overtreatment when asymptomatic defects are repaired surgically. Finally, there is an absence of cost-effectiveness analyses to justify routine repair. Thus, while there are many data suggesting that isthmocele has an adverse effect on both natural fertility and the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques, high-quality evidence to support surgical isthmocele repair in all asymptomatic patients desiring future fertility are lacking. There is increasing agreement to recommend hysteroscopic repair of isthmocele as a first-line approach as long as the residual myometrial thickness is at least 2.5-3.0 mm. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Transvaginal repair of isthmocele after cesarean scar pregnancy

The transvaginal approach represents a suitable choice for the management of isthmocele in women seeking to become pregnant.

Cesarean scar disorder: Management and repair

Cesarean scar disorder (CSD) is an entity recently defined as uterine niche with at least one primary or 2 secondary symptoms. CSDs can be visualized by hysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging, but diagnosis should be performed by exams able to measure the residual myometrial thickness (RMT). Although there is a limited number of studies evaluating fertility and reproductive outcomes after different types of surgery, the following consideration should be kept in mind. Asymptomatic women should not be operated with the hope of improving obstetrical outcomes. It is reasonable to consider hormone therapy for CSDs as a symptomatic treatment in women who no longer wish to conceive and have no contraindications. In case of failure of or contraindications to medical treatment, surgery should be offered according to the severity of symptoms, including infertility, the desire or otherwise to preserve the uterus, the size of the CSD, and RMT measurement. Hysteroscopy is considered to be more of a resection than a repair, so women who desire pregnancy should be excluded from this technique in case of RMT <3 mm. In this instance, repair is essential and can only be achieved by a laparoscopic or vaginal approach. The benefit of laparoscopic approach seems to persist after subsequent CS. Women with CSDs need to be given complete information, including available literature, before any treatment decision is made.

Comparing levonorgestrel intrauterine system with hysteroscopic niche resection in women with postmenstrual spotting related to a niche in the uterine cesarean scar: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postmenstrual spotting and chronic pelvic pain after cesarean delivery are associated with the presence of niches. Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (52 mg) and hysteroscopic niche resection have been shown to relieve niche-related symptoms at 6 months after the intervention.

OBJECTIVE

This trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system with that of hysteroscopic niche resection in reducing niche-related postmenstrual spotting.

STUDY DESIGN

This randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted at a medical center in Shanghai, China. Women with symptoms of postmenstrual spotting after cesarean delivery, with a niche depth of at least 2 mm and residual myometrium of at least 2.2 mm on magnetic resonance imaging, and no intention to conceive within the next year were randomly assigned to receive treatment with 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system or hysteroscopic niche resection. The primary outcome was the reduction in postmenstrual spotting at 6 months after randomization, defined as the percentage of women with a reduction of at least 50% in spotting days relative to baseline. Efficacy and safety were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Between September 2019 and January 2022, 208 women were randomized into the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group (N=104) or the hysteroscopic niche resection group (N=104). At the 6-month follow-up, a 50% reduction in spotting had occurred in 78.4% (80/102) of women in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group and in 73.1% (76/104) of women in the hysteroscopic niche resection group (relative risk, 1.07 [95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.25]; P=.370). Spotting decreased over time (Ptrend=.001), with a stronger reduction observed in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group (P=.001). There was also a significant interaction between time and treatment (P=.007). From 9 months onward, a more significant reduction in spotting was observed in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group than in the hysteroscopic niche resection group (9 months, 89.2% vs 72.1%; relative risk, 1.24 [95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.42]; 12 months, 90.2% vs 70.2%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.48]). Moreover, compared with the hysteroscopic niche resection group, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group had significantly fewer postmenstrual spotting days and total bleeding days from 6 months onward (all P<.001), and less pelvic pain from 3 months onward (all P<.010). No intervention-related complications were reported in any group. During follow-up, 11 (10.8%) women reported hormone-related side effects, and 2 women (2.0%) in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group had spontaneous partial expulsion. Meanwhile, 3 unintended pregnancies were reported in the hysteroscopic niche resection group.

CONCLUSION

In women with niche-related postmenstrual spotting, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was not more effective than hysteroscopic niche resection in reducing the number of spotting days by at least 50% at 6 months. However, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was superior in reducing spotting from 9 months onward, and it reduced the absolute number of spotting days from 6 months onward and pelvic pain from 3 months onward.

Postoperative morphologic changes of the isthmocele and clinical impact in patients treated by channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic technique

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the changes in (1) residual myometrial thickness (RMT), (2) cesarean scar defect (CSD) size, and (3) clinical symptoms, before and after channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of CSD.

METHODS

A single-center, observational, prospective, cohort study was carried out enrolling all symptomatic patients of childbearing age, diagnosed with CSD and routinely scheduled for channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection from July 2020 to July 2021 at the Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna. University of Bologna, Italy. The primary outcome was the difference in mean RMT before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the differences before and 4 months after the surgery in: (1) CSD size measured by transvaginal ultrasound, (2) visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the symptoms, and (3) abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) rate. Lastly, patients' satisfaction was assessed by the global impression of improvement (PGI-I) score.

RESULTS

We found a significant difference before and after the procedure in: (1) mean RMT (+2.0 mm; P < 0.001); mean size of the CSD (base: +1.6 mm; height: -2.5 mm; transverse diameter: -3.2 mm; volume: -263.7 mm³ ; P < 0.001); (2) mean VAS score for dyspareunia (-5.84; P < 0.001), dysmenorrhea (-8.94; P < 0.001), pelvic pain (-2.94; P < 0.001); (3) AUB rate (91% vs. 3%; P < 0.001). Lastly, the mean PGI-I score ± SD was 1.7 ± 0.9.

CONCLUSION

Channel-like (360°) hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of patients with symptomatic CSD may lead to an increase in RMT, decrease in CSD, and improvement of symptoms after the procedure, with high patient satisfaction.

Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review

Background

Cesarean scar defects (CSD) are caused by cesarean sections and cause various symptoms. Although there has been no previous consensus on the name of this condition for a long time, it has been named cesarean scar disorder (CSDi).

Methods

This review summarizes the definition, prevalence, and etiology of CSD, as well as the pathophysiology and treatment of CSDi. We focused on surgical therapy and examined the effects and procedures of laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, and transvaginal surgery.

Main findings

The definition of CSD was proposed as an anechoic lesion with a depth of at least 2 mm because of the varied prevalence, owing to the lack of consensus. CSD incidence depends on the number of times, procedure, and situation of cesarean sections. Histopathological findings in CSD are fibrosis and adenomyosis, and chronic inflammation in the uterine and pelvic cavities decreases fertility in women with CSDi. Although the surgical procedures are not standardized, laparoscopic, hysteroscopic, and transvaginal surgeries are effective.

Conclusion

The cause and pathology of CSDi are becoming clear. However, there is variability in the prevalence and treatment strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further studies using the same definitions.

New Efficient Method for Hysteroscopic Isthmoplasty: Four Simple Steps Lead to a Significant Improvement in Bleeding Status

We demonstrate an effective reduction in postmenstrual spotting after our novel hysteroscopic isthmoplasty. This study included 66 patients with isthmocele-related postmenstrual spotting confirmed by sonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy between 2000 and 2017. Our new interventions included the following four steps: (1) make a resection gradient of the distal edge of the isthmocele from the ape of the isthmocele down to the cervical outer orifice; (2) resect the distal and proximal niches of the isthmocele; (3) electrocauterize the distal and proximal sides (not only the niche bottom) of the small cave on the scar side of the isthmocele; (4) manage the isthmocele until it is largely connected to the cavity. In our results, all patients underwent extensive hysteroscopic repair of newly hysteroscopic isthmoplasty without any intra- or postoperative complications. After final hysteroscopic repair modification, prolonged menstrual spotting was significantly decreased in 98.2% (53/54) of the patients, and the total number of bleeding days per menstrual cycle significantly decreased from a mean of 15.38 ± 3.3 days to 6.4 ± 1.9 days postoperatively (p < 0.001). Our four-step hysteroscopic technique successfully resolved prolonged menstrual spotting in over 90% of the patients, exceeding the resolution rates of 60−85% achieved with other hysteroscopic techniques used to treat symptomatic isthmocele. No patients experience recurrence after long-term follow up. Four simple steps led to a significant improvement in bleeding status.

Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device Use Can Be a Treatment Option in Symptomatic Patients with Isthmocele

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices have been used for contraception and treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. There is only limited data about the effect of this on isthmocele. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices in a larger study population with a longer follow-up as compared to the literature on symptomatic patients with isthmocele. A total of 29 patients with symptomatic isthmocele and inserted levonorgestrel-releasing device were included in this prospective study. All patients were included at January 2020 and followed for 18 months. Sociodemographic findings, laboratory parameters, premenstrual spotting, postmenstrual spotting, menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain related to isthmocele were recorded. In sonography, width, length, area of isthmocele, and residual myometrial thickness were determined. The frequency of symptoms during follow-up was compared between visits and also compared between groups according to residual myometrial thickness. Premenstrual spotting and pelvic pain were significantly reduced at 6th months (48.3 to 10.3%, p = 0.007 and 34.5 to 10.3%, p = 0.039, respectively) and no significant change was detected until the end of follow-up period. Postmenstrual spotting reduced at 6th months (96.6 to 34.5%, p < 0.001) and also significant change was detected between 6 and 12th months (34.5% vs 13.8%, p = 0.031). Menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea disappeared at 12th months. No association was found between residual myometrial thickness and the frequency of symptoms for each follow-up. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices are useful and reliable therapeutic tools for symptomatic isthmocele patients who do not desire fertility, regardless of residual myometrial thickness.

Hysteroscopic management of caesarean scar defects

A caesarean section may lead to a defect of the myometrium at the site of the uterine scar. The association with abnormal uterine bleeding or impaired fertility has been demonstrated. Hysteroscopic remodelling reportedly reduces the symptoms. To review the available literature reporting on hysteroscopic treatment of these defects in symptomatic women with abnormal uterine bleeding or impaired fertility. A systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane databases has been performed until January 2021, including 27 articles. Hysteroscopic remodelling relieved symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding in 60-100% and 25-100% of women with impaired fertility conceived within the follow up period. No major complications were reported. Hysteroscopic remodelling seems a treatment option in the management of symptomatic caesarean scar defects. Long-term follow-up and larger studies are needed to evaluate the effect on abnormal uterine bleeding as well as on reproductive outcomes.

Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic isthmocele repair on isthmocele-related symptoms and/or fertility-related problems. The residual myometrial thickness before and after subsequent cesarean section was also evaluated.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case series.

SETTING

Public university hospital.

POPULATION

Women with isthmocele (residual myometrium < 5 mm) complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain or secondary infertility not otherwise specified.

METHODS

Women's complaints and the residual myometrium were assessed pre-operatively and at three to six months post-operatively. In patients who conceived after surgery, the latter was measured at least six months after delivery by cesarean section.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Resolution of the main symptom three to six months after surgery and persistence of laparoscopic repair benefits after subsequent cesarean section were considered as primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 women underwent laparoscopic isthmocele repair. The success rates of the surgery as improvement of abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain and secondary infertility were 71.4% (10 of 14), 83.3% (10 of 12) and 83.3% (10 of 12), respectively. Mean residual myometrial thickness increased significantly from 1.77 mm pre-operatively to 6.67 mm, three to six months post-operatively. Mean myometrial thickness in patients who underwent subsequent cesarean section (N = 7) was 4.49 mm. In this sub-group, there was no significant difference between the mean myometrial thickness measured after the laparoscopic isthmocele repair and that measured after the subsequent cesarean section. None of these patients reported recurrence of their symptoms after delivery.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the laparoscopic isthmocele excision and repair is an appropriate approach for the treatment of isthmocele-related symptoms when done by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. The benefit of this new surgical approach seems to persist even after a subsequent cesarean section. Further investigations and prospective studies are required to confirm this finding.

Robotic or laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar defects or cesarean scar pregnancies with a uterine sound guidance

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of robotic/laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defects or cesarean scar pregnancies with a uterine sound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive women with cesarean scar defects or cesarean scar pregnancies who underwent robotic/laparoscopic repair with a bent uterine sound guidance were reviewed. Subjective changes in symptoms and objective changes in the depth and width of cesarean scar defects after surgery were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 20 women underwent robotic (n = 3) or conventional laparoscopic (n = 17) repair of cesarean scar defects, which included postmenstrual vaginal bleeding associated with cesarean scar defects (n = 15), cesarean scar pregnancies (n = 3), accumulated pus in the cesarean scar defect (n = 1) and an incomplete abortion incarcerated in the cesarean scar defect (n = 1). Bladder perforation occurred in one woman during robotic adhesiolysis. All women with cesarean scar defects (n = 15) reported an improvement in postmenstrual vaginal bleeding after surgery. Follow-up sonography showed a decrease in the depth and width of the cesarean scar defect and an increase in the residual myometrial thickness.

CONCLUSION

Robotic or laparoscopic repair with a uterine sound guidance seems to be a feasible and effective method in the treatment of cesarean scar defect or cesarean scar pregnancy.

The effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection compared with Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on postmenstrual spotting in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection with a Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD, 52 mg) on postmenstrual spotting duration in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cohort study was conducted at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. Patients with postmenstrual spotting symptomatic niches were allocated to hysteroscopy group or LNG-IUD group based on the shared medical decision-making approach, and were followed up for 1 year after treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was reduced postmenstrual spotting days at 6th month after treatment. Secondary outcomes were effectiveness rate (proportion of patients with spotting days reduced by at least 50% from baseline), menstrual characteristics, menstruation satisfaction, direct medical costs, complications and side effects.

RESULTS

78 out of the 82 eligible patients were included, 36 patients in both group finished 1-year follow-up. Reduced spotting days at the 6th month was 7 days in LNG-IUD group, significantly higher than 5 days in hysteroscopy group, P = 0.004; The effectiveness rate increased over time within 1 year after the insertion of LNG-IUD (63.89%, 83.33%, 88.89%, 88.89%, P for trend = 0.006), while no trend change was observed in hysteroscopy group (71.05%, 71.05%, 66.67%, 61.11%, P for trend = 0.77). The mean direct medical costs were 817[785,856] $ in the hysteroscopy group and 243[239,255] $ in the LNG-IUD group (p＜0.001). 2 patients removed IUD and 2 patients reported weight gain of more than 5 kg and breast distended pain in LNG-IUD group; 2 patients got pregnant in hysteroscopy group. No serious complications were observed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LNG-IUD is more effective in the treatment of postmenstrual spotting from the 6th month onwards than a hysteroscopic niche resection in patients with a symptomatic niche at lower direct costs.

Comparing levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic resection in patients with postmenstrual spotting related to a niche in the caesarean scar (MIHYS NICHE trial): protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the rate of caesarean sections (CS) worldwide has risen and CS-associated complications such as niche have increased substantially. Until now, evidence-based clinical guidelines for the treatment of niche-related symptoms remain absent. In patients with postmenstrual spotting, it has not been studied if the effect of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (LNG-IUS 52 mg) is superior to that of hysteroscopy. This study will answer the question of whether LNG-IUS 52 mg is more effective in improving postmenstrual spotting than hysteroscopic niche resection in women with niche-related spotting at 6 months after randomisation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a randomised controlled trial. A total of 208 women with postmenstrual spotting related to niche in the caesarean uterine scar of at least 2 mm and residual myometrium of at least 2.2 mm evaluated by MRI will be included. Women desiring to conceive within 1 year, with contraindications for LNG-IUS 52 mg or hysteroscopic surgery will be excluded. After informed consent is obtained, eligible women will be randomly allocated to LNG-IUS 52 mg or hysteroscopic niche resection at 1:1. The primary outcome is the efficacy in reducing postmenstrual spotting at 6 months after randomisation. The secondary outcomes include menstrual pattern, total days of blood loss per month, rate of amenorrhoea, side effects and complications.We will use a Visual Analogue Scale for chronic pelvic pain, urological symptoms and women's satisfaction (five-point Likert scale).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the local medical ethics committee and by the Institutional Review Board of the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai, China (No. GKLW 2019-08). Participants will sign a written informed consent before participation. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900025677.

Post-caesarean Niche (Isthmocele) in Uterine Scar: An Update

Uterine niche is one of the emerging complications of caesarean section. With rising caesarean rates, the caesarean-related iatrogenic complications are also on the rise. These include placenta accreta, scar ectopic pregnancy and uterine niche which is a newer entity being described in the recent literature. Uterine niche, also described as uterine isthmocele, caesarean scar defect and diverticulum, is an iatrogenic defect in the myometrium at the site of previous caesarean scar due to defective tissue healing. Patients may have varied symptoms including abnormal uterine bleeding, post-menstrual spotting and infertility, though many women may be asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally. Diagnosis is made radiologically by transvaginal sonography, saline instillation sonohysterography or magnetic resonance imaging. Occurrence of niche may be prevented by using correct surgical technique during caesarean. Patients may be managed medically; however, subfertility and persistent symptoms may require surgical correction either by hysteroscopic resection or transabdominal or transvaginal repair. This mini-review comprehensively covers the potential risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of this increasingly encountered condition due to rising caesarean rates.

Obstetric and Gynecologic Outcomes after the Transvaginal Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect in a Series of 183 Women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To analyze retrospectively the effect of hysteroscopy combined with transvaginal repair on the cesarean section diverticulum (CSD) and explore the clinical significance of this procedure.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital and a gynecology hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 183 patients with scar diverticulum after cesarean section were recruited from the Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan and Shenzhen In Vitro Fertilization Gynecological Hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

In this study, we reported a surgical method for repairing uterine scar through uterine therapy and explored its clinical efficacy and pregnancy outcome.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The time of operation, volume of bleeding, and duration of hospitalization were recorded. The size of the scar diverticulum and the remaining myometrium were examined by B-mode ultrasonography before and after the operation. The length of the menstrual cycle and pelvic pain were recorded during follow-up to check the recovery of patients after surgery. The pregnancy of patients with pregnancy needs was recorded to check the pregnancy outcome. All 183 patients successfully completed the repair of the transvaginal uterus scar diverticulum with the help of a hysteroscopy examination. The mean (± standard deviation) operation time was 58.61 ± 18.56 minutes. The mean blood loss was 36.97 ± 22.32 mL. The mean hospital stay was 6.08 ± 1.89 days. In 57.14% of patients, the CSD completely disappeared, whereas the volume of CSD shrank by at least 50% in 88.95% of patients. The mean menstrual period of patients after surgery was 7.72 ± 2.68 days, which was significantly shorter than that recorded preoperatively (13.45 ± 3.69 days) (t = 19.62, p = .00). The pelvic pain disappeared in 81.08% of the patients. The mean postoperative thickness of the remaining muscular layer was 5.30 ± 1.27-mm, which was significantly higher than the preoperative value of 2.25 ± 0.92-mm (t = 28.21, p = .00). The mean postoperative thickness of the remaining muscular layer of patients with improved menstrual cycle was 5.40 ± 1.27-mm, which was significantly higher than the thickness of 4.88 ± 1.11-mm in patients without improved menstrual cycle (t = 2.31, p = .025). A total of 124 patients attempted to become pregnant, 83 of whom were successful. The pregnancy rate was as high as 66.95%, which included 2 scar pregnancies, 4 ectopic pregnancies, and 87 intrauterine pregnancies. No uterine rupture occurred.

CONCLUSION

The transvaginal repair of the uterine diverticulum improved the symptoms and probability of a successful pregnancy effectively. This process is a surgical procedure to increase the thickness of the residual uterine muscle wall effectively.

Is Hysteroscopy a Good Option to Manage Severe Cesarean Scar Defect?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of hysteroscopic management in women with a severe or nonsevere symptomatic cesarean scar defect (residual myometrium ≤3-mm vs >3-mm, respectively).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Gynecology department of a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Seventy-one women with an operative hysteroscopy for a symptomatic defect (49 with severe defects and 22 with nonsevere ones).

INTERVENTIONS

Operative hysteroscopy for cesarean scar defect in women with a severe defect (residual myometrium ≤3-mm) and with nonsevere defect (residual myometrium >3-mm).

MEASUREMENTS

The main objective was to compare success rates between the 2 groups. The secondary objectives were the comparisons of (1) the number of women who required more than 1 procedure, (2) the rate of complications, (3) the number of subsequent pregnancies, and (4) the evolution of residual myometrium thickness between the groups.

MAIN RESULTS

The success rates were not significantly different between the groups (73.5% in the severe group and 63.6% in the nonsevere group [p = .40]). The number of women requiring more than 1 procedure was also similar, as were the rate of complications and the mean increase of myometrium thickness. The rate of subsequent pregnancies in women who were infertile was significantly higher in women with a severe defect (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

The hysteroscopic approach seems to be a good way to manage cesarean scar defects even when the residual myometrium is thin. A prospective study is, however, necessary to confirm these findings.

Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased

Around 20% of pregnant women undergo cesarean section (CS), and in most regions of the world CS rates continue to grow. There is still no clear definition of what is considered a normal physiologic aspect of a CS scar and what is abnormal. Cesarean scar defects (CSDs) should be suspected in women presenting with spotting, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, or infertility and a history of CS. CSDs can be visualized with the use of hysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging. It is reasonable to consider hormone therapy for CSDs as a symptomatic treatment in women who no longer wish to conceive and have no contraindications. In case of failure of or contraindications to medical treatment, surgery should be contemplated according to the severity of symptoms, including infertility, the desire or otherwise to preserve the uterus, the size of the CSD, and residual myometrium thickness (RMT) measurement. Hysteroscopy is considered to be more of a resection than a repair, so women who desire pregnancy should be excluded from this technique if the RMT is <3 mm, in which case repair is essential and can be achieved by only laparoscopic or vaginal approach. Women with CSDs need to be given complete information, including available literature, before any treatment decision is made. Because prevention is better than cure, risk factors should be identified early to ensure appropriate management.

Demonstration of Isthmocele Surgical Repair

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the surgical treatment of a uterine isthmocele.

DESIGN

Demonstration of the laparoscopic technique with narrated video footage.

SETTING

Cesarean section rate has been increasing despite the World Health Organization's recommendation of a maximum 15%, with some countries reaching rates as high as 50%. The choice of delivery method is a complex topic based on physical and psychologic health, social and cultural context, and quality of maternity care. With the increasing number of cesarean sections, a new entity was recognized, the isthmocele [1]. A uterine isthmocele is a dilatation of the uterine cesarean scar and functions as a reservoir collecting blood during menstruation. Isthmocele prevalence ranges from 19% to 84%[2]. The most frequent complaint relates to intermittent postmenstrual bleeding (30%). Isthmocele can be a cause of infertility and pelvic pain [3]. Interstitial pregnancy is a known complication with a mortality rate up to 2.5%. The diagnosis can be made by transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging but also by hysteroscopy or hysterosalpingography. Treatment can be done by controlling the symptoms with oral combined contraceptive (decreasing metrorrhagia) or with surgical correction improving symptoms and/or fertility [4-7]. Isthmocele correction seems to improve secondary infertility in patients in whom a fertility workup did not find other cause [8,9]. Surgical approach can be done by vaginal route with hysteroscopy; abdominal route with laparoscopy, robotic or laparotomy; or through a combine procedure with both routes. Hysterectomy is the definitive treatment, but for those who want to preserve fertility, isthmocele correction can be offered. For laparoscopic surgery, several ways have been described to detect the isthmocele such as Foley catheter, hysteroscopy, methylene blue, and Hegar probe. When we do laparoscopy, we prefer concomitant use of hysteroscopy. There is a trending opinion that patients with a smaller isthmocele could be treated hysteroscopically (2.5 mm according to Jeremy et al [10] and 3.0 mm described by Marotta et al [11]). The goal of hysteroscopy correction is to remove the inflammatory infiltration in the endocervix, cutting the superior and inferior edges of the defect enabling normal blood evacuation of the uterus. By contrast, those with a larger isthmocele (with <2.5-3.0-mm residual myometrium) and a risk of perforation during hysteroscopy could be better treated by laparoscopy. This is especially important in patients interested in pregnancy because of the risk of uterine perforation [12]. There is still no strong evidence that hysteroscopic correction leads to an increased number of uterine ruptures compared with laparoscopy, but myometrium thickness seems to be greater after laparoscopic correction. Myometrium thickness is an independent risk factor for uterine rupture [13], and therefore, laparoscopic correction is preferred over hysteroscopic in women with a pregnancy desire. Finally, after surgical correction of an isthmocele, we recommend a 6-month interval before attempting pregnancy.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic treatment is important in women who are symptomatic, have thin endometrium, and desire a pregnancy. Key strategies are (1) dissection of the vesicouterine pouch laterally to avoid entering the bladder wall; (2) transillumination with hysteroscopy; (3) cut with cold scissors avoiding thermal damage of remaining myometrium; and (4) suture with figure 8 in multiple layers. No evidence of using a specific suture is available.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of a uterine isthmocele is a good option in women who are symptomatic and infertile. Laparoscopic treatment guided by hysteroscopy is a good option if residual myometrium is <3 mm.

Hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean scar defect

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of hysteroscopic surgery on the outcomes of obstetrics and gynecology among patients with cesarean section diverticulum.

METHODS

Ninety-nine infertile patients with cesarean section diverticulum received hysteroscopic treatment and were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were followed for 1 year.

RESULTS

The study included ninety-nine symptomatic patients with cesarean section diverticulum. After surgery, the menstrual periods of patients were improved from 11.15 ± 4.44 to 7.69 ± 2.85 days. Forty-seven (47/99) women became pregnant after surgery. The number of patients who became pregnant with an anteflexion uterus after hysteroscopic surgery is 32 (32/57), and the number of women who became pregnant with a retroflexion uterus is 15 (15/42).

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic surgery could improve the PCSD-associated prolonged menstrual bleeding, and satisfactory obstetrical outcomes could be achieved by the surgery treatment in women with cesarean defect.

Vaginal repaired cesarean section diverticulum is beneficial in women with two prior cesarean sections

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaginal repair in patients with cesarean section diverticulum (CSD) who had one or two previous cesarean sections (CSs).

Methods

From January 2012 to December 2014, 248 women with CSD underwent vaginal repair surgery in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. These included 193 women with one previous cesarean section and 55 women with two previous cesarean sections. Excision and suture of CSD was performed through a vaginal approach. The duration of menstruation, the length, width and depth of the CSD and thickness of the remaining muscular layer (TRM) were evaluated before and after surgery by transvaginal three-dimensional (3D) color Doppler ultrasound.

Results

A total of 221 (89.11%) women were followed-up for more than 3 months, and 168 (67.74%) women were followed-up for more than 6 months. There were significant differences in the average duration of menstruation (7.77 ± 2.05 and 8.02 ± 2.06 days VS 13.99 ± 3.71 days), the average size of CSD (5.54*9.19*5.60 and 5.75*9.04*6.18 mm VS 7.99*12.43*6.62 mm) and the TRM (7.61 ± 2.52 and 7.60 ± 3.00 mm VS 2.51 ± 1.02 mm) after surgery compared with those figures before surgery. The results of this study reveal that vaginal repair could shorten the duration of menstruation and improve anatomical defects (P < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the effect of clinical repair between women with one or two previous cesarean sections (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In CSD patients, the clinical effectiveness of vaginal repair was equivalent between women with one or two previous cesarean sections.

From hysteroscopy to laparoendoscopic surgery: what is the best surgical approach for symptomatic isthmocele? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness and risks of different surgical therapies for isthmocele in symptomatic women with abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility, or for the prevention of obstetric complications, considering safety and surgical complications.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched (n° CRD4201912035) for original articles on the surgical treatment of isthmocele published between 1950 and 2018. Data synthesis was completed using MedCalc 16.4.3. The body of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

We retrieved 33 publications: 28 focused on a single surgical technique, and five comparing different techniques. Meta-analysis showed an improvement of symptoms in 85.00% (75.05-92.76%) of women after hysteroscopic correction, 92.77% (85.53-97.64%) after laparoscopic/robotic correction, and 82.52% (67.53-93.57%) after vaginal correction. Hysteroscopic surgery was associated with the lowest risk of complications (0.76%, 0.20-1.66%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found adequate evidence supporting the use of surgery for the treatment of symptomatic isthmocele, as it was found to improve the bleeding symptoms in more than 80% of patients. Differently, we found a lack of evidence regarding the role of surgery with the purpose of improving fertility or reducing the risk of obstetric complications in women with asymptomatic isthmocele. The hysteroscopic correction of isthmocele may be the safest and most effective strategy in those patients with adequate residual myometrial thickness overlying the isthmocele. Laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries may be the preferred options for patients with a thinner residual myometrium over the defect (< 2.5 mm) and when hysteroscopic treatment is inconclusive.

Niche-related outcomes after caesarean section and quality of life: a focus group study and review of literature

Background

A niche in the uterus, present in 60% of women after caesarean section (CS), is associated with several gynaecological symptoms and possibly with subfertility. Studies that focus on quality of life (QoL) in relation to a niche are lacking.

Purpose

To identify niche-related outcomes that influence QoL and to compare patient-reported outcomes with outcomes studied in the literature.

Methods

Two focus group discussions (FGDs, N = 8 and 5) were conducted in Amsterdam UMC—location VUmc. Participants were Dutch patients with a large niche, with (planned) surgical treatment for their symptoms. Niche-related symptoms and impact on functioning or participation were fixed topics. The transcripts of the FGDs were coded into outcomes, themes and domains of QoL according to the WHOQOL model. Additionally, participants created a top five important outcomes. Next, we performed a systematic review (SR) on niche-related outcomes and compared the FGDs with niche-related outcomes from the SR.

Results

In four domains (physical health, psychological domain, social relationships and environment), fifteen themes were reported in the FGDs. Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), subfertility, sexual activity, abdominal pain and self-esteem were themes prioritised by participants. In the literature, gynaecological symptoms and reproductive outcomes were predominantly studied. Sexuality and self-esteem were prioritised in the FGDs but hardly or never studied in the literature.

Conclusion

We found a broad range of niche-related outcomes influencing QoL. Apart from symptoms evaluated in the literature such as AUB, abdominal pain and subfertility, clinicians and researchers should be more aware of sexual activity and self-esteem in this population.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02376-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of transvaginal repair versus laparoscopic repair of lower-segment cesarean scar defects

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate transvaginal repair versus laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defects (CSDs).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 67 symptomatic women with CSDs who attended a tertiary hospital in Beijing, China, between July 1, 2013, and March 31, 2017. The participants underwent either transvaginal repair (n=31) or laparoscopic repair (n=36). Medical costs, perioperative outcomes, and surgical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant between-group differences were found at baseline. The mean thickness of the residual myometrium increased from 1.71 ± 0.67 mm before surgery to 4.41 ± 2.09 mm after surgery in the transvaginal repair group (P<0.001), and from 1.81 ± 0.93 to 4.68 ± 1.96 mm in the laparoscopic repair group (P<0.001). The duration of menses after surgery was less than 10 days in both the transvaginal repair group (n=30, 96.3%) and the laparoscopic repair group (n=30, 83.9%; P=0.113). Operative time and medical costs were both lower in the transvaginal repair group than in the laparoscopic repair group (P<0.001). Conception rates for the two groups were similar among women who desired fertility.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal repair of CSD was associated with reduced operative times and medical costs when compared with laparoscopic repair.

Isthmocele: From Risk Factors to Management

OBJECTIVE

 The aim of the present study was to perform a comprehensive review of the literature to provide a complete and clear picture of isthmocele-a hypoechoic area within the myometrium at the site of the uterine scar of a previous cesarean section-by exploring in depth every aspect of this condition.

METHODS

 A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify the most relevant studies about this topic.

RESULTS

 Every aspect of isthmocele has been studied and described: pathophysiology, clinical symptoms, classification, and diagnosis. Its treatment, both medical and surgical, has also been reported according to the actual literature data.

CONCLUSION

 Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed worldwide, and one of the consequences of this technique is isthmocele. A single and systematic classification of isthmocele is needed to improve its diagnosis and management. Further studies should be performed to better understand its pathogenesis.

Obstetrical outcomes after vaginal repair of caesarean scar diverticula in reproductive-aged women

Background

Although vaginal repair has been conducted to manage caesarean scar diverticula, most studies evaluated only the gynaecological outcomes post-surgery, and their obstetrical outcomes were unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the obstetrical outcomes in vaginal repair-treated caesarean scar diverticula patients.

Methods

A series of 51 symptomatic women with caesarean scar defects or a thickness of the remaining muscular layer of less than 3 mm according to transvaginal ultrasound were included. We retrospectively evaluated the gynaecological and obstetrical outcomes after vaginal repair and histologically analysed the defect.

Results

Transvaginal ultrasound revealed that the thickness of the remaining muscular layer significantly increased from 2.24 ± 0.81 mm to 6.10 ± 1.43 mm 3 months after vaginal repair. The duration of menstruation significantly decreased from 14.29 ± 3.13 days to 8.31 ± 2.14 days post-vaginal repair. Notably, 26 of the 51 (50.98%) women who were followed for more than 15.04 months post-surgery achieved pregnancy. A total of 6 of the 26 pregnancies (23.08%) resulted in miscarriages, including 5 early miscarriages and 1 late miscarriage. Among the 20 women who achieved pregnancy without miscarriage, 18 had term deliveries, 2 had preterm birth, and none reported uterine rupture. Histological analysis was performed in all 51 cases. Muscle fibre density was significantly lower in the scar than in the myometrium adjacent to the scar and collagen expression was markedly increased in the scar tissue.

Conclusion

Satisfactory gynaecological and subsequent obstetrical outcomes can be achieved in vaginal repair-treated caesarean scar diverticula patients.

Treatment for Uterine Isthmocele, A Pouchlike Defect at the Site of a Cesarean Section Scar

An isthmocele appears as a fluid pouchlike defect in the anterior uterine wall at the site of a prior cesarean section and ranges in prevalence from 19% to 84%, a direct relation to the increase in cesarean sections performed worldwide. Many definitions have been suggested for the dehiscence resulting from cesarean sections, and we propose standardization with a single term for all cases-isthmocele. Patients are not always symptomatic, but symptoms typically include intermittent abnormal bleeding, pain, and infertility. Pregnancy complications that result from an isthmocele include ectopic pregnancy, low implantation, and uterine rupture. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound are the gold standard imaging techniques for diagnosis. Surgical treatment of an isthmocele is still a controversial issue but should be offered to symptomatic women or the asymptomatic patient who desires future pregnancy. When surgery is the treatment choice, laparoscopy guided by hysteroscopy, hysteroscopy alone, or vaginal repair are the best options depending on the isthmocele's characteristics and surgeon expertise.

Efficacy of caesarean scar defect repair in improving postmenstrual bleeding and factors associated with poor effect

Caesarean scar defect (CSD) can cause postmenstrual bleeding. Defect repair is an effective technique to improve this symptom, but there are still a few patients getting little improvement. This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of scar repair and explores the factors associated with poor effect. In total, 123 patients were involved in the final analysis. All of them complained about menstruation period >7 days due to postmenstrual bleeding. Before surgery, 87.8% of patients had a menstruation period more than 10 days and 20.3% had a period more than 15 days. After surgery, a normal menstruation period (< =7 days) was achieved in 46.3% (95%CI 37.3%-55.6%) of patients and a menstruation period lasting no more than 10 days was achieved in 74.8% (95%CI 66.2%-82.2%). Through multivariate logistic analysis, four factors were found dependently associated with poor effect (defined as menstruation period >10 days after surgery): repeated caesarean section (OR 9.75, 95%CI 2.30-41.36, 0.002) was a risk factor, while defect volume >600 mm³ (OR 0.14, 95%CI 0.03-0.56, 0.006), interval from caesarean section to symptom emerging >3 months (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.07-0.94, 0.041) and straight or retroflexed uterus (OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.05-0.79, 0.022) were protective factors. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Caesarean scar defect can cause postmenstrual bleeding. Defect repair can improve this symptom, but there are still a few patients getting little improvement after surgery. What do the results of this study add? Defect volume >600 mm³, interval from caesarean section to symptom emerging >3 months and straight or retroflexed uterus are protective factors of poor effect (defined as menstruation period >10 days after surgery), and repeated caesarean section is a risk factor. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings may help in counselling the patients and in medical decision. Further researches are needed to explore other factors associated with surgical effect and build prediction models.

[Laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar pouch - A case series study of 9 patients]

OBJECTIVES

To study the effects of laparoscopic repair of isthmoceles acquired after a cesarean section on symptoms and fertility.

METHODS

This retrospective case series study included symptomatic women (abnormal uterine bleeding and/or pelvic pain and/or infertility) suffering from a large isthmocele and treated laparoscopically in our center. The surgical procedure consisted in resecting the pouch and suturing the scar in 2 layers. The patient follow-up has been realised through the postoperative control, the medical file and a survey, and concerned the evolution of the symptoms and fertility.

RESULTS

Nine patients have been included, all suffering from large isthmoceles, diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound associated with hysteroscopy, hysterosalpingography or MRI. Postoperatively, the symptoms disappeared in 78% of the patients. There have been 4 spontaneous pregnancies in 4 patients, 3 of them had been diagnosed with infertility. The median patient medical follow-up lasted 28 months.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of a large isthmocele in patients suffering from invalidant symptoms and infertility should lead to consider a surgical treatment which is an efficient and surgically safe procedure.