Severity and frequency of community-onset Clostridium difficile infection on an Australian tertiary referral hospital campus

Risk Factors of Patients With Diarrhea for Having Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection

Nosocomial infections with Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile have become an emergent health threat. We sought to define risk factors for a C. difficile infection (CDI) beyond the widely known ones, such as antibiotic use and prior hospital stay. We therefore focused on a group of patients with diarrhea in order to identify risk factors for C. difficile infection among this symptomatic cohort. A total of 121 hospitalized patients from Seesen/Germany with diarrhea were included who submitted a stool sample and were interviewed about their socio-demographic background, lifestyle and state of health using a standardized questionnaire. Antibiotic potential of diuretics was examined by agar diffusion test. C. difficile was identified in 29 patients resulting in a prevalence of 24.0%. The infection was hospital-acquired in most cases (p < 0.001, 82.1%; n = 23/28, versus 29/91, 31.9%). The generally accepted risk factor previous antibiotic use was confirmed in this study (p = 0.002, n = 23/28 CDI patients, 82.1%, versus n = 44/91 non-CDI patients, 48.4%). The following additional risk factors were identified: regular consumption of proton pump inhibitors; PPI (p = 0.011, n = 24/29, 82.8% vs. n = 52/92, 56.5%), CDI patients ate less vegetables (p = 0.001, n = 12/29, 41.4% vs. 69/92, 75.0%). The intake of the diuretic agent torasemid in patients with CDI (p = 0.005, n = 18/29, 62.1%) was higher than in patients without (n = 30/92, 32.6%). More patients with CDI had to undergo a surgery in the previous year (p = 0.022, n = 13/29, 44.8% vs. n = 21/92, 22.8%) and held more birds (p = 0.056, n = 4/29, 13.8%) than individuals of the negative group (n = 3/92, 3.3%). In conclusion, although no antibiotic potential was detected in diuretics, especially torasemid seems to have significant influence for the occurrence of a CDI as well as a nutrition poor in vegetables. A diet rich in vegetables represented a fourfold lower risk for a CDI (OR 0.240, CI (0.0720 - 0.796]).

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults

SCOPE

In 2009, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) published the first treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). This document was updated in 2014. The growing literature on CDI antimicrobial treatment and novel treatment approaches, such as faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and toxin-binding monoclonal antibodies, prompted the ESCMID study group on C. difficile (ESGCD) to update the 2014 treatment guidance document for CDI in adults.

METHODS AND QUESTIONS

Key questions on CDI treatment were formulated by the guideline committee and included: What is the best treatment for initial, severe, severe-complicated, refractory, recurrent and multiple recurrent CDI? What is the best treatment when no oral therapy is possible? Can prognostic factors identify patients at risk for severe and recurrent CDI and is there a place for CDI prophylaxis? Outcome measures for treatment strategy were: clinical cure, recurrence and sustained cure. For studies on surgical interventions and severe-complicated CDI the outcome was mortality. Appraisal of available literature and drafting of recommendations was performed by the guideline drafting group. The total body of evidence for the recommendations on CDI treatment consists of the literature described in the previous guidelines, supplemented with a systematic literature search on randomized clinical trials and observational studies from 2012 and onwards. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to grade the strength of our recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The guideline committee was invited to comment on the recommendations. The guideline draft was sent to external experts and a patients' representative for review. Full ESCMID endorsement was obtained after a public consultation procedure.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Important changes compared with previous guideline include but are not limited to: metronidazole is no longer recommended for treatment of CDI when fidaxomicin or vancomycin are available, fidaxomicin is the preferred agent for treatment of initial CDI and the first recurrence of CDI when available and feasible, FMT or bezlotoxumab in addition to standard of care antibiotics (SoC) are preferred for treatment of a second or further recurrence of CDI, bezlotoxumab in addition to SoC is recommended for the first recurrence of CDI when fidaxomicin was used to manage the initial CDI episode, and bezlotoxumab is considered as an ancillary treatment to vancomycin for a CDI episode with high risk of recurrence when fidaxomicin is not available. Contrary to the previous guideline, in the current guideline emphasis is placed on risk for recurrence as a factor that determines treatment strategy for the individual patient, rather than the disease severity.

Prognostic factors for severe and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), its subsequent recurrences (rCDIs), and severe CDI (sCDI) provide a significant burden for both patients and the healthcare system. Identifying patients diagnosed with initial CDI who are at increased risk of developing sCDI/rCDI could lead to more cost-effective therapeutic choices. In this systematic review we aimed to identify clinical prognostic factors associated with an increased risk of developing sCDI or rCDI.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science and COCHRANE Library databases were searched from database inception through March, 2021. The study eligibility criteria were cohort and case-control studies. Participants were patients ≥18 years old diagnosed with CDI, in which clinical or laboratory factors were analysed to predict sCDI/rCDI. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Quality in Prognostic Research (QUIPS) tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool modified for prognostic studies. Study selection was performed by two independent reviewers. Overview tables of prognostic factors were constructed to assess the number of studies and the respective effect direction and statistical significance of an association.

RESULTS

136 studies were included for final analysis. Greater age and the presence of multiple comorbidities were prognostic factors for sCDI. Identified risk factors for rCDI were greater age, healthcare-associated CDI, prior hospitalization, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) started during or after CDI diagnosis, and previous rCDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic factors for sCDI and rCDI could aid clinicians to make treatment decisions based on risk stratification. We suggest that future studies use standardized definitions for sCDI/rCDI and systematically collect and report the risk factors assessed in this review, to allow for meaningful meta-analysis of risk factors using data of high-quality trials.

One Health approach to Clostridioides difficile in Japan

Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are predominantly a healthcare-associated illness in developed countries, with the majority of cases being elderly and hospitalize patients who used antibiotic therapy. Recently, the incidence of community-associated CDIs (CA-CDIs) in younger patients without a previous history of hospitalization or antibiotic treatment has been increasing globally. C. difficile is sometimes found in the intestine of many animals, such as pigs, calves, and dogs. Food products such as retail meat products and vegetables sometimes contain C. difficile. C. difficile has also been isolated from several environments such as compost manure, rivers, and soils. Yet, direct transmission of C. difficile from animals, food products, and environments to humans has not been proven, although these strains have similar molecular characteristics. Therefore, it has been suggested that there is a relationship between CA-CDIs and C. difficile from animals, food products, and the environment. To clarify the importance of the presence of C. difficile in several sources, characterization of C. difficile in these sources is required. However, the epidemiology of C. difficile in animals, food products, and the environment is not well studied in Japan. This review summarizes recent trends of CDIs and compares the molecular characteristics of C. difficile in Japanese animals, food products, and the environment. The prevalence trends of C. difficile in Japan are similar to those in the rest of the world. Therefore, I recommend using a One Health approach to CDI surveillance, monitoring, and control.

Clostridium difficile infection: Is there a change in the underlying factors? Inflammatory bowel disease and Clostridium difficile

BACKGROUND / AIMS

Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, strict anaerobe, spore-forming bacterium. It can cause self-limiting mild diarrhea, severe diarrhea, pseudomembranous colitis, and fatal fulminant colitis. We aimed to investigate the changes in epidemiology and incidence of C. difficile infection in our hospital database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Episodes of C. difficile toxin were identified in hospital database, and data such as age, sex, community versus hospital acquisition, intensive care follow-up, current or previous treatments with antibiotics within the past 3 months, medication with proton pump inhibitors, or immunosuppressive therapies were collected.

RESULTS

Toxin-positive 78 individuals constituted the patient group. In univariate analyses, independent risk factors for toxin positivity were community versus hospital acquisition [odds ratio (OR), 5.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.52-11.95; P = 0.0001], presence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) (OR, 21.5; 95% CI, 8.65-53.44; P = 0.0001), proton pump inhibitors' use (OR, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.97-10.43; P = 0.0001), immunosuppressive drug use (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.01-8.3; P = 0.0001), and use of quinolone group of antibiotics (OR, 5.95; 95% CI, 1.92-18.46; P = 0.001). Antibiotic use was a protective risk factor (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.78; P = 0.01) and presence of IBDs was an independent risk factor (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 1.5-30.08; P = 0.01) in community-acquired group (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.78; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In recent studies, C. difficile infections were demonstrated to be more frequent in younger individuals who did not have a history of hospitalization but had an underlying disease such as IBD. In our study, we showed the change in the epidemiological data with prominence of underlying diseases such as IBDs.

Clostridium difficile colitis and zoonotic origins-a narrative review

Clostridium difficile is a major cause of hospital-associated diarrhoea, and in severe cases leads to pseudomembranous colitis and toxic megacolon. The frequency of C. difficile infection (CDI) has increased in recent decades, with 453 000 cases identified in 2011 in the USA. This is related to antibiotic-selection pressure, disruption of normal host intestinal microbiota and emergence of antibiotic-resistant C. difficile strains. The burden of community-acquired CDI has been increasingly appreciated, with disease identified in patients previously considered low-risk, such as young women or patients with no prior antibiotic exposure. C. difficile has been identified in livestock animals, meat products, seafood and salads. It has been postulated that the pool of C. difficile in the agricultural industry may contribute to human CDI. There is widespread environmental dispersal of C. difficile spores. Domestic households, turf lawns and public spaces are extensively contaminated, providing a potential reservoir for community-acquired CDI. In Australia, this is particularly associated with porcine-derived C. difficile UK PCR ribotype 014/020. In this article, the epidemiological differences between hospital- and community-acquired CDI are discussed, including some emerging evidence for community-acquired CDI being a possible zoonosis.

A population-based matched cohort study examining the mortality and costs of patients with community-onset Clostridium difficile infection identified using emergency department visits and hospital admissions

Few studies have evaluated the mortality or quantified the economic burden of community-onset Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We estimated the attributable mortality and costs of community-onset CDI. We conducted a population-based matched cohort study. We identified incident subjects with community-onset CDI using health administrative data (emergency department visits and hospital admissions) in Ontario, Canada between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2010. We propensity-score matched each infected subject to one uninfected subject and followed subjects in the cohort until December 31, 2011. We evaluated all-cause mortality and costs (unadjusted and adjusted for survival) from the healthcare payer perspective (2014 Canadian dollars). During our study period, we identified 7,950 infected subjects. The mean age was 63.5 years (standard deviation = 22.0), 62.7% were female, and 45.0% were very high users of the healthcare system. The relative risk for 30-day, 180-day, and 1-year mortality were 7.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.94-9.02), 3.55 (95%CI, 3.17-3.97), and 2.59 (95%CI, 2.37-2.83), respectively. Mean attributable cumulative 30-day, 180-day, and 1-year costs (unadjusted for survival) were $7,434 (95%CI, $7,122-$7,762), $12,517 (95%CI, $11,687-$13,366), and $13,217 (95%CI, $12,062-$14,388). Mean attributable cumulative 1-, 2-, and 3-year costs (adjusted for survival) were $10,700 (95%CI, $9,811-$11,645), $13,312 (95%CI, $12,024-$14,682), and $15,812 (95%CI, $14,159-$17,571). Infected subjects had considerably higher risk of all-cause mortality and costs compared with uninfected subjects. This study provides insight on an understudied patient group. Our study findings will facilitate assessment of interventions to prevent community-onset CDI.

Emergence of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: the experience of a French hospital and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common cause of nosocomial diarrhoea. People in the general community are not usually considered to be at risk of CDI. CDI is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. The risk of severity is defined by the Clostridium Severity Index (CSI).

METHODS

The cases of 136 adult patients with CDI treated at the University Hospital of Tours, France between 2008 and 2012 are described. This was a retrospective study.

RESULTS

Among the 136 patients included, 62 were men and 74 were women. Their median age was 64.4 years (range 18-97 years). Twenty-six of the 136 (19%) cases were community-acquired (CA) and 110 (81%) were healthcare-acquired (HCA). The major risk factors for both groups were long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors (54% of CA, 53% of HCA patients) and antibiotic treatment within the 2.5 months preceding the CDI (50% of CA, 91% of HCA). The CSI was higher in the CA-CDI group (1.56) than in the HCA-CDI group (1.39). Intensive care was required for 8% of CA-CDI and 16.5% of HCA-CDI patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CDI can cause community-acquired diarrhoea, and CA-CDI may be more severe than HCA-CDI. Prospective studies of CDI involving people from the general community without risk factors are required to confirm this observation.