CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test: Rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial infection

Diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is the most common type of tuberculosis (TB). Rapid diagnosis of PTB can help in TB control. Although the use of molecular tests (such as the GeneXpert MTB/RIF) has improved the ability to rapidly diagnose PTB, there is still room for improvement. Nanopore sequencing is a novel means of rapid TB detection. The purpose of this study was to establish a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol for evaluating the accuracy of nanopore sequencing for the rapid diagnosis of PTB.

METHODS

We completed this protocol according to the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) statement and registered on the PROSPERO platform. We will screen studies related to nanopore sequencing for diagnosis of PTB by searching through PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library using English, and Wanfang database, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) using Chinese. Eligible studies will be screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established in the study protocol. We will evaluate the methodological quality of the individual included studies using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). We will use Stata (version 15.0) with the midas command and RevMan (version 5.3) for meta-analysis and forest plots and SROC curves generation. A p < 0.05 was treated as a statistically significant difference. When significant heterogeneity exists between studies, we will explore sources of heterogeneity through meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis of nanopore sequencing for the diagnosis of PTB. We hope that this study will find a new and effective tool for the early diagnosis of PTB.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023495593.

Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using palladium-platinum bimetallic nanoparticles combined with paper-based analytical devices

In this study, we demonstrate that palladium-platinum bimetallic nanoparticles (Pd@Pt NPs) as the nanozyme, combined with a multi-layer paper-based analytical device and DNA hybridization, can successfully detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This nanozyme has peroxidase-like properties, which can increase the oxidation rate of the substrate. Compared with horseradish peroxidase, which is widely used in traditional detection, the Michaelis constants of Pd@Pt NPs are fourteen and seventeen times lower than those for 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine and H2O2, respectively. To verify the catalytic efficiency of Pd@Pt NPs, this study will execute molecular diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We chose the IS6110 fragment as the target DNA and divided the complementary sequences into the capture DNA and reporter DNA. They were modified on paper and Pd@Pt NPs, respectively, to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis on a paper-based analytical device. With the above-mentioned method, we can detect target DNA within 15 minutes with a linear range between 0.75 and 10 nM, and a detection limit of 0.216 nM. These results demonstrate that the proposed platform (a DNA-nanozyme integrated paper-based analytical device, dnPAD) can provide sensitive and on-site infection prognosis in areas with insufficient medical resources.

Evaluation of Nanopore Sequencing for Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis Using Negative Smear Clinical Specimens

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanopore sequencing for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) using smear-negative clinical specimens.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study based on a review of patient medical records to assess the accuracy of nanopore sequencing as a diagnostic tool for smear-negative PTB. Compared with clinical diagnosis, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of nanopore sequencing.

Results

A total of 647 patients were evaluated. Nanopore sequencing demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 91.7%, specificity of 85.3%, PPV of 95.1%, NPV of 76.4%, and AUC of 0.88. Notably, the overall diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing was significantly higher than that of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture technique.

Conclusion

Nanopore sequencing exhibited satisfactory overall diagnostic accuracy for smear-negative PTB, regardless of MTB culture status. Therefore, if conditions permit, nanopore sequencing is recommended as a diagnostic method for smear-negative PTB.

Determination of the diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis

PURPOSE

The early and efficient diagnosis of patients suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of nanopore sequencing for PTB diagnosis using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples and compared it with other techniques such as acid-fast bacilli smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and CapitalBio Mycobacterium reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (MTB RT-PCR).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 195 patients with suspected PTB who were admitted to our hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these assays were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of nanopore sequencing were 90.70%, 84.85%, 92.13%, 82.35%, and 0.88; those of acid-fast bacilli smear were 12.40%, 98.48%, 94.12%, 36.52%, and 0.55; those of culture were 36.43%, 100%, 100%, 44.59%, and 0.68; those of Xpert MTB/RIF were 41.09%, 100%, 100%, 46.48%, and 0.71; and those of CapitalBio MTB RT-PCR were 34.88%, 98.48%, 97.83%, 43.62%, and 0.67, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The nanopore sequencing assay using BALF samples showed the best diagnostic accuracy for sputum-scarce PTB. Moreover, it can improve the clinical diagnosis of PTB.

Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum using CRISPR-Cas12b combined with cross-priming amplification in a single reaction

IMPORTANCE

In this study, we successfully established a new One-Pot method, named TB One-Pot, for detecting Mtb in sputum by combining CRISPR-cas12b-mediated trans-cleavage with cross-priming amplification (CPA). Our study evaluated the diagnostic performance of TB One-Pot in clinical sputum samples for tuberculosis. The findings provide evidence for the potential of TB One-Pot as a diagnostic tool for tuberculosis.

DNA microarray chip assay in new use: early diagnostic value in cutaneous mycobacterial infection

Introduction

The clinical practicability of DNA microarray chip in detecting the presence of mycobacterial species/isolates directly in the skin tissues has not been evaluated, nor the efficacy of DNA microarray chip as a novel diagnostic tool for the early diagnosis of cutaneous mycobacterial infections is known.

Methods

The present study analyzed the incidence of cutaneous mycobacterial infections in Shanghai and explored the efficacy of a novel DNA microarray chip assay for the clinical diagnosis of the disease from skin tissue specimens compared to traditional detection methods. A total of 60 participants fulfilling the defined diagnostic criteria and confirmed positive for cutaneous mycobacterial infections from 2019 to 2021 were enrolled in the study. Subsequent to recording the participants' medical history and clinical characteristics, the skin tissue specimens were collected for analyses. The specimens underwent histopathological analyses, skin tissue culture, and DNA microarray chip assay.

Results

Increased incidence of cutaneous mycobacterial infection was detected from 2019 to 2021. The most common infecting pathogen was M. marinum followed by M. abscessus. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the skin tissue culture method were 70%, 100% and 76.62%, respectively, while that of the DNA microarray chip assay were 91.67%, 100% and 93.51%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy of the DNA microarray chip assay were significantly higher than those of the skin tissue culture method. The positive likelihood and diagnostic odds ratio were >10 and >1, respectively for both the methods. The negative likelihood ratio was significantly higher (30% vs 8.33%) and the Youden's index was significantly lower (70.00% vs 91.67%) in the skin culture method compared to that of the DNA microarray chip assay. There was a significant association of false negative results with a history of antibiotic use in the skin tissue culture method.

Discussion

Given the increasing incidence of cutaneous mycobacterial infections, early diagnosis remains a prime clinical focus. The DNA microarray chip assay provides a simple, rapid, high-throughput, and reliable method for the diagnosis of cutaneous mycobacterial infections with potential for clinical application.

The value of histopathology combined with CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction test for diagnosing spinal tuberculosis

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (CapitalBio test) in spinal tuberculosis (STB). The value of histopathology combined with the CapitalBio test in diagnosing STB was also assessed.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical information of suspected STB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of histopathology, CapitalBio test, and histopathology combined with CapitalBio test were calculated to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy compared with a composite reference standard.

Results

A total of 222 suspected STB patients were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of histopathology for STB were recorded to be 62.0, 98.0, 97.4, 68.3%, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the CapitalBio test were 75.2, 98.0, 97.9, 76.7%, and 0.87, respectively, while that of histopathology combined with the CapitalBio test was 81.0, 96.0, 96.1, 80.8%, and 0.89, respectively.

Conclusion

Histopathology and CapitalBio test exhibited high accuracy and are recommended in diagnosing STB. Histopathology combined with the CapitalBio test might give the best efficacy in STB diagnosis.

Clinical utility of tuberculosis RNA in the rapid diagnosis of bone and joint tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of tuberculosis RNA (TB-RNA) for the rapid diagnosis of bone and joint tuberculosis (BJTB).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of TB-RNA and acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear against the final clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 268 patients were included. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of AFB smear for BJTB were 0.7%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 49.3%, and 0.50, respectively, whereas those of TB-RNA were 59.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 70.6%, and 0.80, respectively; for cases of confirmed (culture-positive) BJTB, these values were 82.8%, 99.4%, 99.7%, 89.2%, and 0.91, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA in the rapid diagnosis of BJTB was relatively good, especially in culture-positive BJTB. The use of TB-RNA could be an effective technique for the rapid diagnosis of BJTB.

Clinical application of Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay using various specimens for the rapid detection of lymph node tuberculosis: A diagnostic accuracy study

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Capital Bio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction assay Capital Bio assay for lymph node (LN) tuberculosis (LNTB), and to further compare the effect of different types of LN specimens on the detection capability of the test. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of LNTB patients who met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve of Capital Bio assay were calculated to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared with the final clinical diagnosis as reference standard. Three hundred sixty-four patients were included in the study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve of the Capital Bio assay for LNTB were 74.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 34.9%, and 0.87, respectively. For the pus specimens, these values for Capital Bio assay were 93.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 27.3%, 0.97, respectively. For the core needle biopsy specimens, these values were 65.9%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 33.3%, and 0.83, respectively. For the fine-needle aspiration specimens, these values were 60.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 53.9%, and 0.80, respectively. For the tissue, these values were 59.3%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 33.3%, 0.80, respectively. The Capital Bio assay had good effective for the diagnosis of LNTB. Compared to LN fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy specimens and tissue specimens, pus specimens were more suitable for molecular testing and had the best diagnostic efficacy.

Application of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA for the Rapid Diagnosis of Lymph Node Tuberculosis Using Different Specimens

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-RNA in the rapid diagnosis of lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB). Moreover, the difference in the diagnostic accuracy of MTB-RNA using different specimens was determined.

Methods

We included patients with suspected LNTB who met the inclusion criteria and retrospectively analyzed their clinical data. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV), negative-predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of MTB-RNA and culture were calculated and its diagnostic accuracy for LNTB was evaluated in comparison with the final clinical diagnosis.

Results

Overall, 285 patients were included in the study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of MTB-RNA were 40.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 17.0%, and 0.70, respectively. These values were 30.8%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 16.0%, and 0.65, respectively, for tissue specimens; 34.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 24.6%, and 0.67, respectively, for puncture specimens; and 57.14%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 5.3%, and 0.79, respectively, for pus specimens. These values of culture were 24.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 13.9%, and 0.62, respectively, for all specimens; 17.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 13.8%, and 0.59, respectively, for tissue specimens; 25.3%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 22.4%, and 0.63, respectively, for puncture specimens; and 31.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 3.3%, and 0.65, respectively, for pus specimens.

Conclusion

The diagnostic efficacy of MTB-RNA for the rapid diagnosis of LNTB was moderate, but its sensitivity was low. The lymph node pus specimens were the most sensitive for MTB-RNA testing, followed by puncture specimens; tissues were the least sensitive. Pus specimens should be preferably obtained in case only this test is to be used for diagnosis.

Performance evaluation and clinical validation of optimized nucleotide MALDI-TOF-MS for mycobacterial identification

Objective

To evaluate the performance and validate the diagnostic value of a nucleotide matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) with the analysis process optimized in identification of mycobacterium species.

Methods

The optimized analysis process was used for mycobacterial identification in the nucleic MALDI-TOF-MS. 108 samples were used for assessing the performance of nucleic MALDI-TOF-MS, including 25 reference standards, 37 clinical isolates, 37 BALF, and 9 plasmids. The BALF of 38 patients suspected of pulmonary mycobacterial infection was collected for validation. Clinical etiological diagnosis was used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic value of nucleotide MALDI-TOF-MS.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the nucleotide MALDI-TOF-MS in mycobacterial identification were 96.91%, 100% and 97.22%, respectively, and the limit of detection for mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) was 50 bacteria/mL. Among 38 patients suspected of pulmonary mycobacterial infection, 33 were diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis infection, and 5 with non-mycobacterial infection. In clinical validation, the positive rates of MALDI-TOF-MS, Xpert MTB/RIF, culture and AFS in BALF of patients diagnosed with tuberculosis infection were 72.7%, 63.6%, 54.5% and 27.3%, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity of MALDI-TOF-MS, Xpert, culture and AFS in diagnosing MTB were 72.7%/100%, 63.6%/100%, 54.5%/100%, 27.3%/100%, with the areas under the curve of 0.864, 0.818, 0.773, and 0.636, respectively.

Conclusion

Optimized nucleotide MALDI-TOF-MS has satisfactory sensitivity, specificity and low LOD in the identification of mycobacteria, which may serve as a potential assay for mycobacterial identification.

Comparing Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA Accuracy in Various Respiratory Specimens for the Rapid Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Objective

To evaluate the rapid diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA (TB-RNA) for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in a large patient sample and to evaluate the difference in TB-RNA diagnostic accuracy in various respiratory specimens.

Methods

Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear and TB-RNA to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy against final clinical diagnosis.

Results

Of the 2336 patients ultimately included, 1123 provided 1 sputum specimen each and 1213 provided 1 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimen each. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the AFB smear were 36.2%, 86.4%, 90.6%, 27.3%, and 0.61, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of TB-RNA for the rapid detection of PTB were 57.4%, 99.4%, 99.7%, 39.3%, and 0.78, respectively. When sputum and BALF specimens were used for AFB smear testing, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the AFB smear were 44.5%, 81.5%, 87.5%, 33.5%, and 0.63; and 29.2%, 92.7%, 94.8%, 22.5%, and 0.61, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of TB-RNA for the rapid detection of PTB using sputum were 49.6%, 99.3%, 99.5%, 40.4%, and 0.74, respectively; whereas those of TB-RNA determined using BALF were 63.9%, 99.5%, 99.8%, 38.0%, and 0.82, respectively.

Conclusion

The diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for PTB was moderate and considerably better than that of the AFB smear. The diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for various respiratory specimens differed; the diagnostic accuracy of TB-RNA for BALF specimens was substantially better than that for sputum samples, and BALF specimens were more suitable for TB-RNA.

Diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing using respiratory specimens in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the role of nanopore sequencing using respiratory specimens in the early diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and simultaneously compare it head-to-head with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture, and Xpert MTB/rifampin (RIF).

METHODS

The clinical data of 164 patients with suspected PTB were retrospectively reviewed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, MTB culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and nanopore sequencing and assess their diagnostic accuracy compared with culture combined with clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of the AFB smear were 27.6%, 87.5%, 84.2%, 33.3%, and 0.58, respectively; for MTB culture, these values were 57.8%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 49.5%, and 0.79, respectively; for Xpert MTB/RIF, these values were 62.9%, 97.9%, 98.7%, 52.2%, and 0.80, respectively; and for nanopore sequencing, these values were 94.8%, 97.9%, 99.1%, 88.7%, and 0.96, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing was excellent in terms of PTB diagnosis and was considerably better than that of the Xpert MTB/RIF and MTB culture. Nanopore sequencing could be an effective alternative to Xpert MTB/RIF for the initial detection of PTB to improve the accuracy of PTB diagnosis.

Comparison of the Accuracy of Two Different Molecular Tests for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Using Core Needle Biopsy Specimens: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (CapitalBio test) testing of core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens for tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBL) and to compare it with Xpert MTB/RIF.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical data on patients with suspected peripheral TBL. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the CapitalBio test, Xpert MTB/RIF, and parallel test (positive result for either of these two tests) were calculated to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy compared with the final clinical diagnosis.

Results

The study included 114 patients. For diagnosing TBL using CNB samples, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were 65.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 28.6%, and 0.83, respectively, for the CapitalBio test; 72.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 33.3%, and 0.86, respectively, for Xpert MTB/RIF; and 82.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 43.8%, and 0.91, respectively, for the parallel test.

Conclusion

The accuracy of the CapitalBio test and Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing TBL using CNB specimens was moderate, while the sensitivity and NPV of these two tests were relatively low. The diagnostic accuracy of the CapitalBio test was slightly lower than that of Xpert MTB/RIF, but the difference between the two was not statistically significant. Parallel test might improve the diagnostic accuracy but not substantially over a single test.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR Detection Assay for Tuberculous Pericarditis

Purpose

We evaluated CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay diagnosing tuberculous pericarditis (TBP), performed a head-to-head comparison with Xpert MTB/RIF, and assessed the impact of a parallel test (positive result for either of these two tests).

Methods

We reviewed suspected TBP patients with Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture. We analyzed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Seventy-four patients were included. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay compared with culture were 50%, 91.1%, 64.3%, 85%, and 0.71, respectively. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP were 61.1%, 91.1%, 68.8%, 87.9%, and 0.76. Parallel test values were 72.2%, 91.1%, 72.2%, 91.1%, and 0.82. The diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF was higher than CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay but was not significant (P > 0.05). The parallel test could improve diagnostic accuracy, but it was not significant compared to single tests (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay had a moderate diagnostic accuracy, similar to Xpert MTB/RIF. The parallel test maximized diagnostic efficacy, but differences were not significant. CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR assay and Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP could be an initial option for early diagnosis.

The Role of Core Needle Biopsy Pathology Combined with Molecular Tests in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Tuberculosis

Background

Early lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB) diagnosis is still difficult. The majority of LN specimens require the undertaking of invasive and unpleasant procedures.

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of pathology when combined with molecular tests for the diagnosis of LNTB in core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens and to compare that diagnostic efficacy with that deriving from tissue specimens’ examination alone.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of LNTB patients who met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of pathology, molecular tests, and parallel test (positive result for either of these two assays) were calculated to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy compared with a composite reference standard.

Results

A total of 289 patients were included in the study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of pathology, molecular tests, and parallel test were 94.5%, 97.2%, 99.6%, 71.4%, 0.96; 73.1%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 34.6%, 0.87; and 98.4%, 97.2%, 99.6%, 89.7%, 0.98, respectively. For CNB specimens, these values for pathology, molecular tests, and parallel test were 93.3%, 96.2%, 99.4%, 69.4%, 0.95; 76.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 40.0%, 0.88; and 99.4%, 96.2%, 99.4%,96.2%,0.98, while those same values for the tissue were 96.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 76.9%, 0.98; 67.1%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 25.6%, 0.84; and 96.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 76.9%,0.98, respectively.

Conclusion

The validity of pathology and molecular testing when using CNB specimens was similar to that of tissue specimens for relevant assessment approaches. For the LNTB diagnosis, CNB specimens were preferred for the simultaneous undertaking of pathological examination and molecular testing.

Diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell-free DNA for tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is still difficult. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for diagnosing of TB.

METHODS

We searched relevant databases for studies that used cfDNA to diagnose TB. We evaluated the accuracy of cfDNA compared with the composite reference standard (CRS) and culture. True positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative values for cfDNA were obtained first, then the estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) of cfDNA for diagnosing TB were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was determined using the I2 statistic. When the heterogeneity was obvious, the source of heterogeneity was further discussed.

RESULTS

We included 14 independent studies comparing cfDNA with the CRS, and 4 studies compared with culture. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, DOR, and AUC of the SROC were 68%, 98%,99%, 62%, 83, and 0.97 as compared with the CRS, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, DOR, and AUC of the SROC were 48%, 91%, 92%, 60%, 5, and 0.88 as compared with culture, respectively. The heterogeneity between studies was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of cfDNA testing for TB diagnosis was good compared with CRS and culture. cfDNA can be used for rapid early diagnosis of TB.

Nucleic acid amplification techniques for rapid diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacteria: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection is similar to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection. Early clinical identification and differentiation of NTM and MTB infections continues to be a major challenge. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have the ability to efficiently and rapidly detect pathogens and are widely used in mycobacterial infections. The objective of this study is to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of NAATs for NTM.

METHODS

We will search candidate studies that assessing the accuracy of NAATs for diagnosis of NTM through PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library until May 2021. Studies with full text that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Following a revised tool for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2), two researchers will independently evaluate the study quality. The STATA software (version 15.0) will be used to carry out meta-analyses. When heterogeneity is observed, subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses will be used to explore sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses will be used to check the robustness of analyses.

CONCLUSION

We hope that this study will provide meaningful evidence for the early and rapid diagnosis of NAATs for NTM, which will help to guide the treatment of NTM and improve the prognosis of patients.

A comparison of the accuracy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the efficiency of the CapitalBioMycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection test with the standard Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM).

METHODS

We analyzed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 163 patients with suspected TBM that were collected between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. For both tests, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC). Next, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of the two techniques using clinical diagnosis as a reference standard.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC, of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test were 48.5%, 100%, 100%, 29.6%, and 0.74, respectively, when used for the diagnosis of TBM. In comparison, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay returned values of 47.0%, 100%, 100%, 29.0%, and 0.74, respectively. Our analysis showed that the diagnostic accuracies of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were very similar; the accuracy of both tests for detecting mycobacteria was significantly higher than that associated with acid-fast staining.

CONCLUSIONS

The CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time PCR detection test has moderate sensitivity and very high specificity for TBM; results are very similar to those generated by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. We recommend that the CapitalBio PCR test should be used as an initial screening method for TB.

Metagenomic next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a severe form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and its early diagnosis is very difficult leading to present with severe disability or die. The current study aimed to assess the accuracy of metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) for TBM, and to identify a new test for the early diagnosis of TBM.

Methods

We searched for articles published in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data up to June 30, 2020 for studies that assessed the efficacy of mNGS for the diagnosis of TBM. Then, the accuracy between mNGS and a composite reference standard (CRS) in these articles was compared using the meta-analysis approach.

Results

Four independent studies with 342 samples comparing mNGS and a CRS were included in this study. The sensitivity of mNGS for TBM diagnosis ranged from 27% to 84%. The combined sensitivity of mNGS was 61%, and the I² value was 92%. Moreover, the specificity of mNGS for TBM diagnosis ranged from 96% to 100%. The combined specificity of mNGS was 98%, and the I² value was 74%. The heterogeneity between studies in terms of sensitivity and specificity was significant. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) of mNGS for TBM was 0.98.

Conclusions

The sensitivity of mNGS for TBM diagnosis was moderate. Furthermore, the specificity was extremely high, and the AUC of the SROC indicated a very good diagnostic efficacy. mNGS could be used as an early diagnostic method for TBM, however, the results should be treated with caution for the heterogeneity between studies was extremely significant.

Systematic review registration

INPLASY202070100.

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection test and the first-generation Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). In this retrospective study of smear-negative PTB, we reviewed patient medical records to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test (positive result for either of the Xpert MTB/RIF and CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection tests) to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy against a composite reference standard. In total, 1553 patients were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test were 57.1%, 92.9%, 81.1%, 95.9%, and 0.75; 53.4%, 97.7%, 98.6%, 41.5%, and 0.76; and 66.2%, 90.8%, 95.5%, 47.7%, and 0.79, respectively. For the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens, these values for Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test were 68.8%, 97.7%, 99.2%, 43.9%, and 0.83; 61.7%, 97.7%, 99.1%, 38.9%, and 0.80; and 77.0%, 95.5%, 98.6%, 50.9%, and 0.86, respectively. CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test had moderate accuracy for smear-negative PTB, similar to Xpert MTB/RIF. The parallel test improved the sensitivity. BALF significantly improved the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of the test. The maximum diagnostic accuracy for smear-negative PTB was obtained with the parallel test and BALF specimens. BALF was the most effective specimen for diagnosing smear-negative PTB.

Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on antigen 85B via real-time recombinase polymerase amplification

Tuberculosis (TB), as a common infectious disease, still remains a severe challenge to public health. Due to the unsatisfied clinical needs of currently available diagnostic vehicles, it is desired to establish a new approach for universally detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Herein, we designed a real-time recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) technology for identifying M. tuberculosis within 20 min at 39°C via custom-designed oligonucleotide primers and probe, which could specifically target antigen 85B (Ag85B). Particularly, the primers F4-R4 produced the fastest fluorescence signal with the probe among four pairs of designed primers in the RPA assays. The optimal primers/probe combination could effectively identify M. tuberculosis with the detection limit of 4·0 copies per μl, as it could not show a positive signal for the genomic DNA from other mycobacteria or pathogens. The Ag85B-based RPA could determine the genomic DNA extracted from M. tuberculosis with high reliability (100%, 22/22). More importantly, when testing clinical sputum samples, the real-time RPA displayed an admirable sensitivity (90%, 95% CI: 80·0-96·0%) and specificity (98%, 95% CI: 89·0-100·0%) compared to traditional smear microscopy, which was similar to the assay of Xpert MTB/RIF. This real-time RPA based Ag85B provides a promising strategy for the rapid and universal diagnosis of TB.

Comparison of the CapitalBio™Mycobacterium RT-PCR detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of renal tuberculosis

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency difference between CapitalBio™Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of renal tuberculosis (TB). We analyzed 117 samples collected between July 1, 2018, and October 31, 2019, from patients with suspected renal TB to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of the CapitalBio™ Mycobacterium RT-PCR detection test for renal TB and to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared with Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Five cases were excluded from this study because of incomplete data. Taking clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, the sensitivity was 87.95% (78.96-94.07%), specificity 96.55% (82.24-99.91%), PPV 98.65% (92.70-99.97%), NPV 73.68% (56.90-86.60%), and AUC 0.92 (0.86-0.96). For the CapitalBio™Mycobacterium RT-PCR detection test, the overall sensitivity was 84.34% (74.71-91.39%), specificity 93.10% (77.23-99.15%), PPV 97.22% (90.32-99.66%), NPV 67.50% (50.87-81.43%), and AUC 0.89(0.81-0.94). The diagnostic efficiency of the CapitalBio™Mycobacterium RT-PCR detection test was similar to that of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in patients with renal TB. Hence, the CapitalBio™Mycobacterium RT-PCR detection test presents a valuable alternative for the diagnosis of renal TB.