Violence against care workers in psychiatry: is prosecution justified?

Characteristics of Assaultive Patients Whom Inpatient Psychiatric Staff Report to Law Enforcement

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to identify factors that affect hospital staff's decision to pursue criminal charges against patients who assault staff on inpatient psychiatric units.

METHODS

Data on assaults occurring on inpatient psychiatric units in one hospital system were collected over 32 months, from November 1, 2016, to July 1, 2019. The events were grouped by whether staff pursued criminal charges after the incident. Descriptive statistics and regression models were used to describe the data and identify predictive variables.

RESULTS

Data were reviewed from 9,654 admissions, of which 124 patient encounters involved assaults on staff. Overall, 27 (22%) of 124 assaults on staff resulted in staff pursuing criminal charges. Regression models indicated that criminal history (odds ratio [OR]=2.18, 95% CI=1.26-3.78, p=0.006), age (OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.91-0.94, p<0.001), and diagnosis of chronic mental illness with psychotic symptoms (OR=7.23, 95% CI=1.49-35.04, p=0.01) predicted patient assaults resulting in contact with law enforcement. Several variables were not statistically significantly associated with filing of criminal charges, including race, gender, degree of injury from the assault, number of instances of restraint, and number of as-needed medications.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest quantitative study to examine the demographic and clinical factors that may play a role in whether staff pursue criminal charges against patients on inpatient psychiatric units. The results suggest that certain patients are more likely to be reported to law enforcement. Institutions should monitor factors that increase the likelihood of assaults on staff resulting in criminal charges and create policies that mitigate discrepancies in criminal justice involvement.

Nursing violent patients: Vulnerability and the limits of the duty to provide care

The duty to provide care is foundational to the nursing profession and the work of nurses. Unfortunately, violence against nurses at the hands of recipients of care is increasingly common. While employers, labor unions, and professional associations decry the phenomenon, the decision to withdraw care, even from someone who is violent or abusive, is never easy. The scant guidance that exists suggests that the duty to care continues until the risk of harm to the nurse is unreasonable, however, "reasonableness" remains undefined in the literature. In this paper, I suggest that reasonable risk, and the resulting strength of the duty to provide care in situations where violence is present, hinge on the vulnerability of both nurse and recipient of care. For the recipient, vulnerability increases with the level of dependency and incapacity. For the nurse, vulnerability is related to the risk and implications of injury. The complex interplay of contextual vulnerabilities determines whether the risk a nurse faces at the hands of a violent patient is reasonable or unreasonable. This examination will enhance our understanding of professional responsibilities and can help to clarify the strengths and limitations of the nurse's duty to care.

Prevalence and Risk Factors ofWorkplace Violence towardMental Health Staff Departments in Jordanian Hospitals

A cross-sectional study (n = 262) was conducted to assess the prevalence of workplace violence among mental health departments staff in Jordan. The findings showed that 67.2% of the respondents were victims of at least one violent incident in the last year. Verbal abuse was the most reported type of violence. Patients were considered as the main source of violence. The contributing factors to workplace violence include being unmarried and working longer shifts. Sadly, just being a healthcare worker was found to also be a factor in the incidence of increased workplace violence. As a result of these findings, workplace violence policies and legislation should be instituted, and mental health department staff should be trained on violence-management policies.

Critical incidents and judicial response during medium security treatment

This study examined inpatient incidents in three Flemish forensic medium security units and analyzed the subsequent judicial reactions to these incidents. During medium security treatment, incidents were reported for more than half of the participants. The most frequently registered incidents were non-violent in nature, such as absconding and treatment non-compliance. The base rate for physically violent incidents was low. Although crime-related incidents during medium security treatment were rarely prosecuted and adjudicated, the base rate of revocation - and hence drop-out from treatment - as a result of these incidents was high.

Implementation of a comprehensive intervention to reduce physical assaults and threats in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of a comprehensive program to reduce the incidence of workplace violence (WPV) against ED providers by patients and visitors.

METHODS

An intervention study was conducted with 3 intervention and 3 comparison emergency departments. Participants completed monthly surveys during an 18-month period to measure violent event rates before and after the WPV intervention implementation. Descriptive statistics were used to describe violent events. Analysis of variance was used to assess if the emergency departments participating in the WPV intervention experienced a significant reduction in violence rates compared with nonintervention emergency departments.

RESULTS

On average, participants experienced more than 6 incidents of violence during the 18-month study period. Although the study hypothesis was not supported, 2 intervention sites had a significant decrease in violence.

DISCUSSION

This study emphasizes the risk of WPV to ED workers and highlights the need for prevention programs. Future research needs to be conducted to test additional comprehensive WPV prevention interventions.

Conceptualizing structural violence in the context of mental health nursing

This article explores how the intersections of gendered, racialized and neoliberal dynamics reproduce social inequality and shape the violence that nurses face. Grounded in the interviews and focus groups conducted with a purposeful sample of 17 registered nurses (RNs) and registered practical nurses (RPNs) currently working in Ontario's mental health sector, our analysis underscores the need to move beyond reductionist notions of violence as simply individual physical or psychological events. While acknowledging that violence is a very real and disturbing experience for individual nurses, our article casts light on the importance of a broader, power structure analysis of violence experienced by nurses in this sector, arguing that effective redress lies beyond blame shifting between clients/patients and nurses. Our analysis illustrates how assumptions about gender, race and care operate in the context of global, neoliberal forces to reinforce, intensify and create, as well as obscure, structural violence through mechanisms of individualization and normalization.