The association between discontinuation of community treatment orders and outcomes in the 12-months following discharge from residential mental health rehabilitation

The long-term adherence following the end of Community Treatment Order: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The community treatment order (CTO) is designed to deliver mental healthcare in the community and has been introduced in around 75 jurisdictions worldwide. It constitutes a legal obligation in which individuals with severe mental illness must adhere to out-of-hospital treatment plans. Despite intense criticism and the debated nature of published evidence, it has emerged as a clinical and policy response to frequent hospital readmissions and to enhance adherence in cases where there is refusal of pharmacological treatments. This systematic review outlines findings on CTO long-term adherence, after mandatory outpatient treatment has ended, in studies that include people with psychiatric disorders.

METHOD

Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a review of published articles from PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL up to January 15, 2023. We included studies that assessed adherence after CTO ends. The study is registered with PROSPERO number CRD42022360879.

RESULTS

Six independent studies analyzing the main indicators of long adherence: engagement with services and medication adherence, were included. The average methodological quality of the studies included is fair. Long-term adherence was assessed over a period ranging from 11 to 28 months. Only two studies reported a statistically significant improvement. Regarding the remaining studies, no positive correlation was observed, except for certain subgroup samples, while in one study, medication adherence decreased.

CONCLUSION

Scientific evidence supporting the hypothesis that CTO has a positive role on long-term adherence post-obligation is currently not sufficient. Given the importance of modern recovery-oriented approaches and the coercive nature of compulsory outpatient treatment, it is necessary that future studies ensure the role of CTO in effectively promoting adherence.

Cross-Sectional Comparison of Treatment Provided Under the Clinical, Integrated, and Partnership Staffing Models for Community-Based Residential Mental Health Rehabilitation

In Queensland (Australia), community-based residential mental health rehabilitation services have three distinct staffing profiles. The traditional 'clinical' staffing model has nursing staff occupying most staff roles. The 'partnership' approach involves collaboration between the health service and a Non-Government Organisation. Under the 'integrated' staffing approach, Peer Support Workers reflect the majority staffing component. This study compares the treatment received by consumers (N = 172) under these staffing models using cross-sectional administrative data. Staffing models were generally comparable on demographic, diagnostic, and symptomatic/impairment measures. However, statistically significant differences were present on a range of treatment variables. Differences mainly occurred between the clinical and integrated approaches, with the integrated staffing model having lower rates of involuntary treatment, antipsychotic polypharmacy, depot use, and chlorpromazine dose equivalence levels. These findings indicate the need to carefully examine the impact of staffing configuration on rehabilitation processes to understand whether differences in approaches are likely to impact rehabilitation outcomes.