The fungibility of time in claims of efficiency: the case of making transmission of prescriptions electronic in English general practice

My time, your time, our time. Older patients' and GPs' time sensibilities around email consultations

In this study, we discuss how email consultations in general practice operate as a temporal technology, transforming working conditions and power relations between general practitioners (GPs) and patients. We draw on empirical material from Denmark in the form of a set of semi-structured interviews with 53 patients and 15 GPs, including two focus group discussions with 17 GPs. Our theoretical point of departure stems primarily from media theorist Sarah Sharma's (2014) concept of power-chronography, which describes how power is embedded in temporal relations and everyday life and secondarily from sociologist, Judy Wajcman's (2015) concept of multiple temporal landscapes. Patients and GPs calibrate their own time and attune their mutual time according to their expectations and ideas about the other party's time. The patient and the GP can both be viewed as 'time workers' and the email consultation as a digital technology fostering the recalibration of one person's time to that of another, requiring significant labour. The email consultation rearranges the GP-patient boundaries and thereby the power relations. Health institutions ought to consider whose time and labour is being 'saved' with digital systems.

Going digital in Germany: An exploration of physicians’ attitudes towards the introduction of electronic prescriptions – a mixed methods approach

PURPOSE

Digitalization of medical prescriptions is a core element for the digitalization of healthcare. While some countries have introduced electronic prescriptions over 20 years ago and nearly reached 100 % penetration, physicians in Germany have only been able to use electronic prescriptions since mid-2021 and currently only 0.1 % of prescriptions are transmitted electronically. This study investigates German physicians' viewpoint towards electronic prescriptions as a potential reason for the low penetration and investigates levers to drive adoption.

BASIC PROCEDURES

We conducted a two-stage sequential mixed methods study consisting of semi-structured interviews followed by an online survey among 1136 physicians testing the main dimensions of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model.

MAIN FINDINGS

Our initial interviews suggested that there was a high technology acceptance by physicians, but due to technical barriers, they were not able to use the system, explaining the low penetration. However, with the larger sample size of the survey, we identified, that while physicians see barriers for introducing electronic prescriptions, such as unclear cost reimbursement or lack of time to deal with the implementation, the majority believes these can be overcome within twelve months. Furthermore, we found that only one third of physicians is in favor of replacing paper-based prescriptions with electronic prescriptions and most physicians considers it unlikely that they will issue more than half of their prescriptions electronically within the next twelve month. Additionally, respondents perceived limited usefulness and expect high effort for using electronic prescriptions.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSION

Low electronic prescription penetration in Germany seems to be driven by low technology acceptance, not technical barriers. This can be linked to low perceived usefulness, high effort expectancy and low perceived patient demand. Improving technical stability, system functionality and increasing physicians' level of information were seen as main levers to drive electronic prescription adoption.

Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians' Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature

PURPOSE

Operational failures are system-level errors in the supply of information, equipment, and materials to health care personnel. We aimed to review and synthesize the research literature to determine how operational failures in primary care affect the work of primary care physicians.

METHODS

We conducted a critical interpretive synthesis. We searched 7 databases for papers published in English from database inception until October 2017 for primary research of any design that addressed problems interfering with primary care physicians' work. All potentially eligible titles/abstracts were screened by 1 reviewer; 30% were subject to second screening. We conducted an iterative critique, analysis, and synthesis of included studies.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 8,544 unique citations. Though no paper explicitly referred to "operational failures," we identified 95 papers that conformed to our general definition. The included studies show a gap between what physicians perceived they should be doing and what they were doing, which was strongly linked to operational failures-including those relating to technology, information, and coordination-over which physicians often had limited control. Operational failures actively configured physicians' work by requiring significant compensatory labor to deliver the goals of care. This labor was typically unaccounted for in scheduling or reward systems and had adverse consequences for physician and patient experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care physicians' efforts to compensate for suboptimal work systems are often concealed, risking an incomplete picture of the work they do and problems they routinely face. Future research must identify which operational failures are highest impact and tractable to improvement.