1
|
Nezu M, Sakuma M, Nakamura T, Sonoyama T, Matsumoto C, Takeuchi J, Ohta Y, Kosaka S, Morimoto T. Monitoring for adverse drug events of high-risk medications with a computerized clinical decision support system: a prospective cohort study. Int J Qual Health Care 2023; 35:mzad095. [PMID: 37982724 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Monitoring is recommended to prevent severe adverse drug events, but such examinations are often missed. To increase the number of monitoring that should be ordered for high-risk medications, we introduced a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that alerts and orders the monitoring for high-risk medications in an outpatient setting. We conducted a 2-year prospective cohort study at a tertiary care teaching hospital before (phase 1) and after (phase 2) the activation of a CDSS. The CDSS automatically provided alerts for liver function tests for vildagliptin, thyroid function tests for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), and a slit-lamp examination of the eyes for oral amiodarone when outpatients were prescribed the medications but not examined for a fixed period. The order of laboratory tests automatically appeared if alert was accepted. The alerts were hidden and did not appear on the display before activation of the CDSS. The outcomes were the number of prescriptions with alerts and examinations. During the study period, 330 patients in phase 1 and 307 patients in phase 2 were prescribed vildagliptin, 20 patients in phase 1 and 19 patients in phase 2 were prescribed ICIs or MKIs, and 72 patients in phase 1 and 66 patients in phase 2 were prescribed oral amiodarone. The baseline characteristics were similar between the phases. In patients prescribed vildagliptin, the proportion of alerts decreased significantly (38% vs 27%, P < 0.0001), and the proportion of examinations increased significantly (0.9% vs 4.0%, P < 0.0001) after activation of the CDSS. In patients prescribed ICIs or MKIs, the proportion of alerts decreased significantly (43% vs 11%, P < 0.0001), and the proportion of examinations increased numerically, but not significantly (2.6% vs 7.0%, P = 0.13). In patients prescribed oral amiodarone, the proportion of alerts decreased (86% vs 81%, P = 0.055), and the proportion of examinations increased (2.2% and 3.0%, P = 0.47); neither was significant. The CDSS has potential to increase the monitoring for high-risk medications. Our study also highlighted the limited acceptance rate of monitoring by CDSS. Further studies are needed to explore the generalizability to other medications and the cause of the limited acceptance rates among physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Nezu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Mio Sakuma
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Nakamura
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo 693-8555, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Sonoyama
- Department of Pharmacy, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo 693-8555, Japan
| | - Chisa Matsumoto
- Center for Health Surveillance and Preventive Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, 6-1-1 Shinjuku, Shinjuku 160-8402, Japan
| | - Jiro Takeuchi
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ohta
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Shinji Kosaka
- Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo 693-8555, Japan
| | - Takeshi Morimoto
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hak F, Guimarães T, Santos M. Towards effective clinical decision support systems: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272846. [PMID: 35969526 PMCID: PMC9377614 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are used to assist the decision-making process in the healthcare field. Developing an effective CDSS is an arduous task that can take advantage from prior assessment of the most promising theories, techniques and methods used at the present time. Objective To identify the features of Clinical Decision Support Systems and provide an analysis of their effectiveness. Thus, two research questions were formulated: RQ1—What are the most common trend characteristics in a CDSS? RQ2—What is the maturity level of the CDSS based on the decision-making theory proposed by Simon? Methods AIS e-library, Decision Support Systems journal, Nature, PlosOne and PubMed were selected as information sources to conduct this systematic literature review. Studies from 2000 to 2020 were chosen covering search terms in CDSS, selected according to defined eligibility criteria. The data were extracted and managed in a worksheet, based on the defined criteria. PRISMA statements were used to report the systematic review. Results The outcomes showed that rule-based module was the most used approach regarding knowledge management and representation. The most common technological feature adopted by the CDSS were the recommendations and suggestions. 19,23% of studies adopt the type of system as a web-based application, and 51,92% are standalone CDSS. Temporal evolution was also possible to visualize. This study contributed to the development of a Maturity Staging Model, where it was possible to verify that most CDSS do not exceed level 2 of maturity. Conclusion The trend characteristics addressed in the revised CDSS were identified, compared to the four predefined groups. A maturity stage model was developed based on Simon’s decision-making theory, allowing to assess the level of maturity of the most common features of the CDSS. With the application of the model, it was noticed that the phases of choice and implementation are underrepresented. This constitutes the main gap in the development of an effective CDSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francini Hak
- Algoritmi Research Center, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- * E-mail:
| | - Tiago Guimarães
- Algoritmi Research Center, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Manuel Santos
- Algoritmi Research Center, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen W, Howard K, Gorham G, O'Bryan CM, Coffey P, Balasubramanya B, Abeyaratne A, Cass A. Design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of contemporary chronic disease clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29:1757-1772. [PMID: 35818299 PMCID: PMC9471723 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Electronic health record-based clinical decision support (CDS) has the potential to improve health outcomes. This systematic review investigates the design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of CDS targeting several common chronic diseases. Material and Methods We conducted a search in PubMed (Medline), EBSCOHOST (CINAHL, APA PsychInfo, EconLit), and Web of Science. We limited the search to studies from 2011 to 2021. Studies were included if the CDS was electronic health record-based and targeted one or more of the following chronic diseases: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Studies with effectiveness or economic outcomes were considered for inclusion, and a meta-analysis was conducted. Results The review included 76 studies with effectiveness outcomes and 9 with economic outcomes. Of the effectiveness studies, 63% described a positive outcome that favored the CDS intervention group. However, meta-analysis demonstrated that effect sizes were heterogenous and small, with limited clinical and statistical significance. Of the economic studies, most full economic evaluations (n = 5) used a modeled analysis approach. Cost-effectiveness of CDS varied widely between studies, with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranging between USD$2192 to USD$151 955 per QALY. Conclusion We summarize contemporary chronic disease CDS designs and evaluation results. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness results for CDS interventions are highly heterogeneous, likely due to differences in implementation context and evaluation methodology. Improved quality of reporting, particularly from modeled economic evaluations, would assist decision makers to better interpret and utilize results from these primary research studies. Registration PROSPERO (CRD42020203716)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnie Chen
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gillian Gorham
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Claire Maree O'Bryan
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Patrick Coffey
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Bhavya Balasubramanya
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Asanga Abeyaratne
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Alan Cass
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saigí-Rubió F, Pereyra-Rodríguez JJ, Torrent-Sellens J, Eguia H, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Novillo-Ortiz D. Routine Health Information Systems in the European Context: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:4622. [PMID: 33925384 PMCID: PMC8123776 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of this study is to provide a better understanding of the requirements to improve routine health information systems (RHISs) for the management of health systems, including the identification of best practices, opportunities, and challenges in the 53 countries and territories of the WHO European region. (2) Methods: We conducted an overview of systematics reviews and searched the literature in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases. After a meticulous screening, we identified 20 that met the inclusion criteria, and RHIS evaluation results were presented according to the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) framework. (3) Results: The reviews were published between 2007 and 2020, focusing on the use of different systems or technologies and aimed to analyze interventions on professionals, centers, or patients' outcomes. All reviews examined showed variability in results in accordance with the variability of interventions and target populations. We have found different areas for improvement for RHISs according to the three determinants of the PRISM framework that influence the configuration of RHISs: technical, organizational, or behavioral elements. (4) Conclusions: RHIS interventions in the European region are promising. However, new global and international strategies and the development of tools and mechanisms should be promoted to highly integrate platforms among European countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesc Saigí-Rubió
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain; (F.S.-R.); (H.E.)
- Interdisciplinary Research Group on ICTs, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | | | - Joan Torrent-Sellens
- Interdisciplinary Research Group on ICTs, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
- Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hans Eguia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain; (F.S.-R.); (H.E.)
- SEMERGEN New Technologies Working Group, 28009 Madrid, Spain
| | - Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat
- Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - David Novillo-Ortiz
- Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taheri Moghadam S, Sadoughi F, Velayati F, Ehsanzadeh SJ, Poursharif S. The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:98. [PMID: 33691690 PMCID: PMC7944637 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01376-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) for Prescribing are one of the innovations designed to improve physician practice performance and patient outcomes by reducing prescription errors. This study was therefore conducted to examine the effects of various CDSSs on physician practice performance and patient outcomes. Methods This systematic review was carried out by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2019. The studies were independently reviewed by two researchers. Any discrepancies in the eligibility of the studies between the two researchers were then resolved by consulting the third researcher. In the next step, we performed a meta-analysis based on medication subgroups, CDSS-type subgroups, and outcome categories. Also, we provided the narrative style of the findings. In the meantime, we used a random-effects model to estimate the effects of CDSS on patient outcomes and physician practice performance with a 95% confidence interval. Q statistics and I2 were then used to calculate heterogeneity. Results On the basis of the inclusion criteria, 45 studies were qualified for analysis in this study. CDSS for prescription drugs/COPE has been used for various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases, AIDS, appendicitis, kidney disease, malaria, high blood potassium, and mental diseases. In the meantime, other cases such as concurrent prescribing of multiple medications for patients and their effects on the above-mentioned results have been analyzed. The study shows that in some cases the use of CDSS has beneficial effects on patient outcomes and physician practice performance (std diff in means = 0.084, 95% CI 0.067 to 0.102). It was also statistically significant for outcome categories such as those demonstrating better results for physician practice performance and patient outcomes or both. However, there was no significant difference between some other cases and traditional approaches. We assume that this may be due to the disease type, the quantity, and the type of CDSS criteria that affected the comparison. Overall, the results of this study show positive effects on performance for all forms of CDSSs. Conclusions Our results indicate that the positive effects of the CDSS can be due to factors such as user-friendliness, compliance with clinical guidelines, patient and physician cooperation, integration of electronic health records, CDSS, and pharmaceutical systems, consideration of the views of physicians in assessing the importance of CDSS alerts, and the real-time alerts in the prescription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharare Taheri Moghadam
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farahnaz Sadoughi
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Rashid Yasemi Street, Vali-e Asr Avenue, Tehran, 1996713883, Iran.
| | - Farnia Velayati
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Jafar Ehsanzadeh
- School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Balveren JA, Verboeket-van de Venne WPHG, Doggen CJM, Cornelissen AS, Erdem-Eraslan L, de Graaf AJ, Krabbe JG, Musson REA, Oosterhuis WP, de Rijke YB, van der Sijs H, Tintu AN, Verheul RJ, Hoedemakers RMJ, Kusters R. Clinical usefulness of drug-laboratory test interaction alerts: a multicentre survey. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021; 59:1239-1245. [PMID: 33645171 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Knowledge of possible drug-laboratory test interactions (DLTIs) is important for the interpretation of laboratory test results. Failure to recognize these interactions may lead to misinterpretation, a delayed or erroneous diagnosis, or unnecessary extra diagnostic tests or therapy, which may harm patients. The aim of this multicentre survey was to evaluate the clinical value of DLTI alerts. METHODS A survey was designed with six predefined clinical cases selected from the clinical laboratory practice with a potential DLTI. Physicians from several departments, including internal medicine, cardiology, intensive care, surgery and geriatrics in six participating hospitals were recruited to fill in the survey. The survey addressed their knowledge of DLTIs, motivation to receive an alert and opinion on the potential influence on medical decision making. RESULTS A total of 210 physicians completed the survey. Of these respondents 93% had a positive attitude towards receiving DLTI alerts; however, the reported value differed per case and per respondent's background. In each clinical case, medical decision making was influenced as a consequence of the reported DLTI message (ranging from 3 to 45% of respondents per case). CONCLUSIONS In this multicentre survey, most physicians stated DLTI messages to be useful in laboratory test interpretation. Medical decision making was influenced by reporting DLTI alerts in each case. Alerts should be adjusted according to the needs and preferences of the receiving physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmijn A van Balveren
- Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Carine J M Doggen
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Anne S Cornelissen
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Lale Erdem-Eraslan
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert J de Graaf
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes G Krabbe
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben E A Musson
- Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wytze P Oosterhuis
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Yolanda B de Rijke
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen van der Sijs
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrei N Tintu
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rolf J Verheul
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Rein M J Hoedemakers
- Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Kusters
- Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shahmoradi L, Safdari R, Ahmadi H, Zahmatkeshan M. Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve medication outcomes: A systematic literature review on features and effects. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2021; 35:27. [PMID: 34169039 PMCID: PMC8214039 DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.35.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) interventions were used to improve the life quality and safety in patients and also to improve practitioner performance, especially in the field of medication. Therefore, the aim of the paper was to summarize the available evidence on the impact, outcomes and significant factors on the implementation of CDSS in the field of medicine. Methods: This study is a systematic literature review. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and ProQuest were investigated by 15 February 2017. The inclusion requirements were met by 98 papers, from which 13 had described important factors in the implementation of CDSS, and 86 were medicated-related. We categorized the system in terms of its correlation with medication in which a system was implemented, and our intended results were examined. In this study, the process outcomes (such as; prescription, drug-drug interaction, drug adherence, etc.), patient outcomes, and significant factors affecting the implementation of CDSS were reviewed. Results: We found evidence that the use of medication-related CDSS improves clinical outcomes. Also, significant results were obtained regarding the reduction of prescription errors, and the improvement in quality and safety of medication prescribed. Conclusion: The results of this study show that, although computer systems such as CDSS may cause errors, in most cases, it has helped to improve prescribing, reduce side effects and drug interactions, and improve patient safety. Although these systems have improved the performance of practitioners and processes, there has not been much research on the impact of these systems on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Shahmoradi
- Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Safdari
- Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Ahmadi
- OIM Department, Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, United Kingdom
| | - Maryam Zahmatkeshan
- Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Niazkhani Z, Fereidoni M, Rashidi Khazaee P, Shiva A, Makhdoomi K, Georgiou A, Pirnejad H. Translation of evidence into kidney transplant clinical practice: managing drug-lab interactions by a context-aware clinical decision support system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:196. [PMID: 32819359 PMCID: PMC7439664 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01196-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-laboratory (lab) interactions (DLIs) are a common source of preventable medication errors. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are promising tools to decrease such errors by improving prescription quality in terms of lab values. However, alert fatigue counteracts their impact. We aimed to develop a novel user-friendly, evidence-based, clinical context-aware CDSS to alert nephrologists about DLIs clinically important lab values in prescriptions of kidney recipients. METHODS For the most frequently prescribed medications identified by a prospective cross-sectional study in a kidney transplant clinic, DLI-rules were extracted using main pharmacology references and clinical inputs from clinicians. A CDSS was then developed linking a computerized prescription system and lab records. The system performance was tested using data of both fictitious and real patients. The "Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction" was used to measure user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. RESULTS Among 27 study medications, 17 needed adjustments regarding renal function, 15 required considerations based on hepatic function, 8 had drug-pregnancy interactions, and 13 required baselines or follow-up lab monitoring. Using IF & THEN rules and the contents of associated alert, a DLI-alerting CDSS was designed. To avoid alert fatigue, the alert appearance was considered as interruptive only when medications with serious risks were contraindicated or needed to be discontinued or adjusted. Other alerts appeared in a non-interruptive mode with visual clues on the prescription window for easy, intuitive notice. When the system was used for real 100 patients, it correctly detected 260 DLIs and displayed 249 monitoring, seven hepatic, four pregnancy, and none renal alerts. The system delivered patient-specific recommendations based on individual lab values in real-time. Clinicians were highly satisfied with the usability of the system. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study of a comprehensive DLI-CDSS for kidney transplant care. By alerting on considerations in renal and hepatic dysfunctions, maternal and fetal toxicity, or required lab monitoring, this system can potentially improve medication safety in kidney recipients. Our experience provides a strong foundation for designing specialized systems to promote individualized transplant follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Niazkhani
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Mahsa Fereidoni
- Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Student Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | | | - Afshin Shiva
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Khadijeh Makhdoomi
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Department of Adult Nephrology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Habibollah Pirnejad
- Patient Safety Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. .,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jia P, Jia P, Chen J, Zhao P, Zhang M. The effects of clinical decision support systems on insulin use: A systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:1292-1301. [PMID: 31782586 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A clinical decision support system (CDSS) is a computerized system using case-based reasoning to assist clinicians in assessing disease status, in selecting appropriate therapy or in making other clinical decisions. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs or trials) have shown that CDSSs have the potential to improve the insulin use, but the evidence was conflicting and uncertain. The purpose of our study was to determine whether a CDSS improves the use of insulin. METHOD PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to October 2018. The quality assessment was based on the risk of bias criteria of the Cochrane Handbook. RESULTS Twenty-four RCTs, involving 7653 participants, were included. Thirteen of those trials (54.2%) used a computerized algorithm or a computer-assisted insulin protocol for insulin dose and therapy adjustment, of which 30.8% (four of 13) found significant changes. Of 10 trials that measured mean blood glucose levels and the 11 trials reported HbA1c, the computerized insulin dose adjustment resulted in lower mean blood glucose levels in 70.0% (seven of 10) and 36.4% (four of 11) of RCTs, respectively. Additionally, a significant reduction of hyperglycaemia events was reported in three of six RCTs. The evidence in a majority of the 24 RCTs was of moderate quality. CONCLUSIONS CDSSs have the potential to improve the insulin use and blood glucose control in a clinical setting. The methodologies in these studies were of mixed quality. Better designed and longer-term studies are required to ensure a larger and more reliable evidence base on the effects of CDSS intervention on insulin use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengli Jia
- School of Management, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.,Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Pengyan Jia
- State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agricultural Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - JingJing Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pujing Zhao
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingming Zhang
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Olakotan OO, Yusof MM. Evaluating the alert appropriateness of clinical decision support systems in supporting clinical workflow. J Biomed Inform 2020; 106:103453. [PMID: 32417444 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The overwhelming number of medication alerts generated by clinical decision support systems (CDSS) has led to inappropriate alert overrides, which may lead to unintended patient harm. This review highlights the factors affecting the alert appropriateness of CDSS and barriers to the fit of CDSS alert with clinical workflow. A literature review was conducted to identify features and functions pertinent to CDSS alert appropriateness using the five rights of CDSS. Moreover, a process improvement method, namely, Lean, was used as a tool to optimise clinical workflows, and the appropriate design for CDSS alert using a human automation interaction (HAI) model was recommended. Evaluating the appropriateness of CDSS alert and its impact on workflow provided insights into how alerts can be designed and triggered effectively to support clinical workflow. The application of Lean methods and tools to analyse alert efficiencies in supporting workflow in this study provides an in-depth understanding of alert-workflow fit problems and their root cause, which is required for improving CDSS design. The application of the HAI model is recommended in the design of CDSS alerts to support various levels and stages of alert automations, namely, information acquisition and analysis, decision action and action implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maryati Mohd Yusof
- Faculty of Information Science & Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Heringa M, Floor-Schreudering A, De Smet PAGM, Bouvy ML. Clinical Decision Support and Optional Point of Care Testing of Renal Function for Safe Use of Antibiotics in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study in Community Pharmacy Practice. Drugs Aging 2018; 34:851-858. [PMID: 29119468 PMCID: PMC5705753 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-017-0497-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim was to investigate the management of drug therapy alerts on safe use of antibiotics in elderly patients with (potential) renal impairment and the contribution of optional creatinine point of care testing (PoCT) in community pharmacy practice. Methods Community pharmacists used a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for seven antibiotics. Alerts were generated during prescription processing in the case of previously registered renal impairment and when no information on renal function was available for patients aged 70 and over. Pharmacists could perform PoCT when renal function could not be retrieved from other health care professionals. Actions were registered in the CDSS. A retrospective descriptive analysis of alert management, performed PoCT and medication dispensing histories was performed. Results A total of 351 pharmacists registered the management of 88,391 alerts for 64,763 patients. For 68,721 alerts (77.7%), the pharmacist retrieved a renal function above the threshold for intervention. 1.7% of the alerts (n = 1532) led to a prescription modification because of renal impairment; in 3.0% of the alerts (n = 2631), the patient had renal impairment, but the pharmacist judged that no intervention was needed. Pharmacists performed 1988 PoCTs (2.2% of the alerts), which led to 15 prescription modifications (0.8% of the PoCT). Conclusion Community pharmacists performed CDSS-based interventions to prevent potentially inappropriate (dosing of) antibiotics in elderly patients with renal impairment. Pharmacists were well able to retrieve information on renal function, using PoCT in a limited number of cases. The intervention rate could be greatly increased by better registration of information on renal function. Performing PoCT seems especially worthwhile in the highest age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Heringa
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Theda Mansholtstraat 5B, 2331 JE, Leiden, The Netherlands. .,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Health Base Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands.
| | - Annemieke Floor-Schreudering
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Theda Mansholtstraat 5B, 2331 JE, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A G M De Smet
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacy and IQ Healthcare, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel L Bouvy
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Theda Mansholtstraat 5B, 2331 JE, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jia P, Zhang L, Chen J, Zhao P, Zhang M. The Effects of Clinical Decision Support Systems on Medication Safety: An Overview. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0167683. [PMID: 27977697 PMCID: PMC5157990 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 11/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical decision support system(CDSS) has potential to improving medication safety. However, the effects of the intervention were conflicting and uncertain. Meanwhile, the reporting and methodological quality of this field were unknown. OBJECTIVE The aim of this overview is to evaluate the effects of CDSS on medication safety and to examine the methodological and reporting quality. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to August 2015. Systematic reviews (SRs) investigating the effects of CDSS on medication safety were included. Outcomes were determined in advance and assessed separately for process of care and patient outcomes. The methodological quality was assessed by Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and the reporting quality was examined by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). RESULTS Twenty systematic reviews, consisting of 237 unique randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and 176 non-RCTs were included. Evidence that CDSS significantly impacted process of care was found in 108 out of 143 unique studies of the 16 SRs examining this effect (75%). Only 18 out of 90 unique studies of the 13 SRs reported significantly evidence that CDSS positively impacted patient outcomes (20%). Ratings for the overall scores of AMSTAR resulted in a mean score of 8.3 with a range of scores from 7.5 to 10.5. The reporting quality was varied. Some contents were particularly strong. However, some contents were poor. CONCLUSIONS CDSS reduces medication error by obviously improving process of care and inconsistently improving patient outcomes. Larger samples and longer-term studies are required to ensure more reliable evidence base on the effects of CDSS on patient outcomes. The methodological and reporting quality were varied and some realms need to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengli Jia
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR, China
| | - Longhao Zhang
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR, China
| | - Jingjing Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, PR, China
| | - Pujing Zhao
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR, China
| | - Mingming Zhang
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bos JM, van den Bemt PMLA, Kievit W, Pot JLW, Nagtegaal JE, Wieringa A, van der Westerlaken MML, van der Wilt GJ, de Smet PAGM, Kramers C. A multifaceted intervention to reduce drug-related complications in surgical patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 83:664-677. [PMID: 27670813 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The P-REVIEW study was a prospective, multicenter, open intervention study, designed to determine whether a multifaceted intervention of educating the prescriber combined with medication review and pharmaceutical visits to the ward by the hospital pharmacist could lead to a reduction in drug-related complications among surgical patients. METHODS A total of 6780 admissions of 5940 patients to surgical, urological and orthopaedic wards during the usual care period and 6484 admissions of 5711 patients during the intervention period were included. An educational programme covering pain management, antithrombotics, fluid and electrolyte management, prescription in case of renal insufficiency and antibiotics was developed. National and local hospital guidelines were included. Hospital pharmacists performed medication safety consultations, combining medication review of high-risk patients and a visit to the physician on the ward. RESULTS A significantly lower proportion of admissions with one or more clinically relevant, potentially preventable, drug-related problems (including death, temporary or sustained disability, increased length of hospital stay or readmission within 30 days) occurred in the intervention period (1.1% (73/6484) compared to the usual care period [1.6% (106/6780)] (P = 0.029). The relative risk (RR) was 0.72 (95% CI 0.53-0.97). Several types of drug-related problems occurred less frequently. Costs incurred as result of time spent on study-related activities were not different before and after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS The P-REVIEW study shows that education and support of the prescribing physician with respect to high-risk patients in surgical departments leads to a significant, clinically relevant benefit for patients without generating additional costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline M Bos
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wietske Kievit
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L W Pot
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - J Elsbeth Nagtegaal
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - André Wieringa
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gert Jan van der Wilt
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter A G M de Smet
- Department Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Kramers
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park HA. Health Informatics in Developing Countries: A Review of Unintended Consequences of IT Implementations, as They Affect Patient Safety and Recommendations on How to Address Them. Yearb Med Inform 2016; 26:1-2. [PMID: 27830233 DOI: 10.15265/iy-2016-028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient safety concerns every healthcare organization. Adoption of Health information technology (HIT) appears to have the potential to address this issue, however unanticipated and undesirable consequences from implementing HIT could lead to new and more complex hazards. This could be particularly problematic in developing countries, where regulations, policies and implementations are few, less standandarized and in some cases almost non-existing. METHODS Based on the available information and our own experience, we conducted a review of unintended consequences of HIT implementations, as they affect patient safety in developing countries. RESULTS We found that user dependency on the system, alert fatigue, less communications among healthcare actors and workarounds topics should be prioritize. Institution should consider existing knowledge, learn from other experiences and model their implementations to avoid known consequences. We also recommend that they monitor and communicate their own efforts to expand knowledge in the region.
Collapse
|
15
|
Zegers M, Hesselink G, Geense W, Vincent C, Wollersheim H. Evidence-based interventions to reduce adverse events in hospitals: a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012555. [PMID: 27687901 PMCID: PMC5051502 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of effective interventions aimed at reducing rates of adverse events in hospitals. DESIGN Systematic review of systematic reviews. DATA SOURCES PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched for systematic reviews published until October 2015. STUDY SELECTION English-language systematic reviews of interventions aimed at reducing adverse events in hospitals, including studies with an experimental design and reporting adverse event rates, were included. Two reviewers independently assessed each study's quality and extracted data on the study population, study design, intervention characteristics and adverse patient outcomes. RESULTS Sixty systematic reviews with moderate to high quality were included. Statistically significant pooled effect sizes were found for 14 types of interventions, including: (1) multicomponent interventions to prevent delirium; (2) rapid response teams to reduce cardiopulmonary arrest and mortality rates; (3) pharmacist interventions to reduce adverse drug events; (4) exercises and multicomponent interventions to prevent falls; and (5) care bundle interventions, checklists and reminders to reduce infections. Most (82%) of the significant effect sizes were based on 5 or fewer primary studies with an experimental study design. CONCLUSIONS The evidence for patient-safety interventions implemented in hospitals worldwide is weak. The findings address the need to invest in high-quality research standards in order to identify interventions that have a real impact on patient safety. Interventions to prevent delirium, cardiopulmonary arrest and mortality, adverse drug events, infections and falls are most effective and should therefore be prioritised by clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Zegers
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs Hesselink
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wytske Geense
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Charles Vincent
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hub Wollersheim
- Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jackups R. The Promise-and Pitfalls-of Computerized Provider Alerts for Laboratory Test Ordering. Clin Chem 2016; 62:791-2. [PMID: 27127182 DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.256776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Jackups
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Seppänen K, Kauppila T, Pitkälä K, Kautiainen H, Puustinen R, Iivanainen A, Mäki T. Altering a computerized laboratory test order form rationalizes ordering of laboratory tests in primary care physicians. Int J Med Inform 2016; 86:49-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2015] [Revised: 11/25/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
18
|
Integrating computerized clinical decision support systems into clinical work: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84:1009-18. [PMID: 26391601 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Revised: 09/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are an emerging means for improving healthcare safety, quality and efficiency, but meta-analyses findings are mixed. This meta-synthesis aggregates qualitative research findings as possible explanations for variable quantitative research outcomes. INCLUSION CRITERIA Qualitative studies published between 2000 and 2013 in English, involving physicians, registered and advanced practice nurses' experience of CDSS use in clinical practice were included. SEARCH STRATEGY PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched. Study titles and abstracts were screened against inclusion criteria. Retained studies were appraised against quality criteria. Findings were extracted iteratively from studies in the 4th quartile of quality scores. Two reviewers constructed themes inductively. A third reviewer applied the defined themes deductively achieving 92% agreement. RESULTS 3798 unique records were returned; 56 met inclusion criteria and were reviewed against quality criteria. 9 studies were of sufficiently high quality for synthetic analysis. Five major themes (clinician-patient-system integration; user interface usability; the need for better 'algorithms'; system maturity; patient safety) were defined. CONCLUSIONS Despite ongoing development, CDSS remains an emerging technology. Lack of understanding about and lack of consideration for the interaction between human decision makers and CDSS is a major reason for poor system adoption and use. Further high-quality qualitative research is needed to better understand human-system interaction issues. These issues may continue to confound quantitative study results if not addressed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Sebastián-Viana T, Losa-Iglesias M, González-Ruiz JM, Lema-Lorenzo I, Núñez-Crespo FJ, Salvadores Fuentes P. Reduction in the incidence of pressure ulcers upon implementation of a reminder system for health-care providers. Appl Nurs Res 2015; 29:107-12. [PMID: 26856498 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2014] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To measure the clinical impact of the introduction of a reminder system for healthcare professionals to alert patients who are at risk for pressure ulcers (PU). METHODS This was a pre- and post-test study of patients who were discharged from 6 medical-surgical units of the University Hospital of Fuenlabrada in 2009 and 2010. Beginning in January 2010, implementation of an on-screen list of reminders was automatically updated daily on the units' computers including patient arrival date, last assessment of ulceration risk and location of any PU. The cumulative incidence of PU was measured for patients discharged in 2009 (group A: healthcare professionals were not exposed to on-screen reminder) and 2010 (group B: healthcare professionals were exposed to on-screen reminder list). The relative risk (RR) was estimated. The study was completed with a stratified analysis and binary logistic regression. RESULTS In group A, there were 84 cases of PU among 9263 patients discharged (0.9%); whereas in group B, there were 59 cases among 9220 patients discharged (0.6%). The RR of PU for group B/group A was 0.706 (p=0.038). In the logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for study variables, the odds ratio of PU B/A was 0.558. CONCLUSION A list of on-screen reminders at the beginning of a healthcare professional's shift to inform them of patients at risk for developing a PU was effective at reducing the incidence of these clinical burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Sebastián-Viana
- Department of Innovation and Improvement, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
| | - M Losa-Iglesias
- Department of Nursing, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - J M González-Ruiz
- Medical Hospitalization Unit, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Lema-Lorenzo
- Medical Hospitalization Unit, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - F J Núñez-Crespo
- Reanimation Unit, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|