Information on adverse drug reactions—Proof of principle for a structured database that allows customization of drug information

Identification and simultaneous quantification of potential genotoxic impurities in first-line HIV drug dolutegravir sodium using fast ultrasonication-assisted extraction method coupled with GC-MS and in-silico toxicity assessment

Dolutegravir (DLG) has become a distinctive first-line antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV in most countries due to its affordability, high efficacy, and low drug-drug interactions. However, the evaluation of genotoxic impurities (GTIs) in DLG and their toxicity assessment has not been explored thoroughly. Thus, in this study, a simple, fast, and selective analytical methodology was developed for the identification and determination of 7 GTIs in the comprehensive, explicit route of synthesis for the dolutegravir sodium (DLG-Na) drug. A facile, fast ultrasonication-assisted liquid-liquid extraction procedure was adapted to isolate the GTIs in DLG-Na and then analyzed using the gas chromatography (GC)-electron impact (EI)/mass spectrometer (MS) quantification (using selective ion monitoring mode) technique. This EI-GC/MS method was validated as per the current requirements of ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines. Under optimal method conditions, excellent linearities were achieved with R between 0.9959 and 0.9995, and high sensitivity was obtained in terms of detection limits (LOD) between 0.15 to 0.63 µg/g, and quantification limits (LOQ) between 0.45 to 1.66 µg/g for the seven GTIs in DLG. The obtained recoveries ranged from 98.2 to 104.3 % at LOQ, 15 µg/g, and 18 µg/g concentration levels (maximum daily dose of 100 mg). This developed and validated method is rapid, easy to adopt, specific, sensitive, and accurate in estimating the seven GTIs in a relatively complex sodium matrix of the DLG-Na drug moiety. As a method application, two different manufactured samples of DLG-Na drug substances were analyzed for the fate of the GTIs and drug safety for the intended dosage applications. Moreover, an in-silico QSAR toxicity prediction assessment was carried out to prove scientifically the potential GTI nature of each impurity from the alerting functional groups.

A Text Mining Protocol for Predicting Drug-Drug Interaction and Adverse Drug Reactions from PubMed Articles

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur during the pharmacotherapy of multiple comorbidities and in susceptible individuals. DDIs and ADRs limit the therapeutic outcomes in pharmacotherapy. DDIs and ADRs have significant impact on patients' life and health care cost. Hence, knowledge of DDI and ADRs is required for providing better clinical outcomes to patients. Various approaches are developed by the scientific community to document and report the occurrences of DDIs and ADRs through scientific publications. Due to the enormously increasing number of publications and the requirement of updated information on DDIs and ADRs, manual retrieval of data is time consuming and laborious. Various automated techniques are developed to get information on DDIs and ADRs. One such technique is text mining of DDIs and ADRs from published biomedical literature in PubMed. Here, we present a recently developed text mining protocol for predicting DDIs and ADRs from PubMed abstracts.

Customization of information on adverse drug reactions according to patients' needs - A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

Interviewing patients, we evaluated how information on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) could be customized to best meet the patients' expectations.

METHODS

Recruitment followed an approach of variation sampling. Data collection was paper-based (questionnaires) and through semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to evaluate different ADR characteristics (e.g. frequency, seriousness, lay perceptibility, and management strategies) as suitable filters to customize information and subsequently how they would apply these to meet their information wishes. Their wishes were then verified by presenting them accordingly customized information.

RESULTS

Forty-one participants (mean age 44.9 ± 20.1 years) were recruited. Overall, information needs were highly diverse. Therefore, it was not possible to identify one single characteristic that was generally considered suitable. Initially, participants often wished for a maximum of information (e.g. 'all' ADRs). The actual presentation of comprehensive information often surprised the recipients and consequently changed the desired information.

CONCLUSIONS

By simply supplying patients with ADR information they request, it is not possible to guarantee their satisfaction with such information and their understanding of it; initial wishes might be uttered without actually comprehending their practical meaning.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

It is crucial to precisely assess, question, and verify information wishes in order to customize ADR information successfully.

Current Knowledge about Providing Drug-Drug Interaction Services for Patients-A Scoping Review

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) pose a major problem to patient safety. eHealth solutions have the potential to address this problem and generally improve medication management by providing digital services for health care professionals and patients. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) to alert physicians or pharmacists about DDIs are common, and there is an extensive body of research about CDSS for professionals. Information about DDIs is commonly requested by patients, but little is known about providing similar support to patients. The aim of this scoping review was to explore and describe current knowledge about providing digital DDI services for patients. Using a broad search strategy and an established framework for scoping reviews, 19 papers were included. The results show that although some patients want to check for DDIs themselves, there are differences between patients, in terms of demands and ability. There are numerous DDI services available, but the existence of large variations regarding service quality implies potential safety issues. The review includes suggestions about design features but also indicates a substantial knowledge gap highlighting the need for further research about how to best design and provide digital DDI to patients without risking patient safety or having other unintended consequences.

ADR databases for on-site clinical use: Potentials of summary of products characteristics

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for all drugs in Europe are described in the legally approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). An overview of all ADRs of the patients' drug list can support healthcare staff to link patient symptoms to possible ADRs. We review the possibilities and challenges to extract ADR information from SmPCs or American Structured Product Labels and present the development of our semi-automated procedure for extraction of ADRs from the tabulated section in the SmPCs to create a database, named Bikt, which is regularly updated and used at point of care in Sweden. The existence of five major table formats for ADRs used in the SmPCs required the development of different parsing scripts. Manual checks for correctness for all content have to be performed. The quality of extraction was investigated for all SmPCs by measuring precision, recall and F1 scores and compared with other methods published. We conclude that it is possible to semi-automatically extract ADR information from SmPCs. However, clear technical and content guidelines and standards for ADR tables and terms from drug registration authorities would lead to improved extraction and usability of ADR information at point of care.

Systematic Evaluation of Research Progress on Natural Language Processing in Medicine Over the Past 20 Years: Bibliometric Study on PubMed

BACKGROUND

Natural language processing (NLP) is an important traditional field in computer science, but its application in medical research has faced many challenges. With the extensive digitalization of medical information globally and increasing importance of understanding and mining big data in the medical field, NLP is becoming more crucial.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the research was to perform a systematic review on the use of NLP in medical research with the aim of understanding the global progress on NLP research outcomes, content, methods, and study groups involved.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed database as a search platform. All published studies on the application of NLP in medicine (except biomedicine) during the 20 years between 1999 and 2018 were retrieved. The data obtained from these published studies were cleaned and structured. Excel (Microsoft Corp) and VOSviewer (Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman) were used to perform bibliometric analysis of publication trends, author orders, countries, institutions, collaboration relationships, research hot spots, diseases studied, and research methods.

RESULTS

A total of 3498 articles were obtained during initial screening, and 2336 articles were found to meet the study criteria after manual screening. The number of publications increased every year, with a significant growth after 2012 (number of publications ranged from 148 to a maximum of 302 annually). The United States has occupied the leading position since the inception of the field, with the largest number of articles published. The United States contributed to 63.01% (1472/2336) of all publications, followed by France (5.44%, 127/2336) and the United Kingdom (3.51%, 82/2336). The author with the largest number of articles published was Hongfang Liu (70), while Stéphane Meystre (17) and Hua Xu (33) published the largest number of articles as the first and corresponding authors. Among the first author's affiliation institution, Columbia University published the largest number of articles, accounting for 4.54% (106/2336) of the total. Specifically, approximately one-fifth (17.68%, 413/2336) of the articles involved research on specific diseases, and the subject areas primarily focused on mental illness (16.46%, 68/413), breast cancer (5.81%, 24/413), and pneumonia (4.12%, 17/413).

CONCLUSIONS

NLP is in a period of robust development in the medical field, with an average of approximately 100 publications annually. Electronic medical records were the most used research materials, but social media such as Twitter have become important research materials since 2015. Cancer (24.94%, 103/413) was the most common subject area in NLP-assisted medical research on diseases, with breast cancers (23.30%, 24/103) and lung cancers (14.56%, 15/103) accounting for the highest proportions of studies. Columbia University and the talents trained therein were the most active and prolific research forces on NLP in the medical field.