Nagaraja M, Narendra H, Venkataramana B, Kalawat U. HPV genotype prevalence in Indian women with cervical disease and estimation of the potential impact of HPV vaccines on prevention of cervical cancer.
Indian J Med Microbiol 2022;
43:73-78. [PMID:
36241529 DOI:
10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.09.004]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes genital and oropharyngeal cancers worldwide. There are significant gaps exist in the data on HPV genotype prevalence in this part of the country. HPV vaccination is one of the best preventive methods available currently. HPV genotyping plays an important role in the selection of appropriate vaccines and monitoring vaccine efficacy and coverage. The present study aimed to determine the HPV genotype prevalence and to estimate the potential impact of HPV vaccines on invasive cervical cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 204 cervical biopsy samples collected from symptomatic women were subjected to an in-house designed and standardised nested multiplex PCR (NM-PCR) assay. The NM-PCR was designed to detect 38 Mucosal HPV types as a pooled result and genotyping of 15 HPV types. Further, the HPV genotype data was used to estimate the HPV vaccine bivalent, quadrivalent and nonavalent impact on the population using a mathematical formula.
RESULTS
Out of 204 samples 188 were subjected to HPV-nested PCR. A total of 163 (86.7%) samples were positive for at least one HPV type. Multiple genotypes were identified in 30% of samples processed. HPV-16 (85.3%) was the most frequently detected genotype followed by HPV-18 (13.5%) and HPV-33 (11.0%). Other genotypes were observed less frequently. Based on the HPV prevalence observed in the study a mathematical model estimated the efficacy of bivalent, quadrivalent and nonavalent vaccines were 76.1%, 76.7%, and 91.1% (average) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
HPV-16 was the most prevalent (>85%) genotype detected in this study. Multiple infections observed in 30% of samples were quite high as compared to the majority of national, and global reference (15-25.4%) data. The Mathematical model showed that a nonavalent vaccine would give better protection.
Collapse