Detection of viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis in ocular fluids using mRNA-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction

Evaluating Truenat Assay for the Diagnosis of Ocular Tuberculosis and Detection of Drug Resistance

BACKGROUND

Truenat MTB Plus assay was evaluated for diagnosing ocular tuberculosis (OTB) and detecting multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extremely-drug resistant (XDR) OTB.

METHODS

A total of 75 vitreous fluid specimens [five confirmed OTB, 40 clinically suspected OTB and 30 controls] were subjected to Truenat MTB Plus, multiplex PCR, and Xpert Ultra. Chips of Truenat were used for detecting rifampicin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolone and bedaquiline resistance. The performance was compared against culture, composite reference standard, and gene sequencing.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity of TruePlus, MPCR, and Ultra in diagnosing OTB was 66.6%, 73.3%, and 55.5%, respectively. Out of six cases with mutations in rpoB gene, RifR was detected in five by TrueRif and four by Ultra. Three MDR and one XDR-OTB were reported by Truenat.

CONCLUSION

Truenat assay along with its strategic chips is a rapid and reliable tool for diagnosis of OTB and detection of drug resistance, including MDR and XDR-OTB.Abbreviations: OTB: Ocular tuberculosis; XDR: Extremely drug resistant; Ultra: Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra; Xpert: Xpert MTB/RIF; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; NAATs: Nucleic acid amplification tests; MDR: Multi Drug Resistant; NSP: National Strategic plan for elimination of tuberculosis; FqR: Fluoroquinolone resistant; BdqR: bedaquiline resistant; TrueRif: Truenat MTB Rif Dx; TruePlus: Truenat Plus; INH: Isoniazid; DST: Drug susceptibility testing; MGIT: Mycobacterial growth indicator tube; CRF: Composite reference standard; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; EPTB: extrapulmonary tuberculosis; VF: vitreous fluid; DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid; ATT: antitubercular therapy; RifR: Rifampicin resistance; RifS: Rifampicin susceptible; RifI: Rifampicin indeterminate.

Diagnosing osteo-articular tuberculosis and multidrug resistance using real-time polymerase chain reaction and high-resolution melt-curve analysis

The study evaluated real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and high-resolution melt-curve analysis (HRM) for simultaneous diagnosis of osteo-articular tuberculosis (OATB) and drug resistance. Two hundred and fifty synovial fluid and pus specimens (20 confirmed OATB by culture, 130 suspected OATB, and 100 controls) processed in the Department of Medical Microbiology, PGIMER were subjected to qPCR using rpoB, MPB64, and IS6110 genes. All OATB positive specimens were subjected to HRM for detecting resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid. qPCR detected 129/150 OATB cases with a sensitivity of 86% (95% for confirmed and 84.6% for suspected OATB cases) and specificity of 100%. rpoB and MPB64 genes had higher sensitivity than IS6110 (86% vs. 74.6%). HRM reported eight multidrug resistant (MDR), two mono-rifampicin, and five mono-isoniazid resistant cases, all were concordant with gene sequencing. qPCR followed by HRM analysis offer a simple, accurate, and rapid platform for simultaneous detection of OATB and MDR.

Comparison of Protein B Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) With IS6110 PCR for Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis Patients

Purpose Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a diagnostic challenge. With the conventional staining and culture techniques being too insensitive and time-consuming, and the commercial detection systems being costly, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) seems lucrative for routine laboratories. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of protein b antigen polymerase chain reaction (Pab PCR) for TBM, in comparison to IS6110. Another purpose was to compute a cut-off at which adenosine deaminase (ADA) could diagnose TBM. Material and methods This is a prospective case-control study to measure the diagnostic accuracy of PCR, BACTEC culture, Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture, ADA, and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear tests in TBM. CSF from 50 TBM patients (10 confirmed, 40 clinically suspected) and 40 controls was subjected to Pab PCR and IS6110 PCR, and performance was compared against culture and composite reference standards. Results The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of Pab PCR in diagnosing TBM were 82%, 100%, 100%, and 81.63%, respectively, and that of IS6110 PCR were 74%, 100%, 100%, and 75.47%, respectively. Both PCRs outperformed culture (p<0.001). Though performance of both PCRs was comparable (p=0.335) with excellent agreement (k=0.86), Pab PCR detected four additional cases, one culture-positive and three culture-negative clinically suspected. ADA of 6.5 IU/L was able to differentiate between TBM and non-TBM with 86% sensitivity and 63% specificity. Conclusions Molecular tools such as PCR have the potential to increase the clinician's ability to diagnose tuberculous meningitis. Pab PCR is a rapid and reliable method for diagnosing TBM in routine microbiology laboratories.