Benefits and risks of upright positions during the second stage of labour: An overview of systematic reviews

Women's experience of adopting lateral positions during the second stage of labour compared with conventional lithotomy positions: A cross-sectional study

AIMS

Maternal positions during childbirth play an important role in safe vaginal births and might also influence women's childbirth experiences greatly. Lateral positions, as a potential position to reduce negative maternal and neonatal outcomes, have become popular in recent years, especially in China where the adoption of conventional lithotomy positions is still common. However, the childbirth experience of those who gave birth in lateral positions has been rarely studied. This study aimed to describe and compare women's childbirth experiences of adopting the newly introduced lateral positions and the conventional lithotomy positions during the second stage of labour.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in China involving a total of 658 primiparous and parous women who adopted lateral and lithotomy positions during the second stage of labour from July to November 2020. Sociodemographic characteristics, maternal and neonatal outcomes as well as childbirth experience assessed by the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) were collected. This study followed the STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

Women who once adopted lateral positions during the second stage of labour had better positive childbirth experiences compared with those in the lithotomy positions group, as demonstrated by their overall higher CEQ scores. Women in the lateral position group also reported better participation and perceived safety, and a greater sense of control during childbirth. Lateral positions remained an influential factor in CEQ scores after controlling for potential confounders. In this study, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were rare. Women in lateral positions had comparatively better perineal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study described and compared women's childbirth experiences of adopting conventional lithotomy positions and lateral positions during the second stage of labour using a valid instrument. Women who adopted lateral positions during the second stage of labour reported better childbirth experiences than those giving birth in the conventional lithotomy positions. Thus, assisting women in giving birth in lateral positions might be a promising way to improve women's childbirth experience.

Barriers and facilitators of implementing the practice programme for upright positions in the second stage of labour: A mixed-method study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the possible barriers and facilitators to implementing the Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour (UPSSL) programme in Chinese healthcare settings.

DESIGN

A mixed-method convergent design with the guidance of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

METHODS

An online survey study and semi-structured interviews were conducted between March and May 2023. Healthcare professionals were recruited from four hospitals in Shijiazhuang, China. One hundred and thirty-one participants completed the survey study, and 23 of them were interviewed individually. Descriptive statistics evaluated the possible barriers and facilitators of implementing the UPSSL programme within the CFIR framework quantitatively. Guided by the CFIR framework, qualitative data were analysed using directed content analysis to summarize healthcare professionals' perspectives on barriers and facilitators of the UPSSL programme.

RESULTS

Multiple intersectional barriers and facilitators were identified from the survey and semi-interviews. Healthcare professionals believed that the UPSSL programme has a scientific evidence base, systematic contents, and possible benefits for women. However, various barriers existed at individual, system, and organizational levels. Major barriers included healthcare professionals and women's safety concerns towards the use of upright positions during childbirth, the healthcare professionals' unfamiliarity with assisting an upright position birth, poor adaptability of the programme protocol, inadequate facilities and staffing, and a lack of readiness to change in the clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS

To facilitate the implementation of the UPSSL programme in China, tailored antenatal education on upright positions, especially addressing safety-related issues, should be provided to pregnant women, their families, or peers to enhance their understanding of and familiarity with such positions. Healthcare professionals should also be offered adequate training opportunities and necessary facilities. Furthermore, national-level policy changes might be required to address midwifery workforce shortages. Additionally, further research is warranted to select, adapt, and test effective implementation strategies for programme adoption.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

What problem did the study address? The adoption of upright positions during the second stage of labour could promote better maternal and neonatal outcomes and a positive childbirth experience. However, the adoption of upright positions during the second stage of labour is suboptimal in healthcare settings in China. Barriers and facilitators of implementing upright positions during childbirth are unclear. What were the main findings? A range of barriers and facilitators within the CFIR framework to promote upright positions during childbirth from healthcare professionals' perspectives were identified, and the major barriers included safety concerns towards and unfamiliarity with an upright position birth, inadequate facilities and staffing, and a lack of readiness to change in the clinical setting. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study will enable a better understanding of the barriers and facilitators to promoting upright positions in the second stage of labour in China. The smooth and effective implementation of the UPSSL programme could help to promote better maternal and neonatal outcomes and improve women's childbirth experiences.

REPORTING METHOD

The reporting of this study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) and Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

In this study, healthcare professionals were involved in refining the topic guides and survey questions. Additionally, findings from the interviews were returned to them for comments and corrections.

Quality assessment of systematic reviews with meta-analysis in undergraduate nursing education

BACKGROUND

Little attention has been given to the methodological quality of meta-analyses in nursing education. This warrants further improvements in meta-analyses in nursing education.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the methodological quality of meta-analysis in the field of undergraduate nursing education.

DESIGN

This was a methodological study to review the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analysis.

METHODS

Exhaustive literature searches were performed using five comprehensive databases. Between 1994 and 2022, 11,827 studies were identified, and 41 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. Two researchers extracted data using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)-2. The Chi-square test was conducted to make comparisons before and after 2017, the year AMSTAR-2 was released.

RESULTS

A comprehensive literature retrieval strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature selection, and data extraction were observed in nursing education more than in other disciplines. Improvements to be made include pre-specifying the protocol, providing a list of excluded studies with their exclusion reasons, reporting the source of funding for the included studies, assessing and discussing the potential impact of risk of bias, as well as investigating and discussing publication bias and its impact.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of SRs with meta-analyses in nursing education is increasing. This warrants efforts to improve the quality of research. In addition, guidelines for reporting SRs in the field of nursing education should be constantly updated.

Practice Programme for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour: the development of a complex intervention based on the Medical Research Council Framework

AIMS

This study aimed to develop a Practice Programme for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour to provide a reference for midwifery professionals in the standardized implementation of upright positions in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

The adoption of upright positions in the second stage of labour is recommended by many international organizations, but upright positions have not been widely used and their implementation varies greatly across studies.

METHODS

The Practice Programme for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour was developed under the guidance of the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions and the World Health Organization handbook for guideline development. Four stages were conducted: (1) establishing the intervention development group; (2) identifying a theoretical basis and forming a content framework; (3) evidence retrieval and synthesis; (4) refining and modelling the practice programme.

RESULTS

The content framework of the Practice Programme for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour was formed based on the literature review, semi- structured interviews and expert consultation, including indications and contraindications, implementation methods, observations, potential risks and precautions. According to each item, we conducted a series of systematic reviews, and summarized the available best evidence from clinical guidelines, systematic reviews and original studies. Eventually, the Practice Programme for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour was developed, integrating the findings of the iterative evidence reviews and revised by stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

This study firstly reported the development process of the Practice Programme for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour, characterized by evidence-based, iteratively-processed, and highly-rigorous. The implications may guide researchers to embed the intervention normatively into clinical practice for improving maternal and infant outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

Facilitate systematic labour position management, and guide midwives in the successful implementation of upright positions.

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a practice programme for upright positions in the second stage of labour in China: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

Upright positions in the second stage of labour are recommended by many labour and birth guidelines, but they have not been widely used in China and the implementation varies greatly. Given this, we developed a Practice Programme for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour (UPSSL Programme). Whether the UPSSL Programme can be translated into action in the local context is a crucial issue that needs to be further explored. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the UPSSL Programme in the Chinese context to facilitate the integration of evidence and routine clinical practice.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative design was adopted.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the maternity unit of a tertiary general hospital in China.

PARTICIPANTS

A purposeful sampling was used to recruit midwives, obstetricians and their leaders. Data were collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide the development of interview guide and the analysis of qualitative data. The study was reported following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.

FINDINGS

Twelve eligible participants were interviewed, including eight midwives, two obstetricians, the head nurse of the delivery room, and the head of the maternity unit. Eight barriers and 10 facilitators were identified by using the directed content analysis. The barriers to implementing the UPSSL Programme were professionals' concerns about the potential risks of the programme (relative advantage), higher complexity (complexity), placement method of upright positions presented without pictures (design quality & packaging), staff shortage (cost), limited understanding of parturients' needs (patient needs & resources), lack of a training protocol for professionals (available resources), professionals' limited knowledge and skills in the programme (knowledge & beliefs about the intervention), and lack of confidence in the successful implementation of the programme (self-efficacy).

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Participants expressed several barriers and facilitators to implementing the UPSSL Programme in clinical practice in the Chinese context.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings provide a reference for the development of targeted implementation strategies that could promote the integration of evidence and routine clinical practice, and thus facilitate the normative application and promotion of upright positions in China.

The birthing room and its influence on the promotion of a normal physiological childbirth - a qualitative interview study with midwives in Sweden

The birthing room is a major workplace for midwives but how it influences them in practice is not enough investigated.Purpose: This study aimed to explore midwives´ experiences of how the birthing room affects them in their work to promote a normal physiological birth.Methods: A phenomenological reflective lifeworld research approach was used and included individual interviews with 15 midwives working at four different hospitals in western Sweden, and of which two also assisted at homebirths. The analysis focused on the meanings of the study phenomenon.Results: A birthing room can by its design either support a normal physiological birth or support a risk approach to childbirth. Four opposing constituents complete the essential meaning of the birthing rooms, and to which the midwives need to relate in their roles as guardians for normal birth: i) a private or a public room; ii) a home-like or hospital-like room; iii) a room promoting activity or passivity; iv) a room promoting the midwife´s presence or absence.Conclusions: The birthing room mirrors a pathogenic-oriented care approach. A presupposition for the work to keep the birth bubble intact is to protect the mother from disturbing elements both inside and outside the room.