A randomized comparison of a five-minute versus fifteen-minute lockout interval for PCEA during labor

ED90 of epidural esketamine with 0.075% ropivacaine for labor analgesia in nulliparous parturients: a prospective, randomized and dose-finding study

Background: Because it has been reported that racemic ketamine had a local anesthetic-sparing effect when used for epidural analgesia this would suggest the likelihood of a potential advantage (less pruritus) over opioid drugs. Esketamine has greater analgesic efficacy than racemic ketamine, but the optimum dosage regimen for epidural use is undetermined. The aim of this study was to determine the ED₉₀ of epidural esketamine when coadministered with 0.075% ropivacaine for labor analgesia. Methods: A total of 65 laboring nulliparous patients were enrolled in this study from 16 March 2022 to 15 October 2022. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 or 1.0 mg/mL esketamine with 0.075% ropivacaine epidurally. An effective response to the epidural loading dose was defined as numerical rating scale pain score ≤3 at 30 min after the end of the epidural loading dose (10 mL of the ropivacaine 0.075% solution with the added esketamine). The ED₉₀ of epidural esketamine coadministered with 0.075% ropivacaine with 95% confidence intervals for labor analgesia was determined using probit regression. Secondary outcomes and side effects were recorded. Results: The estimated value of ED₉₀ with 95% CIs for epidural esketamine with 0.075% ropivacaine was 0.983 (0.704-2.468) mg/mL. The characteristics of sensory and motor block, consumption of ropivacaine per hour, duration of first or second stage, Apgar scores did not differ among the five groups. The incidence of mild dizziness in Group esketamine 1.0 mg/mL was significantly higher than that in other groups (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found in other side effects among groups. Conclusion: The ED₉₀ value of epidural esketamine coadministered with 0.075% ropivacaine for labor analgesia in nulliparous parturients was about 1.0 mg/mL. Furthermore, our results suggested that epidural esketamine would cause dose-dependent mild dizziness especially at doses up to 1.0 mg/mL. As a single epidural additive, esketamine may not be suitable for labor analgesia. Future studies may investigate the appropriate dosage of esketamine at slightly higher concentrations of local anesthetics or larger initial volume of analgesia, or explore other potential advantages of esketamine. Clinical Trial Registration: (https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=159764), identifier (ChiCTR2200057662).

Analgesic effects of sufentanil in combination with flurbiprofen axetil and dexmedetomidine after open gastrointestinal tumor surgery: a retrospective study

Background

To investigated the effects of sufentanil in combination with flurbiprofen axetil and dexmedetomidine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on patients after open gastrointestinal tumor surgery, and compared this combination with traditional PCIA with pure opioids or epidural analgesia (PCEA).

Methods

Patients (n = 640) who underwent open gastrointestinal tumor surgery and received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) were included. According to the type of PCA, patients were assigned to three groups: MPCIA (PCIA with sufentanil, flurbiprofen axetil, dexmedetomidine and metoclopramide), OPCIA (PCIA with sufentanil, tramadol and metoclopramide) and PCEA group (PCEA with sufentanil and ropivacaine). The characteristics of patients, intraoperative use of analgesics, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), postoperative adverse reactions and postoperative recovery were collected. The primary outcome was postoperative VAS score. One-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Fisher exact probability method, and binary logistic regression analysis were used for analysis.

Results

There were no significant differences in the characteristics of patients, operation time, tumor site and the use of postoperative rescue analgesics among the groups. In the first two days after open gastrointestinal tumor surgery, the VAS (expressed by median and interquartile range) of MPCIA (24^th h, resting: 1,1; movement: 3,2. 48^th h, resting: 0,1; movement: 2,1.) and PCEA (24^th h, resting: 0,1; movement: 2,1. 48^th h, resting: 0,1; movement: 2,2.) groups were significantly lower than those of OPCIA group (24^th h, resting: 2.5,2; movement: 4,2. 48^th h, resting: 1.5,1.75; movement: 3,1.) (all p <  0.01). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in MPCIA group was 13.6% on the first day after surgery, which was significantly higher than that in PCEA group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of other postoperative adverse events. Higher intraoperative sufentanil dosage (OR (95%CI) = 1.017 (1.002–1.031), p = 0.021), lower body mass index (OR (95%CI) = 2.081 (1.059–4.089), p = 0.033), and tumor location above duodenum (OR (95%CI) = 2.280 (1.445–3.596), p <  0.001) were associated with poor postoperative analgesia.

Conclusions

The analgesic effects of PCIA with sufentanil in combination with flurbiprofen axetil and dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia was better than that of traditional pure opioids PCIA, and similar with that of PCEA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01670-0.

Effects of different epidural initiation volumes on postoperative analgesia in cesarean section

Background/aim

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different epidural initiation volumes on postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, and side effects in pregnant women administered patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain after cesarean sections.

Materials and methods

Eighty-one pregnant women, aged 18–45 years, were included in this randomized, double-blind study. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia was administered for each cesarean section. The patients were divided into 3 groups and different volumes (20 mL, 10 mL, and 5 mL) of the study drug (0.0625% bupivacaine plus 2 μg/mL of fentanyl) were administered 90 min after the spinal block via epidural catheter. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest and during movement, first PCEA dose time, number of PCEA doses required per hour, total analgesic consumed, and side effects were recorded postoperatively.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences among the groups in terms of the VAS rest and VAS movement scores. The times to the first analgesic dose requirement were longer in Group 10 and Group 20 than in Group 5. The analgesic requirement during the first 2 h was lower in Group 20 than in the other groups.

Conclusions

The PCEA initiations with different volumes provided similar pain scores. However, the 20 mL volume resulted in a lower analgesic dose requirement during the early postoperative period, and it also delayed the requirement for analgesia.

[Labor pain worries future fathers more than the mothers]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the concerns of the future father about labor pain and another 9 items which could be important to the well-being of the mother during delivery. To investigate any possible differences in opinion between the future father and mother.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An anonymous and voluntary questionnaire was offered to the father and the pregnant patient during the last month of pregnancy. They had to answer the questionnaire separately, scoring 10 items in a 0-10 point ordinal scale, according to their concerns and the importance for the good development of the delivery (0= not concerned about/insignificant to 10=concerned about/great importance). The items included were: 1) esthetic aftermath, 2) embarassment, 3) continous information, 4) walking during labor, 5) drinking during labor, 6) companionship, 7) labor pain, 8) keeping composure, 9) kindness, 10) room comfortability. Data on age, education, parity and nationality were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 147 questionnaires were completed, 99 by mothers, and 48 by fathers. Pain was the most important concern for the future fathers scoring a mean (SD) of 8.15 (2), while continuous information 7.71 (2.5), kindness 7.9 (2.1), and companionship 8.21 (2.3) were more important than pain for mothers. A statistically significant difference was found between fathers and mothers regarding labor pain (P=.001), walking during labor (P=.003), and drinking during labor (P=.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The result of our study suggests that increasing the presence of the father during the delivery process, and taking care of the emotional aspects and the quality of the information given could be very important for the perception of satisfaction.

A randomized controlled trial of three patient-controlled epidural analgesia regimens for labor

BACKGROUND

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is a safe and effective mode of maintaining labor analgesia; however, the ideal PCEA regimen is controversial.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we examined the analgesic efficacy of demand-only PCEA and PCEA with background infusion. We recruited 300 nulliparous parturients. Analgesia was initiated with intrathecal ropivacaine 2 mg and fentanyl 15 microg and maintained with epidural ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 2 microg/mL. Parturients were randomized to one of three groups. Group 0: demand-only PCEA, bolus of 5 mL, lockout interval of 15 min. Group 5: background infusion of 5 mL/h, bolus of 5 mL, lockout interval of 12 min. Group 10: background infusion of 10 mL/h, bolus of 5 mL, lockout interval of 10 min. The maximum dose of all groups was 20 mL/h. The primary outcome was incidence of breakthrough pain. Secondary outcomes included intrapartum pain scores, neuraxial blockade characteristics, side effects, the total and hourly volume of ropivacaine, neonatal outcomes, and obstetric outcomes.

RESULTS

The incidence of breakthrough pain and the maximum visual analog scale (0-100 mm scale) pain scores were higher in Group 0 versus Groups 5 and 10 (43% vs 17% and 11%, P < 0.001 and 37 +/- 28 vs 22 +/- 26 and 16 +/- 25 [mean +/- SD], P < 0.001), respectively. Group 10 had a longer duration of effective analgesia compared with Group 0 (mean 895 min, 95% CI 823-966 vs 565 min, 95% CI 454-677, P < 0.001) and increased ropivacaine consumption, and was associated with a longer duration of the second stage of labor.

CONCLUSION

Demand-only PCEA (5-mL bolus, 15-min lockout interval) resulted in less local anesthetic consumption but an increased incidence of breakthrough pain, higher pain scores, shorter duration of effective analgesia, and lower maternal satisfaction, when compared with PCEA with background infusion (5-mL bolus, 10-12-min lockout interval, and 5-10 mL/h infusion).

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with or without a background infusion following initial spinal analgesia for labor pain

BACKGROUND

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) combined with spinal analgesia is an option for pain relief in labor. However, the effect of a CBI on the analgesic requirements of laboring women is still debated. This double-blind study investigated the effect of CBI with PCEA following spinal analgesia on the local anesthetic requirements of parturients during labor.

METHODS

Sixty-six nulliparous women were randomly assigned to a standard PCEA protocol (5-mL demand bolus, 10-min lockout) with or without a CBI of 6 mL/h. The epidural solution consisted of 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 microg/mL. Labor analgesia was initiated in both groups with intrathecal bupivacaine 2.5 mg plus fentanyl 25 microg. The number of demands per hour and the hourly dose of ropivacaine were calculated for both groups.

RESULTS

The median [range] number of analgesic boluses per hour in the PCEA group that were demanded: 2.4 [0.8-12.2] and delivered: 1.6 [0.8-2.6], were significantly greater than those in the PCEA+CBI group: 0.7 [0.4-4.2] and 0.6 [0.2-1.3] (P 0.05). However, the hourly ropivacaine dose in the PCEA group (7.9 [3.9-13.2] mg/h) was not significantly different from that in the PCEA+CBI group (8.4 [6.0-12.5] mg/h).

CONCLUSION

In laboring nulliparous patients provided initial labor analgesia with spinal anesthesia, the use of a continuous background infusion decreases PCEA demand dosing, but not the total hourly amount of ropivacaine and fentanyl used.

“Ultra-light” patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: effects of varying regimens on analgesia and physician workload

BACKGROUND

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) offers many advantages over continuous epidural infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. Some of these benefits may depend on the PCEA settings. This study evaluated several regimens for "ultra-light" (0.125%) PCEA with basal continuous infusion (CI) in labor with goals of minimizing physician interventions while providing good analgesia.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty ASA I-II women receiving epidural analgesia during active labor (cervical dilation <5 cm) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four treatment groups (n=30 in each). Analgesia was maintained with a PCEA/CI pump using bupivacaine 0.0625% + sufentanil 0.35 microg/mL. PCEA settings were: group A: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group B: CI 10 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout; group C: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 6 mL, 8-min lockout; group D: CI 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 12 mL, 16-min lockout.

RESULTS

In groups A, B, C and D, 76, 77, 75 and 85% of parturients respectively, required no physician rescue boluses. Pain scores were low and maternal satisfaction was high in all groups, with minimal differences among them. Spontaneous vaginal delivery occurred in 78% of patients overall, instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery in 10% and cesarean section in 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

These ultra-light PCEA regimens provided excellent analgesia with minimal physician workload and a high spontaneous delivery rate. Use of moderate to high-volume, ultra-light PCEA/CI techniques should facilitate provision of labor analgesia in busy obstetric units.