Novel vital signs-controlled, patient-assisted intravenous analgesia using remifentanil for labour and delivery

Analysis of Physiological Respiratory Variable Alarm Alerts Among Laboring Women Receiving Remifentanil

BACKGROUND

Remifentanil may be used by laboring women for analgesia, despite controversy because of potential apneas. We evaluated candidate variables as early warning alerts for apnea, based on prevalence, positive predictive rate, sensitivity for apnea event detection, and early warning alert time intervals (lead time) for apnea.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of respiratory physiological data that had been collected during a prospective IRB-approved study of laboring women receiving IV patient-controlled boluses of remifentanil 20 to 60 μg every 1 to 2 minutes. Analyzed data included the respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), pulse oximetry (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI; Capnostream 20; Medtronic, Boulder, CO) that had been recorded continuously throughout labor. We defined immediate early warning alerts as any drop in a variable value below a prespecified threshold for 15 seconds: RR < 8 breaths per minute (bpm), EtCO2 < 15 mm Hg, and SpO2 < 92%. We defined alerts as "sustained" when the value remained below the threshold for ≥ 10 further seconds. The IPI value (1 to 10; 10 = healthy patient, ≤4 = immediate attention required, 1 = dire condition) was generated from a proprietary algorithm using RR, EtCO2, SpO2, and HR parameters. Apnea was defined as maximal CO2 < 5 mm Hg for at least 30 consecutive seconds.

RESULTS

We counted 62 apneas, among 10 of 19 (52.6%) women who received remifentanil (total dose 1725 ± 1392 μg, administered over 160 ± 132 minutes). We counted 331 immediate early warning alerts for the variables; 271 (82%) alerts were sustained for ≥10 seconds. The positive predictive value of alerts for apnea was 35.8% (99% confidence interval [CI]: 27.1-45.6), 28.9% (99% CI: 20.8-38.7), 4.3% (99% CI: 1.9-9.6), and 24.6% (99% CI: 18.3-32.2) for RR, EtCO2, SpO2, and IPI, respectively. The sensitivity for apnea event detection was 100% (99% CI: 90.3-100) for RR (<8 bpm) and IPI (≤4); 75.8% (99% CI: 59.8-86.9) for EtCO2 <15 mm Hg; and 14.5% (99% CI: 6.5-29.4) for SpO2 <92%. We found a statistically significant difference in the timing of RR, EtCO2, SpO2, and IPI alerts for apnea; Friedman's Q = 33.53; P < .0001. The EtCO2 had a median (interquartile range) lead time of -0.2 (-12.2 to 0.7) seconds, and SpO2 had a median (interquartile range) lead time of 40.0 (40.0 to 40.0) seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of women receiving IV remifentanil for labor analgesia experienced apneas. Alerts for EtCO2 (<15 mm Hg), RR (<8 bpm), and IPI (≤4) detected most apneas, whereas SpO2 alerts missed the majority of apneas. All variables had a low positive predictive rate, demonstrating the limitations of the respiratory monitors utilized as early warning surveillance for apneas in this setting.

A case series of vital signs-controlled, patient-assisted intravenous analgesia (VPIA) using remifentanil for labour and delivery

Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia can be used during labour as an alternative to epidural analgesia. Adverse effects of opioids, including hypoxia and bradycardia, may lead to maternal morbidity and mortality. We devised an interactive feedback system based on a clinical proportional algorithm, to continuously monitor for adverse effects to enhance safety and better titrate analgesia. This vital signs-controlled, patient-assisted intravenous analgesia with remifentanil used a prototype delivery system linked to a pulse oximeter that evaluated maternal oxygen saturation and heart rate continuously. With this system, we detected oxygen saturation < 95% for more than 60 s in 15 of 29 subjects (52%); and heart rate < 60 min^-1 for more than 60 s in 7 of 29 subjects (24%) during use. The system automatically responded appropriately by reducing the dosages and temporarily halting remifentanil administration, thus averting further hypoxia and bradycardia.

Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia remifentanil for labor analgesia: time to stop, think and reconsider

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Remifentanil is a relatively new but commonly used opioid alternative in the management of labor pain relief. The present article evaluates efficacy and safety of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with remifentanil in the management of labor pain relief.

RECENT FINDINGS

Remifentanil PCIA provides analgesia that is superior to nitrous oxide or other opioids such as meperidine, but is less effective when compared with epidural analgesia. Recent evidence suggests it produces significant respiratory depression making routine use as first line analgesia strategy virtually impossible.

SUMMARY

Remifentanil PCIA is a valuable analgesic strategy whenever regional analgesia is contraindicated. Using it as first line strategy seems to be contraindicated because of significant respiratory side-effects to the mother. Whenever used advanced and continuous monitoring using capnography, saturation monitoring and one-to-one midwifery care are mandatory!

Effect-site concentration of remifentanil during patient-controlled analgesia in labour

BACKGROUND

Intravenous remifentanil has been described for patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Recently, the application of target-controlled infusion pumps with Minto's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model has been reported. Hypothetical effect-site remifentanil concentration during patient-controlled analgesia for labour has yet to be examined. The aim of this concept study was to explore characteristics of this parameter.

METHODS

We performed a historical cohort study based on our previous randomised cross-over clinical trial and analysed hypothetical effect-site remifentanil concentration. Values at spontaneous vaginal delivery and Apgar scores were tested for correlation. The association between pain score and the corresponding effect-site remifentanil concentration before and after bolus administration, and their relative difference, was examined with a linear mixed-effects model, adjusted for other variables.

RESULTS

A series of 23 parturients with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies were included. On average, effect-site remifentanil concentration was highest during the third quarter throughout our recordings (5.5ng/mL; maximum 15.8ng/mL). The mean (median) {IQR} [range] at spontaneous vaginal delivery (n=14) was 2.52 (1.32) {0.95-4.28} [0.65-6.88] ng/mL, all Apgar scores were >7, and no correlation was confirmed. A negative association between effect-site remifentanil concentration before bolus administration and pain score (scale 0-100) was observed (-3.9, 95% CI -5.16 to -2.61, P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The residual value of hypothetical effect-site remifentanil concentration before uterine contraction, at the beginning of bolus administration, predicted lower pain scores. Monitoring effect-site remifentanil concentration may be potentially useful when remifentanil is administered for labour analgesia. However, our results need to be confirmed with a pharmacokinetic model optimized for pregnant patients.