The effects of a resistive warming mattress during caesarean section: a randomised, controlled trial

The effect of forced-air warming in the cesarean section on maternal hypothermia, shivering, and thermal comfort: A randomized controlled trial

This trial was carried out to investigate the effect of forced air warming in various body areas of women on hypothermia during cesarean delivery. The patients in the study groups (n = 76) were assigned to the full-body warming group, upper-extremity warming group, lower-extremity warming group, and control groups. The intervention groups received forced-air warming 30 min before the surgery and continued until 30 min after surgery. The incidence of hypothermia was significantly higher in the control group than in the other groups at the 60th minute of the operation (p < 0.01). The intervention and control groups showed significant differences in the frequency of shivering at the entrance to the PACU (p = 0.001). Thermal comfort scores have significant difference between the control group and all of the intervention groups (p<.001). It is said that the full-body forced-air warming technique prevents hypothermia, shivering, and thermal discomfort in women Cesarean Section (CS).

Resistive Warming Mattress, Forced-Air Warming System, or a Combination of the Two in the Prevention of Intraoperative Inadvertent Hypothermia: A Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To prevent intraoperative inadvertent hypothermia (IIH), resistive products and forced-air warming systems are often used simultaneously. There is insufficient evidence to show whether this application is clinically more effective than a single active warming device. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy a single intraoperative active warming method with combined methods in IIH prevention.

DESIGN

A randomized, prospective, experimental study.

METHODS

This study was conducted between June and October 2021 in the operating room of a training and research hospital. The study sample consisted of 123 patients who underwent scheduled orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia, were young (18-64), and had an ASA risk score of I to III. The patients were divided into three groups preoperatively according to the stratified randomization technique. To prevent IIH, a resistive warming mattress was used in group 1; a forced-air warming system was used in group 2; and a combination of the two methods were used in group 3. The body temperatures of the patients were measured and recorded every 15 minutes from admission to the operating room until the end of surgery.

FINDINGS

The mean intraoperative body temperature of the patients was 36.6±0.15˚C for group 1; 36.6±0.1˚C for Group 2 and 36.6 ± 0.15˚C for Group 3. There was no difference between the groups in terms of body temperature. The overall incidence of IIH was 8.1%; 9.8% in group 1, 9.8% in group 2 and 4.9% in group 3. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of IIH (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the efficacy of using resistive warming mattress and forced-air warming systems in preventing IIH. The use of both methods together made no difference in terms of IIH development.

Combined Forced Air Warming and Warm Intravenous Fluid Strategy for Perioperative Hypothermia in Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Evaluate the effect of a combined forced-air warming (FAW) and warm intravenous fluid (IVF) modality on maternal and neonatal outcomes in cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

DESIGN

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

METHODS

An extensive search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and other grey literature. Only randomized controlled trials examining the combined modality on maternal temperatures were included. Risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to estimate outcomes with suitable effect models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Risk of Bias and GRADE system.

FINDINGS

Nine trials involving 595 patients were included. Combined strategy showed a smaller change in maternal temperature from baseline by 0.42°C (MD, -0.42; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.22; P < .0001), higher temperature on PACU arrival (MD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.11-0.82; P = .01), 15 minutes (MD, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-0.67; P = .0004) and 30 minutes after surgery (MD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.12-0.64; P = .005). Combined strategy also reduced the incidence of hypothermia (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.95; P = .03), and shivering (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.28-0.58; P < .00001) with improvement in maternal comfort score (SMD; 0.38; 95% CI, 0.08-0.69; P = .01). However, there were no differences in clinical indicators of adverse neonatal outcomes. Lack of participants blinding, and substantial heterogeneity were limitations of this review.

CONCLUSION

The use of combined FAW and warm IVF is an effective strategy in mitigating perioperative hypothermia in cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

Development and validation of a risk prediction scale for hypothermia during cesarean section: A prospective study

Background

Evidence shows that active insulation can reduce the incidence of hypothermia during cesarean section; however, compliance is lower than recommended. Moreover, several aspects of temperature management via active heat preservation remain unclear, including patient indications, timing, methods, and duration. Therefore, promptly identifying parturients at a high risk for hypothermia during cesarean section is crucial.

Objective

To develop and validate a scale for predicting hypothermia in parturients during cesarean section.

Design

Prospective study.

Setting

Three grade A hospitals in Hunan Province, China.

Participants

The prediction scale was developed based on data from 369 parturients who underwent cesarean section from July 2018 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria were as follows: cesarean section under lumbar anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or combined lumbar and epidural anesthesia; voluntary participation in the study and completion of the informed consent form; age >18 years.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors influencing hypothermia and establish the predictive model for hypothermia risk during cesarean section. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to determine the goodness of fit of the prediction tool, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the predictive ability of the proposed scale. The cutoff value of the prediction scale was determined according to the Youden index.

Results

In the logistic regression prediction model, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test yielded a p-value of 0.425. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.888. The model exhibited a good fitting effect and discriminant validity. Total risk scores for hypothermia ranged from 0 to 11. A score of 7 was used as the diagnostic cutoff value. Parturients during the operation who had total scores of ≥7 and <7 were considered the high-risk and low-risk groups, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the scale was 0.891. The authenticity evaluation indicated that the incidence of hypothermia was significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group.

Conclusions

The risk prediction scale developed in this study exhibits moderately predictive efficiency, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying parturients at high risk of hypothermia during cesarean section. Implementing this scale in clinical practice may help to decrease the incidence of hypothermia in such patients.

Tweetable

 .

abstract

This new predictive model can identify women who are at a high risk of hypothermia during cesarean section.

Effect of active and passive warming on preventing hypothermia and shivering during cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Perioperative hypothermia and shivering commonly occur in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section. The warming method is usually used to prevent hypothermia and shivering. However, the effect of active warming (AW) prior to passive warming (PW) on the perioperative outcomes of pregnant women and their offspring remains controversial.

METHODS

This study aimed to investigate the effects of AW and PW on maternal and newborn perioperative outcomes during cesarean delivery. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were used to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to August 7, 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess articles selected for the systematic review. Continuous data were analyzed using weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and categorical data were analyzed by the random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 1241 participants from twelve RCTs were selected for the final meta-analysis. AW was associated with a lower risk of maternal hypothermia (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63-0.93, P = 0.007) and shivering (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.85; P = 0.007). AW was associated with high maternal temperature (WMD: 0.27, 95%CI: 0.14 to 0.40, P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between AW and PW in terms of hypothermia (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.24-1.51, P = 0.278), temperature (WMD: 0.31, 95% CI: - 0.00 to 0.62; P = 0.050), and umbilical vein PH in newborns (WMD: -0.00; 95% CI: - 0.02 to 0.02, P = 0.710).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that AW can better prevent maternal hypothermia and shivering than PW. In contrast, no significant effect was observed in newborns. Overall, the quality of the included studies is high due to RCTs, low risk of bias, consistency, and precision. We identified the quality of the overall evidence from the survey to be GRADE I.

Maternal temperature in emergency caesarean section (MATES): an observational multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Temperature regulation in women undergoing emergency caesarean section is a complex topic about which there is a paucity of evidence-based recommendations. The adverse effects of inadvertent peri-operative hypothermia are well described. Hyperthermia is also associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, an increased risk of obstetric intervention and increased treatment for suspected sepsis. We conducted a multi-centre observational cohort study to identify the prevalence of hypothermia and hyperthermia during emergency caesarean section. S: Participants undergoing emergency caesarean section were recruited across 14 sites in the UK. The primary end point was maternal temperature in the recovery room. Temperature was measured using a zero heat-flux temperature monitoring device.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-five participants were recruited over a 12-month period. The prevalence of hypothermia (<36.0°C) was 10.7% and the prevalence of hyperthermia (>37.5°C) was 14.7% on admission to recovery. The prevalence of hypothermia, normothermia, and hyperthermia differed among type of anaesthesia: 71.4% of the hypothermic group had received a spinal anaesthetic whereas 76.9% of the hyperthermic group had received epidural top-up anaesthesia. There was a significant decrease in maternal temperature between the time of delivery and admission to the recovery room of 0.20°C (95% CI 0.15 to 0.25, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both hypothermia and hyperthermia are prevalent findings in mothers who undergo emergency caesarean section. Therefore, accurate temperature measurement is essential to ensure that an appropriate intra-operative temperature management strategy is employed.

Improving intraoperative temperature management in elective repeat cesarean deliveries: a retrospective observational cohort study

Background

Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (< 36 °C) occurs frequently during elective cesarean delivery and most institutions do employ perioperative active warming. The purpose of this retrospective observational cohort study was to determine if the addition of preoperative forced air warming in conjunction with intraoperative underbody forced air warming improved core temperature and reducing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia during elective repeat elective cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia.

Methods

We evaluated the addition of perioperative active warming to standard passive warming methods (preheated intravenous/irrigation fluids and cotton blankets) in 120 parturients scheduled for repeat elective cesarean delivery (passive warming, n = 60 vs. active + passive warming, n = 60) in a retrospective observational cohort study. The primary outcomes of interest were core temperature at the end of the procedure and a decrease in inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (< 36 °C). Secondary outcomes were surgical site infections and adverse markers of neonatal outcome.

Results

The mean temperature at the end of surgery after instituting the active warming protocol was 36.0 ± 0.5 °C (mean ± SD, 95% CI 35.9–36.1) vs. 35.4 ± 0.5 °C (mean ± SD, 95% CI 35.3–35.5) compared to passive warming techniques (p <  0.001) and the incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia at the end of the procedure was less in the active warming group - 68% versus 92% in the control group (p <  0.001). There was no difference in surgical site infections or neonatal outcomes.

Conclusions

Perioperative active warming in combination with passive warming techniques was associated with a higher maternal temperature and lower incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia with no detectable differences in surgical site infections or indicators of adverse neonatal outcomes.

Forced-Air Warming for Rewarming and Comfort Following Laparoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trail

We investigated the efficacy of a forced-air warming (FAW) system on postoperative rewarming and comfort in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. In this randomized controlled trial, a total of 127 participants were randomly divided into the FAW group ( n = 64) and control group ( n = 63). The esophageal temperature was measured every 30 min during surgery, and the tympanic temperature and comfort levels were measured preoperatively and in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Data analysis used the generalized estimating equation. We found that there was a lower incidence of postoperative hypothermia in the FAW group compared with the control group, as well as a higher body temperature between 30 and 180 min in the PACU, a shorter time for rewarming, and a higher comfort level. Taken together, these results suggest that FAW is an effective rewarming technique for laparoscopic patients during surgery and in the PACU that improves comfort levels.

Effectiveness of active and passive warming for the prevention of inadvertent hypothermia in patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Perioperative hypothermia is a common complication of anesthesia that can result in negative outcomes. The purpose of this review is to answer the question: Does the type of warming intervention influence the frequency or severity of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH) in surgical patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia?

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Perioperative care areas.

PATIENTS

Adults undergoing surgery with neuraxial anesthesia.

INTERVENTION

Perioperative active warming (AW) or passive warming (PW).

MEASUREMENTS

PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trials; adults undergoing surgery with neuraxial anesthesia; comparison(s) of AW and PW; and temperature measured at end of surgery/upon arrival in the Postanesthesia Care Unit. Exclusion criteria were: no full-text available; not published in English; studies of: combined neuraxial and general anesthesia, warm intravenous or irrigation fluids without using AW, and rewarming after hypothermia. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and titles, and selected records following full-text review. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used to evaluate study quality. A random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 1587 records, 25 studies (2048 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Eleven studies (1189 patients) comparing AW versus PW were included in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis found that intraoperative AW is more effective than PW in reducing the incidence of IPH during neuraxial anesthesia (RR=0.71; 95% CI 0.61-0.83; p<0.0001; I²=32%). The qualitative synthesis revealed that IPH continues despite current AW technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

During neuraxial anesthesia, AW reduces IPH more effectively than PW. Even with AW, IPH persists in some patients. Continued innovation in AW technology and additional comparative effectiveness research studying different AW methods are needed.

Active body surface warming systems for preventing complications caused by inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults

BACKGROUND

Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is a phenomenon that can occur as a result of the suppression of the central mechanisms of temperature regulation due to anaesthesia, and of prolonged exposure of large surfaces of skin to cold temperatures in operating rooms. Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia has been associated with clinical complications such as surgical site infection and wound-healing delay, increased bleeding or cardiovascular events. One of the most frequently used techniques to prevent inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is active body surface warming systems (ABSW), which generate heat mechanically (heating of air, water or gels) that is transferred to the patient via skin contact.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of pre- or intraoperative active body surface warming systems (ABSW), or both, to prevent perioperative complications from unintended hypothermia during surgery in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Issue 9, 2015); MEDLINE (PubMed) (1964 to October 2015), EMBASE (Ovid) (1980 to October 2015), and CINAHL (Ovid) (1982 to October 2015).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared an ABSW system aimed at maintaining normothermia perioperatively against a control or against any other ABSW system. Eligible studies also had to include relevant clinical outcomes other than measuring temperature alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several authors, by pairs, screened references and determined eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias. We resolved disagreements by discussion and consensus, with the collaboration of a third author.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 67 trials with 5438 participants that comprised 79 comparisons. Forty-five RCTs compared ABSW versus control, whereas 18 compared two different types of ABSW, and 10 compared two different techniques to administer the same type of ABSW. Forced-air warming (FAW) was by far the most studied intervention.Trials varied widely regarding whether the interventions were applied alone or in combination with other active (based on a different mechanism of heat transfer) and/or passive methods of maintaining normothermia. The type of participants and surgical interventions, as well as anaesthesia management, co-interventions and the timing of outcome measurement, also varied widely. The risk of bias of included studies was largely unclear due to limitations in the reports. Most studies were open-label, due to the nature of the intervention and the fact that temperature was usually the principal outcome. Nevertheless, given that outcome measurement could have been conducted in a blinded manner, we rated the risk of detection and performance bias as high.The comparison of ABSW versus control showed a reduction in the rate of surgical site infection (risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.66; 3 RCTs, 589 participants, low-quality evidence). Only one study at low risk of bias observed a beneficial effect with forced-air warming on major cardiovascular complications (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.00; 1 RCT with 12 events, 300 participants, low-quality evidence) in people at high cardiovascular risk. We found no beneficial effect for mortality. ABSW also reduced blood loss during surgery but the magnitude of this effect seems to be irrelevant (MD -46.17 mL, 95% CI -82.74 to -9.59; I² = 78%; 20 studies, 1372 participants). The same conclusion applies to total fluids infused during surgery (MD -144.49 mL, 95% CI -221.57 to -67.40; I² = 73%; 24 studies, 1491 participants). These effects did not translate into a significant reduction in the number of participants being transfused or the average amount of blood transfused. ABSW was associated with a reduction in shivering (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.54; 29 studies, 1922 participants) and in thermal comfort (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.76, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.24; I² = 77%, 4 trials, 364 participants).For the comparison between different types of ABSW system or modes of administration of a particular type of ABSW, we found no evidence for the superiority of any system in terms of clinical outcomes, except for extending systemic warming to the preoperative period in participants undergoing major abdominal surgery (one study at low risk of bias).There were limited data on adverse effects (the most relevant being thermal burns). While some trials included a narrative report mentioning that no adverse effects were observed, the majority made no reference to it. Nothing so far suggests that ABSW involves a significant risk to patients.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Forced-air warming seems to have a beneficial effect in terms of a lower rate of surgical site infection and complications, at least in those undergoing abdominal surgery, compared to not applying any active warming system. It also has a beneficial effect on major cardiovascular complications in people with substantial cardiovascular disease, although the evidence is limited to one study. It also improves patient's comfort, although we found high heterogeneity among trials. While the effect on blood loss is statistically significant, this difference does not translate to a significant reduction in transfusions. Again, we noted high heterogeneity among trials for this outcome. The clinical relevance of blood loss reduction is therefore questionable. The evidence for other types of ABSW is scant, although there is some evidence of a beneficial effect in the same direction on chills/shivering with electric or resistive-based heating systems. Some evidence suggests that extending systemic warming to the preoperative period could be more beneficial than limiting it only to during surgery. Nothing suggests that ABSW systems pose a significant risk to patients.The difficulty in observing a clinically-relevant beneficial effect with ABSW in outcomes other than temperature may be explained by the fact that many studies applied concomitant procedures that are routinely in place as co-interventions to prevent hypothermia, whether passive or active warming systems based in other physiological mechanisms (e.g. irrigation fluid or gas warming), as well as a stricter control of temperature in the context of the study compared with usual practice. These may have had a beneficial effect on the participants in the control group, leading to an underestimation of the net benefit of ABSW.