Uterotonic drug usage in Canada: a snapshot of the practice in obstetric units of university-affiliated hospitals

Trends and regional variations in prescriptions dispensed to stimulate uterine contractions at the end of pregnancy in Belgium: A community-based study from 2003 to 2018

PURPOSE

To investigate trends and regional variations in uterotonics dispensed around birth between 2003 and 2018 in Belgium.

METHODS

Data, including outpatient and inpatient prescriptions were extracted from a nationally representative prescription database. The prevalence of uterotonics dispensed during a period including the 7 days before birth, the delivery day and the 7 days after birth was computed over three 4-year-long study periods from 2003 to 2018. The trends between periods and associations between the use of at least one uterotonic and maternal age, region of residence, delivery type and social status were assessed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 31 675 pregnancies were included in the study. The proportion of pregnancies exposed to at least one uterotonic decreased significantly from 92.9% (95%CI, 92.3-93.4) in 2003-2006 to 91.4% (95%CI, 90.7-92.0) in 2015-2018 for vaginal births and from 95.5% (95%CI, 94.5-96.4) to 93.7% (95%CI, 92.6-94.7) for caesarean sections. However, for vaginal births, the proportion of oxytocin increased from 84.5% (95%CI, 83.7-85.2) to 89% (95%CI 88.3-89.7). A significant association was found between uterotonic agent use and maternal age, region of residence, and delivery type. The dispensation of some uterotonic agents differed significantly between the regions.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of pregnancies exposed to at least one uterotonic was high across the study period but decreased slightly between 2003 and 2018. Important variations in uterotonic use between regions highlight the need for improved national guidance.

A survey of anaesthetists on uterotonic usage practices for elective caesarean section in Australia and New Zealand

Prophylactic administration of uterotonics ensures adequate uterine contraction at elective caesarean section to prevent substantial haemorrhage. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines advise the administration of oxytocin 5 IU as a 'slow bolus' but there are variations in clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the beliefs and uterotonic usage practices at elective caesarean section by surveying anaesthetist members of the Obstetric Anaesthesia Special Interest Group in Australia and New Zealand. Questionnaires were emailed to Obstetric Anaesthesia Special Interest Group members and the response rate was 33%, with analysis of 279 completed reports. Oxytocin was the most commonly used first-line uterotonic, but extensive variation in oxytocin bolus use was identified. Thirty-eight percent of anaesthetists routinely administered Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guideline-recommended 5 IU, whereas 38% favoured low dose (<5 IU), 10% high dose (≥10 IU) oxytocin, and 13% carbetocin (100 µg). More than 50% felt the evidence was weak for guideline-recommended 5 IU. Wide variation in the duration of oxytocin administration was also identified. Fifty-eight percent of anaesthetists routinely gave follow-up oxytocin infusions, most commonly at 40 IU over four hours, but there was significant variation in the dosage (10-40 IU) and administration duration (one hour to ≥six hours). In conclusion, there is significant variation in oxytocin usage practices at elective caesarean section among Australian and New Zealand anaesthetists. This variation may be due to a lack of strong evidence to guide practice. This emphasises the need for high quality trials in this clinically important area.

Prophylactic Dose of Oxytocin for Uterine Atony during Caesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review

Objective—to overview, compare and generalize results of randomized clinical trials analyzing different oxytocin doses to prevent postpartum hemorrhage, initiate and maintain uterine contraction after Caesarean delivery. Methods—‘PubMed’, ‘EMBASE’, ‘CENTRAL’, and ‘CINAHL’ electronic databases were searched for clinical trials analyzing the effectiveness of different dose of oxytocin given intravenously during surgery for uterine contraction and to reduce postpartum hemorrhage. A systematic review of relevant literature sources was performed. Results—our search revealed 813 literature sources. A total of 15 randomized clinical trials, comparing different doses of oxytocin bolus and infusion used after caesarean delivery have met the selection criteria. Conclusion—oxytocin bolus 0.5–3 UI is considered an effective prophylactic dose. Recommended effective prophylactic oxytocin infusion dose is 7.72 IU/h, but it is unanswered whether we really need a prophylactic infusion of oxytocin if we choose effective bolus dose size and rate. Adverse hemodynamic effects were observed when a 5 UI oxytocin bolus was used. However, topics such as bolus dose size, infusion dose size and requirement as well as bolus injection rate, still remain unanswered. The doses that are recommended in the guidelines of peripartum hemorrhage prophylaxis are not confirmed by randomized controlled double-blind trials and more research should cover this topic.

The Attitude of Health Care Workers on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Delivery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Previous systematic reviews have found that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for cesarean delivery can vary from one study to another, and the attitudes of health care professionals regarding ERAS methods and the implementation of the ERAS for cesarean delivery remain unclear. We aimed to identify the attitudes of health professionals toward ERAS in the context of cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic searches were conducted in 6 databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Sage Journals from September 2010 to September 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 4 articles were selected for analysis. All articles use survey methods and present health professional attitudes toward ERAS for cesarean delivery.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted using Excel spreadsheets. The results obtained are presented descriptively.

CONCLUSION

This review illustrates that there are many ERAS protocols that health care professionals have not yet implemented for cesarean delivery. Policymakers can use this knowledge to inform the promotion of the ERAS protocol for cesarean delivery.